Excerpts from some writing that may have relevance to recent posts:
Introduction
My first series of long distance cruises began in 1972 aboard my
family's custom 68-foot steel-hulled Defever, Wandering Star that we
had built in Japan. The route back to the U.S. was Japan - Okinawa -
Manila - Vietnam - Singapore - Indonesia - Timor - Australia - New
Caledonia - American Samoa - Fiji - Palmyra - Hawaii - Seattle. The
trip was undertaken nine years after Beebe set-off from Singapore in
Passagemaker but still before long distance passages in
non-commercial motoryachts was commonplace.
Both my parents were marine engineers and my father, who had a
lifetime of experience at sea was a Master Mariner and formerly a
skipper for American President Lines. I grew up living on off-shore
rigs and running small craft and crewing on tugs in the South China
Sea and Persian Gulf, so I was well prepared to make the most of the
long trip back to the U.S. which was an incredible experience for a
teenager.
Thirty three years later we still own the Defever. Eighteen years ago
I married a woman who had just finished sailing around the world, and
together we've had many experiences aboard vessels we've owned or had
access to, both power and sail. I've also spent the last eighteen
years designing and building commercial submarines and submersibles,
including long-distance diesel electric luxury submarines.
It's time now for us to build a new long distance passagemaker, and
we have some definite ideas, some of which are non-conventional. Some
of our key criteria follow:
Comfort in Motion
Contemporary custom and production passagemakers tend to be well
appointed and climate controlled, meeting the definition of
comfortable in the most general sense. I would like to be able to say
that after years of messing about in boats that I have a cast iron
stomach, but unfortunately I do succumb to mal de mer on occasion. As
a consequence, mitigating the motion that causes sea sickness is a
bit of a passion of mine. In fact, 12 years ago I developed the
world's first luxury submarine simply so that owners could dive the
vessel when it was too rough on the surface and then proceed
underwater in a perfectly smooth environment.
Studies show that the primary cause of seasickness is vertical
acceleration and deceleration. Contemporary stabilizers and to a
somewhat lesser extent, flopper stoppers, do a great job of reducing
roll. Yet pitch is most often the culprit that causes the most
discomfort, for several reasons.
Most production passagemakers have bluff bows with considerable
freeboard and flare to keep the deck dry and provide ample reserve
buoyancy. The effect of this, in a substantial head sea, is truly
horrible. As the wave contacts the bow the boat slows, sometimes
dramatically, then rises vertically, reaches its apogee, and as the
wave passes the bow falls away nearly putting you in free-fall before
the plunge suddenly stops, practically bringing you to your knees,
and then the entire process starts over, ad nauseum. If you happen to
be the occupant of a bridge located far forward of the beam, the
impact of all this motion is clearly exacerbated.
I firmly believe that this pitching motion, the tendency to which is
ubiquitous among every single production passagemaker, is the single
most substantial reason why sensible people with some minimal
experience don't make long ocean passages on motoryachts. It is
simply too uncomfortable.
The solution is relatively simple and well recognized to sailboat
owners. Build a boat with a fine bow with a narrow entry and minimal
flare/reserve buoyancy and stay off the foredeck when it's rough. The
second solution is to locate the areas where you spend the most time
near the pitch center of the boat to minimize motion.
Efficiency
In the beginning of the motoryacht era hulls tended to be long and
thin. A function of the reality of engine power output vs. weight,
these early yachts were highly efficient for their time because
designers had little choice.
The fuel prices we've experienced over the last several months had
driven home the concept that diesel fuel is not likely to get less
expensive in the long term. As consumers in China and India compete
for diminishing petroleum resources while environmentalists apply
pressure to curtail exploration and refining, we face a long future
of escalating fuel prices.
Long slender hulls are significantly more efficient than the shorter,
wider hulls of passagemakers today. The hull speed of an 85-foot
passagemaker with a 14.5-foot beam that displaces 100,000 lbs will be
nearly 12 knots while a 55-foot passagemaker with a 19 foot beam of
equivalent weight will have a hull speed of just over 9 knots.
Assuming $3.00 per gallon diesel, at hull speed (V/L = 1.3) the
longer leaner passagemaker will require $1500 worth of diesel to go
1000 nautical miles while the shorter, fatter vessel will spend
$2800. This for basically the same interior volume and equivalent
cost. The longer vessel will also make the trip in 101 hours vs. 128
for the shorter boat.
One might make the point that the longer vessel will cost more to
berth, which is undeniable, but we almost always anchor out when
cruising and this is less of a consideration for us.
In my opinion, contemporary passagemaker designers are following a
trend based on demand for short vessels that maximize interior space
for waterline length at the expense of efficiency and comfort. It
supports my theory that few designers spend any time at sea in their
own vessels and if they do, are highly reluctant to experience
alternatives.
Readers interested in the balance of the article can e-mail me at
bruce@ussubmarines.com
--
---=====
L. Bruce Jones U.S. SUBMARINES, INC.
President POSEIDON UNDERSEA RESORTS LLC
Tel: 208/687-9057 Fax: 208/441-7478
E-mail: bruce@ussubmarines.com http://ussubs.com
http://poseidonresorts.com
"Design, engineering and construction of submarines and submersibles"
"Submarine related consulting, sales and operations."
---=====