PK
Pete Khooshabeh, PhD
Wed, Jun 11, 2014 6:00 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gale Lucas lucas@ict.usc.edu
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: "pkhoosh@gmail.com" pkhoosh@gmail.com
I tried sending it her way, but it rejected my message. Would you send
these for me?
-
Weisband, S., Kiesler, S. (1996). Self-disclosure on computer forms:
Meta analysis and implications. CHI, 96, 3-10.
-
Baker, R.P. (1992). New Technology in Survey Research:
Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI). Social Science Computer
Review, 10, 145-157.
-
*Beckenbach*, A. (*1995)*. *Computer* assisted questioning: The new
survey methods in the perception of the respondent. Bulletin de
Méthodologie Sociologique, 48, 82-100.
-
Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated
communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
-
Sebestik, J., Zelon, H., DeWitt, D., O’Reilly J.M., McGowan, K.
(1988). Initial Experiences with CAPI. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual
Research Conference, March, Arlington, Virginia (pp.357- 371). Washington
D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
-
Thornberry, O., Rowe, B., Biggar, R. (1990). Use of CAPI with the
U.S. National Health Interview Survey. Paper presented at the World
Congress of Sociology, Madrid.
-
van der Heijden, P. G. M., Van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J. (2000).
A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview and
face-to-face direct-questioning. *Sociological Methods *Research, 28,
505–537.
-
Aquilino, W. S., LoSciuto, L. A. (1990). Interview mode effects in
drug use surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362-395.
-
London, K.A., Williams, L.B. (1990). A Comparison of Abortion
Underreporting in an In-Person Interview and a Self-Administered
Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population
Association of America, Toronto, Canada.
- Tourangeau, R., Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The
impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. *Public
Opinion Quarterly, 60, *275–304.
*11. *Greist, J. H., et al. (1973). A computer interview for suicide-risk
prediction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1327-1332.
- Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., Devore, J.W. (1992). Effects of mode of
administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C.F. Turner, J.T.
Lessler, J.C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use:
Methodological studies (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1929, pp. 177-220).
Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
From: Pete Khooshabeh, PhD [mailto:pkhoosh@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:53 AM
To: Gale Lucas
Subject: Fwd: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
Hi Gale,
I think your proposal had some citations regarding in person vs.
paper/pencil vs. computer assessments.
Just thought I'd throw this your way in case you want to point these out to
Jenny Davis.
pete
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eszter Hargittai info@webuse.org
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Hi,
For quality control, I recommend using an attentiveness question (or two)
regardless of mode of data collection. Here is an example.
The purpose of this question is to assess your attentiveness to question
wording. For this question please mark the “Very often” response.
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Very Often
In paper surveys I have administered in the past few years on young adults
(in postal mail) this has resulted in 3-4% cases excluded from the
analyses. (I pitch cases where the answer is wrong or the respondent
skipped the question.)
Eszter
Eszter Hargittai
Delaney Family Professor, Communication Studies Department, Northwestern
University
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University
http://www.eszter.com
@eszter
http://www.webuse.org
Quoting "Davis, Jennifer Lauren - davis5jl" davis5jl@jmu.edu:
Hi all,
A colleague and I wondered what, if anything, the literature says
about accuracy of online vs. paper and pencil surveys. There's a lot
available about response rates, but does medium affect how honest
people are in their responses?
Will happily share with the list.
Thanks!!
Jenny
Jenny L. Davis
Assistant Professor of Sociology
James Madison University
Weekly Author: Cyborgology.orghttp://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/
Twitter: @Jenny_L_Davishttps://twitter.com/Jenny_L_Davis
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow
USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
408 205 7167 [cell]
--
pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow
USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
408 205 7167 [cell]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gale Lucas <lucas@ict.usc.edu>
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: "pkhoosh@gmail.com" <pkhoosh@gmail.com>
I tried sending it her way, but it rejected my message. Would you send
these for me?
1. Weisband, S., Kiesler, S. (1996). Self-disclosure on computer forms:
Meta analysis and implications. *CHI, 96,* 3-10.
2. Baker, R.P. (1992). New Technology in Survey Research:
Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI). *Social Science Computer
Review, 10*, 145-157.
3. *Beckenbach*, A. (*1995)*. *Computer* assisted questioning: The new
survey methods in the perception of the respondent. *Bulletin de
Méthodologie Sociologique, 48,* 82-100.
4. Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated
communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. *European
Journal of Social Psychology, 31,* 177-192.
5. Sebestik, J., Zelon, H., DeWitt, D., O’Reilly J.M., McGowan, K.
(1988). Initial Experiences with CAPI. *Proceedings of the Fourth Annual
Research Conference,* March, Arlington, Virginia (pp.357- 371). Washington
D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.
6. Thornberry, O., Rowe, B., Biggar, R. (1990). Use of CAPI with the
U.S. National Health Interview Survey. Paper presented at the World
Congress of Sociology, Madrid.
7. van der Heijden, P. G. M., Van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J. (2000).
A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview and
face-to-face direct-questioning. *Sociological Methods **Research*, *28*,
505–537.
8. Aquilino, W. S., LoSciuto, L. A. (1990). Interview mode effects in
drug use surveys. *Public Opinion Quarterly, 54,* 362-395.
9. London, K.A., Williams, L.B. (1990). A Comparison of Abortion
Underreporting in an In-Person Interview and a Self-Administered
Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population
Association of America, Toronto, Canada.
10. Tourangeau, R., Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The
impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. *Public
Opinion Quarterly, 60, *275–304.
*11. **Greist,* J. H., et al. (1973). A *computer interview for suicide*-*risk
prediction*. *American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, *1327-1332*.*
12. Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., Devore, J.W. (1992). Effects of mode of
administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C.F. Turner, J.T.
Lessler, J.C. Gfroerer (Eds.), *Survey measurement of drug use:
Methodological studies* (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1929, pp. 177-220).
Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
*From:* Pete Khooshabeh, PhD [mailto:pkhoosh@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:53 AM
*To:* Gale Lucas
*Subject:* Fwd: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
Hi Gale,
I think your proposal had some citations regarding in person vs.
paper/pencil vs. computer assessments.
Just thought I'd throw this your way in case you want to point these out to
Jenny Davis.
pete
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *Eszter Hargittai* <info@webuse.org>
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: citasa@list.citasa.org
Hi,
For quality control, I recommend using an attentiveness question (or two)
regardless of mode of data collection. Here is an example.
The purpose of this question is to assess your attentiveness to question
wording. For this question please mark the “Very often” response.
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Very Often
In paper surveys I have administered in the past few years on young adults
(in postal mail) this has resulted in 3-4% cases excluded from the
analyses. (I pitch cases where the answer is wrong or the respondent
skipped the question.)
Eszter
Eszter Hargittai
Delaney Family Professor, Communication Studies Department, Northwestern
University
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University
http://www.eszter.com
@eszter
http://www.webuse.org
Quoting "Davis, Jennifer Lauren - davis5jl" <davis5jl@jmu.edu>:
Hi all,
A colleague and I wondered what, if anything, the literature says
about accuracy of online vs. paper and pencil surveys. There's a lot
available about response rates, but does medium affect how honest
people are in their responses?
Will happily share with the list.
Thanks!!
Jenny
Jenny L. Davis
Assistant Professor of Sociology
James Madison University
Weekly Author: Cyborgology.org<http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/>
Twitter: @Jenny_L_Davis<https://twitter.com/Jenny_L_Davis>
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
_______________________________________________
CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org
--
pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow
USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
408 205 7167 [cell]
--
pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow
USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
408 205 7167 [cell]