trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

Displacement, length, power, and speed.

LZ
Lawrence Zeitlin
Mon, Aug 15, 2005 1:27 PM

For those still obsessed with determining power required to move a
displacement hull at a specific speed, try Keith's formula.

Keith's formula for relating speed, power, length, and displacement is
described on p. 105 of "Skene's Elements of Yacht Design, 8th ed."
revised by Francis S. Kinney. It is published by Dodd, Mead & Co., New
York, ISBN: 0-396-06582-1. The book also has a number of other
techniques for calculating the power requirements of boats and is a
compendium of material useful to yacht designers.

I use the following formula:  KTS =  (LWL)^.5  x  C x ((HP x 1000)/D)^.333

This is essentially Keith's formula restated for easy computer calculation.

LWL is waterline length measured in feet.
D is displacement measured in lbs.
C is a scaling constant which varies between 1.1 and 1.5 and must be
determined by observation or experimentation with a specific type of boat.

I use a constant of 1.18 for a typical displacement trawler hull. This
is based on experience, not on theory. Lower values of the constant
imply a more pessimistic outlook and prescribe more power for a given
speed. Values above 1.2 tend to be too optimistic.

The presence of arbitrary constants in an equation are a serious fudge
factor. I was once told by a professor of mathematics that if you have
two arbitrary constants in an equation, you can make the resulting curve
look like a puppy dog, and if you throw in a third arbitrary constant,
you can make it wag its tail.

What the scaling constant in Keith's formula does is correct for
difference in hull shape (prismatic coefficient, etc), hull condition
(squeeky clean or barnacle covered), sea state (mill pond or "real
world"), measurement units (statute miles, knots, kilometers, lbs.,
kilograms, tons, etc.), and propeller efficiency (usually assumed to be
about 50%). All the basic formula does is provide the shape of the curve
of increasing power requirement with speed for a hull of given length
and displacement. The scaling constant changes the axes of the graph to
meaningful units.

The best way to use Keith's formula, or any similar formula, is to make
exact measurements of a boat's power requirements at a specific speed
and displacement. Then calculate the proper constant. Using this
constant, power requirements (and fuel consumption) can then be
estimated for that same hull for a range of speeds and displacements.
You can generalize to other boats of the same general type with
correspondingly less accurate results. It would not do, however, to use
Keith's formula to compare displacement, semi-displacement, and planing
boats.

You can't accept any of the maritime formulas on blind faith but Keith's
formula seems to be one of the more reliable ones for approximating
power required to move a displacement hull. It considers LWL,
displacement, speed, and power. Inherent in the calculations are
assumptions made about propeller efficiency, specific hull
configuration, units of measurement, and sea conditions. These are
included in the scaling constant. Generally the mathematical formulas
give results which are in error by no more than 10% when compared with
actual in-water trials. Nothing beats actual tank tests or full scale
prototypes, but using a computer is a lot cheaper.

Larry Z

For those still obsessed with determining power required to move a displacement hull at a specific speed, try Keith's formula. Keith's formula for relating speed, power, length, and displacement is described on p. 105 of "Skene's Elements of Yacht Design, 8th ed." revised by Francis S. Kinney. It is published by Dodd, Mead & Co., New York, ISBN: 0-396-06582-1. The book also has a number of other techniques for calculating the power requirements of boats and is a compendium of material useful to yacht designers. I use the following formula: KTS = (LWL)^.5 x C x ((HP x 1000)/D)^.333 This is essentially Keith's formula restated for easy computer calculation. LWL is waterline length measured in feet. D is displacement measured in lbs. C is a scaling constant which varies between 1.1 and 1.5 and must be determined by observation or experimentation with a specific type of boat. I use a constant of 1.18 for a typical displacement trawler hull. This is based on experience, not on theory. Lower values of the constant imply a more pessimistic outlook and prescribe more power for a given speed. Values above 1.2 tend to be too optimistic. The presence of arbitrary constants in an equation are a serious fudge factor. I was once told by a professor of mathematics that if you have two arbitrary constants in an equation, you can make the resulting curve look like a puppy dog, and if you throw in a third arbitrary constant, you can make it wag its tail. What the scaling constant in Keith's formula does is correct for difference in hull shape (prismatic coefficient, etc), hull condition (squeeky clean or barnacle covered), sea state (mill pond or "real world"), measurement units (statute miles, knots, kilometers, lbs., kilograms, tons, etc.), and propeller efficiency (usually assumed to be about 50%). All the basic formula does is provide the shape of the curve of increasing power requirement with speed for a hull of given length and displacement. The scaling constant changes the axes of the graph to meaningful units. The best way to use Keith's formula, or any similar formula, is to make exact measurements of a boat's power requirements at a specific speed and displacement. Then calculate the proper constant. Using this constant, power requirements (and fuel consumption) can then be estimated for that same hull for a range of speeds and displacements. You can generalize to other boats of the same general type with correspondingly less accurate results. It would not do, however, to use Keith's formula to compare displacement, semi-displacement, and planing boats. You can't accept any of the maritime formulas on blind faith but Keith's formula seems to be one of the more reliable ones for approximating power required to move a displacement hull. It considers LWL, displacement, speed, and power. Inherent in the calculations are assumptions made about propeller efficiency, specific hull configuration, units of measurement, and sea conditions. These are included in the scaling constant. Generally the mathematical formulas give results which are in error by no more than 10% when compared with actual in-water trials. Nothing beats actual tank tests or full scale prototypes, but using a computer is a lot cheaper. Larry Z