[CT Birds] CTBirds Digest, Vol 2306, Issue 2

Val Guarino bths62 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 19 13:40:10 EDT 2013


The whole environmental movement started small and insignificant.  We should continue to voice our views until we affect a change.  Think DDT and Silent Spring.

Sent from my iPod

On Jun 19, 2013, at 12:00 PM, ctbirds-request at lists.ctbirding.org wrote:

> Send CTBirds mailing list submissions to
>    ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://lists.ctbirding.org/mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    ctbirds-request at lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    ctbirds-owner at lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CTBirds digest..."
> 
> 
> ***  When replying to this message please trim off the unrelated portions ***
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. More on Hammo (Milan Bull)
>   2. Re: More on Hammo (Mark Szantyr)
>   3. Hammo "improvements" (kmueller at ntplx.net)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:58:15 -0400
> From: Milan Bull <mbull at ctaudubon.org>
> To: "ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org" <ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org>
> Subject: [CT Birds] More on Hammo
> Message-ID:
>    <EE843014A138D849A1AAC4DA140948DA017BBCED02B3 at mail.CAS.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> Date:  Tues. Jan 18, 2013 10:35
> From:  Milan Bull
> 
> This is an ongoing issue with the State Parks that we have been working on for several years with little result.  Hammo is just one of the many State Parks (Sherwood Is. is another prime example) that have lost valuable bird habitat due to "development".  Each time it happens we complain, set up meetings with DEP (now DEEP) and the Friends groups to work out a solution that never seems to happen.
> 
> The supervisors treat the parks like a groomed and manicured park as opposed to a wildlife refuge and unfortunately there seems to be little or no communication between the DEEP State Parks and Forests and the Wildlife Division in spite of repeated requests from Wildlife.  The upper DEEP management may be reluctant to take a strong stand because the parks are an important source of state revenue and the wildlife division isn't.
> 
> Milan Bull
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------
> 
> Milan G. Bull
> Senior Director of Science and Conservation
> Connecticut Audubon Society
> 2325 Burr St.
> Fairfield, CT 06824
> (203)259-6305, ext. 111
> mbull at ctaudubon.org<mailto:mbull at ctaudubon.org>
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:11:43 -0400
> From: Mark Szantyr <birdinggeek at gmail.com>
> To: Milan Bull <mbull at ctaudubon.org>
> Cc: "ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org" <ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org>
> Subject: Re: [CT Birds] More on Hammo
> Message-ID: <BBB031F4-343E-40B3-8DED-3F7FE800443D at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset=us-ascii
> 
> Maybe we should make it inconvenient and difficult ti ignore us. 
> 
> Mark 
> 
> On Jun 19, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Milan Bull <mbull at ctaudubon.org> wrote:
> 
>> Date:  Tues. Jan 18, 2013 10:35
>> From:  Milan Bull
>> 
>> This is an ongoing issue with the State Parks that we have been working on for several years with little result.  Hammo is just one of the many State Parks (Sherwood Is. is another prime example) that have lost valuable bird habitat due to "development".  Each time it happens we complain, set up meetings with DEP (now DEEP) and the Friends groups to work out a solution that never seems to happen.
>> 
>> The supervisors treat the parks like a groomed and manicured park as opposed to a wildlife refuge and unfortunately there seems to be little or no communication between the DEEP State Parks and Forests and the Wildlife Division in spite of repeated requests from Wildlife.  The upper DEEP management may be reluctant to take a strong stand because the parks are an important source of state revenue and the wildlife division isn't.
>> 
>> Milan Bull
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----------------
>> 
>> Milan G. Bull
>> Senior Director of Science and Conservation
>> Connecticut Audubon Society
>> 2325 Burr St.
>> Fairfield, CT 06824
>> (203)259-6305, ext. 111
>> mbull at ctaudubon.org<mailto:mbull at ctaudubon.org>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut.
>> For subscription information visit http://lists.ctbirding.org/mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:32:03 +0000
> From: kmueller at ntplx.net
> To: "ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org" <ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org>
> Subject: [CT Birds] Hammo "improvements"
> Message-ID:
>    <505869083-1371655910-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1797335965- at b28.c19.bise6.blackberry>
>    
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> I have a feeling that little will change regarding our outcry. We only represent a handful against the interests of thousands and thousands of beach worshipers which generate way more $$$ than we do. We will lose this one and every issue down the road. Let's face it....we are  insignificant.
> 
> K Mueller
>> From way up in Marquette Mich.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut.
> For subscription information visit http://lists.ctbirding.org/mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of CTBirds Digest, Vol 2306, Issue 2
> ****************************************




More information about the CTBirds mailing list