One of the biggest elections impacting our Subdivision, Limestone Ranch is coming on November 6.  State Representative Lyle Larson and State Senator Donna Campbell worked tirelessly last year to get legislation passed which would limit a city’s ability to annex a subdivision without the express consent of the homeowners.  On November 6, the City of San Antonio is coming at us with a poorly worded proposition which will require us to vote whether we want to be annexed or not.  Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is against annexation.  I think this proposition was purposely worded so as to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.   Clearly everyone needs to vote and have their opinion heard.  I for one don’t want to incur additional and significant city taxes so I will be voting for OPTION TWO.  My recommendation is that you vote for OPTION TWO as well. Please make every effort to vote in this crucial election and have your voice heard.  Please don’t allow a few persons to make the hard work of Larson and Campbell be in vain and impose city taxation on us.  Early voting starts on October 22 and continues through November 2.  You can get more information at this site:https://www.bexar.org/1568/Elections-Department.  The closest early voting site to us is the Fair Oaks Ranch city hall located at 7286 Dietz Elkhorn. Please make every effort to vote. Thanks, Greg Anderson   null

In my previous email I stated, “Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is against annexation.  I think this proposition was purposely worded so as to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.”  I wanted to explain that in more detail.  The language in Option 1 talks about annexation for the purpose of providing city services.  There is no mention of land use regulations by the military in this option. Option 2 talks about land use regulation by the military.  The implication is that this will be a bad thing to be subject to “military land use regulation.” The irony is that we are already under this “military land use regulation.”  Texas Senate Bill 6 imposed “military land use regulation” when the bill became law.  If you want to learn more about SB 6, you can look at this website: https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB6/2017/X1. So, under Option 1 and Option 2 we are already under “military land use regulation” by operation of law.   What does that term mean?  It means we can’t engage in certain activities without getting military approval.  It means we can’t erect a 200 foot radio tower in our neighborhood.  We can’t erect a skyscraper.  We can’t focus floodlights into the heavens.  As is evident, these are activities that our subdivision would never do.  So “military land use regulation” really doesn’t impact us in our day-to-day life. Thanks, Greg Anderson -------- Original message --------From: Greg Anderson via Discussion <discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18 10:52 AM (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion <discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Greg Anderson <grega@satx.rr.com> Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation Election One of the biggest elections impacting our Subdivision, Limestone Ranch is coming on November 6.  State Representative Lyle Larson and State Senator Donna Campbell worked tirelessly last year to get legislation passed which would limit a city’s ability to annex a subdivision without the express consent of the homeowners.  On November 6, the City of San Antonio is coming at us with a poorly worded proposition which will require us to vote whether we want to be annexed or not.  Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is against annexation.  I think this proposition was purposely worded so as to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.   Clearly everyone needs to vote and have their opinion heard.  I for one don’t want to incur additional and significant city taxes so I will be voting for OPTION TWO.  My recommendation is that you vote for OPTION TWO as well. Please make every effort to vote in this crucial election and have your voice heard.  Please don’t allow a few persons to make the hard work of Larson and Campbell be in vain and impose city taxation on us.  Early voting starts on October 22 and continues through November 2.  You can get more information at this site:https://www.bexar.org/1568/Elections-Department.  The closest early voting site to us is the Fair Oaks Ranch city hall located at 7286 Dietz Elkhorn. Please make every effort to vote. Thanks, Greg Anderson   null _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com

Greg, thanks for the clarification. It is appreciated. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 2:18 PM Greg Anderson via Discussion < discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> wrote: > In my previous email I stated, “Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is > against annexation. I think this proposition was purposely worded so as to > confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.” I wanted > to explain that > in more detail. > The language in Option 1 talks about annexation for the purpose of > providing city services. There is no mention of land use regulations by > the military in this option. > Option 2 talks about land use regulation by the military. The implication > is that this will be a bad thing to be subject to “military land use > regulation.” > The irony is that we are already under this “military land use > regulation.” Texas Senate Bill 6 imposed “military land use regulation” > when the bill became law. If you want to learn more about SB 6, you can > look at this website: > https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB6/2017/X1. > So, under Option 1 and Option 2 we are already under “military land use > regulation” by operation of law. What does that term mean? It means we > can’t engage in certain activities without getting military approval. It > means we can’t erect > a 200 foot radio tower in our neighborhood. We can’t erect a > skyscraper. We can’t focus floodlights into the heavens. As is evident, > these are activities that our subdivision would never do. So “military > land use regulation” really doesn’t impact us in > our day-to-day life. > Thanks, Greg Anderson > -------- Original message --------From: Greg Anderson via Discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18 10:52 AM > (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Greg Anderson < > grega@satx.rr.com> Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation > Election > One of the biggest elections impacting our Subdivision, Limestone Ranch is > coming on November 6. State Representative Lyle Larson and State Senator > Donna Campbell worked tirelessly last year to get legislation passed which > would limit a city’s ability to annex a subdivision without the express > consent of the homeowners. On November 6, the City of San Antonio is > coming at us with a poorly worded proposition which will require us to vote > whether we want to be annexed or not. Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 > is against annexation. I think this proposition was purposely worded so as > to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more > attractive. Clearly everyone needs to vote and have their opinion heard. > I for one don’t want to incur additional and significant city taxes so I > will be voting for OPTION TWO. My recommendation is that you vote for > OPTION TWO as well. Please make every effort to vote in this crucial > election and have your voice heard. Please don’t allow a few persons to > make the hard work of Larson and Campbell be in vain and impose city > taxation on us. Early voting starts on October 22 and continues through > November 2. You can get more information at this site: > https://www.bexar.org/1568/Elections-Department. The closest early > voting site to us is the Fair Oaks Ranch city hall located at 7286 Dietz > Elkhorn. Please make every effort to vote. Thanks, Greg Anderson > null > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com >

I just pulled up the sample ballet and the annexation is titled CAMP BULLIS which is very misleading and confusing. Obviosly, the city wants us to vote for Camp Bullis and not against the military. From my understanding it has nothing to do with Camp Bullis. Bill Drees Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message --------From: Rob Cline via Discussion <discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18 2:38 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion <discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Rob Cline <cpaskier@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation Election Greg, thanks for the clarification.  It is appreciated. On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 2:18 PM Greg Anderson via Discussion < discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> wrote: > In my previous email I stated, “Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is > against annexation.  I think this proposition was purposely worded so as to > confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.”  I wanted > to explain that >  in more detail. > The language in Option 1 talks about annexation for the purpose of > providing city services.  There is no mention of land use regulations by > the military in this option. > Option 2 talks about land use regulation by the military.  The implication > is that this will be a bad thing to be subject to “military land use > regulation.” > The irony is that we are already under this “military land use > regulation.”  Texas Senate Bill 6 imposed “military land use regulation” > when the bill became law.  If you want to learn more about SB 6, you can > look at this website: > https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB6/2017/X1. > So, under Option 1 and Option 2 we are already under “military land use > regulation” by operation of law.   What does that term mean?  It means we > can’t engage in certain activities without getting military approval.  It > means we can’t erect >  a 200 foot radio tower in our neighborhood.  We can’t erect a > skyscraper.  We can’t focus floodlights into the heavens.  As is evident, > these are activities that our subdivision would never do.  So “military > land use regulation” really doesn’t impact us in >  our day-to-day life. > Thanks, Greg Anderson > -------- Original message --------From: Greg Anderson via Discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18  10:52 AM > (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Greg Anderson < > grega@satx.rr.com> Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation > Election > One of the biggest elections impacting our Subdivision, Limestone Ranch is > coming on November 6.  State Representative Lyle Larson and State Senator > Donna Campbell worked tirelessly last year to get legislation passed which > would limit a city’s ability to annex a subdivision without the express > consent of the homeowners.  On November 6, the City of San Antonio is > coming at us with a poorly worded proposition which will require us to vote > whether we want to be annexed or not.  Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 > is against annexation.  I think this proposition was purposely worded so as > to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more > attractive.   Clearly everyone needs to vote and have their opinion heard. > I for one don’t want to incur additional and significant city taxes so I > will be voting for OPTION TWO.  My recommendation is that you vote for > OPTION TWO as well. Please make every effort to vote in this crucial > election and have your voice heard.  Please don’t allow a few persons to > make the hard work of Larson and Campbell be in vain and impose city > taxation on us.  Early voting starts on October 22 and continues through > November 2.  You can get more information at this site: > https://www.bexar.org/1568/Elections-Department.  The closest early > voting site to us is the Fair Oaks Ranch city hall located at 7286 Dietz > Elkhorn. Please make every effort to vote. Thanks, Greg Anderson > null > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com

You are absolutely right. Whether there is annexation or not, Camp Bullis will still have the buffer zone with light restriction rules. With or without annexation, the city, county, and state of Texas made those restrictions permanent as part of the BRAC process in 2005. That buffer zone will be there until the Federal Government decides to change it. We will never have a vote on that issue until the Department of Defense stops using Camp Bullis for night training. Vote against the proposition and defeat annexation!!! *Richard (Dick) Agee* *Agee's Consulting Service, LLC* A Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (210) 854-3978 *When Change Happens . . . Management Matters!­®* *richardagee.com <http://richardagee.com>* *wantalifecoach.com <http://wantalifecoach.com>* On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 3:13 PM Bill Drees via Discussion < discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> wrote: > I just pulled up the sample ballet and the annexation is titled CAMP > BULLIS which is very misleading and confusing. Obviosly, the city wants us > to vote for Camp Bullis and not against the military. > From my understanding it has nothing to do with Camp Bullis. > Bill Drees > > > Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > -------- Original message --------From: Rob Cline via Discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18 2:38 PM > (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Rob Cline <cpaskier@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation Election > Greg, thanks for the clarification. It is appreciated. > > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018, 2:18 PM Greg Anderson via Discussion < > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> wrote: > > > In my previous email I stated, “Option 1 is for annexation, Option 2 is > > against annexation. I think this proposition was purposely worded so as > to > > confuse the voters and to make annexation look more attractive.” I > wanted > > to explain that > > in more detail. > > The language in Option 1 talks about annexation for the purpose of > > providing city services. There is no mention of land use regulations by > > the military in this option. > > Option 2 talks about land use regulation by the military. The > implication > > is that this will be a bad thing to be subject to “military land use > > regulation.” > > The irony is that we are already under this “military land use > > regulation.” Texas Senate Bill 6 imposed “military land use regulation” > > when the bill became law. If you want to learn more about SB 6, you can > > look at this website: > > https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB6/2017/X1. > > So, under Option 1 and Option 2 we are already under “military land use > > regulation” by operation of law. What does that term mean? It means we > > can’t engage in certain activities without getting military approval. It > > means we can’t erect > > a 200 foot radio tower in our neighborhood. We can’t erect a > > skyscraper. We can’t focus floodlights into the heavens. As is evident, > > these are activities that our subdivision would never do. So “military > > land use regulation” really doesn’t impact us in > > our day-to-day life. > > Thanks, Greg Anderson > > -------- Original message --------From: Greg Anderson via Discussion < > > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Date: 10/8/18 10:52 AM > > (GMT-06:00) To: Limestone Ranch HOA discussion < > > discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com> Cc: Greg Anderson < > > grega@satx.rr.com> Subject: Re: [Limestone Ranch Discussion] Annexation > > Election > > One of the biggest elections impacting our Subdivision, Limestone Ranch > is > > coming on November 6. State Representative Lyle Larson and State Senator > > Donna Campbell worked tirelessly last year to get legislation passed > which > > would limit a city’s ability to annex a subdivision without the express > > consent of the homeowners. On November 6, the City of San Antonio is > > coming at us with a poorly worded proposition which will require us to > vote > > whether we want to be annexed or not. Option 1 is for annexation, > Option 2 > > is against annexation. I think this proposition was purposely worded so > as > > to confuse the voters and to make annexation look more > > attractive. Clearly everyone needs to vote and have their opinion > heard. > > I for one don’t want to incur additional and significant city taxes so I > > will be voting for OPTION TWO. My recommendation is that you vote for > > OPTION TWO as well. Please make every effort to vote in this crucial > > election and have your voice heard. Please don’t allow a few persons to > > make the hard work of Larson and Campbell be in vain and impose city > > taxation on us. Early voting starts on October 22 and continues through > > November 2. You can get more information at this site: > > https://www.bexar.org/1568/Elections-Department. The closest early > > voting site to us is the Fair Oaks Ranch city hall located at 7286 Dietz > > Elkhorn. Please make every effort to vote. Thanks, Greg Anderson > > null > > _______________________________________________ > > Discussion mailing list > > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please > visit: > > > > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Discussion mailing list > > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please > visit: > > > > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > _______________________________________________ > Discussion mailing list > Discussion@lists.limestoneranchhoa.com > > To manage your subscription to this list, or to unsubscribe, please visit: > > http://lists.limestoneranchhoa.com/mailman/listinfo/discussion_lists.limestoneranchhoa.com >