volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

3458A integrator

RS
Randy Scott
Thu, Nov 10, 2011 2:16 PM

Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I have a question about the integrator amplifier being used.  In the HP Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom amplifier design.  I had always taken this to mean that they had constructed a custom op amp IC for the task.  I was then surprised to see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392 JFET and various passives.

It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an OP-27 and an AD711.  In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos).  I suspect that the LT1001 in the 3458A serves a similar purpose.  Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit.

The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how either of these two designs work.  Can anyone shed some light on this or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it out for myself?

Thanks.

Randy.

Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I have a question about the integrator amplifier being used.  In the HP Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom amplifier design.  I had always taken this to mean that they had constructed a custom op amp IC for the task.  I was then surprised to see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392 JFET and various passives. It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an OP-27 and an AD711.  In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos).  I suspect that the LT1001 in the 3458A serves a similar purpose.  Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit. The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how either of these two designs work.  Can anyone shed some light on this or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it out for myself? Thanks. Randy.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Thu, Nov 10, 2011 5:50 PM

Randy Scott wrote:

Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I have a question about the integrator amplifier being used.  In the HP Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom amplifier design.  I had always taken this to mean that they had constructed a custom op amp IC for the task.  I was then surprised to see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392 JFET and various passives.

It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an OP-27 and an AD711.  In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos).  I suspect that the LT1001 in the 3458A serves a similar purpose.  Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit.

The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how either of these two designs work.  Can anyone shed some light on this or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it out for myself?

Thanks.

Randy.


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The OP27 in the 34401A integrator reduces the effective input offset of
the AD711 (including the finite (non negligible) input required to
produce the desired integrator output slew rate).
Since the OP27 output swing is small only its small signal
charateristics and not its large signal characteristics (slew rate etc)
are important. The resistive divider network at the OP27 output adjusts
the effective gain bandwidth of the OP27 so that the integrator loop
remains stable.
Higher slew rate integrators with low input offset using this technique
are feasible with the faster JFET opamps that are now available.
LTSpice simulations will quickly show how such integrators behave and
the necessity for the OP27 output divider.

The more complex integrator of the 3458A is an earlier attempt to
achieve a high slew rate integrator with a low effective input offset.

Bruce

Randy Scott wrote: > Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I have a question about the integrator amplifier being used. In the HP Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom amplifier design. I had always taken this to mean that they had constructed a custom op amp IC for the task. I was then surprised to see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392 JFET and various passives. > > > It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an OP-27 and an AD711. In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos). I suspect that the LT1001 in the 3458A serves a similar purpose. Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit. > > > The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how either of these two designs work. Can anyone shed some light on this or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it out for myself? > > Thanks. > > Randy. > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > The OP27 in the 34401A integrator reduces the effective input offset of the AD711 (including the finite (non negligible) input required to produce the desired integrator output slew rate). Since the OP27 output swing is small only its small signal charateristics and not its large signal characteristics (slew rate etc) are important. The resistive divider network at the OP27 output adjusts the effective gain bandwidth of the OP27 so that the integrator loop remains stable. Higher slew rate integrators with low input offset using this technique are feasible with the faster JFET opamps that are now available. LTSpice simulations will quickly show how such integrators behave and the necessity for the OP27 output divider. The more complex integrator of the 3458A is an earlier attempt to achieve a high slew rate integrator with a low effective input offset. Bruce
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Thu, Nov 10, 2011 6:28 PM

Bruce Griffiths wrote:

Randy Scott wrote:

Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I
have a question about the integrator amplifier being used.  In the HP
Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for
the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom
amplifier design.  I had always taken this to mean that they had
constructed a custom op amp IC for the task.  I was then surprised to
see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the
integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392
JFET and various passives.

It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an
OP-27 and an AD711.  In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that
the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the
AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos).  I suspect that the LT1001 in the
3458A serves a similar purpose.  Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low
Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit.

The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how
either of these two designs work.  Can anyone shed some light on this
or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it
out for myself?

Thanks.

Randy.

The OP27 in the 34401A integrator reduces the effective input offset
of the AD711 (including the finite (non negligible) input required to
produce the desired integrator output slew rate).
Since the OP27 output swing is small only its small signal
charateristics and not its large signal characteristics (slew rate
etc) are important. The resistive divider network at the OP27 output
adjusts the effective gain bandwidth of the OP27 so that the
integrator loop remains stable.
Higher slew rate integrators with low input offset using this
technique are feasible with the faster JFET opamps that are now
available.
LTSpice simulations will quickly show how such integrators behave and
the necessity for the OP27 output divider.

The more complex integrator of the 3458A is an earlier attempt to
achieve a high slew rate integrator with a low effective input offset.

Bruce

In the 3458A integrator the AD848 plus the 4392 source follower form the
uncompensated integrator with large input offset (volts ? due to the
source follower) and a significant slew rate induced offset.
The LM6361 corrects the slew rate induced offset variations by adjusting
the input at the noninverting input of the AD848 whilst the LT1001
corrects the input offset (at the 2N4392 gate) by adjusting the input
signal at the LM6361 non inverting input. The additional passive
components ensure that the resultant integrator is stable with a well
damped transient response.

Bruce

Bruce Griffiths wrote: > Randy Scott wrote: >> Since it seems that more people now have access to the 3458A CLIP, I >> have a question about the integrator amplifier being used. In the HP >> Journal article on the 3458A, they list a set of specifications for >> the integrator and then go on to say that it required a custom >> amplifier design. I had always taken this to mean that they had >> constructed a custom op amp IC for the task. I was then surprised to >> see that the schematic used a set of off-the-shelf op amps in the >> integrator loop: one each of LT1001, LM6361, and AD848, plus a 2N4392 >> JFET and various passives. >> >> >> It bears some similarity to the integrator in the 34401A that uses an >> OP-27 and an AD711. In the notes on the 34401A, they mention that >> the OP-27 is used to improve the input offset characteristics of the >> AD711 (a JFET amp with large Vos). I suspect that the LT1001 in the >> 3458A serves a similar purpose. Both the OP-27 and LT1001 have low >> Vos, but are too slow to be useful as the integrators in either circuit. >> >> >> The problem is that I am failing to even begin to understand how >> either of these two designs work. Can anyone shed some light on this >> or maybe point me to a reference that I could use to help figure it >> out for myself? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Randy. >> > The OP27 in the 34401A integrator reduces the effective input offset > of the AD711 (including the finite (non negligible) input required to > produce the desired integrator output slew rate). > Since the OP27 output swing is small only its small signal > charateristics and not its large signal characteristics (slew rate > etc) are important. The resistive divider network at the OP27 output > adjusts the effective gain bandwidth of the OP27 so that the > integrator loop remains stable. > Higher slew rate integrators with low input offset using this > technique are feasible with the faster JFET opamps that are now > available. > LTSpice simulations will quickly show how such integrators behave and > the necessity for the OP27 output divider. > > The more complex integrator of the 3458A is an earlier attempt to > achieve a high slew rate integrator with a low effective input offset. > > Bruce > In the 3458A integrator the AD848 plus the 4392 source follower form the uncompensated integrator with large input offset (volts ? due to the source follower) and a significant slew rate induced offset. The LM6361 corrects the slew rate induced offset variations by adjusting the input at the noninverting input of the AD848 whilst the LT1001 corrects the input offset (at the 2N4392 gate) by adjusting the input signal at the LM6361 non inverting input. The additional passive components ensure that the resultant integrator is stable with a well damped transient response. Bruce