time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent 53181A/53131A/53132A

SD
Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 3:34 PM

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process. I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter. This said, I need your opinion about some points. 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry standard... 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for beginners. 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. Thanks for your answers ! PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr
SD
Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 3:39 PM

Damn, I forgot to finish the "Price" point.

So, what seems to be a "fair" price ? My goal is €49 for a PCB, €99 for a kit and €149 for an assembled/tested board. It's just a first estimation of what seems fair for me. I still need to check the real price of components and the price will change with the number of buyers, of course.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr

-----Message d'origine-----
De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la part de Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 16:35
À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Objet : [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent 53181A/53131A/53132A

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Damn, I forgot to finish the "Price" point. So, what seems to be a "fair" price ? My goal is €49 for a PCB, €99 for a kit and €149 for an assembled/tested board. It's just a first estimation of what seems fair for me. I still need to check the real price of components and the price will change with the number of buyers, of course. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr -----Message d'origine----- De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la part de Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 16:35 À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Objet : [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent 53181A/53131A/53132A Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process. I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter. This said, I need your opinion about some points. 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry standard... 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for beginners. 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. Thanks for your answers ! PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 3:42 PM

I joined the group this year.
Since I don't have these counters I might be interested in just a free
standing version.
More importantly a couple thoughts.
Use a mar amplifier as the fuse. They are pretty cheap.
Would appreciate seeing the schematic board... So I might understand better.
Regards

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER sam@canardpc.comwrote:

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component
selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design
process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make
big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread
counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add
some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps.
It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I joined the group this year. Since I don't have these counters I might be interested in just a free standing version. More importantly a couple thoughts. Use a mar amplifier as the fuse. They are pretty cheap. Would appreciate seeing the schematic board... So I might understand better. Regards On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER <sam@canardpc.com>wrote: > Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal > prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. > > I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked > further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog > ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component > selection > to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design > process. > > > I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to > recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make > big > money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to > benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread > counter. > This said, I need your opinion about some points. > > 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine > wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add > some > more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the > ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board > for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? > > 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range > (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. > It > would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? > > 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. > Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF > diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add > some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. > > 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I > first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount > inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not > big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the > only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC > @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry > standard... > > 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an > assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and > the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for > beginners. > > 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz > board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could > buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. > > Thanks for your answers ! > > PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal > (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) > > PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. > > --------------------- > Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > Presse Non Stop - Canard PC > http://www.canardpc.com > Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 > MSN : sam@x86.fr > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 4:35 PM

Hi

I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer".

Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go
with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it
mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original.
Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough
mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's
going to get a lot of use / abuse.

I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for
a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great
virtue of being quick on / quick off.

The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20
dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I
would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves
sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them.

Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below
it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale
the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz.
That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real
applications.

Hope that helps.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for
HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer". Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original. Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's going to get a lot of use / abuse. I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great virtue of being quick on / quick off. The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20 dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them. Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz. That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real applications. Hope that helps. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process. I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter. This said, I need your opinion about some points. 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry standard... 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for beginners. 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. Thanks for your answers ! PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
SD
Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 5:02 PM

I would probably scale the input caps so that they start to block RF below
something like 50 MHz.

I'm still trying to find the best capacitors for the input. Right now, I use
two standard 100 ØF caps (COG/0805 SMD case), but all tips for a better caps
are welcome. I never designed a prescaler before and I used to work with
frequencies not higher than 3 GHz.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr

-----Message d'origine-----
De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la
part de Bob Camp
Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 17:36
À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for
HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Hi

I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer".

Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go
with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it
mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original.
Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough
mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's
going to get a lot of use / abuse.

I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for
a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great
virtue of being quick on / quick off.

The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20
dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I
would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves
sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them.

Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below
it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale
the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz.
That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real
applications.

Hope that helps.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for
HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

> I would probably scale the input caps so that they start to block RF below > something like 50 MHz. I'm still trying to find the best capacitors for the input. Right now, I use two standard 100 ØF caps (COG/0805 SMD case), but all tips for a better caps are welcome. I never designed a prescaler before and I used to work with frequencies not higher than 3 GHz. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr -----Message d'origine----- De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la part de Bob Camp Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 17:36 À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Hi I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer". Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original. Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's going to get a lot of use / abuse. I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great virtue of being quick on / quick off. The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20 dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them. Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz. That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real applications. Hope that helps. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process. I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter. This said, I need your opinion about some points. 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry standard... 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for beginners. 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. Thanks for your answers ! PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
SD
Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 5:42 PM

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107.
I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there for a try.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la
part de Bob Camp
Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 17:36
À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for
HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Hi

I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer".

Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go
with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it
mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original.
Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough
mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's
going to get a lot of use / abuse.

I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for
a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great
virtue of being quick on / quick off.

The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20
dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I
would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves
sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them.

Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below
it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale
the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz.
That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real
applications.

Hope that helps.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for
HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal
prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter.

I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked
further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog
ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection
to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process.

I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to
recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big
money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to
benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter.
This said, I need your opinion about some points.

1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine
wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some
more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the
ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board
for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ?

2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range
(as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It
would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ?

3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity.
Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF
diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add
some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm.

4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I
first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount
inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not
big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the
only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC
@ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry
standard...

5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an
assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and
the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for
beginners.

6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz
board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could
buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200.

Thanks for your answers !

PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal
(http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA)

PS2 : Sorry for my bad English.


Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Presse Non Stop - Canard PC
http://www.canardpc.com
Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003
MSN : sam@x86.fr


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107. I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there for a try. -----Message d'origine----- De : time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] De la part de Bob Camp Envoyé : jeudi 25 mars 2010 17:36 À : 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Objet : Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Hi I don't need a board so take this as a comment from a "non customer". Mounting the board inside the counter is a very useful thing. I would go with the connector that originally was on the front panel. That makes it mechanically sound and it should work every bit as well as the original. Second choice would be to lash an SMA into the same location with enough mechanical support to be very secure. What ever connector is there, it's going to get a lot of use / abuse. I do agree that BNC would not be my first choice (or even in the top 10) for a multi GHz connector in terms of RF performance. It does have the great virtue of being quick on / quick off. The levels sound pretty good. I would make sure that the input will take +20 dbm on a continuous basis. It probably should read accurately to +13 dbm. I would not add a bunch of amplification. Often when you do, it improves sensitivity, but they do odd things as you overload them. Low end frequency sounds plenty good enough. There's a fine input just below it on the counter if you want to go below 100 MHz. I would probably scale the input caps so that they start to block RF below something like 50 MHz. That will help with overload and possibly improve sensitivity in real applications. Hope that helps. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 11:35 AM To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' Subject: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board for HP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Last year, I posted a message on timenuts about a project for an internal prescaler board for the 53131A (and related 53181A & 53132A) counter. I successfully cloned the original 3 GHz board from Agilent and I've looked further. I then designed a more advanced prescaler PCB based on the Analog ADF4107 PLL, able to reach 6 GHz and beyond. I worked on component selection to get a stable board and I'm now in the final stages of the design process. I will order soon a batch of the final PCB and consider selling them to recover some of the bucks I spend on the project. My goal is NOT to make big money, just help some ham and others measurements addicted like me to benefit from a frequency extensions for one of the more wide-spread counter. This said, I need your opinion about some points. 1- The minimum measurable frequency for that design is 80-85 MHz for a sine wave (down to DC with a square wave). To get lower specs, I need to add some more components to get fast-rising edge in all cases at the input of the ADF4107. I don't think there is a need for that as the original 5 GHz board for Agilent is rated to 200 MHz min. What's your thought ? 2- About sensibility, my goal is to achieve -20 dB over the 0.1-6 GHz range (as "rated" spec). To get higher sensitivity, I need to add some RF amps. It would cost more and seems overkill for that application, but .... ? 3- Let's speak about input protection. More protected = less sensitivity. Right now, the front stage is protected by a voltage limiter (2x dual RF diode) but it will not support a huge peak (more than 30 dBm). Should I add some more protection ? In all case, the "rated" spec will be 10 dBm. 4- Connectors. The PCB board will input into a standard SMA connector. I first planned to provide the board with a short SMA/Type-N cable to mount inside the 53131A. This is not possible because the front-panel hole is not big enough and will require hardware mod to fit a Type-N connector. So, the only other option is a TNC connector at input. Is it a right choice ? A BNC @ 6+ GHz seems not a good idea, but works just fine too and is the industry standard... 5- I'm thinking about selling the prescaler board as a "nude" PCB or an assembled board. Should I sell a "kit" PCB too ? The board is all SMD and the main chip is a fine pitch TSSOP quite hard to solder. This is not for beginners. 6- Price. Last but not least : the price ! Right now, the original 3 GHz board costs $1100 and up to $2200 for the 5 GHz. What a ripoff ! You could buy some refurbished 3 GHz board on eBay for about $200. Thanks for your answers ! PS : Two pictures of the Beta 0.7 PCB measuring a 3 GHz / -30 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OB) and a 8 GHz / 0 dB signal (http://cpc.cx/OA) PS2 : Sorry for my bad English. --------------------- Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER Presse Non Stop - Canard PC http://www.canardpc.com Tel : +33.6.13.73.4003 MSN : sam@x86.fr _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
JM
John Miles
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 8:37 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board
forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107.
I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there
for a try.

Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, not
an amplifier.

-- john, KE5FX

> -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On > Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM > To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board > forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A > > > I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107. > I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there > for a try. Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, not an amplifier. -- john, KE5FX
PS
paul swed
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 8:41 PM

Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2
in small quantites.
Just a thought.

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles jmiles@pop.net wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board
forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107.
I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there
for a try.

Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, not
an amplifier.

-- john, KE5FX


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2 in small quantites. Just a thought. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On > > Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM > > To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board > > forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A > > > > > > I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107. > > I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there > > for a try. > > Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, not > an amplifier. > > -- john, KE5FX > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 9:06 PM

Hi

Every time I've ever done much "amp in front of the counter" stuff, I've
discovered a great way to make a doubler / tripler / quadrupler / random
number generator. There always seems to be some magic combination of
frequency and level that does strange things, often multiple combinations.
They rarely pop up when testing the front end design it's self. They are
amazingly easy to come up with when actually using the device.

Strange how things always seem to work that way.

If you really need to amplify, something like a very high speed ECL gate
biased in it's linear region is a good thing to try. At no extra charge it
would give you a differential signal to route into the divider. You are
already pretty sensitive so it may not help at all.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:42 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler
boardforHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2
in small quantites.
Just a thought.

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles jmiles@pop.net wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board
forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107.
I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there
for a try.

Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip,

not

an amplifier.

-- john, KE5FX


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Every time I've ever done much "amp in front of the counter" stuff, I've discovered a great way to make a doubler / tripler / quadrupler / random number generator. There always seems to be some magic combination of frequency and level that does strange things, often multiple combinations. They rarely pop up when testing the front end design it's self. They are amazingly easy to come up with when actually using the device. Strange how things always seem to work that way. If you really need to amplify, something like a very high speed ECL gate biased in it's linear region is a good thing to try. At no extra charge it would give you a differential signal to route into the divider. You are already pretty sensitive so it may not help at all. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:42 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler boardforHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2 in small quantites. Just a thought. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On > > Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM > > To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board > > forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A > > > > > > I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107. > > I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there > > for a try. > > Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, not > an amplifier. > > -- john, KE5FX > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Thu, Mar 25, 2010 9:23 PM

Bob I do the ecl trick quite often to repair older counters with preamp
issues like HP 5248 series etc. Ones you can not get parts for which is
about everything these days. A couple of stages in series have pretty good
gain and the other benefits you sight.

But not sure a lot of folks on the thread may have access to these devices
anymore.
I pick them up when I happen to be in ca. for business at $2 or so each.
Surplus stuff.
10116 as an example. By the way I do dead bug style because they only need
to work to 135 Mhz.
I might guess as a fuse a gali does pretty well. Attenuate ahead of and
behind for matching and stability. Simply stay clear of the edge cases.

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Bob Camp lists@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

Every time I've ever done much "amp in front of the counter" stuff, I've
discovered a great way to make a doubler / tripler / quadrupler / random
number generator. There always seems to be some magic combination of
frequency and level that does strange things, often multiple combinations.
They rarely pop up when testing the front end design it's self. They are
amazingly easy to come up with when actually using the device.

Strange how things always seem to work that way.

If you really need to amplify, something like a very high speed ECL gate
biased in it's linear region is a good thing to try. At no extra charge it
would give you a differential signal to route into the divider. You are
already pretty sensitive so it may not help at all.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:42 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler
boardforHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2
in small quantites.
Just a thought.

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles jmiles@pop.net wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board
forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A

I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107.
I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there
for a try.

Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip,

not

an amplifier.

-- john, KE5FX


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Bob I do the ecl trick quite often to repair older counters with preamp issues like HP 5248 series etc. Ones you can not get parts for which is about everything these days. A couple of stages in series have pretty good gain and the other benefits you sight. But not sure a lot of folks on the thread may have access to these devices anymore. I pick them up when I happen to be in ca. for business at $2 or so each. Surplus stuff. 10116 as an example. By the way I do dead bug style because they only need to work to 135 Mhz. I might guess as a fuse a gali does pretty well. Attenuate ahead of and behind for matching and stability. Simply stay clear of the edge cases. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Bob Camp <lists@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Every time I've ever done much "amp in front of the counter" stuff, I've > discovered a great way to make a doubler / tripler / quadrupler / random > number generator. There always seems to be some magic combination of > frequency and level that does strange things, often multiple combinations. > They rarely pop up when testing the front end design it's self. They are > amazingly easy to come up with when actually using the device. > > Strange how things always seem to work that way. > > If you really need to amplify, something like a very high speed ECL gate > biased in it's linear region is a good thing to try. At no extra charge it > would give you a differential signal to route into the divider. You are > already pretty sensitive so it may not help at all. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of paul swed > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 4:42 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler > boardforHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A > > Well if you do want a amplifier/fuse. The mini circuit gali-1 0-8Ghz is $2 > in small quantites. > Just a thought. > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 4:37 PM, John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On > > > Behalf Of Samuel DEMEULEMEESTER > > > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:42 AM > > > To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' > > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Low-Cost 6+ GHz Prescaler board > > > forHP/Agilent53181A/53131A/53132A > > > > > > > > > I'm thinking about the need for a MMIC amplifier before the ADF4107. > > > I was unable to find a cheap DC-8 GHz GaAs amplifier to put there > > > for a try. > > > > Bob's right; if anything, you want an attenuator in front of that chip, > not > > an amplifier. > > > > -- john, KE5FX > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >