Maine Cat or Endeavour 40

T
Tom
Tue, Jan 16, 2007 11:56 PM

Any thoughts on the comparison of the two.  Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.

Thanks,

Tom

Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what other (more informed than I) people think. Thanks, Tom
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, Jan 18, 2007 2:52 AM

Any thoughts on the comparison of the two.  Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.

One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the
other is proven over many thousands of miles.

Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried.

--Georgs

>Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what >other (more informed than I) people think. One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the other is proven over many thousands of miles. Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried. --Georgs
BP
B. P. Hawkins
Thu, Jan 18, 2007 3:24 AM

Very true Georgs, but in this case Maine Cat is a very experienced cat
builder with a fine and respected name and product.  You will notice Maine
Cat did not just take an existing sail hull to make the new power cat.

-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Georgs
Kolesnikovs
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:52 PM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] Maine Cat or Endeavour 40

Any thoughts on the comparison of the two.  Interested to know what
other (more informed than I) people think.

One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the other
is proven over many thousands of miles.

Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried.

--Georgs


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Very true Georgs, but in this case Maine Cat is a very experienced cat builder with a fine and respected name and product. You will notice Maine Cat did not just take an existing sail hull to make the new power cat. -----Original Message----- From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com [mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Georgs Kolesnikovs Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:52 PM To: Power Catamaran List Subject: Re: [PCW] Maine Cat or Endeavour 40 >Any thoughts on the comparison of the two. Interested to know what >other (more informed than I) people think. One significant difference is that one in an all-new design while the other is proven over many thousands of miles. Which is not to say new is bad. New is simply untried. --Georgs _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
MT
Malcolm Tennant
Thu, Jan 18, 2007 4:11 AM

Georgs,

The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed
CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls.
Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull
with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics.

Regards,

Malcolm Tennant.

Malcolm Tennant Multihull Design Ltd
PO Box 60513 Titirangi,
Waitakere 0642
NEW ZEALAND

ph +64 9 817 1988
fax +64 9 817 6080

e-mail malcolm@tennantdesign.co.nz
www.tennantdesign.co.nz
www.catdesigners.com

Georgs, The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls. Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics. Regards, Malcolm Tennant. Malcolm Tennant Multihull Design Ltd PO Box 60513 Titirangi, Waitakere 0642 NEW ZEALAND ph +64 9 817 1988 fax +64 9 817 6080 e-mail malcolm@tennantdesign.co.nz www.tennantdesign.co.nz www.catdesigners.com
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, Jan 18, 2007 4:14 AM

Malcolm Tenant wrote from New Zealand:

The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed
CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls.
Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull
with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics.

I wasn't thinking of just the hull form. As you know, Malcolm, there
is a heckuva lot more to a successful boat: Systems, engineering,
systems, fit and finish, systems, comfort, safety, and the thickness
of the cushions in the berths, and how much space there is when you
sit down in the head, and then even more systems.

--Georgs, on Lake Ontario in Canada

Malcolm Tenant wrote from New Zealand: >The Maine Cat my well be a new design but they are using our well developed >CS hull form and a fairly standard 12:1 length to beam ratio for the hulls. >Consequently I think that would now have to be accepted as a proven hull >with highly predictable [at least by us] performance characteristics. I wasn't thinking of just the hull form. As you know, Malcolm, there is a heckuva lot more to a successful boat: Systems, engineering, systems, fit and finish, systems, comfort, safety, and the thickness of the cushions in the berths, and how much space there is when you sit down in the head, and then even more systems. --Georgs, on Lake Ontario in Canada