trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Prepurchase survey

BA
Bob Austin
Fri, Jun 21, 2002 5:17 PM

Dave,
There are those who do recommend new boat surveys--even in the 35 to 40
foot range.  Generally you have a warantee on a new boat, and you may not
find problems until you have run the boat.  Also you may want a survey for
insurance purposes.

I will give an example:  I purchased a new 35 foot sailboat from the

preproduction plans.  I ordered hull # 3 thinking that at least some of the
"bugs" would have been fixed:  The following items happend in the first two
months: The hull  bottom became distorted in the aft 1/3--too large an area
of unsupported fiberglass, with no bulkheads or frames--the manufacteur
tried to pawn it off as "speed bumps"--When we hauled the boat, to look at
these out of the water, we noted that the keel had dropped down abut
1/2"--even though the Keel bolts seemed tight, the plywood under the glass
had crushed.  Solution: , reglass with several layers of mat and roving the
area carrying the keel load---about 8 feet long, which meant removing the
molded cabin sole, then putting in U pieces of SS to carry the load of the
keel bolts.  The aft section had more glass added inside, and "H" foam
frames, with several plywood cross frames added.  A month after the boat was
relaunched, the push pull Morse steering cable failed--the bend as it went
out of the pedistal, through the engine room was too sharp. (Thats nothing
compared to an new Winnebago Motor home I purchased!)

I am not sure that a pre purchase survey would have discovered any of

these items, since they developed over use.

Bob Austin

Dave, There are those who do recommend new boat surveys--even in the 35 to 40 foot range. Generally you have a warantee on a new boat, and you may not find problems until you have run the boat. Also you may want a survey for insurance purposes. I will give an example: I purchased a new 35 foot sailboat from the preproduction plans. I ordered hull # 3 thinking that at least some of the "bugs" would have been fixed: The following items happend in the first two months: The hull bottom became distorted in the aft 1/3--too large an area of unsupported fiberglass, with no bulkheads or frames--the manufacteur tried to pawn it off as "speed bumps"--When we hauled the boat, to look at these out of the water, we noted that the keel had dropped down abut 1/2"--even though the Keel bolts seemed tight, the plywood under the glass had crushed. Solution: , reglass with several layers of mat and roving the area carrying the keel load---about 8 feet long, which meant removing the molded cabin sole, then putting in U pieces of SS to carry the load of the keel bolts. The aft section had more glass added inside, and "H" foam frames, with several plywood cross frames added. A month after the boat was relaunched, the push pull Morse steering cable failed--the bend as it went out of the pedistal, through the engine room was too sharp. (Thats nothing compared to an new Winnebago Motor home I purchased!) I am not sure that a pre purchase survey would have discovered any of these items, since they developed over use. Bob Austin
DS
Dan Symula
Fri, Jun 21, 2002 5:43 PM

I havent quite got htis straight in my head yet. Maybe
osmeone can help. A battery charger needs 110/120
volts AC to produce its rated amount of DC output. OK,
no problem there. But.. it also must need some amount
of AC amps to run im assuming. Im also assuming larger
chargers like 40 amp DC need more AC amps to produce
said DC power than do lower DC chargers such as a 20
amp. What is the relationship here between AC amps
input and DC amps output, or isnt there one? Anyone
care to take a stab at this.

Dan

=====


Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

I havent quite got htis straight in my head yet. Maybe osmeone can help. A battery charger needs 110/120 volts AC to produce its rated amount of DC output. OK, no problem there. But.. it also must need some amount of AC amps to run im assuming. Im also assuming larger chargers like 40 amp DC need more AC amps to produce said DC power than do lower DC chargers such as a 20 amp. What is the relationship here between AC amps input and DC amps output, or isnt there one? Anyone care to take a stab at this. Dan ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
MK
M. Kenneth McQuage
Fri, Jun 21, 2002 8:15 PM
 There are those who do recommend new boat surveys--even in the 35 to

40

foot range.  Generally you have a warantee on a new boat, and you may not
find problems until you have run the boat.  Also you may want a survey for

insurance purposes.

Hi Bob and Dave ,
      Have always strongly suggested pre purchase surveys - have seen

boats come through with missing engine mounts , improper aligned I/O
Drives - even the entire side of a FG boat unattached ! Not to mention
numerous electrical problems ...
Saw one last week where the bottom of the boat - along the stringer  was
not attached - looked like one side and bottom was laid up and then the crew
broke for lunch - or overnight - whenever they came back they picked up
where they left off - adding butt jointed glass and roving - trouble is it
was not really stuck together at all ... After hitting several waves the
crack appeared lengthwise along the hull - adj to the stringer .. The boat
was saved from sinking - and was a total write off ... yeah an almost new
boat ..

 Have no idea that a survey would have picked it up - or any other often

hidden problems .. Still I would suggest one to find the obvious -- pre
delivery - since the dealer wants the cash - much quicker service will most
probably be extended  than  - wait in line warrenty work !

Also I have known a dealer or two who have stopped carrying particular
brands of boats  bec of their many problems and poor pay warranty re
embursement ..

> There are those who do recommend new boat surveys--even in the 35 to 40 > foot range. Generally you have a warantee on a new boat, and you may not > find problems until you have run the boat. Also you may want a survey for insurance purposes. > Hi Bob and Dave , Have always strongly suggested pre purchase surveys - have seen boats come through with missing engine mounts , improper aligned I/O Drives - even the entire side of a FG boat unattached ! Not to mention numerous electrical problems ... Saw one last week where the bottom of the boat - along the stringer was not attached - looked like one side and bottom was laid up and then the crew broke for lunch - or overnight - whenever they came back they picked up where they left off - adding butt jointed glass and roving - trouble is it was not really stuck together at all ... After hitting several waves the crack appeared lengthwise along the hull - adj to the stringer .. The boat was saved from sinking - and was a total write off ... yeah an almost new boat .. Have no idea that a survey would have picked it up - or any other often hidden problems .. Still I would suggest one to find the obvious -- pre delivery - since the dealer wants the cash - much quicker service will most probably be extended than - wait in line warrenty work ! Also I have known a dealer or two who have stopped carrying particular brands of boats bec of their many problems and poor pay warranty re embursement ..
AJ
Arild Jensen
Sat, Jun 22, 2002 6:20 AM

I would like to weigh in with some observations  on this issue.

I worked for a Carver dealership who sold something like 100 new boats per
year out of a total of about 300 ( combined new and used ) boat sales.

This dealer would usually sell half a dozen  of the big 53 footers  and as many
45 footers plus many dozen of the forty foot plus models as well as the smaller
stuff.

I was sent to Florida to investigate a major problem with hull number 4  in the
53 foot series.  My report amounted to six pages of deficiencies, some of
them basic design, the rest assembly workmanship.

My report was forwarded to Carver and  eventually engineering change orders
were circulated to all the CArver dealers about retrofits.
Of the sixteen notices that arrived in a single package  twelve  stemmed
directly from my report on hull number 4.

Now these boats sold for an amount in excess of $1.2 million Cdn so the price
must have been close to  $850,000.00  US.

While at Poulsbo I got to talking to the surveyor  who  supervised  the
Aleyeska project.  He invited me to have a look  on board and even showed
me  the insides of  cabinets not normally  open to the public.

Then he challenged me to find anything he had missed.
And I did!

Admittedly, it was not a major  issue but  my background experience with
Xantrex products and installation  procedures gave me a better insight than
the skilled workers employed by the builder.

It highlights the importance of  close liaison between  the installers and the
equipment manufacturers and their customer support people.

The better builders  know about such pitfalls and try to cover all contingencies.
But there is a limit to how much time an installer can spend on the phone
trying to find out if he has overlooked something.

I am currently  involved in doing  the electrical inspection of a brand new build.
I had specifically asked the electrician to call me the day they were going to
wire in the Iso-Boost  transformer.  I live ten minutes driver from the yard so
timing is not an issue.

On a hunch I decided to drop in although no phone call had been made.
Sure enough  they were half way through installing the transformer. The
location was such that any subsequent  inspection would be  much more
difficult and  less thorough.  This was not a wilful oversight. The yard workers
start at 6:30 Am and the delivery of the transformer was delayed by several
weeks so when it finally arrived the production foreman  promptly  pushed the
guys to get it done. There was no time to call me and I arrived before the
morning coffee break.
A similar situation  occurred with the rudder posts and tiller arms in the
lazarette.  I gave them a thorough  inspection while the hull was empty.
By now the whole area is completely  filled with  the crew cabin and a shower
stall plus fuel tanks plus several other pieces of equipment.  It is no longer
possible for me to crawl in there to have a good look.

However, I know  that the bonding  wires are installed correctly and the cable
runs are secured properly.

More than once I have probed the electrical boxes and found a loose
connector or poor crimp.  Visually they looked good but up close and with
some tension  on it  . . . .    That is what I'm paid to find.

The crew do not mind  me finding these things. They take pride in their work
but realize that foremen sometimes make unreasonable demands, sometimes
they are called away to tend something else and at the end of a nine hour day
they can be fatigued and things happen. So they welcome a second critical
look which helps keep them on their toes.

What  you have to realize is that  in many areas where semi -custom build
yards proliferate, much of the labour force is contract people who come and
go with each project.  As soon as the job is done, they are let go to find the
next yard and project.  These are skilled trades but too expensive to keep on
staff full time.

Regular production yards  on the other hand  prefer  to hire young eager
people who are trainable - and much cheaper!
Trouble is who trains them?  The foreman who  is running all over the  shop
supervising every aspect.  Not likely.  So that leaves  the lead hand.
In many shops I have visited the lead hand is the one with the most
experience but how much is that?
Could be a couple of years or a couple of decades, but it varies.

My experience in dealership yards suggest the amount of quality control on
the production line is minimal.

I was recently asked to do a service call on a brand new Krogen  that had left
the Seattle dealer yard and headed up to Vancouver.
The original problem was one workmanship deficiency and one design
oversight.  However, the owner was lucky that it only resulted in a some
charred equipment instead of a big fire.  Krogens are neither che4ap or
shoddy in either design or construction.  But things happen!

So form your own opinion.  I would submit that  if you  are spending big
dollars on a boat, the added cost of surveying during construction is well worth
it.  How much will the insurance premium be?  How does that compare with a
survey which actually prevent a problem rather than  making a payment after
the disaster.  Sometimes the problem  show up when you are well away from
convenient help and service facilities.

Declaration of interest.
I make a good living fixing screw-ups after the fact  and I also do some
surveying of new builds.

regards

Arild Jensen
The Electronic Navigator

I would like to weigh in with some observations on this issue. I worked for a Carver dealership who sold something like 100 new boats per year out of a total of about 300 ( combined new and used ) boat sales. This dealer would usually sell half a dozen of the big 53 footers and as many 45 footers plus many dozen of the forty foot plus models as well as the smaller stuff. I was sent to Florida to investigate a major problem with hull number 4 in the 53 foot series. My report amounted to six pages of deficiencies, some of them basic design, the rest assembly workmanship. My report was forwarded to Carver and eventually engineering change orders were circulated to all the CArver dealers about retrofits. Of the sixteen notices that arrived in a single package twelve stemmed directly from my report on hull number 4. Now these boats sold for an amount in excess of $1.2 million Cdn so the price must have been close to $850,000.00 US. While at Poulsbo I got to talking to the surveyor who supervised the Aleyeska project. He invited me to have a look on board and even showed me the insides of cabinets not normally open to the public. Then he challenged me to find anything he had missed. And I did! Admittedly, it was not a major issue but my background experience with Xantrex products and installation procedures gave me a better insight than the skilled workers employed by the builder. It highlights the importance of close liaison between the installers and the equipment manufacturers and their customer support people. The better builders know about such pitfalls and try to cover all contingencies. But there is a limit to how much time an installer can spend on the phone trying to find out if he has overlooked something. I am currently involved in doing the electrical inspection of a brand new build. I had specifically asked the electrician to call me the day they were going to wire in the Iso-Boost transformer. I live ten minutes driver from the yard so timing is not an issue. On a hunch I decided to drop in although no phone call had been made. Sure enough they were half way through installing the transformer. The location was such that any subsequent inspection would be much more difficult and less thorough. This was not a wilful oversight. The yard workers start at 6:30 Am and the delivery of the transformer was delayed by several weeks so when it finally arrived the production foreman promptly pushed the guys to get it done. There was no time to call me and I arrived before the morning coffee break. A similar situation occurred with the rudder posts and tiller arms in the lazarette. I gave them a thorough inspection while the hull was empty. By now the whole area is completely filled with the crew cabin and a shower stall plus fuel tanks plus several other pieces of equipment. It is no longer possible for me to crawl in there to have a good look. However, I know that the bonding wires are installed correctly and the cable runs are secured properly. More than once I have probed the electrical boxes and found a loose connector or poor crimp. Visually they looked good but up close and with some tension on it . . . . That is what I'm paid to find. The crew do not mind me finding these things. They take pride in their work but realize that foremen sometimes make unreasonable demands, sometimes they are called away to tend something else and at the end of a nine hour day they can be fatigued and things happen. So they welcome a second critical look which helps keep them on their toes. What you have to realize is that in many areas where semi -custom build yards proliferate, much of the labour force is contract people who come and go with each project. As soon as the job is done, they are let go to find the next yard and project. These are skilled trades but too expensive to keep on staff full time. Regular production yards on the other hand prefer to hire young eager people who are trainable - and much cheaper! Trouble is who trains them? The foreman who is running all over the shop supervising every aspect. Not likely. So that leaves the lead hand. In many shops I have visited the lead hand is the one with the most experience but how much is that? Could be a couple of years or a couple of decades, but it varies. My experience in dealership yards suggest the amount of quality control on the production line is minimal. I was recently asked to do a service call on a brand new Krogen that had left the Seattle dealer yard and headed up to Vancouver. The original problem was one workmanship deficiency and one design oversight. However, the owner was lucky that it only resulted in a some charred equipment instead of a big fire. Krogens are neither che4ap or shoddy in either design or construction. But things happen! So form your own opinion. I would submit that if you are spending big dollars on a boat, the added cost of surveying during construction is well worth it. How much will the insurance premium be? How does that compare with a survey which actually prevent a problem rather than making a payment after the disaster. Sometimes the problem show up when you are well away from convenient help and service facilities. Declaration of interest. I make a good living fixing screw-ups after the fact and I also do some surveying of new builds. regards Arild Jensen The Electronic Navigator
AJ
Arild Jensen
Sat, Jun 22, 2002 7:00 AM

DAn asked.
What is the relationship here between AC amps

input and DC amps output, or isnt there one? Anyone
care to take a stab at this.

Dan

REPLY

As a rough rule of thumb,  figuer on a 10:1  ratio.

In other words  at 120V  you have  3 amps  so at 12V  you would have 30
amps for the same power ( wattage)

Now I realize that  there are losses and  inaccuracies in this but it serves as a
quick guide to estimate  with.

A 2000 watt inverter will draw  approximately  200 amps DC at 12V

A 40 amp charger for a 12V  battery will consume about  4 amps of 120V
power.  plus the inevitable conversion losses.  These losses are not constant
since part of the equation is power factor.  A non technical description of
power factor says that  it is a function of how perfefctly the sine wave is.

Inductive loads  tend to distort the wave which causes losses in some
equipment. It is technically possible to correct for this with capacitors and
inductors.
Newer  European  standards require battery chargers to have power factor
corrrection circuitry included in the design.

Hope this helps.

Arild

DAn asked. What is the relationship here between AC amps > input and DC amps output, or isnt there one? Anyone > care to take a stab at this. > > Dan REPLY As a rough rule of thumb, figuer on a 10:1 ratio. In other words at 120V you have 3 amps so at 12V you would have 30 amps for the same power ( wattage) Now I realize that there are losses and inaccuracies in this but it serves as a quick guide to estimate with. A 2000 watt inverter will draw approximately 200 amps DC at 12V A 40 amp charger for a 12V battery will consume about 4 amps of 120V power. plus the inevitable conversion losses. These losses are not constant since part of the equation is power factor. A non technical description of power factor says that it is a function of how perfefctly the sine wave is. Inductive loads tend to distort the wave which causes losses in some equipment. It is technically possible to correct for this with capacitors and inductors. Newer European standards require battery chargers to have power factor corrrection circuitry included in the design. Hope this helps. Arild
MK
M. Kenneth McQuage
Sat, Jun 22, 2002 4:59 PM

So form your own opinion.  I would submit that  if you  are spending big
dollars on a boat, the added cost of surveying during construction is well

worth

it

Arild ,
A great deal of additional inspection - and control during the
building process was available from Lloyds - and highly utilized in the UK .

For a Lloyds AAA rating -  Plans were submitted to Lloyds for inspection
and revision . Loyds inspected the moulding facility and it had to meet temp

  • humidity control + employe training standards .. If requested a Loyds
    inspector was on site during the lay up .  The same high level of inspection
    continued thoughout the construction and fitting out process - with , for a
    fee . a Lloyds inspector looked over each stage of the work done ..  At the
    conclusion the individual boat was issued a rating .  ( I think the fee
    ranged from 2 to 10 % depending on the cost of the boat - well worth it I
    thought )

    For the general market however - Lloyds inspected the moulders and
    workshops - and gave their approval if their standards were met - so a
    purchaser could be assured of a  boat moulded , and fitted out - by  at
    least a Lloyds inspected and approved yards - at each stage of the process .

    Given the move to mass production of boats in the UK - I doubt if these
    standards are maintained - I have not seen them mentioned in the rec boating
    press at least - in quite some time .

    Some things about the ' good old days ' really were !

    All the Best
    Ken

> > So form your own opinion. I would submit that if you are spending big > dollars on a boat, the added cost of surveying during construction is well worth > it Arild , A great deal of additional inspection - and control during the building process was available from Lloyds - and highly utilized in the UK . For a Lloyds AAA rating - Plans were submitted to Lloyds for inspection and revision . Loyds inspected the moulding facility and it had to meet temp + humidity control + employe training standards .. If requested a Loyds inspector was on site during the lay up . The same high level of inspection continued thoughout the construction and fitting out process - with , for a fee . a Lloyds inspector looked over each stage of the work done .. At the conclusion the individual boat was issued a rating . ( I think the fee ranged from 2 to 10 % depending on the cost of the boat - well worth it I thought ) For the general market however - Lloyds inspected the moulders and workshops - and gave their approval if their standards were met - so a purchaser could be assured of a boat moulded , and fitted out - by at least a Lloyds inspected and approved yards - at each stage of the process . Given the move to mass production of boats in the UK - I doubt if these standards are maintained - I have not seen them mentioned in the rec boating press at least - in quite some time . Some things about the ' good old days ' really were ! All the Best Ken
AJ
Arild Jensen
Sun, Jun 23, 2002 1:37 AM

Ken wrote:

   A great deal of additional inspection - and control during the

building process was available from Lloyds - and highly utilized in the UK .

For a Lloyds AAA rating -   Plans were submitted to Lloyds for inspection and

revision . Loyds inspected the moulding facility  .  .  .

snip<<<

 Given the move to mass production of boats in the UK - I doubt if these

standards are maintained - I have not seen them mentioned in the rec boating
press at least - in quite some time .

Some things about the ' good old days ' really were !

All the Best
      Ken

I too recalled when a Lloyds 100 A  or  AAA rating was considered a real
stamp of quality.

No doubt  the other Standards Classes  originated to meet specific regional
needs and ( quite coincidentally )  also be cheaper.

But then again  in the good old days  yachting was the sport of gentlemen and
the upper class.  If you had to ask about the cost,  then you knew you didn't
belong.    :-)))

Arild

Ken wrote: > A great deal of additional inspection - and control during the > building process was available from Lloyds - and highly utilized in the UK . > > For a Lloyds AAA rating - Plans were submitted to Lloyds for inspection and > revision . Loyds inspected the moulding facility . . . >>> snip<<< > Given the move to mass production of boats in the UK - I doubt if these > standards are maintained - I have not seen them mentioned in the rec boating > press at least - in quite some time . > > Some things about the ' good old days ' really were ! > > All the Best > Ken I too recalled when a Lloyds 100 A or AAA rating was considered a real stamp of quality. No doubt the other Standards Classes originated to meet specific regional needs and ( quite coincidentally ) also be cheaper. But then again in the good old days yachting was the sport of gentlemen and the upper class. If you had to ask about the cost, then you knew you didn't belong. :-))) Arild