volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

Some questions to zeners (1N823-1N829)

AJ
Andreas Jahn
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 3:30 PM

Hello all,
Hello Warren,

after having experimented a lot with 5V monolithic zener references
and still not found the ideal solution I want to try a 1N82x based solution.

For me a extended room temperature range of
25 degrees centigrade +/- 7 degrees (64-90 °F)  is of interest.
Since I plan to have battery supplied instruments a lower supply current would be of interest.

For the zeners a zero TC current is stated.
Over which temperature range the TC is nearly zero.
How large is the voltage deviation in the above mentioned range?

Does it play a role for the absolute temperature deviation if a 1N823 or a 1N829 is used?
Or is the behaviour equally when the individual zero TC current is used?
Is the only difference between the selections that the zero TC current is more near the 7.5mA value on the 1N829?

So is it more likely to get a low zero TC current of 4 mA on a 1N823 device than on the 1N829?
Or should I go for the 1N829A for the lowest absolute TC?

How large is the hysteresis on the zeners in a temperature range of 10-40 degrees celsius (50-104°F).
On monolithic unheated reference voltages with hermetic case I have up to around 2 ppm hysteresis difference
on temperature cycling. (see attached picture with 10-45 degrees celsius on X-Axis for an ADC with a 5V reference
measuring a LM399 heated reference over a 2:1 precision voltage divider. The ADC with the 5V reference is temperature cycled).

I blame the temperature hysteresis on the die attach to the lead frame which seems to be usually a silver filled epoxy compound.
I hope that the hysteresis on a discrete zener is much lower.

With best regards

Andreas

Hello all, Hello Warren, after having experimented a lot with 5V monolithic zener references and still not found the ideal solution I want to try a 1N82x based solution. For me a extended room temperature range of 25 degrees centigrade +/- 7 degrees (64-90 °F) is of interest. Since I plan to have battery supplied instruments a lower supply current would be of interest. For the zeners a zero TC current is stated. Over which temperature range the TC is nearly zero. How large is the voltage deviation in the above mentioned range? Does it play a role for the absolute temperature deviation if a 1N823 or a 1N829 is used? Or is the behaviour equally when the individual zero TC current is used? Is the only difference between the selections that the zero TC current is more near the 7.5mA value on the 1N829? So is it more likely to get a low zero TC current of 4 mA on a 1N823 device than on the 1N829? Or should I go for the 1N829A for the lowest absolute TC? How large is the hysteresis on the zeners in a temperature range of 10-40 degrees celsius (50-104°F). On monolithic unheated reference voltages with hermetic case I have up to around 2 ppm hysteresis difference on temperature cycling. (see attached picture with 10-45 degrees celsius on X-Axis for an ADC with a 5V reference measuring a LM399 heated reference over a 2:1 precision voltage divider. The ADC with the 5V reference is temperature cycled). I blame the temperature hysteresis on the die attach to the lead frame which seems to be usually a silver filled epoxy compound. I hope that the hysteresis on a discrete zener is much lower. With best regards Andreas
EB
Ed Breya
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 6:54 PM

Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment.
There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices,
Maxim, Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs

  • you probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only
    provide near zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be
    ovenized to get best performance. They also have an initial voltage
    tolerance up to a few percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and
    maybe amplification that add more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will
    match an LM399 even with very elaborate circuitry to support it.

I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5
V reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use
four of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature.

If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be
easier to make recommendations.

Ed

Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment. There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices, Maxim, Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs - you probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only provide near zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be ovenized to get best performance. They also have an initial voltage tolerance up to a few percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and maybe amplification that add more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will match an LM399 even with very elaborate circuitry to support it. I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5 V reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use four of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature. If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be easier to make recommendations. Ed
AJ
Andreas Jahn
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 3:50 PM

Hello Ed,

  • you probably haven't seen the right one yet.

Yes it seems to be so.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Breya" eb@telight.com
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Some questions to zeners (1N823-1N829)

Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment.
There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices, Maxim,
Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs - you
probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only provide near
zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be ovenized to get
best performance. They also have an initial voltage tolerance up to a few
percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and maybe amplification that add
more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will match an LM399 even with very
elaborate circuitry to support it.

I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5 V
reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use four
of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature.

If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be
easier to make recommendations.

Ed


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hello Ed, > - you probably haven't seen the right one yet. Yes it seems to be so. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Breya" <eb@telight.com> To: <volt-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Some questions to zeners (1N823-1N829) > Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment. > There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices, Maxim, > Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs - you > probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only provide near > zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be ovenized to get > best performance. They also have an initial voltage tolerance up to a few > percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and maybe amplification that add > more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will match an LM399 even with very > elaborate circuitry to support it. > > I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5 V > reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use four > of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature. > > If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be > easier to make recommendations. > > Ed > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
AJ
Andreas Jahn
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 4:02 PM
  • you probably haven't seen the right one yet.

Yes it seems to be so.

From my point of view this would be a LT1027BCH in a metal can housing.

But unfortunately due to ROHS they are no longer produced.

provide near zero tempco at one temperature only,

Do you have any measurement values to this?
Temperature is not the main issue since I want to do a temperature
correction.
But tempco should be below 1ppm/K (better 0.2ppm/K) in the 18-32 degree
celsius (64-90 °F)  range.

If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be
easier to make recommendations.

I want to have high end specs with the power consumption of a battery
supplied DMM.
that is:
tempco below 1ppm/K
hysteresis in the 10-40 degree range well below 1ppm
no sensitivity to humidity (so all plastic housings will fall out)
ageing in the range of 1 ppm/year after some pre-ageing

With best regards

Andreas

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Breya" eb@telight.com
To: volt-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Some questions to zeners (1N823-1N829)

Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment.
There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices, Maxim,
Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs - you
probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only provide near
zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be ovenized to get
best performance. They also have an initial voltage tolerance up to a few
percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and maybe amplification that add
more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will match an LM399 even with very
elaborate circuitry to support it.

I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5 V
reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use four
of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature.

If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be
easier to make recommendations.

Ed


volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

> - you probably haven't seen the right one yet. Yes it seems to be so. >From my point of view this would be a LT1027BCH in a metal can housing. But unfortunately due to ROHS they are no longer produced. > provide near zero tempco at one temperature only, Do you have any measurement values to this? Temperature is not the main issue since I want to do a temperature correction. But tempco should be below 1ppm/K (better 0.2ppm/K) in the 18-32 degree celsius (64-90 °F) range. > If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be > easier to make recommendations. I want to have high end specs with the power consumption of a battery supplied DMM. that is: tempco below 1ppm/K hysteresis in the 10-40 degree range well below 1ppm no sensitivity to humidity (so all plastic housings will fall out) ageing in the range of 1 ppm/year after some pre-ageing With best regards Andreas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Breya" <eb@telight.com> To: <volt-nuts@febo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [volt-nuts] Some questions to zeners (1N823-1N829) > Don't bother with TC zeners, especially for battery operated equipment. > There are lots of nice IC references available from Analog Devices, Maxim, > Linear Technology, TI, an so on, that will run rings around TCZs - you > probably haven't seen the right one yet. The TCZs will only provide near > zero tempco at one temperature only, so would have to be ovenized to get > best performance. They also have an initial voltage tolerance up to a few > percent, so the circuit would need tweaks and maybe amplification that add > more error yet. I doubt that any TCZ will match an LM399 even with very > elaborate circuitry to support it. > > I think the Maxim MAX3650 family would be hard to beat for a low power 5 V > reference - my super-duper voltage standard (yet to built) will use four > of them averaged together, and operated at constant temperature. > > If you state what kind of performance you're looking for, it would be > easier to make recommendations. > > Ed > _______________________________________________ > volt-nuts mailing list -- volt-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volt-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
Михаил
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 4:36 PM

Hi, Andreas!

AJ> I want to have high end specs with the power consumption of a battery
AJ> supplied DMM.
AJ> that is:
AJ> tempco below 1ppm/K
AJ> hysteresis in the 10-40 degree range well below 1ppm
AJ> no sensitivity to humidity (so all plastic housings will fall out)
AJ> ageing in the range of 1 ppm/year after some pre-ageing

I did a lot of references with LTZ1000, LM399 and aged zeners, but
it is not easy to achieve these specs even with LTZ1000. One of the best voltage
standard Datron 4910AV (4x LTZ1000) have only 1 ppm/year drift.

Regards,
Mickle T.

Hi, Andreas! AJ> I want to have high end specs with the power consumption of a battery AJ> supplied DMM. AJ> that is: AJ> tempco below 1ppm/K AJ> hysteresis in the 10-40 degree range well below 1ppm AJ> no sensitivity to humidity (so all plastic housings will fall out) AJ> ageing in the range of 1 ppm/year after some pre-ageing I did a lot of references with LTZ1000, LM399 and aged zeners, but it is not easy to achieve these specs even with LTZ1000. One of the best voltage standard Datron 4910AV (4x LTZ1000) have only 1 ppm/year drift. Regards, Mickle T.