Discussion and technical support related to USRP, UHD, RFNoC
View all threadsThanks a lot Nick!
So I guess I need something like tune_delay in
usrp_spectrum_sense.py?
At least I finally got data that looks much more like the
expected spectrum when I used the latter behaving like
uhd_rx_cfile.py.
-Sebastian
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:15:14 -0700
Nick Foster nick@ettus.com wrote:
Sebastian,
You are seeing the effect of finite tuning time. The
N210 will start
returning samples immediately after the tune command,
and so you will be
able to observe the SBX/WBX PLL locking on and settling
at its final
frequency. You need to discard the first few hundred
microseconds of data
after a tune command before you will see reliable data.
--n
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Sebastian Döring
sdoering@rhrk.uni-kl.dewrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:21:29 +0100
Andre Puschmann <andre.puschmann@tu-ilmenau.de**>
wrote:
On 03/14/2012 10:03 AM, Sebastian Döring wrote:
@ steam: UHD version is "UHD_003.004.000-b8e41cb" and
FPGA image is the
corresponding one for revision number R2.
@ Nick: I attached 2 figures. The supposed-to-look-like
case I get with
XCVR and independent spectrum analyzer and the one I get
using the SBX.
Both data sets have been recorded using "uhd_rx_cfile.py
-f 2.4G -N
1024".
I processed the samples with octave performing fft,
square magnitude and
translated them to dB level scaled with 20*log10(x).
What rx rate are you using? Have you tried modifying it?
I've seen
similar things happening at certain rx rates.
-Andre
Yes, tried it and always had the same effect.
Also tried it with the WBX by now --> same distortion.
-Sebastian
-Sebastian
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:25:34 +0100
"steam2009@t-online.de" steam2009@t-online.de wrote:
Out of curiousity what FPGA / UHD version are you using.
Von: "Sebastian Döring" sdoering@rhrk.uni-kl.de
Datum: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:11:22 +0100
The output of uhd_usrp_probe is the following:
_______**
/
| Device: USRP2 / N-Series Device
|
_______**
| /
| | Mboard: USRP-N210
| | hardware: 2561
| | mac-addr: a0:36:fa:25:32:f2
| | ip-addr: 192.168.10.2
| | gpsdo: none
| | serial: EFR12W2UP
| |
| | Time sources: none, external, external, mimo
| | Clock sources: internal, external, mimo
| | Sensors: mimo_locked, ref_locked
| |
_______**
| | /
| | | RX DSP: 0
| | | Freq range: -50.000 to 50.000 Mhz
| |
_______**
| | /
| | | RX DSP: 1
| | | Freq range: -50.000 to 50.000 Mhz
| |
_______**
| | /
| | | RX Dboard: A
| | | ID: SBX (0x0054)
| | | Serial: E8R12X9XS
| | |
_______**
| | | /
| | | | RX Subdev: 0
| | | | Name: SBX RX
| | | | Antennas: TX/RX, RX2, CAL
| | | | Sensors: lo_locked
| | | | Freq range: 400.000 to 4400.000 Mhz
| | | | Gain range PGA0: 0.0 to 31.5 step 0.5 dB
| | | | Connection Type: IQ
| | | | Uses LO offset: No
| | |
_______**
| | | /
| | | | RX Codec: A
| | | | Name: ads62p44
| | | | Gain range digital: 0.0 to 6.0 step 0.5
dB
| | | | Gain range fine: 0.0 to 0.5 step 0.1 dB
| |
_______**
| | /
| | | TX DSP: 0
| | | Freq range: -250.000 to 250.000 Mhz
| |
_______**
| | /
| | | TX Dboard: A
| | | ID: SBX (0x0055)
| | | Serial: E8R12X9XS
| | |
_______**
| | | /
| | | | TX Subdev: 0
| | | | Name: SBX TX
| | | | Antennas: TX/RX, CAL
| | | | Sensors: lo_locked
| | | | Freq range: 400.000 to 4400.000 Mhz
| | | | Gain range PGA0: 0.0 to 31.5 step 0.5 dB
| | | | Connection Type: QI
| | | | Uses LO offset: No
| | |
_______**
| | | /
| | | | TX Codec: A
| | | | Name: ad9777
| | | | Gain Elements: None
I really appreciate any further information.
Regards
Sebastian
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:07:39 -0700
Jason Abele jason@ettus.com wrote:
Sebastian,
The units displayed in uhd_fft.py are not absolute and
the XCVR and SBX
have vastly different absolute gain at a setting of
"0dB". Thus, they
are not really comparable at the same gain setting.
If you want to compare them, apply a sine wave of known
power (say
-50dBm) and use it to "calibrate" the units in
uhd_fft.py into dBm.
Then you can compare SBX to XCVR.
Also note that the implicit scale factor in the
"calibration" performed
above will vary with gain setting.
If you send your uhd_ffy.py command, it will be easier
to comment on
the
expected SBX behavior.
It is also helpful to provide the output of
uhd_usrp_probe such that we
can see the UHD and hardware versions you are using.
Thanks
Jason
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:51:51PM +0100, Sebastian
Döring wrote:
Hello,
I have been doing some spectrum sensing with the USRP
N210 and the
XCVR2450.
Today I tried the same stuff with the SBX daughterboard
and suddenly
the signal level at the output seems to have an offset
of around
+20dB.
With the XCVR I usually measure a noise level around
-100dB and with
the SBX I get something around -80dB (both with gain
tuned to "0").
My question is, if there's some other gain parameter in
the SBX that
I can´t control?
I used the same antenna and the same USRP.
Any hints highly appreciated!
Regards
Sebastian
____________**
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/**mailman/listinfo/usrp-users**
lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
____________**
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/**mailman/listinfo/usrp-users**lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
____________**
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/**mailman/listinfo/usrp-users**lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
____________**
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/**mailman/listinfo/usrp-users**lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
--
Andre Puschmann
Ilmenau University of Technology, Integrated
Communication Systems Group
Phone: +49 3677 69-4132, Fax: +49 3677 69-1614
Email: andre.puschmann@tu-ilmenau.de, Web:
http://www.tu-ilmenau.de/ics
Office: Zuse Building, room 1071
____________**
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/**mailman/listinfo/usrp-users**lists.ettus.comhttp://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com