great-loop@lists.trawlering.com

Cruising America's Great Loop and other inland routes

View all threads

Fuel Price

J&
John & Judy Gill
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 6:01 PM

Skipper Bob has it correct as usual.  If you are only going to do the
Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your
lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be
economical.  Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was
6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of
$13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel
engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual
cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a
comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator.

We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread
the cost over three years.  We went slow and averaged only 41 miles
per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles
per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour.

Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can
effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and
burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour.

John Gill
AGLCA Looper

Skipper Bob has it correct as usual. If you are only going to do the Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be economical. Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was 6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of $13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator. We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread the cost over three years. We went slow and averaged only 41 miles per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour. Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour. John Gill AGLCA Looper
DC
D C *Mac* Macdonald
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 6:17 PM

My 1995 Carver 355 Aft Cabin with a pair of 454 cic GM
gas engines will get about 1/2 mpg at WOT while making
about 24 smph.  Obviously, one would not run the loop that
way.  According to Boating Magazine's 1992 or 1993 test
of the 33 Aft Cabin (same hull as my boat), I expect I'd get
about 1.1 - 1.2 mpg running 1000-1200 rpm (5-7 smph).
Most often, I run between 1200 and 1500 rpm.  These
engines are positively loafing in this type of service and they
are likely to have a lifespan of considerably more than 2000
hours.  I have a 6.0 liter GM V-8 in my GMC truck and it uses
no oil between changes at 1300 hours of engine time and
is running just fine.

It does appear that comparisons of Diesel vs gasoline prices
are somewhat different between marine and highway usage.
However, marina fuel prices around here reflect the same
relationship as do highway gas stations.  Currently, gasoline
price here in Oklahoma City runs from $2.499 up to as much
as $2.999 per gallon.  Diesel is running from $2.999 upwards.
I choose the vehicle to drive based upon fuel cost per mile.
Right now, my big Ford F250 Diesel is sits in the driveway
while I drive the GMC to work.

Best regards,

D C "Mac" Macdonald
Oklahoma City, OK
m/v Another Adventure
on
Grand Lake - Oklahoma

----Original Message Follows----
From: John & Judy Gill twojscom@quadnet.net
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Subject: GL:  Fuel Price
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:01:21 -0400

Skipper Bob has it correct as usual.  If you are only going to do the
Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your
lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be
economical.  Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was
6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of
$13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel
engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual
cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a
comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator.

We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread
the cost over three years.  We went slow and averaged only 41 miles
per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles
per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour.

Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can
effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and
burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour.

John Gill
AGLCA Looper

My 1995 Carver 355 Aft Cabin with a pair of 454 cic GM gas engines will get about 1/2 mpg at WOT while making about 24 smph. Obviously, one would not run the loop that way. According to Boating Magazine's 1992 or 1993 test of the 33 Aft Cabin (same hull as my boat), I expect I'd get about 1.1 - 1.2 mpg running 1000-1200 rpm (5-7 smph). Most often, I run between 1200 and 1500 rpm. These engines are positively loafing in this type of service and they are likely to have a lifespan of considerably more than 2000 hours. I have a 6.0 liter GM V-8 in my GMC truck and it uses no oil between changes at 1300 hours of engine time and is running just fine. It does appear that comparisons of Diesel vs gasoline prices are somewhat different between marine and highway usage. However, marina fuel prices around here reflect the same relationship as do highway gas stations. Currently, gasoline price here in Oklahoma City runs from $2.499 up to as much as $2.999 per gallon. Diesel is running from $2.999 upwards. I choose the vehicle to drive based upon fuel cost per mile. Right now, my big Ford F250 Diesel is sits in the driveway while I drive the GMC to work. Best regards, D C "Mac" Macdonald Oklahoma City, OK m/v Another Adventure on Grand Lake - Oklahoma ----Original Message Follows---- From: John & Judy Gill <twojscom@quadnet.net> To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com Subject: GL: Fuel Price Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:01:21 -0400 Skipper Bob has it correct as usual. If you are only going to do the Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be economical. Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was 6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of $13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator. We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread the cost over three years. We went slow and averaged only 41 miles per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour. Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour. John Gill AGLCA Looper
TT
Tommy Terrific
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 6:40 PM

There are a LOT of boats suitable for doing the loop, that cost not
$100,000 more, in fact, not $100,000 total.

There are quite a few nice diesel boats for less than $100,000 total and
most of them are not offered as a gas engine version.  I think conveying
the message that a diesel boat will cost $100,000 more than a gas boat is
quite misleading.
Tommy

----- Original Message -----
From: "John & Judy Gill" twojscom@quadnet.net
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: GL: Fuel Price

Skipper Bob has it correct as usual.  If you are only going to do the
Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your
lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be
economical.  Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was
6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of
$13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel
engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual
cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a
comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator.

We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread
the cost over three years.  We went slow and averaged only 41 miles
per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles
per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour.

Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can
effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and
burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour.

John Gill
AGLCA Looper


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:

There are a LOT of boats suitable for doing the loop, that cost not $100,000 more, in fact, not $100,000 total. There are quite a few nice diesel boats for less than $100,000 total and most of them are not offered as a gas engine version. I think conveying the message that a diesel boat will cost $100,000 more than a gas boat is quite misleading. Tommy ----- Original Message ----- From: "John & Judy Gill" <twojscom@quadnet.net> To: <great-loop@lists.samurai.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:01 PM Subject: GL: Fuel Price > Skipper Bob has it correct as usual. If you are only going to do the > Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your > lifestyle then the added cost of a diesel powered boat may not be > economical. Using Skipper Bob's 6,000 mile Great Loop (ours was > 6,724 going the Lake Champlain route) then at a fuel savings of > $13.000 (based on 6,000 miles and today's fuel prices) with diesel > engines versus gasoline, it would take 7-1/2 to 8 years of annual > cruising of 6,000 miles to amortize the $100,000 in added cost for a > comparable boat with diesel engine(s) and generator. > > We split our Great Loop trip up into three boating seasons to spread > the cost over three years. We went slow and averaged only 41 miles > per day and our average cruising speed was only 8.79 statute miles > per hour at 11.4 gallons per engine hour. > > Our point is that if you slow down and smell the roses, you can > effect about 20 percent fuel savings versus going fast (17 knots) and > burning 40 gallons of gasoline per hour. > > John Gill > AGLCA Looper > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
F
fred
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 6:57 PM

Tommy,

I think you're right.  I once asked my local Cummins dealer what a complete
replacement on my Cummins 370B would cost and was told about $ 25,000.-
That's for a whole new diesel engine, not the difference between gas and
diesel.

Fred W.
Tug 44
http://www.tug44.org/

At 02:40 PM 8/28/06 -0400, you wrote:

There are a LOT of boats suitable for doing the loop, that cost not
$100,000 more, in fact, not $100,000 total.

There are quite a few nice diesel boats for less than $100,000 total and
most of them are not offered as a gas engine version.  I think conveying
the message that a diesel boat will cost $100,000 more than a gas boat is
quite misleading.
Tommy

----- Original Message -----
From: "John & Judy Gill" twojscom@quadnet.net
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:01 PM
Subject: GL: Fuel Price

Skipper Bob has it correct as usual.  If you are only going to do the
Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your

WARNING: The remainder of this message has not been transferred.
The estimated size of this message is 5945 bytes.
Click on the server retrieve icon above and check mail again to get the

whole thing.  If the server retrieve icon is not showing, then this message
is no longer on the server.

Tommy, I think you're right. I once asked my local Cummins dealer what a complete replacement on my Cummins 370B would cost and was told about $ 25,000.- That's for a whole new diesel engine, not the difference between gas and diesel. Fred W. Tug 44 http://www.tug44.org/ At 02:40 PM 8/28/06 -0400, you wrote: > There are a LOT of boats suitable for doing the loop, that cost not >$100,000 more, in fact, not $100,000 total. > > There are quite a few nice diesel boats for less than $100,000 total and >most of them are not offered as a gas engine version. I think conveying >the message that a diesel boat will cost $100,000 more than a gas boat is >quite misleading. > Tommy > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John & Judy Gill" <twojscom@quadnet.net> > To: <great-loop@lists.samurai.com> > Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 2:01 PM > Subject: GL: Fuel Price > > > > Skipper Bob has it correct as usual. If you are only going to do the > > Great Loop once and do not plan to make long range cruising your > > >WARNING: The remainder of this message has not been transferred. >The estimated size of this message is 5945 bytes. >Click on the server retrieve icon above and check mail again to get the whole thing. If the server retrieve icon is not showing, then this message is no longer on the server.
JF
Jim Fidler
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 7:05 PM

On the Loop in 2004 we measured exactly our gasoline usage and kept
complete records.  Our Floscans agreed with receipts within 3 percent.
(I never got around to calibrating the Floscans.)

Our 36 Mainship had twin Crusader 370 hp (350 cubic inch) gas engines
and our overall Loop average was 1.46 statute mpg.  We went "fast" (about 15
mph) when crossing large bodies of water but slow the rest of the time.
Much of the slow time we ran one engine at 1800 to 2000 rpm.

Using the Flowscans and an accurate fuel dipstick I was able to log each
day's mpg.  Looking back through the records I see that we typically got
1.6 to 1.8 mpg on days when we ran 7 to 8 mph all day.  With the
favorable current of the Illinois and Mississippi we usually got over 2 mpg.

Gas boats don't have to be such fuel hogs.  We used 3889 gallons.

I doubt my "new" Cat diesels and 43 foot trawler will do this well.

Jim Fidler  "Fiddlesticks"

On the Loop in 2004 we measured exactly our gasoline usage and kept complete records. Our Floscans agreed with receipts within 3 percent. (I never got around to calibrating the Floscans.) Our 36 Mainship had twin Crusader 370 hp (350 cubic inch) gas engines and our overall Loop average was 1.46 statute mpg. We went "fast" (about 15 mph) when crossing large bodies of water but slow the rest of the time. Much of the slow time we ran one engine at 1800 to 2000 rpm. Using the Flowscans and an accurate fuel dipstick I was able to log each day's mpg. Looking back through the records I see that we typically got 1.6 to 1.8 mpg on days when we ran 7 to 8 mph all day. With the favorable current of the Illinois and Mississippi we usually got over 2 mpg. Gas boats don't have to be such fuel hogs. We used 3889 gallons. I doubt my "new" Cat diesels and 43 foot trawler will do this well. Jim Fidler "Fiddlesticks"
JF
Jim Fidler
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 7:12 PM

Correction:

The 350 cubic inch Crusaders are 270 hp, not 370 hp.  My finger misbehaved.
Thanks Mac.

Jim Fidler  "Fiddlesticks"

Correction: The 350 cubic inch Crusaders are 270 hp, not 370 hp. My finger misbehaved. Thanks Mac. Jim Fidler "Fiddlesticks"
TT
Tommy Terrific
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 7:44 PM

Jim,

I think what everybody forgets is that there are factors beyond our
control, that will significantly influence our fuel consumption.  The two
obvious ones are hull entry (are we cutting through or pushing water out of
the way) and underwater configuation (the chines, hull
design-desplacement/semi/full/planing).
At 7knts, I leave virtually zero wake, hardly a ripple, while other hulls
will cause huge wakes.  With the rising price of any type of fuel, we that
are buying boats, need to look at these things more closely.

Tommy
Lying Miami Beach
Aboard LOVERBOAT
a 50' trawler

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fidler" fidlerjim@earthlink.net
To: "D C Mac Macdonald" k2gkk@hotmail.com; "great-loop"
great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: GL: Fuel Price

On the Loop in 2004 we measured exactly our gasoline usage and kept
complete records.  Our Floscans agreed with receipts within 3 percent.
(I never got around to calibrating the Floscans.)

Our 36 Mainship had twin Crusader 370 hp (350 cubic inch) gas engines
and our overall Loop average was 1.46 statute mpg.  We went "fast"

(about 15

mph) when crossing large bodies of water but slow the rest of the time.
Much of the slow time we ran one engine at 1800 to 2000 rpm.

Using the Flowscans and an accurate fuel dipstick I was able to log each
day's mpg.  Looking back through the records I see that we typically got
1.6 to 1.8 mpg on days when we ran 7 to 8 mph all day.  With the
favorable current of the Illinois and Mississippi we usually got over 2

mpg.

Gas boats don't have to be such fuel hogs.  We used 3889 gallons.

I doubt my "new" Cat diesels and 43 foot trawler will do this well.

Jim Fidler  "Fiddlesticks"


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:

Jim, I think what everybody forgets is that there are factors beyond our control, that will significantly influence our fuel consumption. The two obvious ones are hull entry (are we cutting through or pushing water out of the way) and underwater configuation (the chines, hull design-desplacement/semi/full/planing). At 7knts, I leave virtually zero wake, hardly a ripple, while other hulls will cause huge wakes. With the rising price of any type of fuel, we that are buying boats, need to look at these things more closely. Tommy Lying Miami Beach Aboard LOVERBOAT a 50' trawler ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Fidler" <fidlerjim@earthlink.net> To: "D C *Mac* Macdonald" <k2gkk@hotmail.com>; "great-loop" <great-loop@lists.samurai.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 3:05 PM Subject: Re: GL: Fuel Price > On the Loop in 2004 we measured exactly our gasoline usage and kept > complete records. Our Floscans agreed with receipts within 3 percent. > (I never got around to calibrating the Floscans.) > > Our 36 Mainship had twin Crusader 370 hp (350 cubic inch) gas engines > and our overall Loop average was 1.46 statute mpg. We went "fast" (about 15 > mph) when crossing large bodies of water but slow the rest of the time. > Much of the slow time we ran one engine at 1800 to 2000 rpm. > > Using the Flowscans and an accurate fuel dipstick I was able to log each > day's mpg. Looking back through the records I see that we typically got > 1.6 to 1.8 mpg on days when we ran 7 to 8 mph all day. With the > favorable current of the Illinois and Mississippi we usually got over 2 mpg. > > Gas boats don't have to be such fuel hogs. We used 3889 gallons. > > I doubt my "new" Cat diesels and 43 foot trawler will do this well. > > Jim Fidler "Fiddlesticks" > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
J&
John & Judy Gill
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 9:01 PM

Tommy,

Yes, I am sure that there are lots of used boats under $100.000 with
diesel engines available to do the Great Loop.  The cost differential
quoted is based on the price of new boats (Trawlers and Cabin
Cruisers) with diesel engines and generator versus those with
gasoline engines.  When we were thinking about doing the Loop, we
were told that positively we could not do it with our 36 ft Carver
Mariner because gasoline would bankrupt us.  We investigated the cost
to re-power with diesel engines and generator and the estimate was
well over $100.000.  So we did the Loop and spent $17,348 for gas.
We still have plenty left over to re-power if and when necessary!

If we had re-powered, I doubt if we would ever have been able to sell
the boat and recoup much or any of the investment to change from gas
to diesel.  We have two friends on our dock with 36 and 38 ft Carver
aft cabins with diesel engines and they can't sell them for what the
owners think they should be worth!  It's just my opinion, but they
will never see the extra money they spent for diesels -- and while
you think that I am misleading, I think that you are perpetuating the
myth that the Great Loop requires one to have diesel engines or a
slow Trawler.

John

=======================

Tommy, Yes, I am sure that there are lots of used boats under $100.000 with diesel engines available to do the Great Loop. The cost differential quoted is based on the price of new boats (Trawlers and Cabin Cruisers) with diesel engines and generator versus those with gasoline engines. When we were thinking about doing the Loop, we were told that positively we could not do it with our 36 ft Carver Mariner because gasoline would bankrupt us. We investigated the cost to re-power with diesel engines and generator and the estimate was well over $100.000. So we did the Loop and spent $17,348 for gas. We still have plenty left over to re-power if and when necessary! If we had re-powered, I doubt if we would ever have been able to sell the boat and recoup much or any of the investment to change from gas to diesel. We have two friends on our dock with 36 and 38 ft Carver aft cabins with diesel engines and they can't sell them for what the owners think they should be worth! It's just my opinion, but they will never see the extra money they spent for diesels -- and while you think that I am misleading, I think that you are perpetuating the myth that the Great Loop requires one to have diesel engines or a slow Trawler. John =======================
TB
thomas barnes
Mon, Aug 28, 2006 10:57 PM

WOW!!! "$17,348 for gas"

We started the Loop in Jan. of '03 and ended when we reached Fort Pierce, FL in July of '04. We didn't go up through Canada but did make several sid e trips within the USA and we spent just over $2500.00 on diesel.

Of course ours is a 34 Mainship with a 6.354 diesel in it. Burned about 1.47 gph at an average 6 knots.

Tommy,

Yes, I am sure that there are lots of used boats under $100.000 with
diesel engines available to do the Great Loop. The cost differential
quoted is based on the price of new boats (Trawlers and Cabin
Cruisers) with diesel engines and generator versus those with
gasoline engines. When we were thinking about doing the Loop, we
were told that positively we could not do it with our 36 ft Carver
Mariner because gasoline would bankrupt us. We investigated the cost
to re-power with diesel engines and generator and the estimate was
well over $100.000. So we did the Loop and spent $17,348 for gas.
We still have plenty left over to re-power if and when necessary!

If we had re-powered, I doubt if we would ever have been able to sell
the boat and recoup much or any of the investment to change from gas
to diesel. We have two friends on our dock with 36 and 38 ft Carver
aft cabins with diesel engines and they can't sell them for what the
owners think they should be worth! It's just my opinion, but they
will never see the extra money they spent for diesels -- and while
you think that I am misleading, I think that you are perpetuating the
myth that the Great Loop requires one to have diesel engines or a
slow Trawler.

John

=======================


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop


All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

WOW!!! "$17,348 for gas" We started the Loop in Jan. of '03 and ended when we reached Fort Pierce, FL in July of '04. We didn't go up through Canada but did make several sid e trips within the USA and we spent just over $2500.00 on diesel. Of course ours is a 34 Mainship with a 6.354 diesel in it. Burned about 1.47 gph at an average 6 knots. Tommy, Yes, I am sure that there are lots of used boats under $100.000 with diesel engines available to do the Great Loop. The cost differential quoted is based on the price of new boats (Trawlers and Cabin Cruisers) with diesel engines and generator versus those with gasoline engines. When we were thinking about doing the Loop, we were told that positively we could not do it with our 36 ft Carver Mariner because gasoline would bankrupt us. We investigated the cost to re-power with diesel engines and generator and the estimate was well over $100.000. So we did the Loop and spent $17,348 for gas. We still have plenty left over to re-power if and when necessary! If we had re-powered, I doubt if we would ever have been able to sell the boat and recoup much or any of the investment to change from gas to diesel. We have two friends on our dock with 36 and 38 ft Carver aft cabins with diesel engines and they can't sell them for what the owners think they should be worth! It's just my opinion, but they will never see the extra money they spent for diesels -- and while you think that I am misleading, I think that you are perpetuating the myth that the Great Loop requires one to have diesel engines or a slow Trawler. John ======================= _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop --------------------------------- All-new Yahoo! Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.