I think executive session would be a stretch and in the past i have taken the conservative approach and handled in open meeting. If there is no controversy i would place on consent agenda and provide explanatory memo to governing body as privileged attorney client communication.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This transmission is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is or may be an attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
s/ David A. Davis
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. DAVIS
4312 N. Classen Blvd.
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73118
405 840-6353
405 557-0777 (FAX)
ddavislaw@live.commailto:ddavislaw@live.com
From: Oama oama-bounces@lists.imla.org on behalf of Michael Beason mbeason@altusok.gov
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:28 PM
To: oama@lists.imla.org oama@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Oama] Executive Session for a Requested Lump Sum Payout for Retirement
Greetings All:
An employee eligible for retirement has requested a lump sum payout. Initially I thought the agenda item qualified under 25 O.S. Section 307(B)(4). I am on the cusp of convincing myself otherwise. Thoughts please.
Thank you.
Michael T. Beason, OBA #18535
City Attorney – Altus
509 S. Main St.
Altus, Oklahoma 73521
I think executive session would be a stretch and in the past i have taken the conservative approach and handled in open meeting. If there is no controversy i would place on consent agenda and provide explanatory memo to governing body as privileged attorney client communication.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This transmission is protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521 and intended to be delivered only to the named addressee(s) This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message is or may be an attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
s/ David A. Davis
LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. DAVIS
4312 N. Classen Blvd.
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73118
405 840-6353
405 557-0777 (FAX)
ddavislaw@live.com<mailto:ddavislaw@live.com>
________________________________
From: Oama <oama-bounces@lists.imla.org> on behalf of Michael Beason <mbeason@altusok.gov>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 1:28 PM
To: oama@lists.imla.org <oama@lists.imla.org>
Subject: [Oama] Executive Session for a Requested Lump Sum Payout for Retirement
Greetings All:
An employee eligible for retirement has requested a lump sum payout. Initially I thought the agenda item qualified under 25 O.S. Section 307(B)(4). I am on the cusp of convincing myself otherwise. Thoughts please.
Thank you.
Michael T. Beason, OBA #18535
City Attorney – Altus
509 S. Main St.
Altus, Oklahoma 73521
