oama@lists.imla.org

Oklahoma Association of Municipal Attorneys

View all threads

QUESTION REGARDING CERTIFICCATES OF CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY

JM
Jon Miller
Sun, Feb 7, 2021 8:16 PM

Counselors:

The City (like most others who are on OML's list) recently received an Application for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity filed by Southwest Arkansas Telecommunications with the Oklahoma Corporation Commission.  As I understand this process, essentially the only thing that the certificate of convenience and necessity does is authorize SWAT to conduct telecommunications business in Oklahoma.  Are there any municipalities that oppose these types of applications?  I would be interested in others' perspectives.

Jonathan E. Miller
City Attorney
City of Mustang
1885 Piedmont Road N., Suite B
P.O. Box 546
Piedmont, Oklahoma  73078
Telephone: (405) 883-6266
Facsimile: (405) 883-6155


This message is sent by a lawyer and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.  If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments.  This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) only, and may not be distributed to any other person without written consent of the sender.  Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

Counselors: The City (like most others who are on OML's list) recently received an Application for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity filed by Southwest Arkansas Telecommunications with the Oklahoma Corporation Commission. As I understand this process, essentially the only thing that the certificate of convenience and necessity does is authorize SWAT to conduct telecommunications business in Oklahoma. Are there any municipalities that oppose these types of applications? I would be interested in others' perspectives. Jonathan E. Miller City Attorney City of Mustang 1885 Piedmont Road N., Suite B P.O. Box 546 Piedmont, Oklahoma 73078 Telephone: (405) 883-6266 Facsimile: (405) 883-6155 ******************************************************************************* This message is sent by a lawyer and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments. This e-mail is intended for the addressee(s) only, and may not be distributed to any other person without written consent of the sender. Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.