Re: [PCW] Trailerable Cruiser

RE
Richard Eberhardt
Sat, May 5, 2007 11:06 AM

Did you look at Adventure Craft from Florida?  Not a very high bow but lots of
usable space.
Richard Eberhardt> From: kalani@comcast.net> To:
power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:45:10 -0400>
Subject: [PCW] Trailerable Cruiser> > After more than twenty years of cruising
Florida waters and the Bahamas, we > have decided to make a change. We put our
Defever 49RPH on the market this > week and we are ready to settle on the next
vessel.> > We expect to tow the cruiser to remote locations and enjoy the
lakes, > rivers and the Pacific coast. Perhaps some on this list have made
this > change or have considered the possibilities.> > Naturally a catamaran
hull is the only real solution. To be a real cruiser > it must have real
living accomodations, although more of a camping > experience than our
Defever. There must be a head, shower, galley, eating > accomodations,
permanent sleeping accomodations and reasonable tankage.> > To be reasonably
towable, the bare hull must weigh less than 7500 lbs dry > with engines. It
will probably be less than 28 ft long and have a beam > around 8 ft. I expect
very shallow draft.> > The only cats that I have seen that possibly meet these
requirements are by > C-Dory and Glacier Bay. If you can suggest others, let
me know.> > Tom Little> Kalani, Defever 49RPH >
_______________________________________________> Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Did you look at Adventure Craft from Florida? Not a very high bow but lots of usable space. Richard Eberhardt> From: kalani@comcast.net> To: power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:45:10 -0400> Subject: [PCW] Trailerable Cruiser> > After more than twenty years of cruising Florida waters and the Bahamas, we > have decided to make a change. We put our Defever 49RPH on the market this > week and we are ready to settle on the next vessel.> > We expect to tow the cruiser to remote locations and enjoy the lakes, > rivers and the Pacific coast. Perhaps some on this list have made this > change or have considered the possibilities.> > Naturally a catamaran hull is the only real solution. To be a real cruiser > it must have real living accomodations, although more of a camping > experience than our Defever. There must be a head, shower, galley, eating > accomodations, permanent sleeping accomodations and reasonable tankage.> > To be reasonably towable, the bare hull must weigh less than 7500 lbs dry > with engines. It will probably be less than 28 ft long and have a beam > around 8 ft. I expect very shallow draft.> > The only cats that I have seen that possibly meet these requirements are by > C-Dory and Glacier Bay. If you can suggest others, let me know.> > Tom Little> Kalani, Defever 49RPH > _______________________________________________> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
TL
Tom Little
Wed, May 9, 2007 8:28 PM

Thanks to the list for many suggestions on the list and offline.  It was
also a help the review all the past posting on the same subject.

We have decided that a separate head is a firm requirement.  This eliminated
nearly all the possibilities.  After examining the Tom Cat and the Adventure
Craft, we decided the Adventure Craft did not have the sea keeping abilities
that we desire.
The Motor Cat 30 is too wide to trailer easily and the 29 is not available
to see on the east coast.

Our timetable is influenced by our immediate cruising plans and the sale of
our Defever, so we have time to wait and see what else developes.

Tom Little

Thanks to the list for many suggestions on the list and offline. It was also a help the review all the past posting on the same subject. We have decided that a separate head is a firm requirement. This eliminated nearly all the possibilities. After examining the Tom Cat and the Adventure Craft, we decided the Adventure Craft did not have the sea keeping abilities that we desire. The Motor Cat 30 is too wide to trailer easily and the 29 is not available to see on the east coast. Our timetable is influenced by our immediate cruising plans and the sale of our Defever, so we have time to wait and see what else developes. Tom Little
SL
SIDNEY LEVITSKY
Thu, May 10, 2007 12:16 AM

Tom,
I have the same dilemma; the new 30 ft. Glacier Bay may be the answer.
Sid Levitsky

-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces+slevitsk=comcast.net@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces+slevitsk=comcast.net@lists.samurai.com] On
Behalf Of Tom Little
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:28 PM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] Trailerable Cruiser

Thanks to the list for many suggestions on the list and offline.  It was
also a help the review all the past posting on the same subject.

We have decided that a separate head is a firm requirement.  This eliminated

nearly all the possibilities.  After examining the Tom Cat and the Adventure

Craft, we decided the Adventure Craft did not have the sea keeping abilities

that we desire.
The Motor Cat 30 is too wide to trailer easily and the 29 is not available
to see on the east coast.

Our timetable is influenced by our immediate cruising plans and the sale of
our Defever, so we have time to wait and see what else developes.

Tom Little


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Tom, I have the same dilemma; the new 30 ft. Glacier Bay may be the answer. Sid Levitsky -----Original Message----- From: power-catamaran-bounces+slevitsk=comcast.net@lists.samurai.com [mailto:power-catamaran-bounces+slevitsk=comcast.net@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Tom Little Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 4:28 PM To: Power Catamaran List Subject: Re: [PCW] Trailerable Cruiser Thanks to the list for many suggestions on the list and offline. It was also a help the review all the past posting on the same subject. We have decided that a separate head is a firm requirement. This eliminated nearly all the possibilities. After examining the Tom Cat and the Adventure Craft, we decided the Adventure Craft did not have the sea keeping abilities that we desire. The Motor Cat 30 is too wide to trailer easily and the 29 is not available to see on the east coast. Our timetable is influenced by our immediate cruising plans and the sale of our Defever, so we have time to wait and see what else developes. Tom Little _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
TL
Tom Little
Thu, May 10, 2007 12:52 AM

All the Glacier Bay 30 ft models that I know about have a 10 ft 8 in beam
which lets it out for trailering in most states.  Of course, special permits
could be obtained from the states that you were passing through.

Trailer weight is a real issue.  The Tom Cat weights about 10000 lbs with
motors, trailer, and equipment.  This means that it must be pulled by a
truck, not a SUV or van.  Heavier catamarans will require a really big
truck.
Tom

All the Glacier Bay 30 ft models that I know about have a 10 ft 8 in beam which lets it out for trailering in most states. Of course, special permits could be obtained from the states that you were passing through. Trailer weight is a real issue. The Tom Cat weights about 10000 lbs with motors, trailer, and equipment. This means that it must be pulled by a truck, not a SUV or van. Heavier catamarans will require a really big truck. Tom