trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Re: Hull Speed

AS
Al Schober
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 2:16 PM

Sorry to burst your bubble, but a full displacement hull will never, ever
plane! Put enough power on it and the stern will submerge!

I remember a surface run in a Skipjack class submarine.  The boat, with the
hull form of a sewer pipe, took a 17 degree up angle.  I can't tell you the
speed or power - whenever I do, my driveway fills up with black Chevy
Suburbans.

Al Schober

> Sorry to burst your bubble, but a full displacement hull will never, ever > plane! Put enough power on it and the stern will submerge! I remember a surface run in a Skipjack class submarine. The boat, with the hull form of a sewer pipe, took a 17 degree up angle. I can't tell you the speed or power - whenever I do, my driveway fills up with black Chevy Suburbans. Al Schober
AJ
Arild Jensen
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 3:47 PM

On the subject of hull speed and hull form there are two timely articles in
the latest wooden boat magazine and a very  interesting article  about
light weight passage maker yachts in the current issue of Professional Boat
builder magazine.

Tad Roberts, a Naval architect  associated with Bruce King Yacht design  for
about 14 years now has his own design  office on Gabriola Island in BC.

The  Tad Roberts article titled Passagemaker Lite  explains how the designer
was inspired by such designs as Robert Bebee's original passagemaker and
also the Avard Fuller designed  "Jim Hawkins"  a 61 foot motor sailer,
built in 1969.

Both magazines have  articles  that would contribute to the present thread.

regards
Arild

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002

On the subject of hull speed and hull form there are two timely articles in the latest wooden boat magazine and a very interesting article about light weight passage maker yachts in the current issue of Professional Boat builder magazine. Tad Roberts, a Naval architect associated with Bruce King Yacht design for about 14 years now has his own design office on Gabriola Island in BC. The Tad Roberts article titled Passagemaker Lite explains how the designer was inspired by such designs as Robert Bebee's original passagemaker and also the Avard Fuller designed "Jim Hawkins" a 61 foot motor sailer, built in 1969. Both magazines have articles that would contribute to the present thread. regards Arild --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002
RR
Ron Rogers
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 5:05 PM

http://www.tadroberts.com/pssgmkrlite.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arild Jensen" elnav@uniserve.com
To: trawler-world-list@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:47 AM
Subject: TWL: RE: Re: Hull Speed

Tad Roberts, a Naval architect  associated with Bruce King Yacht design

for

about 14 years now has his own design  office on Gabriola Island in BC.

The  Tad Roberts article titled Passagemaker Lite  explains how the

designer

was inspired by such designs as Robert Bebee's original passagemaker and
also the Avard Fuller designed  "Jim Hawkins"  a 61 foot motor sailer,
built in 1969.

http://www.tadroberts.com/pssgmkrlite.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arild Jensen" <elnav@uniserve.com> To: <trawler-world-list@lists.samurai.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 10:47 AM Subject: TWL: RE: Re: Hull Speed > Tad Roberts, a Naval architect associated with Bruce King Yacht design for > about 14 years now has his own design office on Gabriola Island in BC. > > The Tad Roberts article titled Passagemaker Lite explains how the designer > was inspired by such designs as Robert Bebee's original passagemaker and > also the Avard Fuller designed "Jim Hawkins" a 61 foot motor sailer, > built in 1969.
RR
Ron Rogers
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 5:31 PM

From National Geographic: "hydrodynamic teardrop hull design that was first

tested on a conventionally powered sub. All U.S. nuclear subs since have
used this basic combination." It is a highly sophisticated sewer pipe.
Although listed as going 25+ knots, I do remember a newspaper story about a
Skipjack tailing a nuclear carrier west in the Pacific. After a great many
miles, the carrier pulled ahead.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Schober" aeschober@snet.net

I remember a surface run in a Skipjack class submarine.  The boat, with

the

hull form of a sewer pipe, took a 17 degree up angle.  I can't tell you

the

speed or power - whenever I do, my driveway fills up with black Chevy
Suburbans.

>From National Geographic: "hydrodynamic teardrop hull design that was first tested on a conventionally powered sub. All U.S. nuclear subs since have used this basic combination." It is a highly sophisticated sewer pipe. Although listed as going 25+ knots, I do remember a newspaper story about a Skipjack tailing a nuclear carrier west in the Pacific. After a great many miles, the carrier pulled ahead. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Schober" <aeschober@snet.net> > I remember a surface run in a Skipjack class submarine. The boat, with the > hull form of a sewer pipe, took a 17 degree up angle. I can't tell you the > speed or power - whenever I do, my driveway fills up with black Chevy > Suburbans.
MM
Mike Maurice
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 5:35 PM

At 12:05 PM 2/13/03 -0500, you wrote:

Subject: TWL: Re: Hull Speed

http://www.tadroberts.com/pssgmkrlite.html

A few observations about the 2 boats at the URL above.

The draft is pretty shallow, 3' 6" and 2' 10".
Horsepower total , 150, 120.
For hulls 55', 45'.
Narrow beam, 13 for the 55.
The claimed top speed seems a little high for that little power, BUT the
narrow beam, light weight, shallow draft might make it realistic.
If so, then both hulls are exceeding the 1.34 rule, I estimate about 1.55
or thereabouts.
I don't see that the hull profile would lead to a boat that would be
particularly rolly, but it would be more susceptible to chop, than a hull
with more draft.
The higher speed, if even only used in a pinch is very valuable in my opinion.
I would be very leery of such a design with it's limitations, if it did not
have a good turn of speed.

Overall, I like the boats and think they would both be fine cruisers, but
the design has it's limitations.
I doubt this is intended for blue water work.

Capt. Mike Maurice
Wilsonville, Near Portland Oregon

At 12:05 PM 2/13/03 -0500, you wrote: >Subject: TWL: Re: Hull Speed > >http://www.tadroberts.com/pssgmkrlite.html A few observations about the 2 boats at the URL above. The draft is pretty shallow, 3' 6" and 2' 10". Horsepower total , 150, 120. For hulls 55', 45'. Narrow beam, 13 for the 55. The claimed top speed seems a little high for that little power, BUT the narrow beam, light weight, shallow draft might make it realistic. If so, then both hulls are exceeding the 1.34 rule, I estimate about 1.55 or thereabouts. I don't see that the hull profile would lead to a boat that would be particularly rolly, but it would be more susceptible to chop, than a hull with more draft. The higher speed, if even only used in a pinch is very valuable in my opinion. I would be very leery of such a design with it's limitations, if it did not have a good turn of speed. Overall, I like the boats and think they would both be fine cruisers, but the design has it's limitations. I doubt this is intended for blue water work. Capt. Mike Maurice Wilsonville, Near Portland Oregon
AJ
Arild Jensen
Thu, Feb 13, 2003 5:45 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Maurice

A few observations about the 2 boats at the URL above.

The draft is pretty shallow, 3' 6" and 2' 10".
Horsepower total , 150, 120.
For hulls 55', 45'.
Narrow beam, 13 for the 55.
The claimed top speed seems a little high for that little power, BUT the
narrow beam, light weight, shallow draft might make it realistic.
If so, then both hulls are exceeding the 1.34 rule, I estimate about 1.55
or thereabouts.

Overall, I like the boats and think they would both be fine cruisers, but
the design has it's limitations.
I doubt this is intended for blue water work.

REPLY

My first boat with an overall length of 49' 6"  beam of 10' and draft of
4'6"  did achieve such speeds using  two Perkins of 65 HP each.

At 10 knots and  no wind or heavy seas the engines were not WOT.  probably
only about 85%

Admittedly  such a design is not  what we are accustomed to and might not
be agreeable for living aboard.
Although I did live aboard for slightly more than a year, beginning in
November in Toronto harbour (  Brrrr!  -20F )

I  think the claims are  not outrageous nor unduly exaggerated.  but as
mentioned in other articles these are  essentially flat water  conditions.

Cheers

Arild

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002

-----Original Message----- From: Mike Maurice >http://www.tadroberts.com/pssgmkrlite.html A few observations about the 2 boats at the URL above. The draft is pretty shallow, 3' 6" and 2' 10". Horsepower total , 150, 120. For hulls 55', 45'. Narrow beam, 13 for the 55. The claimed top speed seems a little high for that little power, BUT the narrow beam, light weight, shallow draft might make it realistic. If so, then both hulls are exceeding the 1.34 rule, I estimate about 1.55 or thereabouts. Overall, I like the boats and think they would both be fine cruisers, but the design has it's limitations. I doubt this is intended for blue water work. REPLY My first boat with an overall length of 49' 6" beam of 10' and draft of 4'6" did achieve such speeds using two Perkins of 65 HP each. At 10 knots and no wind or heavy seas the engines were not WOT. probably only about 85% Admittedly such a design is not what we are accustomed to and might not be agreeable for living aboard. Although I did live aboard for slightly more than a year, beginning in November in Toronto harbour ( Brrrr! -20F ) I think the claims are not outrageous nor unduly exaggerated. but as mentioned in other articles these are essentially flat water conditions. Cheers Arild --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.423 / Virus Database: 238 - Release Date: 11/25/2002