[CITASA] Fwd: Paper vs Electronic Surveys

PK
Pete Khooshabeh, PhD
Wed, Jun 11, 2014 6:00 PM

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gale Lucas lucas@ict.usc.edu
Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: "pkhoosh@gmail.com" pkhoosh@gmail.com

I tried sending it her way, but it rejected my message. Would you send
these for me?

  1. Weisband, S., Kiesler, S. (1996). Self-disclosure on computer forms:
    

Meta analysis and implications. CHI, 96, 3-10.

  1. Baker, R.P. (1992). New Technology in Survey Research:
    

Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI). Social Science Computer
Review, 10
, 145-157.

  1. *Beckenbach*, A. (*1995)*. *Computer* assisted questioning: The new
    

survey methods in the perception of the respondent. Bulletin de
Méthodologie Sociologique, 48,
82-100.

  1. Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated
    

communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 31,
177-192.

  1. Sebestik, J., Zelon, H., DeWitt, D., O’Reilly J.M., McGowan, K.
    

(1988). Initial Experiences with CAPI. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual
Research Conference,
March, Arlington, Virginia (pp.357- 371). Washington
D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

  1. Thornberry, O., Rowe, B., Biggar, R. (1990). Use of CAPI with the
    

U.S. National Health Interview Survey. Paper presented at the World
Congress of Sociology, Madrid.

  1. van der Heijden, P. G. M., Van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J. (2000).
    

A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview and
face-to-face direct-questioning. *Sociological Methods *Research, 28,
505–537.

  1. Aquilino, W. S., LoSciuto, L. A. (1990). Interview mode effects in
    

drug use surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362-395.

  1. London, K.A., Williams, L.B. (1990). A Comparison of Abortion
    

Underreporting in an In-Person Interview and a Self-Administered
Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population
Association of America, Toronto, Canada.

  1. Tourangeau, R., Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The
    impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. *Public
    Opinion Quarterly, 60, *275–304.

*11.  *Greist, J. H., et al. (1973). A computer interview for suicide-risk
prediction
. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1327-1332.

  1. Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., Devore, J.W. (1992). Effects of mode of
    administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C.F. Turner, J.T.
    Lessler, J.C. Gfroerer (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use:
    Methodological studies
    (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1929, pp. 177-220).
    Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

From: Pete Khooshabeh, PhD [mailto:pkhoosh@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:53 AM
To: Gale Lucas
Subject: Fwd: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys

Hi Gale,

I think your proposal had some citations regarding in person vs.
paper/pencil vs. computer assessments.

Just thought I'd throw this your way in case you want to point these out to
Jenny Davis.

pete

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eszter Hargittai info@webuse.org
Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys
To: citasa@list.citasa.org

Hi,

For quality control, I recommend using an attentiveness question (or two)
regardless of mode of data collection. Here is an example.

The purpose of this question is to assess your attentiveness to question
wording. For this question please mark the “Very often” response.

Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Very Often

In paper surveys I have administered in the past few years on young adults
(in postal mail) this has resulted in 3-4% cases excluded from the
analyses. (I pitch cases where the answer is wrong or the respondent
skipped the question.)

Eszter

Eszter Hargittai
Delaney Family Professor, Communication Studies Department, Northwestern
University
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University

http://www.eszter.com

@eszter
http://www.webuse.org

Quoting "Davis, Jennifer Lauren - davis5jl" davis5jl@jmu.edu:

Hi all,

A colleague and I wondered what, if anything, the literature says
about accuracy of online vs. paper and pencil surveys. There's a lot
available about response rates, but does medium affect how honest
people are in their responses?

Will happily share with the list.

Thanks!!
Jenny

Jenny L. Davis
Assistant Professor of Sociology
James Madison University

Weekly Author: Cyborgology.orghttp://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/
Twitter: @Jenny_L_Davishttps://twitter.com/Jenny_L_Davis


CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org


CITASA mailing list
CITASA@list.citasa.org
http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org

--

pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow

USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536

408 205 7167 [cell]

--

pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow
USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu |
12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
408 205 7167 [cell]

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gale Lucas <lucas@ict.usc.edu> Date: Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:57 AM Subject: RE: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys To: "pkhoosh@gmail.com" <pkhoosh@gmail.com> I tried sending it her way, but it rejected my message. Would you send these for me? 1. Weisband, S., Kiesler, S. (1996). Self-disclosure on computer forms: Meta analysis and implications. *CHI, 96,* 3-10. 2. Baker, R.P. (1992). New Technology in Survey Research: Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI). *Social Science Computer Review, 10*, 145-157. 3. *Beckenbach*, A. (*1995)*. *Computer* assisted questioning: The new survey methods in the perception of the respondent. *Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 48,* 82-100. 4. Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. *European Journal of Social Psychology, 31,* 177-192. 5. Sebestik, J., Zelon, H., DeWitt, D., O’Reilly J.M., McGowan, K. (1988). Initial Experiences with CAPI. *Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Research Conference,* March, Arlington, Virginia (pp.357- 371). Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 6. Thornberry, O., Rowe, B., Biggar, R. (1990). Use of CAPI with the U.S. National Health Interview Survey. Paper presented at the World Congress of Sociology, Madrid. 7. van der Heijden, P. G. M., Van Gils, G., Bouts, J., Hox, J. (2000). A comparison of randomized response, computer-assisted self-interview and face-to-face direct-questioning. *Sociological Methods **Research*, *28*, 505–537. 8. Aquilino, W. S., LoSciuto, L. A. (1990). Interview mode effects in drug use surveys. *Public Opinion Quarterly, 54,* 362-395. 9. London, K.A., Williams, L.B. (1990). A Comparison of Abortion Underreporting in an In-Person Interview and a Self-Administered Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Toronto, Canada. 10. Tourangeau, R., Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. *Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, *275–304. *11. **Greist,* J. H., et al. (1973). A *computer interview for suicide*-*risk prediction*. *American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, *1327-1332*.* 12. Turner, C.F., Lessler, J.T., Devore, J.W. (1992). Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In C.F. Turner, J.T. Lessler, J.C. Gfroerer (Eds.), *Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies* (DHHS Publication No. ADM 92-1929, pp. 177-220). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. *From:* Pete Khooshabeh, PhD [mailto:pkhoosh@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:53 AM *To:* Gale Lucas *Subject:* Fwd: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys Hi Gale, I think your proposal had some citations regarding in person vs. paper/pencil vs. computer assessments. Just thought I'd throw this your way in case you want to point these out to Jenny Davis. pete ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Eszter Hargittai* <info@webuse.org> Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:08 AM Subject: Re: [CITASA] Paper vs Electronic Surveys To: citasa@list.citasa.org Hi, For quality control, I recommend using an attentiveness question (or two) regardless of mode of data collection. Here is an example. The purpose of this question is to assess your attentiveness to question wording. For this question please mark the “Very often” response. Never Rarely Sometimes Often Very Often In paper surveys I have administered in the past few years on young adults (in postal mail) this has resulted in 3-4% cases excluded from the analyses. (I pitch cases where the answer is wrong or the respondent skipped the question.) Eszter Eszter Hargittai Delaney Family Professor, Communication Studies Department, Northwestern University Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University http://www.eszter.com @eszter http://www.webuse.org Quoting "Davis, Jennifer Lauren - davis5jl" <davis5jl@jmu.edu>: Hi all, A colleague and I wondered what, if anything, the literature says about accuracy of online vs. paper and pencil surveys. There's a lot available about response rates, but does medium affect how honest people are in their responses? Will happily share with the list. Thanks!! Jenny Jenny L. Davis Assistant Professor of Sociology James Madison University Weekly Author: Cyborgology.org<http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/> Twitter: @Jenny_L_Davis<https://twitter.com/Jenny_L_Davis> _______________________________________________ CITASA mailing list CITASA@list.citasa.org http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org _______________________________________________ CITASA mailing list CITASA@list.citasa.org http://list.citasa.org/mailman/listinfo/citasa_list.citasa.org -- pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu | 12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536 408 205 7167 [cell] -- pete khooshabeh, phd | www.ict.usc.edu/~khooshabeh | Research Fellow USC Institute for Creative Technologies | pkhoosh@cal.berkeley.edu | 12015 E. Waterfront Dr., Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536 408 205 7167 [cell]