Dear Friends
This morning I sent the following ill-advised message. Please accept my sincere apologies - especially, my apologies to Barry Wellman who initiated this lively discussion. I fell victim to a momentary lapse of judgment and impatience. Instead of supporting open discussion and exchange of ideas, my message tried to discourage it. It was a mistake and shouldn't happen again. I am honored to be a member of this illustrious group and have no intention to violate this privilege.
Thank you for your understanding.
Alladi Venkatesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Alladi
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:54 AM
To: ellis.godard@csun.edu; 'jeremy hunsinger'; 'communication and information technology section asa'
Subject: RE: [CITASA] capitalism
I know this is an important topic...is there some way to restrict the distribution of these commentaries? I have no interest in the topic and I am sure there must be quite a few like me.
Thank you very much
Alladi Venkatesh
-----Original Message-----
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ellis Godard
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:03 AM
To: 'jeremy hunsinger'; 'communication and information technology section asa'
Subject: Re: [CITASA] capitalism
FWIW, the idea of "limited resources" is subject to dispute, as new resources are created and new uses are found both for old materials and new waste. As resources are redefined and rediscovered, opportunities for growth expand - if not perpetually, at least incrementally.
-eg
-----Original Message-----
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On
Behalf Of jeremy hunsinger
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 5:52 AM
To: communication and information technology section asa
Subject: [CITASA] capitalism
well, let's take a bit of Annales school in hand and follow Braudel
that
noted....
institutionally, we have never had capitalism, nor, markets. We have had
anti-
markets, that is, we have had small groups of people exchanging goods
in
private.
Markets, to be markets, must be public. Adrienne hits Stiglitz's idea
perfectly,
states/corporations, create uneven playing fields that are not free or
open, which is
braudel's idea from many years ago.
Capitalism, in the idea that it is good to collect capital and
everyone
should do that,
never really existed, what we ended up with was corporatism, which
again
is about
private exchanges and usually fixed prices. It never existed because
immediately
we created underclasses that could not participate. It existed for
some,
perhaps for
a while, until they found better ways to produce what they wanted.
Ohhh,
I think
we are doing pretty well saying that capitalism is in 'crisis' too,
and
reaching its 'end
times' or 'zero sum' as the only place you are likely to find
something
like
capitalism is amongst children or at swap meets... capitalism and
markets... are too
inefficient, i'd guess in the end, for people that want to make money.
Here's the big question how can you have a regime of permanent growth....
in a
world with limit resources and thus limited population support? if you
can resolve
that... without science fiction, then you are a better political
economist
of capitalism
than i... granted many are.
Jeremy Hunsinger
Center for Digital Discourse and Culture Political Science Virginia
Tech
Everything you can imagine is real.
--Pablo Picasso
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
I apologize for you feeling the need to apologize. You did nothing wrong that I can discern, I hope my email did not make you think that you did anything wrong. It was intended to say, there is a better way to manage your affairs than to require the intervention of others. You did nothing, in my opinion, that warrants public apology, and anyone who implies that you did, owes you an apology.
I wouldn't worry that the discussion ended after your message, I think it was going to end then anyway, as I think it was heading off-topic.
-j
On Aug 31, 2010, at 2:04 AM, Venkatesh, Alladi wrote:
Dear Friends
This morning I sent the following ill-advised message. Please accept my sincere apologies - especially, my apologies to Barry Wellman who initiated this lively discussion. I fell victim to a momentary lapse of judgment and impatience. Instead of supporting open discussion and exchange of ideas, my message tried to discourage it. It was a mistake and shouldn't happen again. I am honored to be a member of this illustrious group and have no intention to violate this privilege.
Thank you for your understanding.
Alladi Venkatesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Venkatesh, Alladi
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 11:54 AM
To: ellis.godard@csun.edu; 'jeremy hunsinger'; 'communication and information technology section asa'
Subject: RE: [CITASA] capitalism
I know this is an important topic...is there some way to restrict the distribution of these commentaries? I have no interest in the topic and I am sure there must be quite a few like me.
Thank you very much
Alladi Venkatesh
-----Original Message-----
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ellis Godard
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:03 AM
To: 'jeremy hunsinger'; 'communication and information technology section asa'
Subject: Re: [CITASA] capitalism
FWIW, the idea of "limited resources" is subject to dispute, as new resources are created and new uses are found both for old materials and new waste. As resources are redefined and rediscovered, opportunities for growth expand - if not perpetually, at least incrementally.
-eg
-----Original Message-----
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On
Behalf Of jeremy hunsinger
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 5:52 AM
To: communication and information technology section asa
Subject: [CITASA] capitalism
well, let's take a bit of Annales school in hand and follow Braudel
that
noted....
institutionally, we have never had capitalism, nor, markets. We have had
anti-
markets, that is, we have had small groups of people exchanging goods
in
private.
Markets, to be markets, must be public. Adrienne hits Stiglitz's idea
perfectly,
states/corporations, create uneven playing fields that are not free or
open, which is
braudel's idea from many years ago.
Capitalism, in the idea that it is good to collect capital and
everyone
should do that,
never really existed, what we ended up with was corporatism, which
again
is about
private exchanges and usually fixed prices. It never existed because
immediately
we created underclasses that could not participate. It existed for
some,
perhaps for
a while, until they found better ways to produce what they wanted.
Ohhh,
I think
we are doing pretty well saying that capitalism is in 'crisis' too,
and
reaching its 'end
times' or 'zero sum' as the only place you are likely to find
something
like
capitalism is amongst children or at swap meets... capitalism and
markets... are too
inefficient, i'd guess in the end, for people that want to make money.
Here's the big question how can you have a regime of permanent growth....
in a
world with limit resources and thus limited population support? if you
can resolve
that... without science fiction, then you are a better political
economist
of capitalism
than i... granted many are.
Jeremy Hunsinger
Center for Digital Discourse and Culture Political Science Virginia
Tech
Everything you can imagine is real.
--Pablo Picasso
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Jeremy Hunsinger
Political Science
Center for Digital Discourse and Culture
Virginia Tech
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
/\ - against microsoft attachments
You cannot depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
--Mark Twain