Hi guys, We formatted the syst:stat? command on the Fury GPSDO so as to be compatible to GPSCon, that meant following a very rigorous syntax (including the exact number of spaces etc), it's not pretty - but works perfectly with GPSCon. One note of interest to the group in general: some of our future products have a new, very high performance mobile GPS on them that will actually track and output 16 Sats and more simultaneously (well, if it could see the Sats it would receive more than 30 channels) to GPSCon. A far cry from the 8-sat Oncore days, and this is causing some grief for GPSCon (not the entire list of Sat's can be shown by GPSCon without overflowing the page etc). We can't reveal the GPS details just yet though, please don't ask :) Seems the web interface of GPSCon works well with any number of Sats though, see for example: _http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm_ (http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm) We are working hard on a set of new products right now, so the ptime command changes will have to be put on a slightly lower priority for now unfortunately. Seems your driver is working well right now though from what I can gather in the email thread. Thanks for your hard work on this, bye, Said In a message dated 7/8/2008 02:09:12 W. Europe Daylight Time, smace@intt.net writes: The gps?,sync?,diag?,meas? results were easier to parse than the system:status? since everything has a prefix. I'm not a fan of a the system:status? command, but it would be nice to get sat signal strength from the gps? command tree. My driver is not ideal, but it works with what the Fury can do with the current firmware. More to come. Scott **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:45 PM, <SAIDJACK@aol.com> wrote: > One note of interest to the group in general: some of our future products > have a new, very high performance mobile GPS on them that will actually track > and output 16 Sats and more simultaneously (well, if it could see the Sats it > would receive more than 30 channels) to GPSCon. A far cry from the 8-sat > Oncore days, and this is causing some grief for GPSCon (not the entire list of > Sat's can be shown by GPSCon without overflowing the page etc). We can't reveal > the GPS details just yet though, please don't ask :) Those ublox chips are nice, aren't they? ;) -- GDB has a 'break' feature; why doesn't it have 'fix' too?

  remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter

Scott

_http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm_ 

This is on a net4501 with the TMRIN mod running FreeBSD 7.0 (nanobsd). Fury 1.18 firmware with a surplus LPRO-101 packaged up in an old 1U Datum 670x rubidium reference chassis. > ntptime ntp_gettime() returns code 0 (OK) time cc1d84fd.0fbd3800 Tue, Jul 8 2008 6:17:33.061, (.061481758), maximum error 1480 us, estimated error 15 us, TAI offset 0 ntp_adjtime() returns code 0 (OK) modes 0x0 (), offset -0.014 us, frequency -0.040 ppm, interval 1 s, maximum error 1480 us, estimated error 15 us, status 0x2001 (PLL,NANO), time constant 4, precision 0.001 us, tolerance 496 ppm, > > ntpq -c peers remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter ============================================================================== +REFCLK(45,0) .GPS. 0 l 13 16 377 0.000 -1.152 3.108 oPPS(0) .PPS. 0 l 4 16 377 0.000 0.000 0.015 > clockstats: 54655 22687.015 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 5.09e-12 -1.10e-09 46.10 1.994153 0.000004 10.53 8 9 1 38 10 54655 22697.016 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 4.59e-12 -1.40e-09 46.00 1.994255 0.000004 10.53 8 9 1 38 10 54655 22707.017 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 4.29e-12 -1.60e-09 46.10 1.994454 0.000004 10.53 8 9 1 38 -11 54655 22717.017 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 3.56e-12 -1.90e-09 46.10 1.994834 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 38 4 54655 22727.018 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 3.29e-12 -2.10e-09 46.10 1.994912 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 -6 54655 22737.010 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 2.35e-12 -2.30e-09 46.10 1.994695 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 -14 54655 22747.010 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 2.08e-12 -2.60e-09 46.10 1.994872 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 -13 54655 22757.011 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 1.43e-12 -2.80e-09 46.10 1.995252 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 0 54655 22767.012 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 1.16e-12 -3.00e-09 46.10 1.995357 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 -5 54655 22777.012 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 8.07e-13 -3.20e-09 46.10 1.995337 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 3 54655 22787.014 127.127.45.0 94 1 0 0 5.83e-13 -3.40e-09 46.10 1.995080 0.000004 10.53 9 9 1 36 -8 Scott SAIDJACK@aol.com wrote: > Hi guys, > > We formatted the syst:stat? command on the Fury GPSDO so as to be compatible > to GPSCon, that meant following a very rigorous syntax (including the exact > number of spaces etc), it's not pretty - but works perfectly with GPSCon. > > One note of interest to the group in general: some of our future products > have a new, very high performance mobile GPS on them that will actually track > and output 16 Sats and more simultaneously (well, if it could see the Sats it > would receive more than 30 channels) to GPSCon. A far cry from the 8-sat > Oncore days, and this is causing some grief for GPSCon (not the entire list of > Sat's can be shown by GPSCon without overflowing the page etc). We can't reveal > the GPS details just yet though, please don't ask :) > > Seems the web interface of GPSCon works well with any number of Sats though, > see for example: > > _http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm_ > (http://www.jackson-labs.com/images/gpsstat.htm) > > > We are working hard on a set of new products right now, so the ptime command > changes will have to be put on a slightly lower priority for now > unfortunately. Seems your driver is working well right now though from what I can gather > in the email thread. > > Thanks for your hard work on this, > bye, > Said > > > > > In a message dated 7/8/2008 02:09:12 W. Europe Daylight Time, smace@intt.net > writes: > > > The gps?,sync?,diag?,meas? results were easier to parse than the > system:status? > since everything has a prefix. > > I'm not a fan of a the system:status? command, but it would be nice to get > sat signal strength from the gps? command tree. > > My driver is not ideal, but it works with what the Fury can do with the > current > firmware. More to come. > > Scott > > > > > > **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for > fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >