VE
Vozzella, Ed
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:12 PM
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
>
> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
>
> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
price. I
> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
>
> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
each
> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
a
> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
each
> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
>
> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
>
> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
older
> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Glacier
> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
on--but
> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
the
> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
cost
> becomes considerable...
>
> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
trimming
> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
any
> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
>
> Bob Austin
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:16 PM
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
>I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
>MC30
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
>To: Power Catamaran List
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
>hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
>should be just under $100K.
>
>The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
>but from the waterline down it is a cat.
>
>Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
>speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
>Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
>Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
>To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>Paul and Bob
>Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
>94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
>130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
>Hakan Widmark
>>
>> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
>> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
>> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>>
>> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
>that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
>a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
>>
>> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
>> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
>> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
>price. I
>> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
>>
>> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
>each
>> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
>a
>> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
>each
>> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
>> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
>>
>> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
>>
>> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
>> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
>older
>> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
>> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
>Glacier
>> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
>on--but
>> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
>> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
>> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
>the
>> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
>cost
>> becomes considerable...
>>
>> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
>> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
>> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
>trimming
>> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
>any
>> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
>>
>> Bob Austin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
JS
JKM Service
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:17 PM
Please clik the link at the open page , down the right side or go directly
to :
http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html
Regards
Kris
-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Vozzella, Ed
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:12 PM
To: 'scott@northsoundcruising.com'; 'Power Catamaran List'
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Please clik the link at the open page , down the right side or go directly
to :
http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html
Regards
Kris
-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Vozzella, Ed
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:12 PM
To: 'scott@northsoundcruising.com'; 'Power Catamaran List'
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
>
> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
>
> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
price. I
> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
>
> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
each
> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without
a
> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from
each
> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good
> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
>
> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
>
> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's
> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
older
> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Glacier
> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
on--but
> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by
the
> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
cost
> becomes considerable...
>
> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
trimming
> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in
any
> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
>
> Bob Austin
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
DC
D C *Mac* Macdonald
Thu, May 4, 2006 4:55 PM
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
- You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
Mac in Oklahoma
----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com>
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
>I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
>MC30
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
>To: Power Catamaran List
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
>hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
US
>should be just under $100K.
>
>The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
monohull
>but from the waterline down it is a cat.
>
>Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
>speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
>Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
>Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
>To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>Paul and Bob
>Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
than
>94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
>130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
>Hakan Widmark
>>
>> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
>> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
>> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>>
>> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
>that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
chop
>a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
>>
>> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
>> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
the
>> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
>price. I
>> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
>>
>> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
>each
>> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
without
>a
>> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
from
>each
>> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
good
>> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
>>
>> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
>>
>> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
90's
>> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
>older
>> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
pads")--which
>> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
>Glacier
>> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
>on--but
>> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
and
>> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
has
>> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
by
>the
>> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
>cost
>> becomes considerable...
>>
>> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
Suziki's
>> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
tanks.
>> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
>trimming
>> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
in
>any
>> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
>>
>> Bob Austin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
CL
Capt. Len
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:01 PM
Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
len
D C Mac Macdonald wrote:
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
- You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
len
D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:
> 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
> I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
> for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
>
> Mac in Oklahoma
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com>
> Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
>
> Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
>
> >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
> >MC30
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
> >To: Power Catamaran List
> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >
> >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
> >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
> US
> >should be just under $100K.
> >
> >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
> monohull
> >but from the waterline down it is a cat.
> >
> >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
> >speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
> >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
> >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
> >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >
> >Paul and Bob
> >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
> than
> >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
> >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
> >Hakan Widmark
> >>
> >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
> >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
> >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >>
> >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
> >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
> chop
> >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
> >>
> >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
> >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
> the
> >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
> >price. I
> >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
> >>
> >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
> >each
> >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
> without
> >a
> >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
> from
> >each
> >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
> good
> >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
> >>
> >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
> >>
> >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
> 90's
> >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
> >older
> >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
> pads")--which
> >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
> >Glacier
> >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
> >on--but
> >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
> and
> >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
> has
> >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
> by
> >the
> >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
> >cost
> >> becomes considerable...
> >>
> >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
> Suziki's
> >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
> tanks.
> >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
> >trimming
> >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
> in
> >any
> >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
> >>
> >> Bob Austin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
SK
Scott Karren
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:07 PM
The MC 30 and the MC 920 are two very different boats. Although they are similar in length, they are very different designs.
The MC30 is a sleek feminine motercat with a cabin that reminds me of my sailboat. It is 10 feet wide and about 4500 lbs with two engines.
The MC920 is a more macho looking cat that looks like a single hull from the water line up. It is 8' 6 wide and more easily trailerable. It has an innovative W style hull in the rear that allows it to be powered with a single Volvo engine saving both money and weight. it is a completely NEW design. Hull number two will be in the Northwest in July.
Scott karren
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: "D C Mac Macdonald" k2gkk@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 16:55:29
To:power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
Mac in Oklahoma
----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
- You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
The MC 30 and the MC 920 are two very different boats. Although they are similar in length, they are very different designs.
The MC30 is a sleek feminine motercat with a cabin that reminds me of my sailboat. It is 10 feet wide and about 4500 lbs with two engines.
The MC920 is a more macho looking cat that looks like a single hull from the water line up. It is 8' 6 wide and more easily trailerable. It has an innovative W style hull in the rear that allows it to be powered with a single Volvo engine saving both money and weight. it is a completely NEW design. Hull number two will be in the Northwest in July.
Scott karren
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: "D C *Mac* Macdonald" <k2gkk@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 16:55:29
To:power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
Mac in Oklahoma
----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com>
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
>I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
>MC30
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
>Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
>To: Power Catamaran List
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
>hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
US
>should be just under $100K.
>
>The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
monohull
>but from the waterline down it is a cat.
>
>Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
>speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
>Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
>Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
>To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
>Paul and Bob
>Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
than
>94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
>130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
>Hakan Widmark
>>
>> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
>> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
>> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
>> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>>
>> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
>that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
chop
>a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
>>
>> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
>> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
the
>> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
>price. I
>> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
>>
>> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
>each
>> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
without
>a
>> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
from
>each
>> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
good
>> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
>>
>> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
>>
>> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
90's
>> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
>older
>> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
pads")--which
>> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
>Glacier
>> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
>on--but
>> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
and
>> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
has
>> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
by
>the
>> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
>cost
>> becomes considerable...
>>
>> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
Suziki's
>> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
tanks.
>> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
>trimming
>> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
in
>any
>> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
>>
>> Bob Austin
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>> _______________________________________________
>> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>_______________________________________________
>Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
SK
Scott Karren
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:13 PM
My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.
At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.
Scott Karren.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Capt. Len" trikini23@trikini.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
len
D C Mac Macdonald wrote:
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
- You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.
At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.
Scott Karren.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Capt. Len" <trikini23@trikini.com>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
len
D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:
> 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
> I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
> for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
>
> Mac in Oklahoma
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com>
> Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
>
> Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
>
> >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
> >MC30
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
> >To: Power Catamaran List
> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >
> >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
> >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
> US
> >should be just under $100K.
> >
> >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
> monohull
> >but from the waterline down it is a cat.
> >
> >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
> >speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
> >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
> >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
> >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >
> >Paul and Bob
> >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
> than
> >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
> >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
> >Hakan Widmark
> >>
> >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
> >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
> >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> >>
> >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
> >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
> chop
> >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
> >>
> >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
> >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
> the
> >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
> >price. I
> >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
> >>
> >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
> >each
> >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
> without
> >a
> >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
> from
> >each
> >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
> good
> >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
> >>
> >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
> >>
> >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
> 90's
> >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
> >older
> >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
> pads")--which
> >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
> >Glacier
> >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
> >on--but
> >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
> and
> >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
> has
> >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
> by
> >the
> >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
> >cost
> >> becomes considerable...
> >>
> >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
> Suziki's
> >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
> tanks.
> >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
> >trimming
> >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
> in
> >any
> >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
> >>
> >> Bob Austin
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> >_______________________________________________
> >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
_______________________________________________
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
CL
Capt. Len
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:25 PM
The photos on the site show the front 1/3 including full forefoot out of the water and it looks like flat.
Also the stern is dug in.
If not true they need better photos.
Len
Scott Karren wrote:
My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.
At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.
Scott Karren.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Capt. Len" trikini23@trikini.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
len
D C Mac Macdonald wrote:
I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
should be just under $100K.
The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
but from the waterline down it is a cat.
Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
- You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark
that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
becomes considerable...
We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
Bob Austin
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
The photos on the site show the front 1/3 including full forefoot out of the water and it looks like flat.
Also the stern is dug in.
If not true they need better photos.
Len
Scott Karren wrote:
> My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.
>
> At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.
>
> Scott Karren.
> Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Capt. Len" <trikini23@trikini.com>
> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
> To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
>
> Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
> hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer.
>
> Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
> show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
> stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.
>
> len
>
> D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:
>
> > 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
> > I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
> > for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.
> >
> > Mac in Oklahoma
> >
> > ----Original Message Follows----
> > From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com>
> > Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400
> >
> > Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>.
> >
> > >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
> > >MC30
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
> > >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
> > >To: Power Catamaran List
> > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> > >
> > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
> > >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the
> > US
> > >should be just under $100K.
> > >
> > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a
> > monohull
> > >but from the waterline down it is a cat.
> > >
> > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
> > >speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
> > >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: <catmarin@bredband.net>
> > >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
> > >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> > >
> > >Paul and Bob
> > >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less
> > than
> > >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
> > >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
> > >Hakan Widmark
> > >>
> > >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com>
> > >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
> > >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com>
> > >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
> > >>
> > >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,
> > >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the
> > chop
> > >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.
> > >>
> > >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul,
> > >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned
> > the
> > >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base
> > >price. I
> > >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.
> > >>
> > >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on
> > >each
> > >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or
> > without
> > >a
> > >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into
> > from
> > >each
> > >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a
> > good
> > >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table.
> > >>
> > >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.
> > >>
> > >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late
> > 90's
> > >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The
> > >older
> > >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking
> > pads")--which
> > >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the
> > >Glacier
> > >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk
> > >on--but
> > >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley
> > and
> > >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay
> > has
> > >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and
> > by
> > >the
> > >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the
> > >cost
> > >> becomes considerable...
> > >>
> > >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has
> > Suziki's
> > >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive
> > tanks.
> > >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what
> > >trimming
> > >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey
> > in
> > >any
> > >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.
> > >>
> > >> Bob Austin
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > _______________________________________________
> > Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> > _______________________________________________
> > Power-Catamaran Mailing List
>
> --
> Live Long and Prosper
> Capt. Len Susman, retired
> trikini23@trikini.com
> What's New
> http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
> _______________________________________________
> Power-Catamaran Mailing List
--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm