volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

Fluke 887A Modifications

RE
Randy Evans
Thu, Dec 26, 2013 4:54 PM

I have received a lot of interest in the modification to the Fluke 887A that I posted earlier.  I have sent out packages with tthe following information to help people understand the modification.  

  • schematic
    markup of the changes 
  • a hand-drawn schematic of the new circuit
  • LTSpice analysis of the new circuit
  • picture of the installed maodification.
     
    The mod on 887A is
    really easy and it only took me about 2 hours to make the circuit and install
    and test it.  Fortunately, I had all the parts on hand (but it requires
    very few parts).  The only time consuming part was removing all the
    existing components but even that was only about an hour.  
     
    I used the LTC1050
    precision op amp but it required +/- 5V so I had to add voltage regulator chips
    to drop the -18 and +8 V lines down to  +/- 5V.  The +8V line is listed as
    +6 on the schematic  but I measured +8 on my unit.  If it’s really +6
    on your unit then you would need an LDO regulator chip for the +5V line. 
     If you use the LTC2057 precision op amp (recommended) instead of the
    LTC1050, then you wouldn't need any regulator chips at all, making the circuit
    even simpler.  The parts list would become the LTC2057, two 1uF
    bypass caps, a 1 K resistor, and a circuit board.  Note the 1 Kohm resistor is needed since the -18
    V power supply oscillated when it was directly connected to the 1 uF input
    bypass cap on the 79L05 regulator chip.  The power supply doesn’t like a capacitive load.  The unit also oscillated
    until I removed C219 for the output filter but the LTC1050 doesn’t need any additional
    filtering.  Obviously, Q206 and C217 need to be removed as
    well.
     
    After I finished calibration
    of the unit it worked fine.  The zero
    adjustment does not ever seem to need adjustment after the initial setting, not
    surprising since the LTC1050 has a voltage offset stability of .05 uV per
    Degree C.  So far I am very happy with
    the modification and it couldn’t be any simpler.
     
    Randy Evans
I have received a lot of interest in the modification to the Fluke 887A that I posted earlier.  I have sent out packages with tthe following information to help people understand the modification.   - schematic markup of the changes  - a hand-drawn schematic of the new circuit - LTSpice analysis of the new circuit - picture of the installed maodification.   The mod on 887A is really easy and it only took me about 2 hours to make the circuit and install and test it.  Fortunately, I had all the parts on hand (but it requires very few parts).  The only time consuming part was removing all the existing components but even that was only about an hour.     I used the LTC1050 precision op amp but it required +/- 5V so I had to add voltage regulator chips to drop the -18 and +8 V lines down to  +/- 5V.  The +8V line is listed as +6 on the schematic  but I measured +8 on my unit.  If it’s really +6 on your unit then you would need an LDO regulator chip for the +5V line.   If you use the LTC2057 precision op amp (recommended) instead of the LTC1050, then you wouldn't need any regulator chips at all, making the circuit even simpler.  The parts list would become the LTC2057, two 1uF bypass caps, a 1 K resistor, and a circuit board.  Note the 1 Kohm resistor is needed since the -18 V power supply oscillated when it was directly connected to the 1 uF input bypass cap on the 79L05 regulator chip.  The power supply doesn’t like a capacitive load.  The unit also oscillated until I removed C219 for the output filter but the LTC1050 doesn’t need any additional filtering.  Obviously, Q206 and C217 need to be removed as well.   After I finished calibration of the unit it worked fine.  The zero adjustment does not ever seem to need adjustment after the initial setting, not surprising since the LTC1050 has a voltage offset stability of .05 uV per Degree C.  So far I am very happy with the modification and it couldn’t be any simpler.   Randy Evans