Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

VE
Vozzella, Ed
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:12 PM

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only MC30 -----Original Message----- From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM To: Power Catamaran List Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US should be just under $100K. The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull but from the waterline down it is a cat. Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising speeds of 15 to 20 knots. Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. -----Original Message----- From: <catmarin@bredband.net> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats Paul and Bob Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than 94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one 130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com Hakan Widmark > > From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> > Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. > > Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, > This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the > Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base price. I > have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. > > The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on each > side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without a > wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from each > side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good > sized galley and L shaped settee/table. > > The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. > > The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's > which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The older > Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which > apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the Glacier > Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk on--but > that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and > storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has > occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by the > time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the cost > becomes considerable... > > We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's > 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks. > Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what trimming > the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in any > chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. > > Bob Austin > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:16 PM

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only >MC30 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM >To: Power Catamaran List >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US >should be just under $100K. > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > >-----Original Message----- >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >Paul and Bob >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com >Hakan Widmark >> >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats >> >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. >> >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base >price. I >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. >> >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on >each >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without >a >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from >each >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. >> >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. >> >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The >older >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the >Glacier >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk >on--but >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by >the >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the >cost >> becomes considerable... >> >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks. >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what >trimming >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in >any >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. >> >> Bob Austin >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List
JS
JKM Service
Thu, May 4, 2006 3:17 PM

Please clik the link at the open page , down the right side or go directly
to :
http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html

Regards
Kris

-----Original Message-----
From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com
[mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Vozzella, Ed
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:12 PM
To: 'scott@northsoundcruising.com'; 'Power Catamaran List'
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US
should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull
but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than
94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop
a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned the
Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a good
sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late 90's
which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which
apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and
storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has
occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's
150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks.
Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Please clik the link at the open page , down the right side or go directly to : http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html Regards Kris -----Original Message----- From: power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com [mailto:power-catamaran-bounces@lists.samurai.com] On Behalf Of Vozzella, Ed Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:12 PM To: 'scott@northsoundcruising.com'; 'Power Catamaran List' Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only MC30 -----Original Message----- From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM To: Power Catamaran List Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US should be just under $100K. The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull but from the waterline down it is a cat. Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising speeds of 15 to 20 knots. Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. -----Original Message----- From: <catmarin@bredband.net> Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats Paul and Bob Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than 94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one 130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com Hakan Widmark > > From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> > Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. > > Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, > This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the > Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base price. I > have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. > > The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on each > side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without a > wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from each > side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good > sized galley and L shaped settee/table. > > The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. > > The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's > which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The older > Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which > apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the Glacier > Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk on--but > that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and > storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has > occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by the > time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the cost > becomes considerable... > > We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's > 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks. > Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what trimming > the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in any > chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. > > Bob Austin > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
DC
D C *Mac* Macdonald
Thu, May 4, 2006 4:55 PM

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.

Mac in Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400

Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the

US

should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a

monohull

but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less

than

  1. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
    130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
    Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the

chop

a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned

the

Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or

without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into

from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a

good

sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late

90's

which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking

pads")--which

apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley

and

storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay

has

occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and

by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has

Suziki's

150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive

tanks.

Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey

in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet. I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant for USA and MC920 for rest of the world. Mac in Oklahoma ----Original Message Follows---- From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400 Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only >MC30 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM >To: Power Catamaran List >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US >should be just under $100K. > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > >-----Original Message----- >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >Paul and Bob >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com >Hakan Widmark >> >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats >> >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. >> >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base >price. I >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. >> >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on >each >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without >a >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from >each >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. >> >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. >> >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The >older >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the >Glacier >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk >on--but >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by >the >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the >cost >> becomes considerable... >> >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks. >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what >trimming >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in >any >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. >> >> Bob Austin >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
CL
Capt. Len
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:01 PM

Take another look  the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs.  Probably really about a 25 footer.

Really a trihull.  Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show.  What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.

len

D C Mac Macdonald wrote:

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.

Mac in Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400

Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the

US

should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a

monohull

but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less

than

  1. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
    130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
    Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the

chop

a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned

the

Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or

without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into

from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a

good

sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late

90's

which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking

pads")--which

apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley

and

storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay

has

occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and

by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has

Suziki's

150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive

tanks.

Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey

in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer. Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds. stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky. len D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote: > 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet. > I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant > for USA and MC920 for rest of the world. > > Mac in Oklahoma > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> > Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400 > > Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. > > >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only > >MC30 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] > >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM > >To: Power Catamaran List > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of > >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the > US > >should be just under $100K. > > > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a > monohull > >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > > > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising > >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. > >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> > >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 > >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > >Paul and Bob > >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less > than > >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one > >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com > >Hakan Widmark > >> > >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> > >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST > >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >> > >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, > >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the > chop > >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. > >> > >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, > >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned > the > >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base > >price. I > >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. > >> > >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on > >each > >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or > without > >a > >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into > from > >each > >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a > good > >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. > >> > >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. > >> > >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late > 90's > >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The > >older > >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking > pads")--which > >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the > >Glacier > >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk > >on--but > >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley > and > >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay > has > >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and > by > >the > >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the > >cost > >> becomes considerable... > >> > >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has > Suziki's > >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive > tanks. > >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what > >trimming > >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey > in > >any > >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. > >> > >> Bob Austin > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
SK
Scott Karren
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:07 PM

The MC 30 and the MC 920 are two very different boats. Although they are similar in length, they are very different designs.

The MC30 is a sleek feminine motercat with a cabin that reminds me of my sailboat. It is 10 feet wide and about 4500 lbs with two engines.

The MC920 is a more macho looking cat that looks like a single hull from the water line up. It is 8' 6 wide and more easily trailerable. It has an innovative W style hull in the rear that allows it to be powered with a single Volvo engine saving both money and weight. it is a completely NEW design. Hull number two will be in the Northwest in July.

Scott karren
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: "D C Mac Macdonald" k2gkk@hotmail.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 16:55:29
To:power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.

Mac in Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400

Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the

US

should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a

monohull

but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less

than

  1. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
    130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
    Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the

chop

a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned

the

Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or

without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into

from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a

good

sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late

90's

which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking

pads")--which

apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley

and

storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay

has

occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and

by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has

Suziki's

150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive

tanks.

Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey

in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

The MC 30 and the MC 920 are two very different boats. Although they are similar in length, they are very different designs. The MC30 is a sleek feminine motercat with a cabin that reminds me of my sailboat. It is 10 feet wide and about 4500 lbs with two engines. The MC920 is a more macho looking cat that looks like a single hull from the water line up. It is 8' 6 wide and more easily trailerable. It has an innovative W style hull in the rear that allows it to be powered with a single Volvo engine saving both money and weight. it is a completely NEW design. Hull number two will be in the Northwest in July. Scott karren Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. -----Original Message----- From: "D C *Mac* Macdonald" <k2gkk@hotmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 16:55:29 To:power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet. I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant for USA and MC920 for rest of the world. Mac in Oklahoma ----Original Message Follows---- From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400 Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only >MC30 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM >To: Power Catamaran List >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the US >should be just under $100K. > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a monohull >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > >-----Original Message----- >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >Paul and Bob >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less than >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com >Hakan Widmark >> >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats >> >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the chop >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. >> >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned the >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base >price. I >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. >> >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on >each >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or without >a >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into from >each >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a good >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. >> >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. >> >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late 90's >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The >older >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking pads")--which >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the >Glacier >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk >on--but >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley and >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay has >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and by >the >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the >cost >> becomes considerable... >> >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has Suziki's >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive tanks. >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what >trimming >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey in >any >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. >> >> Bob Austin >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >> _______________________________________________ >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
SK
Scott Karren
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:13 PM

My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.

At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches.  The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.

Scott Karren.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Capt. Len" trikini23@trikini.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Take another look  the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs.  Probably really about a 25 footer.

Really a trihull.  Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show.  What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.

len

D C Mac Macdonald wrote:

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.

Mac in Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400

Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the

US

should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a

monohull

but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less

than

  1. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
    130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
    Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the

chop

a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned

the

Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or

without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into

from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a

good

sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late

90's

which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking

pads")--which

apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley

and

storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay

has

occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and

by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has

Suziki's

150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive

tanks.

Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey

in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull. At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems. Scott Karren. Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. -----Original Message----- From: "Capt. Len" <trikini23@trikini.com> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05 To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer. Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds. stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky. len D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote: > 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet. > I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant > for USA and MC920 for rest of the world. > > Mac in Oklahoma > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> > Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400 > > Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. > > >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only > >MC30 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] > >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM > >To: Power Catamaran List > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of > >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the > US > >should be just under $100K. > > > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a > monohull > >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > > > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising > >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. > >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> > >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 > >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > >Paul and Bob > >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less > than > >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one > >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com > >Hakan Widmark > >> > >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> > >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST > >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > >> > >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, > >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the > chop > >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. > >> > >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, > >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned > the > >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base > >price. I > >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. > >> > >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on > >each > >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or > without > >a > >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into > from > >each > >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a > good > >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. > >> > >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. > >> > >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late > 90's > >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The > >older > >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking > pads")--which > >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the > >Glacier > >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk > >on--but > >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley > and > >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay > has > >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and > by > >the > >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the > >cost > >> becomes considerable... > >> > >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has > Suziki's > >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive > tanks. > >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what > >trimming > >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey > in > >any > >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. > >> > >> Bob Austin > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > >_______________________________________________ > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm _______________________________________________ Power-Catamaran Mailing List
CL
Capt. Len
Thu, May 4, 2006 5:25 PM

The photos on the site show the front 1/3 including full forefoot out of the water and it looks like flat.

Also the stern is dug in.

If not true they need better photos.

Len

Scott Karren wrote:

My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull.

At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches.  The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems.

Scott Karren.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Capt. Len" trikini23@trikini.com
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Take another look  the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long
hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs.  Probably really about a 25 footer.

Really a trihull.  Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos
show.  What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds.
stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky.

len

D C Mac Macdonald wrote:

9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet.
I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant
for USA and MC920 for rest of the world.

Mac in Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Reply-To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400

Try http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html.

I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only
MC30

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: Power Catamaran List
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of
hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the

US

should be just under $100K.

The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a

monohull

but from the waterline down it is a cat.

Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising
speeds of 15 to 20 knots.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

-----Original Message-----
From: catmarin@bredband.net
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30
To:Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Paul and Bob
Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less

than

  1. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one
    130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com
    Hakan Widmark

From: Mark mark424x@yahoo.com
Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats

Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat,

that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the

chop

a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel.

Bob Austin thataway4@cox.net wrote: Paul,
This is what I have also been looking for.  Jeff Seigel had mentioned

the

Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base

price.  I

have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version.

The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on

each

side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or

without

a

wall on the head size.  We are interested in a bunk we can get into

from

each

side (so we are not crawling over.  It also has a pilothouse, with a

good

sized galley and L shaped settee/table.

The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam.

The Glacier Bay is a good hull;  there was a 25 built around the late

90's

which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house.  The

older

Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking

pads")--which

apparently makes a difference in handling.  One of the beauties of the

Glacier

Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk

on--but

that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley

and

storage are less.  The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay

has

occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and

by

the

time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the

cost

becomes considerable...

We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has

Suziki's

150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive

tanks.

Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what

trimming

the boat bow down does.  Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey

in

any

chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull.

Bob Austin


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm


Power-Catamaran Mailing List


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

The photos on the site show the front 1/3 including full forefoot out of the water and it looks like flat. Also the stern is dug in. If not true they need better photos. Len Scott Karren wrote: > My MC30 rides very flat in the water. Especially compared to the traditional V hull. > > At 20 knots, my bow rises about 6 inches. The boat rides very smooth and stable. I was out in 6 foot plus swell just last Sunday with no problems. > > Scott Karren. > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Capt. Len" <trikini23@trikini.com> > Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 13:01:05 > To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > Take another look the boat is much narrower, different hull and with a long > hull and aft(motor brackets) overhangs. Probably really about a 25 footer. > > Really a trihull. Hope it doesn't trim bow up at speed like the MC30 photos > show. What happens when you try running a displacement hull at planing speeds. > stern digs a hole and bow heads for the sky. > > len > > D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote: > > > 9.2 meters comes out to about 30.4 feet. > > I'd say it's the same boat with MC30 meant > > for USA and MC920 for rest of the world. > > > > Mac in Oklahoma > > > > ----Original Message Follows---- > > From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> > > Reply-To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > > To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > > Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 11:16:33 -0400 > > > > Try <http://www.motorcat.com/mc920.html>. > > > > >I checked out www.motorcat.com I can't find info on MC920 on web site only > > >MC30 > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Scott Karren [mailto:scott@northsoundcruising.com] > > >Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:39 AM > > >To: Power Catamaran List > > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > > > >The factory has completed design in has begun manufacture. I saw video of > > >hull number two with a single Volvo engine. Looks great. The price in the > > US > > >should be just under $100K. > > > > > >The MC920 is a unique design. From the waterline up it looks like a > > monohull > > >but from the waterline down it is a cat. > > > > > >Initial testing shows the MC920 with fuel consumption of 2GPH and cruising > > >speeds of 15 to 20 knots. > > >Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: <catmarin@bredband.net> > > >Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 8:02:30 > > >To:Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > > >Subject: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > > > > >Paul and Bob > > >Look at the all new MC920. Weight is under 2000 pounds and beam is less > > than > > >94. You can get it with a closed cabin. Price with two outboards or one > > >130-160 diesel is about 135000 USD. www.motorcat.com > > >Hakan Widmark > > >> > > >> From: Mark <mark424x@yahoo.com> > > >> Date: 2006/05/04 to AM 12:22:00 CEST > > >> To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> > > >> Dmne: Re: [PCW] the availability of cats > > >> > > >> Just a thought, what about adding a foil (e.g. hysucat) to the TomCat, > > >that would give you a little more swell clearance at speed, dampen the > > chop > > >a bit, and perhaps allow you to run with smaller engines/less fuel. > > >> > > >> Bob Austin <thataway4@cox.net> wrote: Paul, > > >> This is what I have also been looking for. Jeff Seigel had mentioned > > the > > >> Buzzards Bay 33 but this has a 12 foot beam, and costs $280,000 base > > >price. I > > >> have inquired, but they are not at all interested in a smaller version. > > >> > > >> The Buzzard Bay 33 has a queen sized bed in the center and entrances on > > >each > > >> side--one of which is the head and shower and is available with or > > without > > >a > > >> wall on the head size. We are interested in a bunk we can get into > > from > > >each > > >> side (so we are not crawling over. It also has a pilothouse, with a > > good > > >> sized galley and L shaped settee/table. > > >> > > >> The MC 30 has a crawl in bunk, no pilot house, and is over 9' beam. > > >> > > >> The Glacier Bay is a good hull; there was a 25 built around the late > > 90's > > >> which has a bunk in the middle, but no real galley or pilot house. The > > >older > > >> Glacier Bay's have a slightly different hull (no "tracking > > pads")--which > > >> apparently makes a difference in handling. One of the beauties of the > > >Glacier > > >> Bay, is that there is a "walk around" deck wide enough to really walk > > >on--but > > >> that takes a foot out of the cabin width and thus the dinette, galley > > and > > >> storage are less. The idea of extending the cabin on the Glacier Bay > > has > > >> occured to us, but most of the older boats have two stroke engines and > > by > > >the > > >> time the modifications are made and the new engines are purchased, the > > >cost > > >> becomes considerable... > > >> > > >> We are going to sea trial a second TomCat 255 tomarrow--this has > > Suziki's > > >> 150's. The boat is light, with no compressor in the stern or dive > > tanks. > > >> Hopefully we will find some chop and maybe some swells and see what > > >trimming > > >> the boat bow down does. Even the dealer admits that the boat is noisey > > in > > >any > > >> chop from impact of the waves on the flat sections of the hull. > > >> > > >> Bob Austin > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > _______________________________________________ > > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > _______________________________________________ > > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > -- > Live Long and Prosper > Capt. Len Susman, retired > trikini23@trikini.com > What's New > http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm