time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO won't lock: OCXO aged out?

BK
Bob kb8tq
Sat, Jan 16, 2021 4:19 PM

Hi

There is both short term and long term noise on the GPS PPS signal
out of a GPS module. Some of the short term noise can be reduced
by software using the “sawtooth correction” out. That assumes the
module you are using provides this output. The uBlox M8T is one
of many that provide this information.

Even with correction, you are still stuck with “many nanoseconds” of
noise on the GPS PPS. A good OCXO is much more stable than
this. A filter in the locking circuit is needed to reduce this noise.

The lock circuit can be either a PLL (phase locked loop) or a FLL
(frequency locked loop). If it is a FLL, the time output of the GPSDO
will drift. If you want time to stay locked, you need to use a PLL.

Even with a PLL long term accuracy is dependent on an integrator
in your lock circuit. That is what watches the long term problems
and corrects for them.

Working out the timing / corner frequencies of the proportional and
integrator portions of the loop is highly dependent on your oscillator
and the goals you intend to achieve. A reasonable starting point
for the proportional portion is in the 10 to 100 second range. The
integrator usually is 10 to 100X longer.

Getting all this working involves comparing it to “something better”.
Often in a basement project, finding something better becomes
a major effort.

Fun

Bob

On Jan 16, 2021, at 9:43 AM, 李 bd4kc@126.com wrote:

If the gpsdo output pps signal does not drift, but the gps pps signal drifts slowly, it is bound that after a period of time, the gpsdo pps signal will have a very large beat in order to follow the gps. How to solve this problem? In tens of nanosconds, I see that the pps of the gps are always drifting.

| |

|
|
邮箱bd4kc@126.com
|

签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制

On 01/16/2021 12:46, Scott Newell wrote:
At 07:49 PM 1/15/2021, Bob kb8tq wrote:

then indeed, the temperature sensitivity will go
way up. Most of the OCXO’s off these boards
are a sub $20 sort of item on eBay. How good are they? Who

Any suggestions for a SC-cut 5V OCXO? Searching
for "Trimble 73090" or "73090 OCXO" just brings
up the ~$80 GPSDO boards. Nearly everything 5V
I'm seeing is square wave, but maybe that doesn't
matter in this box? (Or maybe the 73090 is square
wave; I'll check next time I have it open.)

--
newell  N5TNL


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Hi There is both short term and long term noise on the GPS PPS signal out of a GPS module. Some of the short term noise can be reduced by software using the “sawtooth correction” out. That assumes the module you are using provides this output. The uBlox M8T is one of many that provide this information. Even with correction, you are still stuck with “many nanoseconds” of noise on the GPS PPS. A good OCXO is *much* more stable than this. A filter in the locking circuit is needed to reduce this noise. The lock circuit can be either a PLL (phase locked loop) or a FLL (frequency locked loop). If it is a FLL, the time output of the GPSDO will drift. If you want time to stay locked, you need to use a PLL. Even with a PLL long term accuracy is dependent on an integrator in your lock circuit. That is what watches the long term problems and corrects for them. Working out the timing / corner frequencies of the proportional and integrator portions of the loop is highly dependent on your oscillator and the goals you intend to achieve. A reasonable starting point for the proportional portion is in the 10 to 100 second range. The integrator usually is 10 to 100X longer. Getting all this working involves comparing it to “something better”. Often in a basement project, finding something better becomes a major effort. Fun Bob > On Jan 16, 2021, at 9:43 AM, 李 <bd4kc@126.com> wrote: > > > If the gpsdo output pps signal does not drift, but the gps pps signal drifts slowly, it is bound that after a period of time, the gpsdo pps signal will have a very large beat in order to follow the gps. How to solve this problem? In tens of nanosconds, I see that the pps of the gps are always drifting. > > > > | | > 李 > | > | > 邮箱bd4kc@126.com > | > > 签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制 > > On 01/16/2021 12:46, Scott Newell wrote: > At 07:49 PM 1/15/2021, Bob kb8tq wrote: >> then indeed, the temperature sensitivity will go >> way up. Most of the OCXO’s off these boards >> are a sub $20 sort of item on eBay. How good are they? Who > > Any suggestions for a SC-cut 5V OCXO? Searching > for "Trimble 73090" or "73090 OCXO" just brings > up the ~$80 GPSDO boards. Nearly everything 5V > I'm seeing is square wave, but maybe that doesn't > matter in this box? (Or maybe the 73090 is square > wave; I'll check next time I have it open.) > > -- > newell N5TNL > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.
O
Oz-in-DFW
Sat, Jan 16, 2021 5:00 PM

On 1/15/2021 8:30 PM, paul swed wrote:

Not sure how hard it might be to get a thermocouple into the oven. That
would give you a hint.
Regards
Paul

Seems to me you already have a temperature sensor in the OCXO.

If you temperature soak it overnight and monitor the frequency as power
is applied, you should see the starting freq of the oscillator.  The
heater will come on immediately and start it warming up, but the
oscillator should stabilize in less than a 100 ms or so, and the heater
should not be a major factor.  Do this at several temps and you should
get a pretty decent picture.

I suspect the fly in the ointment in this approach is that the oven temp
is usually picked to be around the flattest spot in the temp/freq curve.
You may not see much resolution.

You can also monitor oven current which I guess should translate to a
temperature error term, though I'm not sure off hand how you'd calibrate
that.

Oz (in DFW)

On 1/15/2021 8:30 PM, paul swed wrote: > Not sure how hard it might be to get a thermocouple into the oven. That > would give you a hint. > Regards > Paul Seems to me you already have a temperature sensor in the OCXO. If you temperature soak it overnight and monitor the frequency as power is applied, you should see the starting freq of the oscillator.  The heater will come on immediately and start it warming up, but the oscillator should stabilize in less than a 100 ms or so, and the heater should not be a major factor.  Do this at several temps and you should get a pretty decent picture. I suspect the fly in the ointment in this approach is that the oven temp is usually picked to be around the flattest spot in the temp/freq curve. You may not see much resolution. You can also monitor oven current which I guess should translate to a temperature error term, though I'm not sure off hand how you'd calibrate that. Oz (in DFW)
BK
Bob kb8tq
Sat, Jan 16, 2021 6:02 PM

Hi

Ok, what do you know / have a pretty good guess at?

  1. There’s an SC (or similar)  cut crystal in there

  2. That crystal has a curve that looks something like the “0” or “1” curve in figure 7 of:

https://coloradocrystal.com/applications/ https://coloradocrystal.com/applications/

  1. It probably is not a true SC so those curves are only approximately correct.

Since the frequency of the oscillator is low, there are a few possibilities.

  1. It was originally on the lower turn and now is on the upper turn. ( = it got hotter)

  2. It was in the vicinity of the turns and now is colder.

Without knowing where it started, there isn’t much way to work out which
one is correct. Also without being able to repair the circuit / adjust the
temperature the information isn’t of a lot of use.

Simple answer it so watch eBay for the next couple months and grab a
few replacement OCXO’s when they next come up for sale.

Bob

On Jan 16, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Oz-in-DFW lists@ozindfw.net wrote:

On 1/15/2021 8:30 PM, paul swed wrote:

Not sure how hard it might be to get a thermocouple into the oven. That
would give you a hint.
Regards
Paul

Seems to me you already have a temperature sensor in the OCXO.

If you temperature soak it overnight and monitor the frequency as power is applied, you should see the starting freq of the oscillator.  The heater will come on immediately and start it warming up, but the oscillator should stabilize in less than a 100 ms or so, and the heater should not be a major factor.  Do this at several temps and you should get a pretty decent picture.

I suspect the fly in the ointment in this approach is that the oven temp is usually picked to be around the flattest spot in the temp/freq curve. You may not see much resolution.

You can also monitor oven current which I guess should translate to a temperature error term, though I'm not sure off hand how you'd calibrate that.

Oz (in DFW)


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Ok, what do you know / have a pretty good guess at? 1) There’s an SC (or similar) cut crystal in there 2) That crystal has a curve that looks something like the “0” or “1” curve in figure 7 of: https://coloradocrystal.com/applications/ <https://coloradocrystal.com/applications/> 3) It probably is *not* a true SC so those curves are only approximately correct. Since the frequency of the oscillator is low, there are a few possibilities. 1) It was originally on the lower turn and now is on the upper turn. ( = it got hotter) 2) It was in the vicinity of the turns and now is colder. Without knowing where it started, there isn’t much way to work out which one is correct. Also without being able to repair the circuit / adjust the temperature the information isn’t of a lot of use. Simple answer it so watch eBay for the next couple months and grab a few replacement OCXO’s when they next come up for sale. Bob > On Jan 16, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Oz-in-DFW <lists@ozindfw.net> wrote: > > On 1/15/2021 8:30 PM, paul swed wrote: >> Not sure how hard it might be to get a thermocouple into the oven. That >> would give you a hint. >> Regards >> Paul > Seems to me you already have a temperature sensor in the OCXO. > > If you temperature soak it overnight and monitor the frequency as power is applied, you should see the starting freq of the oscillator. The heater will come on immediately and start it warming up, but the oscillator should stabilize in less than a 100 ms or so, and the heater should not be a major factor. Do this at several temps and you should get a pretty decent picture. > > I suspect the fly in the ointment in this approach is that the oven temp is usually picked to be around the flattest spot in the temp/freq curve. You may not see much resolution. > > You can also monitor oven current which I guess should translate to a temperature error term, though I'm not sure off hand how you'd calibrate that. > > Oz (in DFW) > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.