time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

RE: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase Comparator

RA
Robert Atkinson
Wed, Dec 7, 2005 11:57 AM

Hi Jeroen,
Looks like a nice improvement. It deals mainly with the errors in the
phase detector itself. The circuit still needs a 50% duty cycle
squarewave logic level input. The problem of converting from a lower
level sinewave input remanains. Using a differential line receiver IC
with a transformer coupled input followed by a divide by 2 looks like
the best bet. The Low Voltage Differential Signalling (LVDS) systems
that are coming into use have spawned a range of high performance IC's.
I've just got hold of some SN65LVDS048A quad receivers. Designed for
200MHz and with 50ps channel to channel skew on a 2.7ns propagation
delay, these should perform well. I've just got to do some testing. Need
more time.....

Robert G8RPI.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jeroen Bastemeijer
Sent: 07 December 2005 09:52
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase
Comparator

Dear All,

I checked the patentsdatabase, there is another patent form Michael
Fischer (US6,351,153) which claims to be less sensitive to temperature
and supply voltage fluctuations. Interesting to read.
Furthermore, when designing electronics, I always keep in mind the
KISS-principle (Keep It Stupidly Simple). With carefull simple design,
al lot of effects can be neglected or compensated for. More (expensive)
electronics, doesn't mean a much better design. Usuallly more
electronics invite noise and temperature influence instead of
cancelling...

Jeroen PE1RGE

Robert Atkinson wrote:

Hi,
I've looked at building one of these and it's not quite so trivial to
duplicate. The speed of the logic is important, the original design

used

ECL. High speed CMOS may be OK but how do you verify performance? The
original also used an unusual input circuit designed around a
discontinued line receiver IC. This is critical to performance, any
variation in threshold will appear as a phase error. I'm continuing to
prototype a new design and will let you know how I get on.
I've got a manual on PDF if you need it.

Robert G8RPI.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Karlquist
Sent: 06 December 2005 19:35
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase
Comparator

It is trivial to build your own out of a couple of flip flops.
You can read Michael Fischer's patent on it (circa 1980).

Rick Karlquist N6RK

NE8S wrote:

Gentlemen:

Happy Holidays to All Time, Frequency, and Phase Domainers.

I am looking for an HP Linear Phase Comparator, Model K34-59991A. Does
anyone have one to sell???

Thanks in advance for checking and passing the word for me.

Gar Ko
NE8S

Email Addresses:

bionucleonics@southwind.net
ne8s@earthlink.net


time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and

not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600.

The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message

is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a
result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the
contents of this message by a third party.


--
Ing. Jeroen Bastemeijer

Delft University of Technology
Department of Electrical Engineering
Electronic Instrumentation Laboratory
Mekelweg 4, Room 13.090
2628 CD Delft
The Netherlands

Phone: +31.15.27.86542
Fax: +31.15.27.85755
E-mail: J.Bastemeijer@EWI.TUDelft.nl


time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600.

The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party.

Hi Jeroen, Looks like a nice improvement. It deals mainly with the errors in the phase detector itself. The circuit still needs a 50% duty cycle squarewave logic level input. The problem of converting from a lower level sinewave input remanains. Using a differential line receiver IC with a transformer coupled input followed by a divide by 2 looks like the best bet. The Low Voltage Differential Signalling (LVDS) systems that are coming into use have spawned a range of high performance IC's. I've just got hold of some SN65LVDS048A quad receivers. Designed for 200MHz and with 50ps channel to channel skew on a 2.7ns propagation delay, these should perform well. I've just got to do some testing. Need more time..... Robert G8RPI. -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Jeroen Bastemeijer Sent: 07 December 2005 09:52 To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase Comparator Dear All, I checked the patentsdatabase, there is another patent form Michael Fischer (US6,351,153) which claims to be less sensitive to temperature and supply voltage fluctuations. Interesting to read. Furthermore, when designing electronics, I always keep in mind the KISS-principle (Keep It Stupidly Simple). With carefull simple design, al lot of effects can be neglected or compensated for. More (expensive) electronics, doesn't mean a much better design. Usuallly more electronics invite noise and temperature influence instead of cancelling... Jeroen PE1RGE Robert Atkinson wrote: >Hi, >I've looked at building one of these and it's not quite so trivial to >duplicate. The speed of the logic is important, the original design used >ECL. High speed CMOS may be OK but how do you verify performance? The >original also used an unusual input circuit designed around a >discontinued line receiver IC. This is critical to performance, any >variation in threshold will appear as a phase error. I'm continuing to >prototype a new design and will let you know how I get on. >I've got a manual on PDF if you need it. > >Robert G8RPI. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On >Behalf Of Rick Karlquist >Sent: 06 December 2005 19:35 >To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >Cc: time-nuts@febo.com >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase >Comparator > >It is trivial to build your own out of a couple of flip flops. >You can read Michael Fischer's patent on it (circa 1980). > >Rick Karlquist N6RK > > >NE8S wrote: > > >>Gentlemen: >> >>Happy Holidays to All Time, Frequency, and Phase Domainers. >> >>I am looking for an HP Linear Phase Comparator, Model K34-59991A. Does >>anyone have one to sell??? >> >>Thanks in advance for checking and passing the word for me. >> >>Gar Ko >>NE8S >> >>Email Addresses: >> >>bionucleonics@southwind.net >>ne8s@earthlink.net >>_______________________________________________ >>time-nuts mailing list >>time-nuts@febo.com >>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> >> >> >> > > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > >Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600. > > >The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party. > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------- - > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > -- Ing. Jeroen Bastemeijer Delft University of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering Electronic Instrumentation Laboratory Mekelweg 4, Room 13.090 2628 CD Delft The Netherlands Phone: +31.15.27.86542 Fax: +31.15.27.85755 E-mail: J.Bastemeijer@EWI.TUDelft.nl _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600. The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party.
JB
Jeroen Bastemeijer
Wed, Dec 7, 2005 12:40 PM

Hi Robert,

It is an interesting problem. I have been looking in it for some time as
well. Planned to build such a phase-comparator myself.... no real
schematics yet, due to a lack of time :-(  (or maybe too many interests....)

To get a nice 50% duty cycle, you need more than just a D-Flip-Flop...
Probably you already figured that out. You need to synchronise the 50%
pulses with either the positive or the negative edge of your incoming
original signal. This would mean, that your frequency is at least
divided by a factor 4.

For the analog part:
You could consider using a limiter-like circuit, like the ones which are
used in FM-detector IC's. The input signal will be amplified till it
clips. The only interesting parameter is the zero-crossing, which could
be detected by a comparator. (Compare the signal to ground). However, a
slightly distorted (or noisy) sine wave will produce an error as well...
A distortion/noise in your inputsignal will always distort your
measurement. This makes me wonder if it really pays off to use very
fast/high-grade components. Did you do any calculations to estimate the
phase error (not the constant one), which will be introduced by certain
components?

A general question: what kind of signals do you want to compare/measure
the phase? 10 MHz, 10 kHz, 1 pps, .....???? Square, sine-wave???

Best regards, Jeroen PE1RGE

Robert Atkinson wrote:

Hi Jeroen,
Looks like a nice improvement. It deals mainly with the errors in the
phase detector itself. The circuit still needs a 50% duty cycle
squarewave logic level input. The problem of converting from a lower
level sinewave input remanains. Using a differential line receiver IC
with a transformer coupled input followed by a divide by 2 looks like
the best bet. The Low Voltage Differential Signalling (LVDS) systems
that are coming into use have spawned a range of high performance IC's.
I've just got hold of some SN65LVDS048A quad receivers. Designed for
200MHz and with 50ps channel to channel skew on a 2.7ns propagation
delay, these should perform well. I've just got to do some testing. Need
more time.....

Robert G8RPI.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Jeroen Bastemeijer
Sent: 07 December 2005 09:52
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase
Comparator

Dear All,

I checked the patentsdatabase, there is another patent form Michael
Fischer (US6,351,153) which claims to be less sensitive to temperature
and supply voltage fluctuations. Interesting to read.
Furthermore, when designing electronics, I always keep in mind the
KISS-principle (Keep It Stupidly Simple). With carefull simple design,
al lot of effects can be neglected or compensated for. More (expensive)
electronics, doesn't mean a much better design. Usuallly more
electronics invite noise and temperature influence instead of
cancelling...

Jeroen PE1RGE

Robert Atkinson wrote:

Hi,
I've looked at building one of these and it's not quite so trivial to
duplicate. The speed of the logic is important, the original design

used

ECL. High speed CMOS may be OK but how do you verify performance? The
original also used an unusual input circuit designed around a
discontinued line receiver IC. This is critical to performance, any
variation in threshold will appear as a phase error. I'm continuing to
prototype a new design and will let you know how I get on.
I've got a manual on PDF if you need it.

Robert G8RPI.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Rick Karlquist
Sent: 06 December 2005 19:35
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Cc: time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase
Comparator

It is trivial to build your own out of a couple of flip flops.
You can read Michael Fischer's patent on it (circa 1980).

Rick Karlquist N6RK

NE8S wrote:

Gentlemen:

Happy Holidays to All Time, Frequency, and Phase Domainers.

I am looking for an HP Linear Phase Comparator, Model K34-59991A. Does
anyone have one to sell???

Thanks in advance for checking and passing the word for me.

Gar Ko
NE8S

Email Addresses:

bionucleonics@southwind.net
ne8s@earthlink.net


time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts


time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and

not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely
for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended
recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and
that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600.

The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message

is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned
for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a
result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the
contents of this message by a third party.


--
Ing. Jeroen Bastemeijer

Delft University of Technology
Department of Electrical Engineering
Electronic Instrumentation Laboratory
Mekelweg 4, Room 13.090
2628 CD Delft
The Netherlands

Phone: +31.15.27.86542
Fax: +31.15.27.85755
E-mail: J.Bastemeijer@EWI.TUDelft.nl

Hi Robert, It is an interesting problem. I have been looking in it for some time as well. Planned to build such a phase-comparator myself.... no real schematics yet, due to a lack of time :-( (or maybe too many interests....) To get a nice 50% duty cycle, you need more than just a D-Flip-Flop... Probably you already figured that out. You need to synchronise the 50% pulses with either the positive or the negative edge of your incoming original signal. This would mean, that your frequency is at least divided by a factor 4. For the analog part: You could consider using a limiter-like circuit, like the ones which are used in FM-detector IC's. The input signal will be amplified till it clips. The only interesting parameter is the zero-crossing, which could be detected by a comparator. (Compare the signal to ground). However, a slightly distorted (or noisy) sine wave will produce an error as well... A distortion/noise in your inputsignal will always distort your measurement. This makes me wonder if it really pays off to use very fast/high-grade components. Did you do any calculations to estimate the phase error (not the constant one), which will be introduced by certain components? A general question: what kind of signals do you want to compare/measure the phase? 10 MHz, 10 kHz, 1 pps, .....???? Square, sine-wave??? Best regards, Jeroen PE1RGE Robert Atkinson wrote: >Hi Jeroen, >Looks like a nice improvement. It deals mainly with the errors in the >phase detector itself. The circuit still needs a 50% duty cycle >squarewave logic level input. The problem of converting from a lower >level sinewave input remanains. Using a differential line receiver IC >with a transformer coupled input followed by a divide by 2 looks like >the best bet. The Low Voltage Differential Signalling (LVDS) systems >that are coming into use have spawned a range of high performance IC's. >I've just got hold of some SN65LVDS048A quad receivers. Designed for >200MHz and with 50ps channel to channel skew on a 2.7ns propagation >delay, these should perform well. I've just got to do some testing. Need >more time..... > >Robert G8RPI. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On >Behalf Of Jeroen Bastemeijer >Sent: 07 December 2005 09:52 >To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase >Comparator > >Dear All, > >I checked the patentsdatabase, there is another patent form Michael >Fischer (US6,351,153) which claims to be less sensitive to temperature >and supply voltage fluctuations. Interesting to read. >Furthermore, when designing electronics, I always keep in mind the >KISS-principle (Keep It Stupidly Simple). With carefull simple design, >al lot of effects can be neglected or compensated for. More (expensive) >electronics, doesn't mean a much better design. Usuallly more >electronics invite noise and temperature influence instead of >cancelling... > >Jeroen PE1RGE > >Robert Atkinson wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>I've looked at building one of these and it's not quite so trivial to >>duplicate. The speed of the logic is important, the original design >> >> >used > > >>ECL. High speed CMOS may be OK but how do you verify performance? The >>original also used an unusual input circuit designed around a >>discontinued line receiver IC. This is critical to performance, any >>variation in threshold will appear as a phase error. I'm continuing to >>prototype a new design and will let you know how I get on. >>I've got a manual on PDF if you need it. >> >>Robert G8RPI. >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On >>Behalf Of Rick Karlquist >>Sent: 06 December 2005 19:35 >>To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >>Cc: time-nuts@febo.com >>Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for an HP K34-59991A Linear Phase >>Comparator >> >>It is trivial to build your own out of a couple of flip flops. >>You can read Michael Fischer's patent on it (circa 1980). >> >>Rick Karlquist N6RK >> >> >>NE8S wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Gentlemen: >>> >>>Happy Holidays to All Time, Frequency, and Phase Domainers. >>> >>>I am looking for an HP Linear Phase Comparator, Model K34-59991A. Does >>>anyone have one to sell??? >>> >>>Thanks in advance for checking and passing the word for me. >>> >>>Gar Ko >>>NE8S >>> >>>Email Addresses: >>> >>>bionucleonics@southwind.net >>>ne8s@earthlink.net >>>_______________________________________________ >>>time-nuts mailing list >>>time-nuts@febo.com >>>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>time-nuts mailing list >>time-nuts@febo.com >>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> >>Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and >> >> >not necessarily Genetix Ltd (Genetix) or any company associated with it. >This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely >for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended >recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended >recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and >that any use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in >error please notify Genetix by telephone on +44 (0)1425 624600. > > >>The unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message >> >> >is strictly forbidden. This mail and any attachments have been scanned >for viruses prior to leaving the Genetix network. Genetix will not be >liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a >result of any virus being passed on, or arising from alteration of the >contents of this message by a third party. > > >> >> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >- > > >>_______________________________________________ >>time-nuts mailing list >>time-nuts@febo.com >>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> >> >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > -- Ing. Jeroen Bastemeijer Delft University of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering Electronic Instrumentation Laboratory Mekelweg 4, Room 13.090 2628 CD Delft The Netherlands Phone: +31.15.27.86542 Fax: +31.15.27.85755 E-mail: J.Bastemeijer@EWI.TUDelft.nl