time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Subject: Be aware of test equipment seller orzel-enterprises on eBay

GM
Gregory Muir
Tue, Sep 11, 2012 12:19 AM

Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers.  My very first experience included a shipment from Britain of a very expensive communications receiver where the seller simply wrapped cardboard around it and dropped it off at the local shipping store.  After sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum clearances.  I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items.  Packing requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items.  And I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements.

In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the item to me.  Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form  of damage.

Never underestimate the transportation companies and their propensity to damage equipment.  I had a piece of military electronics shipped from the east coast in it's original shipping container that consisted of 1/8 inch aluminum plate on the inside and outside of the container with 3/8" plywood sandwiched in between.  The unit itself rested in a retainer of rigid foam at all corners that spaced it approximately 1-1/2 inches from the inside walls to absorb shock while in transit.  The shipper placed the container and its contents in a cardboard box with reasonable packing.  All told, the entire weight of the shipment was around 50 pounds.  When received, I opened the package and found that the entire container apparently had received what was estimated to be a 15 or 20 foot drop onto concrete (probably off of a conveyor belt on to the floor) driving the front panel knobs of the unit entirely through the inside aluminum, the plywood and the exterior aluminum of the shipping container.  The knobs were literally sticking out through the exterior of the container!!  The transit company (UPS) tried to tell me that it was "poorly packed" for shipment.

Greg

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:16:55 +0100,  David Kirkby david.kirkby@onetel.net wrote:

I hope the list admin does not mind this email, but I think it will be
useful to any time nut buying test equipment from eBay.

orzel-enterprises sells electronic test equipment on eBay. I would
advise anyone to think twice before purchasing from him. This is how
he shipped a vector network analyzer and S-parameter test set which I
won on an auction for $2750. It was shipped from the USA to the UK.

<Remainder snipped>
Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers. My very first experience included a shipment from Britain of a very expensive communications receiver where the seller simply wrapped cardboard around it and dropped it off at the local shipping store. After sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum clearances. I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items. Packing requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items. And I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements. In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the item to me. Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form of damage. Never underestimate the transportation companies and their propensity to damage equipment. I had a piece of military electronics shipped from the east coast in it's original shipping container that consisted of 1/8 inch aluminum plate on the inside and outside of the container with 3/8" plywood sandwiched in between. The unit itself rested in a retainer of rigid foam at all corners that spaced it approximately 1-1/2 inches from the inside walls to absorb shock while in transit. The shipper placed the container and its contents in a cardboard box with reasonable packing. All told, the entire weight of the shipment was around 50 pounds. When received, I opened the package and found that the entire container apparently had received what was estimated to be a 15 or 20 foot drop onto concrete (probably off of a conveyor belt on to the floor) driving the front panel knobs of the unit entirely through the inside aluminum, the plywood and the exterior aluminum of the shipping container. The knobs were literally sticking out through the exterior of the container!! The transit company (UPS) tried to tell me that it was "poorly packed" for shipment. Greg On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:16:55 +0100, David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net> wrote: > I hope the list admin does not mind this email, but I think it will be > useful to any time nut buying test equipment from eBay. > > orzel-enterprises sells electronic test equipment on eBay. I would > advise anyone to think twice before purchasing from him. This is how > he shipped a vector network analyzer and S-parameter test set which I > won on an auction for $2750. It was shipped from the USA to the UK. <Remainder snipped>
DK
David Kirkby
Tue, Sep 11, 2012 12:47 AM

On 11 September 2012 01:19, Gregory Muir engineering@mt.net wrote:

After sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum clearances.  I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items.  Packing requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items.  And I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements.

That sounds a good idea.

In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the item to me.

Another good idea!

Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form  of damage.

I've not has as many transactions has you (about 250 in my case), but
I think this is the first where any damage has occured in shipping.
I've had numerous items poorly packed, but more by luck than anything
else, they have survied.

I've had hard-drives stuck in jiffy bags, so they drop on the flaw
when the post lady puts them in the door.

I think the issues I have here are:

  1. The item was expensive ($2750)
  2. The item was heavy (60 lbs)
  3. Despite what I think is obviously the sellers fault, he seems to
    want to get away with paying out as little as possible. (Personally,
    if I realized I'd messed up, I would not expect someone else to pay
    for my mistakes. He does not have such an attitude).

I don't know the US law, but I'm very tempted to try to report him for
lying about the value of the item he exported. I'm not sure if that
sort of thing is taken seriously in the USA.

Dave

On 11 September 2012 01:19, Gregory Muir <engineering@mt.net> wrote: > After sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum clearances. I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items. Packing requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items. And I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements. That sounds a good idea. > In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the item to me. Another good idea! > Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form of damage. I've not has as many transactions has you (about 250 in my case), but I think this is the first where any damage has occured in shipping. I've had numerous items poorly packed, but more by luck than anything else, they have survied. I've had hard-drives stuck in jiffy bags, so they drop on the flaw when the post lady puts them in the door. I think the issues I have here are: 1) The item was expensive ($2750) 2) The item was heavy (60 lbs) 3) Despite what I think is obviously the sellers fault, he seems to want to get away with paying out as little as possible. (Personally, if I realized I'd messed up, I would not expect someone else to pay for my mistakes. He does not have such an attitude). I don't know the US law, but I'm very tempted to try to report him for lying about the value of the item he exported. I'm not sure if that sort of thing is taken seriously in the USA. Dave
JF
J. Forster
Tue, Sep 11, 2012 1:17 AM

Emailing shipping instructions after paying is pointless. The seller is
not bound by post-facto conditions and can ignore them with impunity.

OTOH, if you demand them in advance, the seller can refuse your bid.

I'd guess most (all) of the guts of the thing are intact. You may well be
able to disassemble the thing and sell some of the subassemblies on eBay
for far more than the unit cost, especially since it is in the UK.

In the case of an 8753D, the subassemblies will bring maybe $10k and up. A
complete working unit can probably be bought for $6k.

YMMV,

-John

============

Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly
learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers.
My very first experience included a shipment from Britain of a very
expensive communications receiver where the seller simply wrapped
cardboard around it and dropped it off at the local shipping store.  After
sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly
started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating
how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum
clearances.  I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches
of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items.  Packing
requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items.  And I was
surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements.

In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain
dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of
approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container
foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid
them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the
item to me.  Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that
I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form
of damage.

Never underestimate the transportation companies and their propensity to
damage equipment.  I had a piece of military electronics shipped from the
east coast in it's original shipping container that consisted of 1/8 inch
aluminum plate on the inside and outside of the container with 3/8"
plywood sandwiched in between.  The unit itself rested in a retainer of
rigid foam at all corners that spaced it approximately 1-1/2 inches from
the inside walls to absorb shock while in transit.  The shipper placed the
container and its contents in a cardboard box with reasonable packing.
All told, the entire weight of the shipment was around 50 pounds.  When
received, I opened the package and found that the entire container
apparently had received what was estimated to be a 15 or 20 foot drop onto
concrete (probably off of a conveyor belt on to the floor) driving the
front panel knobs of the unit entirely through the inside aluminum, the
plywood and the exterior aluminum of the shipping c!
ontainer.  The knobs were literally sticking out through the exterior of
the container!!  The transit company (UPS) tried to tell me that it was
"poorly packed" for shipment.

Greg

On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:16:55 +0100,  David Kirkby
david.kirkby@onetel.net wrote:

I hope the list admin does not mind this email, but I think it will be
useful to any time nut buying test equipment from eBay.

orzel-enterprises sells electronic test equipment on eBay. I would
advise anyone to think twice before purchasing from him. This is how
he shipped a vector network analyzer and S-parameter test set which I
won on an auction for $2750. It was shipped from the USA to the UK.

<Remainder snipped> _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
Emailing shipping instructions after paying is pointless. The seller is not bound by post-facto conditions and can ignore them with impunity. OTOH, if you demand them in advance, the seller can refuse your bid. I'd guess most (all) of the guts of the thing are intact. You may well be able to disassemble the thing and sell some of the subassemblies on eBay for far more than the unit cost, especially since it is in the UK. In the case of an 8753D, the subassemblies will bring maybe $10k and up. A complete working unit can probably be bought for $6k. YMMV, -John ============ > Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly > learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers. > My very first experience included a shipment from Britain of a very > expensive communications receiver where the seller simply wrapped > cardboard around it and dropped it off at the local shipping store. After > sustaining a couple of damage incidents from things like this, I quickly > started emailing a boilerplate clause after paying for the item stating > how I wanted the item packed including types of packing and minimum > clearances. I always asked for double boxing with at least 3 to 4 inches > of dense material between boxes for the more heavier items. Packing > requirements varied for the size, weight and type of items. And I was > surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements. > > In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would obtain > dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard mockup of > approximately the size and profile of the item, have my own container > foamed-in-place at a local "friendly" company shipping department (paid > them a few $$$) and send that container to the seller to use to ship the > item to me. Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that > I have only received less than ten or so items that contained some form > of damage. > > Never underestimate the transportation companies and their propensity to > damage equipment. I had a piece of military electronics shipped from the > east coast in it's original shipping container that consisted of 1/8 inch > aluminum plate on the inside and outside of the container with 3/8" > plywood sandwiched in between. The unit itself rested in a retainer of > rigid foam at all corners that spaced it approximately 1-1/2 inches from > the inside walls to absorb shock while in transit. The shipper placed the > container and its contents in a cardboard box with reasonable packing. > All told, the entire weight of the shipment was around 50 pounds. When > received, I opened the package and found that the entire container > apparently had received what was estimated to be a 15 or 20 foot drop onto > concrete (probably off of a conveyor belt on to the floor) driving the > front panel knobs of the unit entirely through the inside aluminum, the > plywood and the exterior aluminum of the shipping c! > ontainer. The knobs were literally sticking out through the exterior of > the container!! The transit company (UPS) tried to tell me that it was > "poorly packed" for shipment. > > Greg > > > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:16:55 +0100, David Kirkby > <david.kirkby@onetel.net> wrote: > >> I hope the list admin does not mind this email, but I think it will be >> useful to any time nut buying test equipment from eBay. >> >> orzel-enterprises sells electronic test equipment on eBay. I would >> advise anyone to think twice before purchasing from him. This is how >> he shipped a vector network analyzer and S-parameter test set which I >> won on an auction for $2750. It was shipped from the USA to the UK. > > <Remainder snipped> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
CP
Charles P. Steinmetz
Tue, Sep 11, 2012 3:00 AM

Greg wrote:

Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly
learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers.

Amen.  And that is the most polite and charitable description possible.

I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements.

Interesting.  I have often sent basic packing
recommendations/requests, which have almost always been ignored.

In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would
obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard
mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my
own container foamed-in-place  *  *  *  and send that container to
the seller to use to ship the item to me.

Great idea, but it must dramatically raise your cost of
transport.  With the reported scarcity/prices of T&M equipment in
Europe that may be justified, but for domestic sales here in the
States it could be hard to justify.

Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have
only received less than ten or so items that contained some form  of damage.

We have had more than double that many damaged items on fewer than
20% of the purchases.  There was a time several years ago when eBay
and paypal were useless at helping with not-as-described and
damaged-in-shipment claims.  Thankfully, in the last few years they
seem to have gotten more involved.

Never underestimate the transportation companies and their
propensity to damage equipment.

We have seen very little damage -- in fact, almost none -- that was
the shipper's fault.  I know it happens, but from our experience
nowhere near as often as reports would indicate.  I think this means
that most recipients don't know any more about packing than the
sellers, and are mistakenly blaming the carriers for the sellers' failings.

Best regards,

Charles

Greg wrote: >Shortly after I started bidding on eBay back in the 90's, I quickly >learned that many of the sellers are not knowledgeable equipment shippers. Amen. And that is the most polite and charitable description possible. >I was surprised how the sellers would work hard to meet those requirements. Interesting. I have often sent basic packing recommendations/requests, which have almost always been ignored. >In a few instances where items weighed upwards of 100 lbs, I would >obtain dimensions of the item(s) being sent, create a cardboard >mockup of approximately the size and profile of the item, have my >own container foamed-in-place * * * and send that container to >the seller to use to ship the item to me. Great idea, but it must dramatically raise your cost of transport. With the reported scarcity/prices of T&M equipment in Europe that may be justified, but for domestic sales here in the States it could be hard to justify. >Now, after over 700 purchases on eBay, I can safely say that I have >only received less than ten or so items that contained some form of damage. We have had more than double that many damaged items on fewer than 20% of the purchases. There was a time several years ago when eBay and paypal were useless at helping with not-as-described and damaged-in-shipment claims. Thankfully, in the last few years they seem to have gotten more involved. >Never underestimate the transportation companies and their >propensity to damage equipment. We have seen very little damage -- in fact, almost none -- that was the shipper's fault. I know it happens, but from our experience nowhere near as often as reports would indicate. I think this means that most recipients don't know any more about packing than the sellers, and are mistakenly blaming the carriers for the sellers' failings. Best regards, Charles