On 9/17/2019 12:33 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Is there any advantage in using a GPS Rb disciplined oscillator vs a GPS
disciplined high quality OCXO like the HP 10811A? I can’t understand why
there should be, as a Rb source would use an OCCO in its output stage
Therefore in each case
Perhaps there’s is period over which the the overall stability can be
improved by adding a rubidium oscillator. I would be interested to know if
that is the case or not.
Dave
What I was always told was that Rb has low enough noise coming off
the atoms such that it can use a relatively fast loop to lock
the OCXO and clean it up. OTOH, the 5071 Cs has to use a very
long time constant loop to control the 10811, hence it doesn't
clean it up except very close to the carrier. Even the high
performance version of the 5071 doesn't compare with Rb.
Rick N6RK
Hi
You probably are not going to find the Nano’s on the used market.
The last one I worked with was very much a pre-production unit and
that was only a few years back.
Indeed if you are simply looking for a lab clock, the miniature Rb’s may
not be the best choice. Their stability is generally not as good as that of their
bigger cousins. That applies to temperature as well as short term
stability. Since you pay a premium for the smaller parts, the “bang for the
buck” really isn’t there in a home bench application.
If indeed you are trying to build something to go in a drone or put into
space, they make a lot of sense. If you are carrying it on your back along
with all the batteries to power it, again a very reasonable thing to go with.
Lots of fun !!!
On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:18 AM, pisymbol . pisymbol@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:00 PM Dana Whitlow k8yumdoober@gmail.com wrote:
All of the available Rb standards that I've seen have a 10 MHz output,
Some have a
1 PPS output as well.
original buyer could save a few bucks. My PRS-10 is one of these.
How does this compare with say a used Accubeat AR133/60 substance? I also
see they have a Nano unit that looks awesome (but I have no idea what the
price is and if they are ever sold used?).
-aps
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
You probably are not going to find the Nano’s on the used market.
The last one I worked with was very much a pre-production unit and
that was only a few years back.
Indeed if you are simply looking for a lab clock, the miniature Rb’s may
not be the best choice. Their stability is generally not as good as that
of their
bigger cousins. That applies to temperature as well as short term
stability. Since you pay a premium for the smaller parts, the “bang for the
buck” really isn’t there in a home bench application.
If indeed you are trying to build something to go in a drone or put into
space, they make a lot of sense. If you are carrying it on your back along
with all the batteries to power it, again a very reasonable thing to go
with.
Lots of fun !!!
Bob et al: Can folks recommend some starter oscillators to work with? A
friend mentioned a used Accubeat for a nice cheaper Rb standard.
73,
-aps
Hi,
On 2019-09-21 12:33, pisymbol . wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:06 PM Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
You probably are not going to find the Nano’s on the used market.
The last one I worked with was very much a pre-production unit and
that was only a few years back.
Indeed if you are simply looking for a lab clock, the miniature Rb’s may
not be the best choice. Their stability is generally not as good as that
of their
bigger cousins. That applies to temperature as well as short term
stability. Since you pay a premium for the smaller parts, the “bang for the
buck” really isn’t there in a home bench application.
If indeed you are trying to build something to go in a drone or put into
space, they make a lot of sense. If you are carrying it on your back along
with all the batteries to power it, again a very reasonable thing to go
with.
Lots of fun !!!
Bob et al: Can folks recommend some starter oscillators to work with? A
friend mentioned a used Accubeat for a nice cheaper Rb standard.
There is a range of telecom rubidiums to choose from, such as LRPO-101,
LPFRS, the FEI, PRS-10. They all offer a way to get started. Those
having digital read-out can offer some additional things to learn and
study, but I often put a LPRO 101 in the hands of friends that want to
get started. Their next challenge is to verify and trim it against GPS.
Next challenge is to do long term measures and see the variations and
learn from those, both systematic variations as well as the random noise
variants. The same set of challenges can also be done with crystal
oscillators.
Hmm. Should one write a set of lectures and lab exercises to have
different set of challenges to aid in building experience?
Cheers,
Magnus
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 07:03:15 -0700
"Richard (Rick) Karlquist" richard@karlquist.com wrote:
What I was always told was that Rb has low enough noise coming off
the atoms such that it can use a relatively fast loop to lock
the OCXO and clean it up. OTOH, the 5071 Cs has to use a very
long time constant loop to control the 10811, hence it doesn't
clean it up except very close to the carrier. Even the high
performance version of the 5071 doesn't compare with Rb.
This is bascially the big point about why atomic clocks perform
differently. The SNR per interogation is the driving limit for
short taus. Rb vapor cell standards have a LARGE number of atoms
that are interrogated (IIRC millions) with a relative high detection
peak (depending on the exact built type, between 1% and 30% above
background noise level).
On the other extreme are single ion optical clocks, which interrogate
a single atom only. The SNR is so low that anything below minutes of
interrogation is not going to do anything. That's why optical clocks
are so tied to the development of high stability cavities (crystaline,
low expansion spacer, cryogenically cooled with special, low thermal
movement, low creep mirrors, in vacuum) to get a laser that is stable
over these interrogation times.
Somewhere in-between are dual-resonance (ie same principle as Rb vapor cells)
Hg Ion clocks (i.e. the JPL Hg ion clock, or DSAC). They interrogate a fairly
large number of atoms (10'000s of atoms), but have such a low photon efficiency
(i.e. probability of interaction with an atom), that the detection SNR is very
low. Hence the need for interrogation times in the 10s to 100s of seconds.
The one atomic clock that does not fit in this categorization scheeme
are active hydrogen masers. These do not interrogate atoms, but cause
atoms to emit coherent photons. Or in other words, they make the atoms
themselves into oscillators. That's why the noise of AHMs goes down
with tau (at short taus) while for all other, passvie atomic clocks
it goes down with square-root of tau.
At longer taus, the stability of the environment of the atomic clocks
becomes the dominant factor. This is pretty bad for Rb vapor cells,
as they are sensitive to temperature and barometric pressure changes.
AHMs suffer from changes in the wall (where atoms bounce off) and
of pressure deformation of the large and resonant cavity. Other types
of atomic clocks can be made pretty insensitive to enviroment by
being in vacuum and by suspending the elements such, that pressure
changes do not move them (much).
Attila Kinali
--
It is upon moral qualities that a society is ultimately founded. All
the prosperity and technological sophistication in the world is of no
use without that foundation.
-- Miss Matheson, The Diamond Age, Neal Stephenson