passagemaking@lists.trawlering.com

Passagemaking Under Power List

View all threads

Email at sea

GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Fri, Sep 15, 2006 12:39 PM

Here's a question for those who have made trans-oceanic or offshore
passages in recent years:

What's the best way you have found to send and receive email while at sea?

--Georgs

Georgs Kolesnikovs
Your host at Trawlers & Trawlering, formerly Trawler World, since 1997

Our new site is being readied for launch at
http://www.trawlersandtrawlering.com

Here's a question for those who have made trans-oceanic or offshore passages in recent years: What's the best way you have found to send and receive email while at sea? --Georgs -- Georgs Kolesnikovs Your host at Trawlers & Trawlering, formerly Trawler World, since 1997 Our new site is being readied for launch at <http://www.trawlersandtrawlering.com>
JH
John Harris
Fri, Sep 15, 2006 12:51 PM

The Inmarsat system is our primary off shore e-mail service, with no monthly
fees and $.25 / 32 characters it is a great short message system with near
100% coverage. Long messages can wait for shore time.

We also have been very pleased with the GSM cell phone capabilities to send
text messages to either e-mail destinations or other cell phones at a very
reasonable cost and surprising off shore coverage.  Great for the
Mediterranean.

John Harris
World Odd @ Sea

The Inmarsat system is our primary off shore e-mail service, with no monthly fees and $.25 / 32 characters it is a great short message system with near 100% coverage. Long messages can wait for shore time. We also have been very pleased with the GSM cell phone capabilities to send text messages to either e-mail destinations or other cell phones at a very reasonable cost and surprising off shore coverage. Great for the Mediterranean. John Harris World Odd @ Sea
PP
Peter Pisciotta
Fri, Sep 15, 2006 4:56 PM

I have used Iridium email several times. It's been a
couple years, but 9.6 was okay for short wx messages,
and even a daily position report of a few paragraphs
in length. I have only used this for within a few
hundred miles of shore.

Peter
www.SeaSkills.com

--- Georgs Kolesnikovs
georgs@trawlersandtrawlering.com wrote:

Here's a question for those who have made
trans-oceanic or offshore
passages in recent years:

What's the best way you have found to send and
receive email while at sea?

--Georgs

Georgs Kolesnikovs
Your host at Trawlers & Trawlering, formerly Trawler
World, since 1997

Our new site is being readied for launch at
http://www.trawlersandtrawlering.com


Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List

I have used Iridium email several times. It's been a couple years, but 9.6 was okay for short wx messages, and even a daily position report of a few paragraphs in length. I have only used this for within a few hundred miles of shore. Peter www.SeaSkills.com --- Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@trawlersandtrawlering.com> wrote: > Here's a question for those who have made > trans-oceanic or offshore > passages in recent years: > > What's the best way you have found to send and > receive email while at sea? > > --Georgs > -- > Georgs Kolesnikovs > Your host at Trawlers & Trawlering, formerly Trawler > World, since 1997 > > Our new site is being readied for launch at > <http://www.trawlersandtrawlering.com> > _______________________________________________ > Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List
HW
Hal Wyman
Fri, Sep 15, 2006 5:11 PM

I found Iridium worked fine for me crossing the Atlantic, and from Florida
to Panama to Seattle.

On Milt Baker's recommendation I got an email account with ocens.net which
speeded things up considerably.  They compress the email and then send it in
very large packets compared to normal IP traffic which eliminates a lot of
line turnarounds for acknowledgement packets as I understand it.

Hal

I found Iridium worked fine for me crossing the Atlantic, and from Florida to Panama to Seattle. On Milt Baker's recommendation I got an email account with ocens.net which speeded things up considerably. They compress the email and then send it in very large packets compared to normal IP traffic which eliminates a lot of line turnarounds for acknowledgement packets as I understand it. Hal