choice of power cat

PG
Philippe Guillemin
Fri, Apr 30, 2010 12:59 PM

You should also look at the Maryland 37 .Good boat from Fountaine Pajot

Best Regards
PHILIPPE J GUILLEMIN
GLOBAL MARITIME YACHT & SHIP BROKERS.WINDWARD-ISLANDS
TOLL FREE:+1 866 854 2107
CELL USA: +1 954 609 9345
CELL FRA: +33 648 589460
Fax: 1 954 252 4304
SKYPE:pguillemin

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:00 AM, <power-catamaran-request@lists.samurai.com

wrote:

Send Power-Catamaran mailing list submissions to
power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/power-catamaran
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
power-catamaran-request@lists.samurai.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
power-catamaran-owner@lists.samurai.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Power-Catamaran digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Malcolm Tennant Article (Larry G.)

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Larry G." texflot@yahoo.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] Malcolm Tennant Article
Message-ID: 634740.30948.qm@web55507.mail.re4.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thank you Noelle for the link to the article on Cat Comparisons.  I found
it
interesting that, in the end, the comments only demonstrated how much more
I
need to learn about catamaran design.  I think I'm tired of hearing that
"all
boats are a compromise" even though I know darn from an engineering
standpoint
or otherwise, it is quite true.  Knowing exactly what you want to do with a
boat, as he points out, is certainly a help, but no matter how specific the
application, one eventually finds that wall of compromise.
What initially triggered my interests in a power-cat future was the
opulent
Pacific Expedition PE45 design.  For my Admiral and I, this boat would have
covered most any desire we had about cruising and/or living aboard with the
fewest number of compromises.  I would have my generous engineering spaces
while my Admiral would have her condo on water, and outside of needing a
few
drawbridges raised and having to anchor out when no t-heads were available
at
a marina, one could say "who cares" with a boat like that.  When the
economic
turn-down hit, that initial excitement passed down through some of the
larger
production cats like Endeavour 48, Fontaine Pajot 46, Africat 42, Prowler,
Manta, Venture,  PDQ 41, Endeavour 40 and a few custom build designs from
R&C,
Shionning, etc, and most recently the Leopard 47 and 37 which are both
being
delivered from So. Africa to Tortolla on their own bottoms (very
impressive).
Now that we're going back to Miami, I've been thinking that a 34 PDQ may
be
a very good Miami- Keys- Bahamas boat while giving us a taste of the
cruising
life.  Retirement is still about 4 years away, and by that time, maybe I'd
be
able to learn enough about power-cat design that I'd be even be more
undecided
about it than I am right now.
One item I'd rather not compromise on is that ability to cruise
economically
at trawler speeds while having a 15 knot or more capability if we ever
needed
it.  When I add the stabilizer free stability, system redundancy and
shallow
draft advantages, I just can't turn my head away from this design, even
with a
plethora of real bargains out there in mono-hulls.  With the baby-boomers
in
retirement mode, I think we could see a few of these designs reaching "cult
boat" status.  With all the associated costs of boat ownership these days,
such a designation could go a long way toward making your water craft of
choice a more palatable investment.

Oh, and Henry (Sno Dog).  Sorry about the error on my comment about not
understanding the higher speed from your new 4 blade props.  I meant to say
that I was wrong about the Russian "BEAR" bomber, not the Backfire (for
God's
sake).  It counter-rotating props push the Bear 80 to 100 mph. more than I
ever thought possible.  Thanks to "John" for pointing out that ridiculous
mistake through a personal e-mail.  What must I have been thinking?



Power-Catamaran Mailing List

End of Power-Catamaran Digest, Vol 60, Issue 12


You should also look at the Maryland 37 .Good boat from Fountaine Pajot Best Regards PHILIPPE J GUILLEMIN GLOBAL MARITIME YACHT & SHIP BROKERS.WINDWARD-ISLANDS TOLL FREE:+1 866 854 2107 CELL USA: +1 954 609 9345 CELL FRA: +33 648 589460 Fax: 1 954 252 4304 SKYPE:pguillemin On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:00 AM, <power-catamaran-request@lists.samurai.com > wrote: > Send Power-Catamaran mailing list submissions to > power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/power-catamaran > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > power-catamaran-request@lists.samurai.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > power-catamaran-owner@lists.samurai.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Power-Catamaran digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Malcolm Tennant Article (Larry G.) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:30:22 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Larry G." <texflot@yahoo.com> > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Subject: Re: [PCW] Malcolm Tennant Article > Message-ID: <634740.30948.qm@web55507.mail.re4.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Thank you Noelle for the link to the article on Cat Comparisons. I found > it > interesting that, in the end, the comments only demonstrated how much more > I > need to learn about catamaran design. I think I'm tired of hearing that > "all > boats are a compromise" even though I know darn from an engineering > standpoint > or otherwise, it is quite true. Knowing exactly what you want to do with a > boat, as he points out, is certainly a help, but no matter how specific the > application, one eventually finds that wall of compromise. > What initially triggered my interests in a power-cat future was the > opulent > Pacific Expedition PE45 design. For my Admiral and I, this boat would have > covered most any desire we had about cruising and/or living aboard with the > fewest number of compromises. I would have my generous engineering spaces > while my Admiral would have her condo on water, and outside of needing a > few > drawbridges raised and having to anchor out when no t-heads were available > at > a marina, one could say "who cares" with a boat like that. When the > economic > turn-down hit, that initial excitement passed down through some of the > larger > production cats like Endeavour 48, Fontaine Pajot 46, Africat 42, Prowler, > Manta, Venture, PDQ 41, Endeavour 40 and a few custom build designs from > R&C, > Shionning, etc, and most recently the Leopard 47 and 37 which are both > being > delivered from So. Africa to Tortolla on their own bottoms (very > impressive). > Now that we're going back to Miami, I've been thinking that a 34 PDQ may > be > a very good Miami- Keys- Bahamas boat while giving us a taste of the > cruising > life. Retirement is still about 4 years away, and by that time, maybe I'd > be > able to learn enough about power-cat design that I'd be even be more > undecided > about it than I am right now. > One item I'd rather not compromise on is that ability to cruise > economically > at trawler speeds while having a 15 knot or more capability if we ever > needed > it. When I add the stabilizer free stability, system redundancy and > shallow > draft advantages, I just can't turn my head away from this design, even > with a > plethora of real bargains out there in mono-hulls. With the baby-boomers > in > retirement mode, I think we could see a few of these designs reaching "cult > boat" status. With all the associated costs of boat ownership these days, > such a designation could go a long way toward making your water craft of > choice a more palatable investment. > > Oh, and Henry (Sno Dog). Sorry about the error on my comment about not > understanding the higher speed from your new 4 blade props. I meant to say > that I was wrong about the Russian "BEAR" bomber, not the Backfire (for > God's > sake). It counter-rotating props push the Bear 80 to 100 mph. more than I > ever thought possible. Thanks to "John" for pointing out that ridiculous > mistake through a personal e-mail. What must I have been thinking? > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > End of Power-Catamaran Digest, Vol 60, Issue 12 > ***********************************************
LG
Larry G.
Sat, May 1, 2010 10:53 AM

Thank you Philippe.  Of course you're right about checking out the Fontaine
Pajot 37 Marland, one of the few I haven't been aboard.  I see that there are
two in southern Florida where my Admiral and I will be relocated soon.  Here
in Berlin, we will have a sea trial of a new FP 40 early next month.  Those
French really know how to design a sexy cat, and the FP's are no exception.
We both like the layout of the new 40.

Thank you Philippe. Of course you're right about checking out the Fontaine Pajot 37 Marland, one of the few I haven't been aboard. I see that there are two in southern Florida where my Admiral and I will be relocated soon. Here in Berlin, we will have a sea trial of a new FP 40 early next month. Those French really know how to design a sexy cat, and the FP's are no exception. We both like the layout of the new 40.