Suitability for offshore service

H
HClews@aol.com
Wed, Apr 13, 2005 2:54 AM

Pierre,

The term "passage making boat" was used by Bob Austin, not  by me.  I assume
he was talking about boats capable of  making extended open water passages,
but I admit it's  a pretty vague term.  He seems concerned that catamarans may
not have the ultimate seaworthiness of a well-designed monohull.  This
argument has raged for some time among sailboaters, but I gather it's  starting up
all over again for powercats?

I'm certainly no expert on this subject, I'm actually looking for  answers
myself -- which is how I got into this discussion with Bob.  I  think, to some
extent, he's playing devil's advocate here.  (Bob, if  you're on this list,
please comment).

I know there have been cases of sailing cats turning turtle at sea  (mostly
racing boats), but has anyone ever heard of a powercat capsizing?  Of course,
there was that overloaded tour boat in the Chesapeake last year, but  I'm not
sure that really counts.

So, what's your opinion, Pierre?  Do you have any  concerns about capsizing?
Do you consider your boat to be a  passage making boat?

Regards,  Henry

PS: The original name of the PDQ was MV/34 Passagemaker,  but they recently
changed it to 34 Powercat.

In a message dated 4/12/2005 10:01:12 P.M. Eastern  Daylight Time,
yumyum1@earthlink.net writes:

Henry,

Can you please explain what you mean  by  a "Passage making boat" and what
you  mean or imply by  use of  the term "Offshore Service".

Any thoughts about the recent world record  using catamaran hull beating
hurricane/typhoons and other  weathers?

Got a couple more Q's  too.

Thanks,

Pierre

Pierre, The term "passage making boat" was used by Bob Austin, not by me. I assume he was talking about boats capable of making extended open water passages, but I admit it's a pretty vague term. He seems concerned that catamarans may not have the ultimate seaworthiness of a well-designed monohull. This argument has raged for some time among sailboaters, but I gather it's starting up all over again for powercats? I'm certainly no expert on this subject, I'm actually looking for answers myself -- which is how I got into this discussion with Bob. I think, to some extent, he's playing devil's advocate here. (Bob, if you're on this list, please comment). I know there have been cases of sailing cats turning turtle at sea (mostly racing boats), but has anyone ever heard of a powercat capsizing? Of course, there was that overloaded tour boat in the Chesapeake last year, but I'm not sure that really counts. So, what's your opinion, Pierre? Do you have any concerns about capsizing? Do you consider your boat to be a passage making boat? Regards, Henry PS: The original name of the PDQ was MV/34 Passagemaker, but they recently changed it to 34 Powercat. In a message dated 4/12/2005 10:01:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, yumyum1@earthlink.net writes: Henry, Can you please explain what you mean by a "Passage making boat" and what you mean or imply by use of the term "Offshore Service". Any thoughts about the recent world record using catamaran hull beating hurricane/typhoons and other weathers? Got a couple more Q's too. Thanks, Pierre
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, Apr 14, 2005 2:15 PM

Henry Clews wrote:
He seems concerned that catamarans may not have the ultimate
seaworthiness of a well-designed monohull.

We need to take care with the language in this thread.

"Ultimate stability" is what was discussed, which in the real world
means to ability to recover from a severe roll. Monohulls do have the
edge in this specific area.

But there is a lot more than stability involved for a yacht to be
considered "seaworthy."

PS: The original name of the PDQ was MV/34 Passagemaker, but they
recently changed it to 34 Powercat.

Kudos to PDQ Yachts for quickly realizing that "passagemaker" was a
misnomer for a boat intended for coastal and inland service. Would
that others in the industry did not play fast and loose with the word.

--Georgs

Georgs Kolesnikovs
Power Catamaran World
http://www.powercatamaranworld.com

>Henry Clews wrote: >He seems concerned that catamarans may not have the ultimate >seaworthiness of a well-designed monohull. We need to take care with the language in this thread. "Ultimate stability" is what was discussed, which in the real world means to ability to recover from a severe roll. Monohulls do have the edge in this specific area. But there is a lot more than stability involved for a yacht to be considered "seaworthy." >PS: The original name of the PDQ was MV/34 Passagemaker, but they >recently changed it to 34 Powercat. Kudos to PDQ Yachts for quickly realizing that "passagemaker" was a misnomer for a boat intended for coastal and inland service. Would that others in the industry did not play fast and loose with the word. --Georgs -- Georgs Kolesnikovs Power Catamaran World http://www.powercatamaranworld.com
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, Apr 14, 2005 2:34 PM

"Ultimate stability" is what was discussed, which in the real world
means to ability to recover from a severe roll. Monohulls do have
the edge in this specific area.

Having said that, has anyone ever heard of a power catamaran being
capsized by waves?

--Georgs

>"Ultimate stability" is what was discussed, which in the real world >means to ability to recover from a severe roll. Monohulls do have >the edge in this specific area. Having said that, has anyone ever heard of a power catamaran being capsized by waves? --Georgs