Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.
Thanks,
Tom
Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.
One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the
other is proven over many thousands of miles.
Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried.
--Georgs
Very true Georgs, but in this case Maine Cat is a very experienced cat
builder with a fine and respected name and product. You will notice Maine
Cat did not just take an existing sail hull to make the new power cat.
-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Georgs
Kolesnikovs
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:52 PM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] Maine Cat or Endeavour 40
Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.
One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the other
is proven over many thousands of miles.
Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried.
--Georgs
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Georgs,
The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed
CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls.
Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull
with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics.
Regards,
Malcolm Tennant.
Malcolm Tennant Multihull Design Ltd
PO Box 60513 Titirangi,
Waitakere 0642
NEW ZEALAND
ph +64 9 817 1988
fax +64 9 817 6080
e-mail malcolm@tennantdesign.co.nz
www.tennantdesign.co.nz
www.catdesigners.com
Malcolm Tenant wrote from New Zealand:
The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed
CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls.
Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull
with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics.
I wasn't thinking of just the hull form. As you know, Malcolm, there
is a heckuva lot more to a successful boat: Systems, engineering,
systems, fit and finish, systems, comfort, safety, and the thickness
of the cushions in the berths, and how much space there is when you
sit down in the head, and then even more systems.
--Georgs, on Lake Ontario in Canada