[CT Birds] Survival of Fork-tailed Flycatcher
dtrippjr at comcast.net
Tue Dec 10 18:17:01 EST 2013
With every breath.
Can we please stop discussing the ethical question of this Fork-tailed Fly? It is crashing my computer. If it does perish, we may get another study skin for Peabody.
I got your back Mark.
Are we even positive this bird didn't escape from a collector somewhere? Just asking...things that make the birding community go hmmmmm
Sent from my iPad mini
> On Dec 10, 2013, at 5:42 PM, "Mark Szantyr" <birddog55 at charter.net> wrote:
> We are all dying.
> Mark S. Szantyr
> 56 Maple Road
> Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut 06268
> Birddog55 at charter.net
> "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
> you win." Ghandi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CTBirds [mailto:ctbirds-bounces at lists.ctbirding.org] On Behalf Of
> Melissa Baston
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 5:21 PM
> To: Dan Rottino
> Cc: <ctbirds at lists.ctbirding.org>
> Subject: Re: [CT Birds] Survival of Fork-tailed Flycatcher
> Well how do we know it's not dying. The only way to tell its condition would
> be to capture it, feel its keel and get a weight. I've held many skinny
> birds that look healthy even up close.
> I say if its catchable catch it, bring it to a licensed rehabilitator and
> let them decide. It is legal to bring it to someone that is federally
> Melissa Baston
> Sent by MellyB
>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Dan Rottino <rottino at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> I did say if it was "obviously dying". I am a dreamer too. If its
> healthy, then leave it be. But if on the odd chance it were found near
> death, then...
>> It seems there is no clear line on which ones are de facto saved vs the
> ones that are not.
>>> On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:23 PM, kmueller at ntplx.net wrote:
>>> I agree with that!
>>> I keep going back to something I have always believed and constantly
>>> say, which was also reiterated by Dave Provencher the other day. "I
>>> think it is a mistake to try and interpret an animal's behavior using
> human logic or human behavior patterns". Perfectly stated!
>>> Just because we are cold doesn't mean the bird is! We look at the
> perceived long migration route this bird has endured and will have to repeat
> in reverse under harsher circumstances and our hearts sink. To us we feel it
> can never be accomplished now because of the cold weather. I say, why not?
> If there are poison ivy and other berries here in CT, than I assume they are
> also on Long Island, and in New Jersey, and Maryland, Virginia, Carolinas,
> etc! And the farther south this bird travels, the potential for bug protein
> in its diet also increases! I am not ready to throw in the towel just yet!
> In fact, I am not the least bit concerned!
>>> Call me a dreamer......but I am not the only one! :^)
>>> Keith Mueller
> This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA)
> for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut.
> For subscription information visit
> This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut.
> For subscription information visit http://lists.ctbirding.org/mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org
More information about the CTBirds