RA
Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 1:43 PM
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members
of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the
ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new
Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he
tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that
my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said,
assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to
check my email at the end of the day to see what responses I have received
in response to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together
proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best
to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was
not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and
one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the
information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for
organizers (including contact information) and participants and would
welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is
willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will
forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from
previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they
work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit
something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: ?Real Utopias? seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
?nowhere??a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as ?utopian? is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making
practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias
embraces this tension between dreams and practice: ?utopia? implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions
that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have
access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; ?real? means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move
us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations
that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions
that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect
conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and
e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members
of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the
ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new
Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he
tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that
my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said,
assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to
check my email at the end of the day to see what responses I have received
in response to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together
proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best
to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was
not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and
one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the
information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for
organizers (including contact information) and participants and would
welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is
willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will
forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from
previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they
work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit
something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: ?Real Utopias? seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
?nowhere??a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as ?utopian? is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making
practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias
embraces this tension between dreams and practice: ?utopia? implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions
that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have
access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; ?real? means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move
us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations
that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions
that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect
conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and
e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
DL
david.louden@l-3com.com
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 2:06 PM
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much that
can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities
through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow
for co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at
the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY
(Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e.,
August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A.
Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility
for this short notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month
ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary
from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at the end of the day to
see what responses I have received in response to this posting and to do
the best I can in pulling together proposals in time to submit them this
evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with another email
offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out
quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds
and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme
and the information we need to provide. I will need help with
recommendations for organizers (including contact information) and
participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in
the description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a
different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today, please let
me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and develop these
two proposals. I do know from previous experience that if the Program
Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to refine it,
so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how
preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
"nowhere"-a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of
making practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real
utopias embraces this tension between dreams and practice: "utopia"
implies developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing
institutions that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which
all people have access to the conditions to live flourishing lives;
"real" means taking seriously the problem of the viability of the
institutions that could move us in the direction of that world. The goal
is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real potentials
of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way stations,
utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our practical
tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much that
can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities
through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow
for co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at
the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY
(Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e.,
August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A.
Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility
for this short notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month
ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary
from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at the end of the day to
see what responses I have received in response to this posting and to do
the best I can in pulling together proposals in time to submit them this
evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with another email
offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out
quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds
and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme
and the information we need to provide. I will need help with
recommendations for organizers (including contact information) and
participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in
the description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a
different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today, please let
me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and develop these
two proposals. I do know from previous experience that if the Program
Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to refine it,
so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how
preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
"nowhere"-a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of
making practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real
utopias embraces this tension between dreams and practice: "utopia"
implies developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing
institutions that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which
all people have access to the conditions to live flourishing lives;
"real" means taking seriously the problem of the viability of the
institutions that could move us in the direction of that world. The goal
is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real potentials
of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way stations,
utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our practical
tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
NC
Noelle Chesley
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 3:06 PM
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for
utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in
the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but
can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much
that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible
communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem
solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach
that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or
sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
*From:*citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission
of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August
(i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due
today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no
responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this
process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding
of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not
hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at
the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response
to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals
in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it
best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case
he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming
worlds and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted
the theme and the information we need to provide. * I will need help
with recommendations for organizers (including contact information)
and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include
in the description and rationale.* If Aneesh or someone has an idea
for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today,
please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something,
no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME:"Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
"nowhere"---a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to
dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility.
Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious
business of making practical improvements in existing institutions.
The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and
practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of
alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the
conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously
the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in
the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of
viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating
a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for
utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in
the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but
can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
>
> Professor Adams;
>
> I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much
> that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible
> communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem
> solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach
> that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or
> sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
>
> I wish you good luck.
>
> Regards, David
>
> *From:*citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
> [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Rebecca Adams
> R_ADAMS
> *Sent:* Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
> *To:* citasa@list.citasa.org
> *Subject:* [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission
> of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
> TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
> *Importance:* High
>
>
> I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
> members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
> sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August
> (i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due
> today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no
> responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this
> process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding
> of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not
> hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at
> the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response
> to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals
> in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
> follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it
> best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case
> he was not available today.
>
> So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on *gaming
> worlds* and one on *virtual communities*. Below I have cut and pasted
> the theme and the information we need to provide. * I will need help
> with recommendations for organizers (including contact information)
> and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include
> in the description and rationale.* If Aneesh or someone has an idea
> for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today,
> please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
> develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
> if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
> organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something,
> no matter how preliminary.
>
> Thanks!
>
> The theme is as follows:
>
>
>
>
> *MEETING THEME:*"Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
> "nowhere"---a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
> describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to
> dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility.
> Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious
> business of making practical improvements in existing institutions.
> The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and
> practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of
> alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
> aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the
> conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously
> the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in
> the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
> that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
> destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of
> viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating
> a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
>
>
>
> *Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
> Spotlight Sessions should provide:*
>
> Type of Session: Thematic
>
> Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>
> Brief description of the substantive focus;
>
> Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
>
> Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
> and e-mail information
>
> A list of potential participants.
>
>
>
> Rebecca G. Adams
> Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
> P.O. Box 26170
> Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>
> Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
> Voice: 336-334-3578
> FAX: 336-334-4342
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
RA
Ron Anderson
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 5:01 PM
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for
shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as
good societies?" Sociological thinking about
utopias should be applied to the reality and the
potential of the web and specific types of web
sites. Such analysis or evaluation should
encompass topics such as social solidarity, close
ties, caring and uncaring actions,
cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal
societies. An alternate title might be
"Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for
one of our thematic sessions. I would propose
something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include
gaming, but could also include the use of
technology in specific social domains (e.g.
family life, social movements, employment). The
question mark allows for utopian visions, but
also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a
job candidate today, but can try to help more
with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM,
mailto:david.louden@l-3com.comdavid.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an achievable utopia
theme. There is much that can be accomplished
to develop and operationalize tangible
communities through creative practices,
critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic
approach that does not allow for co-opting of
the overall vision or sub-optimization by
elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From:
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.orgcitasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: mailto:citasa@list.citasa.orgcitasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!:
Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012
Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one
of the duties of new members of the CITASA
Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a
year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
just discovered the proposals are due
today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
Council member, bears no responsibility for
this short notice--he tried to jump start this
process over a month ago and I convinced him
that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
accurate. So that being said, assuming I do
not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
intention is to check my email at the end of
the day to see what responses I have received
in response to this posting and to do the best
I can in pulling together proposals in time to
submit them this evening. It is possible
Aneesh will follow up with another email
offering other suggestions. I thought it best
to get this message out quickly without hearing
from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one
proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
communities. Below I have cut and pasted the
theme and the information we need to
provide. I will need help with recommendations
for organizers (including contact information)
and participants and would welcome suggestions
for verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea
for a different topic and is willing to develop
a proposal today, please let me
know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
can and develop these two proposals. I do know
from previous experience that if the Program
Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
organizer to refine it, so the important thing
is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: Real Utopias seems like an
oxymoron: Utopia means nowherea fantasy
world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation
as utopian is to dismiss it as an impractical
dream outside the limits of possibility.
Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction
from the serious business of making practical
improvements in existing institutions. The idea
of real utopias embraces this tension between
dreams and practice: utopia implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives
to existing institutions that embody our
deepest aspirations for a world in which all
people have access to the conditions to live
flourishing lives; real means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the
institutions that could move us in the
direction of that world. The goal is to
elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in
the real potentials of humanity, utopian
destinations that have accessible way stations,
utopian designs of viable institutions that can
inform our practical tasks of navigating a
world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special
Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer,
including address, telephone, and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.eduRebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.orgCITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for
shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as
good societies?" Sociological thinking about
utopias should be applied to the reality and the
potential of the web and specific types of web
sites. Such analysis or evaluation should
encompass topics such as social solidarity, close
ties, caring and uncaring actions,
cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal
societies. An alternate title might be
"Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>Dear Rebecca -
>
>I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for
>one of our thematic sessions. I would propose
>something more inclusive, along the lines of
>"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include
>gaming, but could also include the use of
>technology in specific social domains (e.g.
>family life, social movements, employment). The
>question mark allows for utopian visions, but
>also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
>
>Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a
>job candidate today, but can try to help more
>with the development of this session.
>
>Best,
>Noelle Chesley
>
>
>
>On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM,
><mailto:david.louden@l-3com.com>david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
>>
>>Professor Adams;
>>
>>I like the context of an achievable utopia
>>theme. There is much that can be accomplished
>>to develop and operationalize tangible
>>communities through creative practices,
>>critical thinking, problem solving and risk
>>taking by applying a holistic or systemic
>>approach that does not allow for co-opting of
>>the overall vision or sub-optimization by
>>elements at the expense of the whole.
>>
>>
>>
>>I wish you good luck.
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards, David
>>
>>
>>
>>From:
>><mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org>citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
>>[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
>>Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
>>To: <mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org>citasa@list.citasa.org
>>Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!:
>>Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012
>>Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
>>TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
>>Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I am very sorry for the short notice, but one
>>of the duties of new members of the CITASA
>>Section Council is to propose two thematic
>>sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a
>>year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
>>just discovered the proposals are due
>>today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
>>Council member, bears no responsibility for
>>this short notice--he tried to jump start this
>>process over a month ago and I convinced him
>>that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
>>accurate. So that being said, assuming I do
>>not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
>>intention is to check my email at the end of
>>the day to see what responses I have received
>>in response to this posting and to do the best
>>I can in pulling together proposals in time to
>>submit them this evening. It is possible
>>Aneesh will follow up with another email
>>offering other suggestions. I thought it best
>>to get this message out quickly without hearing
>>from him in case he was not available today.
>>
>>So that being said, I suggest that we do one
>>proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
>>communities. Below I have cut and pasted the
>>theme and the information we need to
>>provide. I will need help with recommendations
>>for organizers (including contact information)
>>and participants and would welcome suggestions
>>for verbiage to include in the description and
>>rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea
>>for a different topic and is willing to develop
>>a proposal today, please let me
>>know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
>>can and develop these two proposals. I do know
>>from previous experience that if the Program
>>Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
>>organizer to refine it, so the important thing
>>is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>The theme is as follows:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>MEETING THEME: Real Utopias seems like an
>>oxymoron: Utopia means nowherea fantasy
>>world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
>>describe a proposal for social transformation
>>as utopian is to dismiss it as an impractical
>>dream outside the limits of possibility.
>>Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction
>>from the serious business of making practical
>>improvements in existing institutions. The idea
>>of real utopias embraces this tension between
>>dreams and practice: utopia implies
>>developing clear-headed visions of alternatives
>>to existing institutions that embody our
>>deepest aspirations for a world in which all
>>people have access to the conditions to live
>>flourishing lives; real means taking
>>seriously the problem of the viability of the
>>institutions that could move us in the
>>direction of that world. The goal is to
>>elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in
>>the real potentials of humanity, utopian
>>destinations that have accessible way stations,
>>utopian designs of viable institutions that can
>>inform our practical tasks of navigating a
>>world of imperfect conditions for social change.
>>
>>
>>
>>Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special
>>Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
>>
>>Type of Session: Thematic
>>
>>Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>>
>>Brief description of the substantive focus;
>>
>>Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
>>
>>Recommendation(s) for session organizer,
>>including address, telephone, and e-mail information
>>
>>A list of potential participants.
>>
>>
>>
>>Rebecca G. Adams
>>Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
>>University of North Carolina at Greensboro
>>P.O. Box 26170
>>Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>>
>>Email: <mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu>Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
>>Voice: 336-334-3578
>>FAX: 336-334-4342
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CITASA mailing list
>><mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>Noelle Chesley,
>Assistant Professor
>Department of Sociology
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>Bolton Hall
>Milwaukee, WI 53201
>414.229.2398
>Fax: 414.229.4266
><mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>chesley@uwm.edu
>_______________________________________________
>CITASA mailing list
>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
SC
Shelia Cotten
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 5:08 PM
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?" Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate title might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of "Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.commailto:david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.orgmailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.orgmailto:citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for organizers (including contact information) and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means "nowhere"a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edumailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.orgmailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edumailto:chesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and http://www.CompassionateSocieties.orghttp://www.compassionatesocieties.org/
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?" Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate title might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of "Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com<mailto:david.louden@l-3com.com> wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org<mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org> [ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org<mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org>
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for organizers (including contact information) and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means "nowhere"a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu<mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu>
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org<mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>
<http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu<mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org<http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
AT
Andrea Tapia
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 6:33 PM
Hello CITASA folks.
Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session proposal from CITASA?
I have been working on one following the ‘Virtual Utopias’ idea from earlier
and wondering if this was still viable or if I should just go back to
grading my students papers (grin).
Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology
Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and Industrial Relations, (2)
Sociology and (3) Science and Technology Studies
Penn State University
Check out my pages!
http://andreatapia.net
http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
http://ist.psu.edu
On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley" chesley@uwm.edu wrote:
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron, I
stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind and
good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and Cassidy as
potential participants in the session (simply based on their list serve
comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of technology
broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to exclude mobile
communications here, either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the
potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists disagree
both about the ways in which information and communication technologies are
being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its institutions, as well as
whether those changes we agree upon reflect a utopian or disutopian social
vision. Analyses for this session can be broadly construed and may encompass
topics such as social solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination,
digital gaps, social control, and any other element of ideal societies. In
addition, these broad social processes can be critically examined across a
variety of social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how
technology facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can reinforce
or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that influence our
ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu mailto:chesley@uwm.edu
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee);
Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham); Ron Anderson
(University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not
asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with the
theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org]
On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of proposed,
thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the
potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or
evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties,
caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate title
might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also include
the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family life, social
movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian visions, but
also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but can
try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an “achievable utopia” theme. There is much that can
be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities through
creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk taking by
applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting of
the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the
whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org ] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual
Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members
of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA
meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I just
discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he tried to
jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that my
misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming
I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email
at the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response to
this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals in time
to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with
another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this
message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available
today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and
one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the
information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for
organizers (including contact information) and participants and would welcome
suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and rationale. If
Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is willing to develop
a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
can and develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to
refine it, so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how
preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: “Real Utopias” seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
“nowhere”a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To describe
a proposal for social transformation as “utopian” is to dismiss it as an
impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists reject such
fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making practical
improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this
tension between dreams and practice: “utopia” implies developing clear-headed
visions of alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the conditions to
live flourishing lives; “real” means taking seriously the problem of the
viability of the institutions that could move us in the direction of that
world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real
potentials of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way
stations, utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our
practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social
change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and
e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
<http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Hello CITASA folks.
Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session proposal from CITASA?
I have been working on one following the ‘Virtual Utopias’ idea from earlier
and wondering if this was still viable or if I should just go back to
grading my students papers (grin).
Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology
Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and Industrial Relations, (2)
Sociology and (3) Science and Technology Studies
Penn State University
Check out my pages!
http://andreatapia.net
http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
http://ist.psu.edu
On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley" <chesley@uwm.edu> wrote:
> Hello all :
>
> I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron, I
> stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind and
> good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and Cassidy as
> potential participants in the session (simply based on their list serve
> comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of technology
> broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to exclude mobile
> communications here, either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
> terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
>
>
>
> Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
>
> Brief description of the substantive focus:
>
> Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the
> potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists disagree
> both about the ways in which information and communication technologies are
> being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its institutions, as well as
> whether those changes we agree upon reflect a utopian or disutopian social
> vision. Analyses for this session can be broadly construed and may encompass
> topics such as social solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
> divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination,
> digital gaps, social control, and any other element of ideal societies. In
> addition, these broad social processes can be critically examined across a
> variety of social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how
> technology facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
> races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can reinforce
> or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that influence our
> ability to build utopian societies.
>
> Session Organizer:
>
> Noelle Chesley,
>
> Assistant Professor
>
> Department of Sociology
>
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>
> Bolton Hall
>
> Milwaukee, WI 53201
>
> 414.229.2398
>
> Fax: 414.229.4266
>
> chesley@uwm.edu <mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
>
> Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee);
> Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham); Ron Anderson
> (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not
> asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
>
>
> On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with the
>> theme and with moving our discipline forward.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Shelia Cotten
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
>> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
>> To: citasa@list.citasa.org
>> Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
>> Communities
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of proposed,
>> thematic sessions.
>> It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
>> Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and the
>> potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or
>> evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties,
>> caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
>> social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate title
>> might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
>> Ron Anderson
>>
>> At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Rebecca -
>>
>> I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
>> sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
>> "Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also include
>> the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family life, social
>> movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian visions, but
>> also for critique of the prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
>>
>> Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but can
>> try to help more with the development of this session.
>>
>> Best,
>> Noelle Chesley
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor Adams;
>>
>> I like the context of an “achievable utopia” theme. There is much that can
>> be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities through
>> creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk taking by
>> applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting of
>> the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the
>> whole.
>>
>>
>>
>> I wish you good luck.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards, David
>>
>>
>>
>> From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
>> <mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org> ] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
>> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
>> To: citasa@list.citasa.org
>> Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
>> Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual
>> Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
>> Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new members
>> of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA
>> meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I just
>> discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
>> Council member, bears no responsibility for this short notice--he tried to
>> jump start this process over a month ago and I convinced him that my
>> misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming
>> I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email
>> at the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response to
>> this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals in time
>> to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will follow up with
>> another email offering other suggestions. I thought it best to get this
>> message out quickly without hearing from him in case he was not available
>> today.
>>
>> So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds and
>> one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and the
>> information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations for
>> organizers (including contact information) and participants and would welcome
>> suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and rationale. If
>> Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is willing to develop
>> a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
>> can and develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
>> if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to
>> refine it, so the important thing is to submit something, no matter how
>> preliminary.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> The theme is as follows:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> MEETING THEME: “Real Utopias” seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
>> “nowhere”a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To describe
>> a proposal for social transformation as “utopian” is to dismiss it as an
>> impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists reject such
>> fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making practical
>> improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this
>> tension between dreams and practice: “utopia” implies developing clear-headed
>> visions of alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
>> aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the conditions to
>> live flourishing lives; “real” means taking seriously the problem of the
>> viability of the institutions that could move us in the direction of that
>> world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in the real
>> potentials of humanity, utopian destinations that have accessible way
>> stations, utopian designs of viable institutions that can inform our
>> practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect conditions for social
>> change.
>>
>>
>>
>> Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
>> Sessions should provide:
>>
>> Type of Session: Thematic
>>
>> Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>>
>> Brief description of the substantive focus;
>>
>> Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
>>
>> Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone, and
>> e-mail information
>>
>> A list of potential participants.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rebecca G. Adams
>> Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
>> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
>> P.O. Box 26170
>> Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>>
>> Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
>> Voice: 336-334-3578
>> FAX: 336-334-4342
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> CITASA mailing list
>>
>> CITASA@list.citasa.org
>>
>> <http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
>>
>> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Noelle Chesley,
>>
>> Assistant Professor
>>
>> Department of Sociology
>>
>> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>
>> Bolton Hall
>>
>> Milwaukee, WI 53201
>>
>> 414.229.2398
>>
>> Fax: 414.229.4266
>>
>> chesley@uwm.edu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CITASA mailing list
>> CITASA@list.citasa.org
>> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>>
>>
>> Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
>> Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
>> http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
>> <http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CITASA mailing list
>> CITASA@list.citasa.org
>> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>>
>
>
>
NC
Noelle Chesley
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 7:27 PM
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron,
I stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind
and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and
Cassidy as potential participants in the session (simply based on their
list serve comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to
exclude mobile communications here, either, so I have substituted the
ubiquitous ICT terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at
this:
Working Title:Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists
disagree both about the ways in which information and communication
technologies are being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
institutions, as well as whether those changes we agree upon reflect a
utopian or disutopian social vision. Analyses for this session can be
broadly construed and may encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions, divisions in paid and unpaid
labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
control, and any other element of ideal societies. In addition, these
broad social processes can be critically examined across a variety of
social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how technology
facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can
reinforce or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that
influence our ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu mailto:chesley@uwm.edu
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at
Birmingham); Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern);
Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not asked him--Gustavo you want your name on
here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit
with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
*From:*citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of
proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality
and the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such
analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such as social
solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying,
discrimination, digital gaps, social control, and any other element of
ideal societies. An alternate title might be "Contributions of the Web
to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for
utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology
in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today,
but can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com
mailto:david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much
that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible
communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem
solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach
that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or
sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission
of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August
(i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due
today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no
responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this
process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding
of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not
hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at
the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response
to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals
in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it
best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case
he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming
worlds and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted
the theme and the information we need to provide. I will need help
with recommendations for organizers (including contact information)
and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include
in the description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea
for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today,
please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something,
no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
"nowhere"a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to
dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility.
Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious
business of making practical improvements in existing institutions.
The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and
practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of
alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the
conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously
the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in
the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of
viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating
a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu mailto:chesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron,
I stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind
and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and
Cassidy as potential participants in the session (simply based on their
list serve comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to
exclude mobile communications here, either, so I have substituted the
ubiquitous ICT terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at
this:
Working Title:Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists
disagree both about the ways in which information and communication
technologies are being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
institutions, as well as whether those changes we agree upon reflect a
utopian or disutopian social vision. Analyses for this session can be
broadly construed and may encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions, divisions in paid and unpaid
labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
control, and any other element of ideal societies. In addition, these
broad social processes can be critically examined across a variety of
social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how technology
facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can
reinforce or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that
influence our ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu <mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at
Birmingham); Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern);
Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not asked him--Gustavo you want your name on
here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
>
> I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit
> with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
>
> Shelia Cotten
>
> *From:*citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
> [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Ron Anderson
> *Sent:* Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
> *To:* citasa@list.citasa.org
> *Subject:* [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
> Communities
>
>
> I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of
> proposed, thematic sessions.
> It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
> Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality
> and the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such
> analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such as social
> solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying,
> discrimination, digital gaps, social control, and any other element of
> ideal societies. An alternate title might be "Contributions of the Web
> to Ideal Societies."
> Ron Anderson
>
> At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>
> Dear Rebecca -
>
> I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
> sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
> "Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
> include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
> life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for
> utopian visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology
> in the creation of utopia.
>
> Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today,
> but can try to help more with the development of this session.
>
> Best,
> Noelle Chesley
>
>
>
> On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com
> <mailto:david.louden@l-3com.com> wrote:
>
>
> Professor Adams;
>
> I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme. There is much
> that can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible
> communities through creative practices, critical thinking, problem
> solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach
> that does not allow for co-opting of the overall vision or
> sub-optimization by elements at the expense of the whole.
>
>
>
> I wish you good luck.
>
>
>
> Regards, David
>
>
>
> *From:* citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
> <mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org>
> [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] *On Behalf Of *Rebecca Adams
> R_ADAMS
> *Sent:* Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
> *To:* citasa@list.citasa.org <mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org>
> *Subject:* [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission
> of Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
> TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
> *Importance:* High
>
>
>
>
> I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
> members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic
> sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August
> (i.e., August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due
> today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section Council member, bears no
> responsibility for this short notice--he tried to jump start this
> process over a month ago and I convinced him that my misunderstanding
> of the calendar was accurate. So that being said, assuming I do not
> hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my email at
> the end of the day to see what responses I have received in response
> to this posting and to do the best I can in pulling together proposals
> in time to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh will
> follow up with another email offering other suggestions. I thought it
> best to get this message out quickly without hearing from him in case
> he was not available today.
>
> So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on *gaming
> worlds* and one on *virtual communities*. Below I have cut and pasted
> the theme and the information we need to provide. *I will need help
> with recommendations for organizers (including contact information)
> and participants and would welcome suggestions for verbiage to include
> in the description and rationale.* If Aneesh or someone has an idea
> for a different topic and is willing to develop a proposal today,
> please let me know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
> develop these two proposals. I do know from previous experience that
> if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
> organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit something,
> no matter how preliminary.
>
> Thanks!
>
> The theme is as follows:
>
>
>
>
> *MEETING THEME:* "Real Utopias" seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
> "nowhere"a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
> describe a proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is to
> dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility.
> Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious
> business of making practical improvements in existing institutions.
> The idea of real utopias embraces this tension between dreams and
> practice: "utopia" implies developing clear-headed visions of
> alternatives to existing institutions that embody our deepest
> aspirations for a world in which all people have access to the
> conditions to live flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously
> the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move us in
> the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
> that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
> destinations that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of
> viable institutions that can inform our practical tasks of navigating
> a world of imperfect conditions for social change.
>
>
>
> *Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional
> Spotlight Sessions should provide:*
>
> Type of Session: Thematic
>
> Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>
> Brief description of the substantive focus;
>
> Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
>
> Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
> and e-mail information
>
> A list of potential participants.
>
>
>
> Rebecca G. Adams
> Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
> P.O. Box 26170
> Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>
> Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu <mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu>
> Voice: 336-334-3578
> FAX: 336-334-4342
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org <mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>
> <http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Noelle Chesley,
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Sociology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> Bolton Hall
> Milwaukee, WI 53201
> 414.229.2398
> Fax: 414.229.4266
> chesley@uwm.edu <mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
> Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
> Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
> http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
> <http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
RA
Ron Anderson
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 8:00 PM
I endorse Noelle's proposed session and its
description. But I would like to see a 2nd
session more like Rebecca's on "Virtual Utopia".
Here is a possible title: "Virtual Utopias: Past,
Present, and Future." Sociologist Robert Boguslaw
published a book in 1965 called The New Utopians
linking utopian thought to systems theory and
design. Are the present builders of virtual
worlds producing the same lame utopias of 50
years ago? Will builders of virtual worlds in
another 50 years make any progress over what we
have now? Contemporary large-scale, muli-user
games and play grounds have been described as
offering social supports but also as
dysfunctional, e.g., promoting aggression and
narcissism. Where do different types of game and
play environments fall on the continuum between
dystopia and utopia? Are these virtual worlds
moving toward dysfunctional or constructive
models of society? How do the social processes of
specific types of virtual worlds differ from
existing human societies? How can virtual systems
advance sociological knowledge?
I welcome anyone to recast this into something more concrete.
Ron Anderson
At 01:27 PM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to
throw this together. Ron, I stole some of your
words from your previous email--hope you don't
mind and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that
I included Sheila, Ron, and Cassidy as potential
participants in the session (simply based on
their list serve comments). Note also that I
tried to keep our conception of technology
broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't
want to exclude mobile communications here,
either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be
applied to the reality and the potential of
contemporary applications of technology.
Sociologists disagree both about the ways in
which information and communication technologies
are being shaped by, and shaping, social life
and its institutions, as well as whether those
changes we agree upon reflect a utopian or
disutopian social vision. Analyses for this
session can be broadly construed and may
encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use,
cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal
societies. In addition, these broad social
processes can be critically examined across a
variety of social contexts. Projects might
consider, for example, how technology
facilitates or discourages close ties across
generations, races/ethnicities, or gender or how
technological applications can reinforce or
dismantle broad processes, like social
stratification, that influence our ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
mailto:chesley@uwm.educhesley@uwm.edu
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley
(University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia
Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham);
Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett
(Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not
asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this
would be a great fit with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From:
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.orgcitasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: mailto:citasa@list.citasa.orgcitasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic
Sessions on Utopian Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for
shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web
as good societies?" Sociological thinking about
utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of the web and specific types of
web sites. Such analysis or evaluation should
encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal
societies. An alternate title might be
"Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for
one of our thematic sessions. I would propose
something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include
gaming, but could also include the use of
technology in specific social domains (e.g.
family life, social movements,
employment). The question mark allows for
utopian visions, but also for critique of the
prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a
job candidate today, but can try to help more
with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM,
mailto:david.louden@l-3com.comdavid.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an achievable utopia
theme. There is much that can be accomplished
to develop and operationalize tangible
communities through creative practices,
critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic
approach that does not allow for co-opting of
the overall vision or sub-optimization by
elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From:
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.orgcitasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: mailto:citasa@list.citasa.orgcitasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!:
Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012
Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one
of the duties of new members of the CITASA
Section Council is to propose two thematic
sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a
year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
just discovered the proposals are due
today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
Council member, bears no responsibility for
this short notice--he tried to jump start this
process over a month ago and I convinced him
that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
accurate. So that being said, assuming I do
not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
intention is to check my email at the end of
the day to see what responses I have received
in response to this posting and to do the best
I can in pulling together proposals in time to
submit them this evening. It is possible
Aneesh will follow up with another email
offering other suggestions. I thought it best
to get this message out quickly without hearing
from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one
proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
communities. Below I have cut and pasted the
theme and the information we need to provide. I
will need help with recommendations for
organizers (including contact information) and
participants and would welcome suggestions for
verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea
for a different topic and is willing to develop
a proposal today, please let me
know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
can and develop these two proposals. I do know
from previous experience that if the Program
Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
organizer to refine it, so the important thing
is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: Real Utopias seems like an
oxymoron: Utopia means nowherea fantasy
world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation
as utopian is to dismiss it as an impractical
dream outside the limits of possibility.
Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction
from the serious business of making practical
improvements in existing institutions. The idea
of real utopias embraces this tension between
dreams and practice: utopia implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives
to existing institutions that embody our
deepest aspirations for a world in which all
people have access to the conditions to live
flourishing lives; real means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the
institutions that could move us in the
direction of that world. The goal is to
elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in
the real potentials of humanity, utopian
destinations that have accessible way stations,
utopian designs of viable institutions that can
inform our practical tasks of navigating a
world of imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special
Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer,
including address, telephone, and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.eduRebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.orgCITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
mailto:chesley@uwm.educhesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.orgCITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites:
http://umn.edu/home/reahttp://umn.edu/home/rea
and
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
CITASA mailing list
mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.orgCITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
I endorse Noelle's proposed session and its
description. But I would like to see a 2nd
session more like Rebecca's on "Virtual Utopia".
Here is a possible title: "Virtual Utopias: Past,
Present, and Future." Sociologist Robert Boguslaw
published a book in 1965 called The New Utopians
linking utopian thought to systems theory and
design. Are the present builders of virtual
worlds producing the same lame utopias of 50
years ago? Will builders of virtual worlds in
another 50 years make any progress over what we
have now? Contemporary large-scale, muli-user
games and play grounds have been described as
offering social supports but also as
dysfunctional, e.g., promoting aggression and
narcissism. Where do different types of game and
play environments fall on the continuum between
dystopia and utopia? Are these virtual worlds
moving toward dysfunctional or constructive
models of society? How do the social processes of
specific types of virtual worlds differ from
existing human societies? How can virtual systems
advance sociological knowledge?
I welcome anyone to recast this into something more concrete.
Ron Anderson
At 01:27 PM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>Hello all :
>
>I had about twenty minutes between meetings to
>throw this together. Ron, I stole some of your
>words from your previous email--hope you don't
>mind and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that
>I included Sheila, Ron, and Cassidy as potential
>participants in the session (simply based on
>their list serve comments). Note also that I
>tried to keep our conception of technology
>broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't
>want to exclude mobile communications here,
>either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
>terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
>
>Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
>
>Brief description of the substantive focus:
>
>Sociological thinking about utopias should be
>applied to the reality and the potential of
>contemporary applications of technology.
>Sociologists disagree both about the ways in
>which information and communication technologies
>are being shaped by, and shaping, social life
>and its institutions, as well as whether those
>changes we agree upon reflect a utopian or
>disutopian social vision. Analyses for this
>session can be broadly construed and may
>encompass topics such as social solidarity,
>close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
>divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use,
>cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
>social control, and any other element of ideal
>societies. In addition, these broad social
>processes can be critically examined across a
>variety of social contexts. Projects might
>consider, for example, how technology
>facilitates or discourages close ties across
>generations, races/ethnicities, or gender or how
>technological applications can reinforce or
>dismantle broad processes, like social
>stratification, that influence our ability to build utopian societies.
>
>Session Organizer:
>
>Noelle Chesley,
>
>Assistant Professor
>
>Department of Sociology
>
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>
>Bolton Hall
>
>Milwaukee, WI 53201
>
>414.229.2398
>
>Fax: 414.229.4266
>
><mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>chesley@uwm.edu
>
> Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley
> (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia
> Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham);
> Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett
> (Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not
> asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
>
>
>On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
>>
>>I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this
>>would be a great fit with the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
>>
>>
>>
>>Shelia Cotten
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>From:
>><mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org>citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
>>[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
>>Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
>>To: <mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org>citasa@list.citasa.org
>>Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic
>>Sessions on Utopian Communities
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I very much support Noelle's suggestion for
>>shifting the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
>>It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web
>>as good societies?" Sociological thinking about
>>utopias should be applied to the reality and
>>the potential of the web and specific types of
>>web sites. Such analysis or evaluation should
>>encompass topics such as social solidarity,
>>close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
>>cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
>>social control, and any other element of ideal
>>societies. An alternate title might be
>>"Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
>>Ron Anderson
>>
>>At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>>
>>Dear Rebecca -
>>
>>I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for
>>one of our thematic sessions. I would propose
>>something more inclusive, along the lines of
>>"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include
>>gaming, but could also include the use of
>>technology in specific social domains (e.g.
>>family life, social movements,
>>employment). The question mark allows for
>>utopian visions, but also for critique of the
>>prospect of technology in the creation of utopia.
>>
>>Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a
>>job candidate today, but can try to help more
>>with the development of this session.
>>
>>Best,
>>Noelle Chesley
>>
>>
>>
>>On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM,
>><mailto:david.louden@l-3com.com>david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>Professor Adams;
>>
>>I like the context of an achievable utopia
>>theme. There is much that can be accomplished
>>to develop and operationalize tangible
>>communities through creative practices,
>>critical thinking, problem solving and risk
>>taking by applying a holistic or systemic
>>approach that does not allow for co-opting of
>>the overall vision or sub-optimization by
>>elements at the expense of the whole.
>>
>>
>>
>>I wish you good luck.
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards, David
>>
>>
>>
>>From:
>><mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org>citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
>>[ mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
>>Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
>>To: <mailto:citasa@list.citasa.org>citasa@list.citasa.org
>>Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!:
>>Deadline for Submission of Proposals for 2012
>>Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is
>>TODAY (Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
>>Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>I am very sorry for the short notice, but one
>>of the duties of new members of the CITASA
>>Section Council is to propose two thematic
>>sessions for the ASA meetings that take place a
>>year from August (i.e., August 2012), and I
>>just discovered the proposals are due
>>today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
>>Council member, bears no responsibility for
>>this short notice--he tried to jump start this
>>process over a month ago and I convinced him
>>that my misunderstanding of the calendar was
>>accurate. So that being said, assuming I do
>>not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
>>intention is to check my email at the end of
>>the day to see what responses I have received
>>in response to this posting and to do the best
>>I can in pulling together proposals in time to
>>submit them this evening. It is possible
>>Aneesh will follow up with another email
>>offering other suggestions. I thought it best
>>to get this message out quickly without hearing
>>from him in case he was not available today.
>>
>>So that being said, I suggest that we do one
>>proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
>>communities. Below I have cut and pasted the
>>theme and the information we need to provide. I
>>will need help with recommendations for
>>organizers (including contact information) and
>>participants and would welcome suggestions for
>>verbiage to include in the description and
>>rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea
>>for a different topic and is willing to develop
>>a proposal today, please let me
>>know. Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I
>>can and develop these two proposals. I do know
>>from previous experience that if the Program
>>Committee likes a proposal, they work with the
>>organizer to refine it, so the important thing
>>is to submit something, no matter how preliminary.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>The theme is as follows:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>MEETING THEME: Real Utopias seems like an
>>oxymoron: Utopia means nowherea fantasy
>>world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
>>describe a proposal for social transformation
>>as utopian is to dismiss it as an impractical
>>dream outside the limits of possibility.
>>Realists reject such fantasies as a distraction
>>from the serious business of making practical
>>improvements in existing institutions. The idea
>>of real utopias embraces this tension between
>>dreams and practice: utopia implies
>>developing clear-headed visions of alternatives
>>to existing institutions that embody our
>>deepest aspirations for a world in which all
>>people have access to the conditions to live
>>flourishing lives; real means taking
>>seriously the problem of the viability of the
>>institutions that could move us in the
>>direction of that world. The goal is to
>>elaborate utopian ideals that are grounded in
>>the real potentials of humanity, utopian
>>destinations that have accessible way stations,
>>utopian designs of viable institutions that can
>>inform our practical tasks of navigating a
>>world of imperfect conditions for social change.
>>
>>
>>
>>Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special
>>Sessions, and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
>>
>>Type of Session: Thematic
>>
>>Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>>
>>Brief description of the substantive focus;
>>
>>Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
>>
>>Recommendation(s) for session organizer,
>>including address, telephone, and e-mail information
>>
>>A list of potential participants.
>>
>>
>>
>>Rebecca G. Adams
>>Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
>>University of North Carolina at Greensboro
>>P.O. Box 26170
>>Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>>
>>Email: <mailto:Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu>Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
>>Voice: 336-334-3578
>>FAX: 336-334-4342
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CITASA mailing list
>><mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>><http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
>>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>
>>Noelle Chesley,
>>Assistant Professor
>>Department of Sociology
>>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>>Bolton Hall
>>Milwaukee, WI 53201
>>414.229.2398
>>Fax: 414.229.4266
>><mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>chesley@uwm.edu
>>_______________________________________________
>>CITASA mailing list
>><mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>>
>>Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
>>Websites:
>><http://umn.edu/home/rea>http://umn.edu/home/rea
>>and
>><http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>CITASA mailing list
>><mailto:CITASA@list.citasa.org>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
>
>
>--
>
>
>Noelle Chesley,
>Assistant Professor
>Department of Sociology
>University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>Bolton Hall
>Milwaukee, WI 53201
>414.229.2398
>Fax: 414.229.4266
><mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>chesley@uwm.edu
>_______________________________________________
>CITASA mailing list
>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
RA
Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 9:49 PM
Keep working. Two is the goal, but there is no limit to what we can
submit.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
Andrea Tapia atapia@ist.psu.edu
Sent by: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
11/12/2010 02:32 PM
To
chesley@uwm.edu, citasa@list.citasa.org
cc
Subject
Re: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on UtopianCommunities
Hello CITASA folks.
Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session proposal from CITASA?
I have been working on one following the ?Virtual Utopias? idea from
earlier and wondering if this was still viable or if I should just go back
to grading my students papers (grin).
Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology
Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and Industrial Relations, (2)
Sociology and (3) Science and Technology Studies
Penn State University
Check out my pages!
http://andreatapia.net
http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
http://ist.psu.edu
On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley" chesley@uwm.edu wrote:
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron,
I stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind
and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and
Cassidy as potential participants in the session (simply based on their
list serve comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to exclude
mobile communications here, either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous
ICT terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists
disagree both about the ways in which information and communication
technologies are being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
institutions, as well as whether those changes we agree upon reflect a
utopian or disutopian social vision. Analyses for this session can be
broadly construed and may encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions, divisions in paid and unpaid
labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
control, and any other element of ideal societies. In addition, these
broad social processes can be critically examined across a variety of
social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how technology
facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can
reinforce or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that
influence our ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu mailto:chesley@uwm.edu
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham);
Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch
(??? I have not asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with
the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of
proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or
evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties,
caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate
title might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian
visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in the
creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but
can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an ?achievable utopia? theme. There is much that
can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities
through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for
co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the
expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org <
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org> ] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY
(Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions
for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August
2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the
other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short
notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I
convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So
that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
intention is to check my email at the end of the day to see what responses
I have received in response to this posting and to do the best I can in
pulling together proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is
possible Aneesh will follow up with another email offering other
suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out quickly without
hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds
and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and
the information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations
for organizers (including contact information) and participants and would
welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is
willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will
forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from
previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they
work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit
something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: ?Real Utopias? seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
?nowhere?a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as ?utopian? is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making
practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias
embraces this tension between dreams and practice: ?utopia? implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions
that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have
access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; ?real? means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move
us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations
that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions
that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect
conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org <
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Keep working. Two is the goal, but there is no limit to what we can
submit.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
Andrea Tapia <atapia@ist.psu.edu>
Sent by: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
11/12/2010 02:32 PM
To
<chesley@uwm.edu>, <citasa@list.citasa.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on UtopianCommunities
Hello CITASA folks.
Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session proposal from CITASA?
I have been working on one following the ?Virtual Utopias? idea from
earlier and wondering if this was still viable or if I should just go back
to grading my students papers (grin).
Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Sciences and Technology
Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and Industrial Relations, (2)
Sociology and (3) Science and Technology Studies
Penn State University
Check out my pages!
http://andreatapia.net
http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
http://ist.psu.edu
On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley" <chesley@uwm.edu> wrote:
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw this together. Ron,
I stole some of your words from your previous email--hope you don't mind
and good to (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila, Ron, and
Cassidy as potential participants in the session (simply based on their
list serve comments). Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I don't want to exclude
mobile communications here, either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous
ICT terminology in the description. Here is my quick shot at this:
Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of contemporary applications of technology. Sociologists
disagree both about the ways in which information and communication
technologies are being shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
institutions, as well as whether those changes we agree upon reflect a
utopian or disutopian social vision. Analyses for this session can be
broadly construed and may encompass topics such as social solidarity,
close ties, caring and uncaring actions, divisions in paid and unpaid
labor, time use, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
control, and any other element of ideal societies. In addition, these
broad social processes can be critically examined across a variety of
social contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how technology
facilitates or discourages close ties across generations,
races/ethnicities, or gender or how technological applications can
reinforce or dismantle broad processes, like social stratification, that
influence our ability to build utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu <mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University of Alabama at Birmingham);
Ron Anderson (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern); Gustavo Mensch
(??? I have not asked him--Gustavo you want your name on here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would be a great fit with
the theme and with moving our discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian
Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting the focus of
proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as good societies?"
Sociological thinking about utopias should be applied to the reality and
the potential of the web and specific types of web sites. Such analysis or
evaluation should encompass topics such as social solidarity, close ties,
caring and uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps,
social control, and any other element of ideal societies. An alternate
title might be "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one of our thematic
sessions. I would propose something more inclusive, along the lines of
"Technology-Based Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social domains (e.g. family
life, social movements, employment). The question mark allows for utopian
visions, but also for critique of the prospect of technology in the
creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job candidate today, but
can try to help more with the development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an ?achievable utopia? theme. There is much that
can be accomplished to develop and operationalize tangible communities
through creative practices, critical thinking, problem solving and risk
taking by applying a holistic or systemic approach that does not allow for
co-opting of the overall vision or sub-optimization by elements at the
expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org <
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org> ] On Behalf Of Rebecca Adams
R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline for Submission of
Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY
(Virtual Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the duties of new
members of the CITASA Section Council is to propose two thematic sessions
for the ASA meetings that take place a year from August (i.e., August
2012), and I just discovered the proposals are due today! A. Aneesh, the
other new Section Council member, bears no responsibility for this short
notice--he tried to jump start this process over a month ago and I
convinced him that my misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So
that being said, assuming I do not hear to the contrary from Aneesh, my
intention is to check my email at the end of the day to see what responses
I have received in response to this posting and to do the best I can in
pulling together proposals in time to submit them this evening. It is
possible Aneesh will follow up with another email offering other
suggestions. I thought it best to get this message out quickly without
hearing from him in case he was not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one proposal on gaming worlds
and one on virtual communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme and
the information we need to provide. I will need help with recommendations
for organizers (including contact information) and participants and would
welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the description and
rationale. If Aneesh or someone has an idea for a different topic and is
willing to develop a proposal today, please let me know. Otherwise I will
forge ahead as best I can and develop these two proposals. I do know from
previous experience that if the Program Committee likes a proposal, they
work with the organizer to refine it, so the important thing is to submit
something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: ?Real Utopias? seems like an oxymoron: Utopia means
?nowhere?a fantasy world of perfect harmony and social justice. To
describe a proposal for social transformation as ?utopian? is to dismiss
it as an impractical dream outside the limits of possibility. Realists
reject such fantasies as a distraction from the serious business of making
practical improvements in existing institutions. The idea of real utopias
embraces this tension between dreams and practice: ?utopia? implies
developing clear-headed visions of alternatives to existing institutions
that embody our deepest aspirations for a world in which all people have
access to the conditions to live flourishing lives; ?real? means taking
seriously the problem of the viability of the institutions that could move
us in the direction of that world. The goal is to elaborate utopian ideals
that are grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian destinations
that have accessible way stations, utopian designs of viable institutions
that can inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of imperfect
conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions, and Regional Spotlight
Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012 program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including address, telephone,
and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
<http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org <
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
M
ms111@illinois.edu
Fri, Nov 12, 2010 10:51 PM
Dear Colleagues,
wonderful collaborative thread, let me add now my 5ct to the pie before of
have to run to meetings and the commencing weekend, i.e. a bit from
intersection with sociological futures research.
Greetings,
Markus
Working Title: New Media Utopias for Virtual and Real Worlds
Brief description of the substantive focus:
The rapid spread of innovative new media technologies has inspired utopian
hopes as well dystopian fears. Sociologists have explored the (more or less)
contentious processes that shape these new technologies as well as their
emerging appropriations and uses. They have found tremendous
opportunities for global trade and production, efficiency enhancement,
leapfrogging development, unleashed communicative networks, and an
incipient global civil society. They witnessed encouraging efforts by users,
citizen initiatives, and social movements to use media technologies to create
new utopias, and renew older ones, in virtual and real worlds. But they also
uncovered great risks looming in exacerbated inequalities and dystopian
specters of inescapable surveillance and control. Imaginative new media
research addresses the possible, probable, and preferable futures that can be
discerned in current trends, projects, values, and aspirations.
---- Original message ----
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:49:23 -0500
From: Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS r_adams@uncg.edu
Subject: Re: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on
To: Andrea Tapia atapia@ist.psu.edu
Cc: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org, citasa@list.citasa.org
Keep working. Two is the goal, but there is no limit
to what we can submit.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
Andrea Tapia To chesley@uwm.edu,
atapia@ist.psu.edu citasa@list.citasa.org
Sent by: cc
citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org Subject Re: [CITASA] Proposals
for 2012 Thematic
11/12/2010 02:32 PM Sessions on
UtopianCommunities
Hello CITASA folks.
Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session
proposal from CITASA?
I have been working on one following the `Virtual
Utopias' idea from earlier and wondering if this was
still viable or if I should just go back to grading
my students papers (grin).
Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Information Sciences and
Technology
Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and
Industrial Relations, (2) Sociology and (3) Science
and Technology Studies
Penn State University
Check out my pages!
http://andreatapia.net
http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
http://ist.psu.edu
On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley"
chesley@uwm.edu wrote:
Hello all :
I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw
this together. Ron, I stole some of your words from
your previous email--hope you don't mind and good to
(virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila,
Ron, and Cassidy as potential participants in the
session (simply based on their list serve comments).
Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I
don't want to exclude mobile communications here,
either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
terminology in the description. Here is my quick
shot at this:
Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
Brief description of the substantive focus:
Sociological thinking about utopias should be
applied to the reality and the potential of
contemporary applications of technology.
Sociologists disagree both about the ways in which
information and communication technologies are being
shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
institutions, as well as whether those changes we
agree upon reflect a utopian or disutopian social
vision. Analyses for this session can be broadly
construed and may encompass topics such as social
solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use,
cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
control, and any other element of ideal societies.
In addition, these broad social processes can be
critically examined across a variety of social
contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how
technology facilitates or discourages close ties
across generations, races/ethnicities, or gender or
how technological applications can reinforce or
dismantle broad processes, like social
stratification, that influence our ability to build
utopian societies.
Session Organizer:
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu mailto:chesley@uwm.edu
Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University
of Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University
of Alabama at Birmingham); Ron Anderson
(University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern);
Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not asked him--Gustavo
you want your name on here?);
On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would
be a great fit with the theme and with moving our
discipline forward.
Shelia Cotten
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
[mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of
Ron Anderson
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic
Sessions on Utopian Communities
I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting
the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as
good societies?" Sociological thinking about utopias
should be applied to the reality and the potential
of the web and specific types of web sites. Such
analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such
as social solidarity, close ties, caring and
uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination,
digital gaps, social control, and any other element
of ideal societies. An alternate title might be
"Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
Ron Anderson
At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
Dear Rebecca -
I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one
of our thematic sessions. I would propose something
more inclusive, along the lines of "Technology-Based
Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
include the use of technology in specific social
domains (e.g. family life, social movements,
employment). The question mark allows for utopian
visions, but also for critique of the prospect of
technology in the creation of utopia.
Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job
candidate today, but can try to help more with the
development of this session.
Best,
Noelle Chesley
On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com
wrote:
Professor Adams;
I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme.
There is much that can be accomplished to develop
and operationalize tangible communities through
creative practices, critical thinking, problem
solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or
systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting
of the overall vision or sub-optimization by
elements at the expense of the whole.
I wish you good luck.
Regards, David
From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org ] On Behalf
Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline
for Submission of Proposals for 2012 Thematic
Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual
Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
Importance: High
I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the
duties of new members of the CITASA Section Council
is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA
meetings that take place a year from August (i.e.,
August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals
are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
Council member, bears no responsibility for this
short notice--he tried to jump start this process
over a month ago and I convinced him that my
misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So
that being said, assuming I do not hear to the
contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my
email at the end of the day to see what responses I
have received in response to this posting and to do
the best I can in pulling together proposals in time
to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh
will follow up with another email offering other
suggestions. I thought it best to get this message
out quickly without hearing from him in case he was
not available today.
So that being said, I suggest that we do one
proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme
and the information we need to provide. I will need
help with recommendations for organizers (including
contact information) and participants and would
welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the
description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has
an idea for a different topic and is willing to
develop a proposal today, please let me know.
Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
develop these two proposals. I do know from
previous experience that if the Program Committee
likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to
refine it, so the important thing is to submit
something, no matter how preliminary.
Thanks!
The theme is as follows:
MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an
oxymoron: Utopia means "nowhere"a fantasy world of
perfect harmony and social justice. To describe a
proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is
to dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the
limits of possibility. Realists reject such
fantasies as a distraction from the serious business
of making practical improvements in existing
institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this
tension between dreams and practice: "utopia"
implies developing clear-headed visions of
alternatives to existing institutions that embody
our deepest aspirations for a world in which all
people have access to the conditions to live
flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously the
problem of the viability of the institutions that
could move us in the direction of that world. The
goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are
grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
destinations that have accessible way stations,
utopian designs of viable institutions that can
inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of
imperfect conditions for social change.
Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions,
and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
Type of Session: Thematic
Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias
and/or Gaming in Utopia?
Brief description of the substantive focus;
Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012
program;
Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including
address, telephone, and e-mail information
A list of potential participants.
Rebecca G. Adams
Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
P.O. Box 26170
Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
Voice: 336-334-3578
FAX: 336-334-4342
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
Noelle Chesley,
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Bolton Hall
Milwaukee, WI 53201
414.229.2398
Fax: 414.229.4266
chesley@uwm.edu
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of
Minnesota, 952-473-5910
Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
Markus S. Schulz, PhD
Asst. Professor, Social Theory, Media, and Global Processes
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Department of Sociology
CAB, MC 454
605 E Springfield
Champaign, Il 61820, USA
Phone: +217.244-9470
Email: ms111@uiuc.edu
Dear Colleagues,
wonderful collaborative thread, let me add now my 5ct to the pie before of
have to run to meetings and the commencing weekend, i.e. a bit from
intersection with sociological futures research.
Greetings,
Markus
Working Title: New Media Utopias for Virtual and Real Worlds
Brief description of the substantive focus:
The rapid spread of innovative new media technologies has inspired utopian
hopes as well dystopian fears. Sociologists have explored the (more or less)
contentious processes that shape these new technologies as well as their
emerging appropriations and uses. They have found tremendous
opportunities for global trade and production, efficiency enhancement,
leapfrogging development, unleashed communicative networks, and an
incipient global civil society. They witnessed encouraging efforts by users,
citizen initiatives, and social movements to use media technologies to create
new utopias, and renew older ones, in virtual and real worlds. But they also
uncovered great risks looming in exacerbated inequalities and dystopian
specters of inescapable surveillance and control. Imaginative new media
research addresses the possible, probable, and preferable futures that can be
discerned in current trends, projects, values, and aspirations.
---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:49:23 -0500
>From: Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS <r_adams@uncg.edu>
>Subject: Re: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic Sessions on
UtopianCommunities
>To: Andrea Tapia <atapia@ist.psu.edu>
>Cc: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org, citasa@list.citasa.org
>
> Keep working. Two is the goal, but there is no limit
> to what we can submit.
>
> Rebecca G. Adams
> Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
> P.O. Box 26170
> Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>
> Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
> Voice: 336-334-3578
> FAX: 336-334-4342
>
>Andrea Tapia To <chesley@uwm.edu>,
><atapia@ist.psu.edu> <citasa@list.citasa.org>
>Sent by: cc
>citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org Subject Re: [CITASA] Proposals
> for 2012 Thematic
>11/12/2010 02:32 PM Sessions on
> UtopianCommunities
>
>
> Hello CITASA folks.
> Are we only allowed to submit one thematic session
> proposal from CITASA?
> I have been working on one following the `Virtual
> Utopias' idea from earlier and wondering if this was
> still viable or if I should just go back to grading
> my students papers (grin).
>
> Andrea H. Tapia, Ph.D.
> Associate Professor of Information Sciences and
> Technology
> Affiliate Associate Professor of (1) Labor and
> Industrial Relations, (2) Sociology and (3) Science
> and Technology Studies
> Penn State University
>
> Check out my pages!
> http://andreatapia.net
> http://cohort.ist.psu.edu
> http://evosta.ist.psu.edu
> http://emerse.ist.psu.edu
> http://ist.psu.edu
>
> On 11/12/10 3:27 PM, "Noelle Chesley"
> <chesley@uwm.edu> wrote:
> Hello all :
>
> I had about twenty minutes between meetings to throw
> this together. Ron, I stole some of your words from
> your previous email--hope you don't mind and good to
> (virtually) meet you. Note that I included Sheila,
> Ron, and Cassidy as potential participants in the
> session (simply based on their list serve comments).
> Note also that I tried to keep our conception of
> technology broad--Ron, you mentioned the web, but I
> don't want to exclude mobile communications here,
> either, so I have substituted the ubiquitous ICT
> terminology in the description. Here is my quick
> shot at this:
>
>
>
> Working Title: Technologically-Facilitated Utopias?
>
> Brief description of the substantive focus:
>
> Sociological thinking about utopias should be
> applied to the reality and the potential of
> contemporary applications of technology.
> Sociologists disagree both about the ways in which
> information and communication technologies are being
> shaped by, and shaping, social life and its
> institutions, as well as whether those changes we
> agree upon reflect a utopian or disutopian social
> vision. Analyses for this session can be broadly
> construed and may encompass topics such as social
> solidarity, close ties, caring and uncaring actions,
> divisions in paid and unpaid labor, time use,
> cyber-bullying, discrimination, digital gaps, social
> control, and any other element of ideal societies.
> In addition, these broad social processes can be
> critically examined across a variety of social
> contexts. Projects might consider, for example, how
> technology facilitates or discourages close ties
> across generations, races/ethnicities, or gender or
> how technological applications can reinforce or
> dismantle broad processes, like social
> stratification, that influence our ability to build
> utopian societies.
>
> Session Organizer:
> Noelle Chesley,
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Sociology
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
> Bolton Hall
> Milwaukee, WI 53201
> 414.229.2398
> Fax: 414.229.4266
> chesley@uwm.edu <mailto:chesley@uwm.edu>
>
> Potential Participants: Noelle Chesley (University
> of Wisconsin-Milwaukee); Shelia Cotton (University
> of Alabama at Birmingham); Ron Anderson
> (University?); Cassidy Puckett (Northwestern);
> Gustavo Mensch (??? I have not asked him--Gustavo
> you want your name on here?);
>
> On 11/12/2010 11:08 AM, Shelia Cotten wrote:
>
>
> I agree with both Noelle and Ron. I think this would
> be a great fit with the theme and with moving our
> discipline forward.
>
>
>
> Shelia Cotten
>
>
>
>
>
> From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
> [mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org] On Behalf Of
> Ron Anderson
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 11:02 AM
> To: citasa@list.citasa.org
> Subject: [CITASA] Proposals for 2012 Thematic
> Sessions on Utopian Communities
>
>
>
> I very much support Noelle's suggestion for shifting
> the focus of proposed, thematic sessions.
> It seems to me about time to evaluate "the web as
> good societies?" Sociological thinking about utopias
> should be applied to the reality and the potential
> of the web and specific types of web sites. Such
> analysis or evaluation should encompass topics such
> as social solidarity, close ties, caring and
> uncaring actions, cyber-bullying, discrimination,
> digital gaps, social control, and any other element
> of ideal societies. An alternate title might be
> "Contributions of the Web to Ideal Societies."
> Ron Anderson
>
> At 09:06 AM 11/12/2010, Noelle Chesley wrote:
>
> Dear Rebecca -
>
> I think gaming worlds is too narrow a topic for one
> of our thematic sessions. I would propose something
> more inclusive, along the lines of "Technology-Based
> Utopias?" This could include gaming, but could also
> include the use of technology in specific social
> domains (e.g. family life, social movements,
> employment). The question mark allows for utopian
> visions, but also for critique of the prospect of
> technology in the creation of utopia.
>
> Like Aneesh, I am involved in activities with a job
> candidate today, but can try to help more with the
> development of this session.
>
> Best,
> Noelle Chesley
>
> On 11/12/2010 8:06 AM, david.louden@l-3com.com
> wrote:
>
> Professor Adams;
>
> I like the context of an "achievable utopia" theme.
> There is much that can be accomplished to develop
> and operationalize tangible communities through
> creative practices, critical thinking, problem
> solving and risk taking by applying a holistic or
> systemic approach that does not allow for co-opting
> of the overall vision or sub-optimization by
> elements at the expense of the whole.
>
>
>
> I wish you good luck.
>
>
>
> Regards, David
>
>
>
> From: citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org [
> mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org
> <mailto:citasa-bounces@list.citasa.org> ] On Behalf
> Of Rebecca Adams R_ADAMS
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:44 AM
> To: citasa@list.citasa.org
> Subject: [CITASA] Need Suggestions TODAY!: Deadline
> for Submission of Proposals for 2012 Thematic
> Sessions on Utopian Communities is TODAY (Virtual
> Utopias? Gaming in Utopia?)
> Importance: High
>
>
>
> I am very sorry for the short notice, but one of the
> duties of new members of the CITASA Section Council
> is to propose two thematic sessions for the ASA
> meetings that take place a year from August (i.e.,
> August 2012), and I just discovered the proposals
> are due today! A. Aneesh, the other new Section
> Council member, bears no responsibility for this
> short notice--he tried to jump start this process
> over a month ago and I convinced him that my
> misunderstanding of the calendar was accurate. So
> that being said, assuming I do not hear to the
> contrary from Aneesh, my intention is to check my
> email at the end of the day to see what responses I
> have received in response to this posting and to do
> the best I can in pulling together proposals in time
> to submit them this evening. It is possible Aneesh
> will follow up with another email offering other
> suggestions. I thought it best to get this message
> out quickly without hearing from him in case he was
> not available today.
>
> So that being said, I suggest that we do one
> proposal on gaming worlds and one on virtual
> communities. Below I have cut and pasted the theme
> and the information we need to provide. I will need
> help with recommendations for organizers (including
> contact information) and participants and would
> welcome suggestions for verbiage to include in the
> description and rationale. If Aneesh or someone has
> an idea for a different topic and is willing to
> develop a proposal today, please let me know.
> Otherwise I will forge ahead as best I can and
> develop these two proposals. I do know from
> previous experience that if the Program Committee
> likes a proposal, they work with the organizer to
> refine it, so the important thing is to submit
> something, no matter how preliminary.
>
> Thanks!
>
> The theme is as follows:
>
> MEETING THEME: "Real Utopias" seems like an
> oxymoron: Utopia means "nowhere"a fantasy world of
> perfect harmony and social justice. To describe a
> proposal for social transformation as "utopian" is
> to dismiss it as an impractical dream outside the
> limits of possibility. Realists reject such
> fantasies as a distraction from the serious business
> of making practical improvements in existing
> institutions. The idea of real utopias embraces this
> tension between dreams and practice: "utopia"
> implies developing clear-headed visions of
> alternatives to existing institutions that embody
> our deepest aspirations for a world in which all
> people have access to the conditions to live
> flourishing lives; "real" means taking seriously the
> problem of the viability of the institutions that
> could move us in the direction of that world. The
> goal is to elaborate utopian ideals that are
> grounded in the real potentials of humanity, utopian
> destinations that have accessible way stations,
> utopian designs of viable institutions that can
> inform our practical tasks of navigating a world of
> imperfect conditions for social change.
>
> Proposals for Thematic Sessions, Special Sessions,
> and Regional Spotlight Sessions should provide:
>
> Type of Session: Thematic
>
> Working Title for the Session: Virtual Utopias
> and/or Gaming in Utopia?
>
> Brief description of the substantive focus;
>
> Rationale for inclusion of the topic on the 2012
> program;
>
> Recommendation(s) for session organizer, including
> address, telephone, and e-mail information
>
> A list of potential participants.
>
> Rebecca G. Adams
> Associate Provost for Planning & Assessment
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro
> P.O. Box 26170
> Greensboro, NC 27402-6170
>
> Email: Rebecca_Adams@uncg.edu
> Voice: 336-334-3578
> FAX: 336-334-4342
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
>
>
> <http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org>
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> Noelle Chesley,
>
> Assistant Professor
>
> Department of Sociology
>
> University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
>
> Bolton Hall
>
> Milwaukee, WI 53201
>
> 414.229.2398
>
> Fax: 414.229.4266
> chesley@uwm.edu
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
> Ron Anderson, Professor Emeritus, University of
> Minnesota, 952-473-5910
> Websites: http://umn.edu/home/rea and
> http://www.CompassionateSocieties.org
> <http://www.compassionatesocieties.org/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> CITASA mailing list
> CITASA@list.citasa.org
> http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
>________________
>_______________________________________________
>CITASA mailing list
>CITASA@list.citasa.org
>http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
**************************************************************
Markus S. Schulz, PhD
Asst. Professor, Social Theory, Media, and Global Processes
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Department of Sociology
CAB, MC 454
605 E Springfield
Champaign, Il 61820, USA
Phone: +217.244-9470
Email: <ms111@uiuc.edu>
**************************************************************