time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

RD
Randy D. Hunt
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 2:37 AM

On 9/27/2012 7:27 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote:

Flagpoles need caps, right?  A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And
a fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical!

On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote:

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS



time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

exactly!!  See the ads in the Ham mags. . .

Randy, KI6WAS

On 9/27/2012 7:27 PM, Peter Gottlieb wrote: > Flagpoles need caps, right? A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And > a fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical! > > > > > On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote: >>> >> >> Put up a flagpole. >> >> Randy, KI6WAS >> >> _______________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > exactly!! See the ads in the Ham mags. . . Randy, KI6WAS
JF
J. Forster
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 2:45 AM

Except, in many places, flagpoles are not permitted.

-John

==============

Flagpoles need caps, right?  A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And a
fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical!

On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote:

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS



time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Except, in many places, flagpoles are not permitted. -John ============== > Flagpoles need caps, right? A GPS antenna would be just perfect. And a > fiberglass flagpole could hide a significant HF vertical! > > > > > On 9/27/2012 10:24 PM, Randy D. Hunt wrote: >>> >> >> Put up a flagpole. >> >> Randy, KI6WAS >> >> _______________________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
D
David
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 3:05 AM

I have been thinking about this problem on and off over the last
couple of days.

Would it be better to take the absolute value rather than squaring the
signal?

I might try some tricky but impractical analog sampling and/or
synchronous demodulation recovery method but the Costas loop looks
awfully easy to do without any digital signal processing.

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:45:16 -0700 (PDT), "J. Forster"
jfor@quikus.com wrote:

You cannot put a narrow filter before the squarer for reasons previously
cited. In a low S/N area, squaring just makes matters worse wrt dynamic
range and clipping.

-John

==========

Hi

A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase
tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to
double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the
signal and lock to the result. If you simply put up a real narrow filter
and hit it with continuous 180 degree phase shifts, the output will be
nothing at all…

Bob

On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Various comments -

Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent
demodulator of arbitrary
bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small
bandwidth since at that point
there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a
stable VCXO you can probably get down
to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out
there on phase tracking receivers
that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have
to search far and the BW can be increased
for acquisition and closed up for tracking.

On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used
the admittedly more powerful software
techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of
code is for the fun of it, this is after all
a hobby.

GPS Antenna Siting -

Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to
an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house
within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but
I also have severe thunderstorms - so the house
plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better
than 1e-12 over 24  hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps
as plotted on a  strip chart recorder.

Sooooo  -

Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who
is gonna notice?
set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec.
get the t bolt manual
get Tbolt monitor
get Lady Heather and read all that stuff.

Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS)  for at least two days -
you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation
Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as
blocked using the signal
level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak =
poor signals. Mine works good
with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than
lots of weak ones.

The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is
OK and the AMU sets the acceptable signal
level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the
strong guys go up to 50. This is a function
of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required.

-73 john k6iql

I have been thinking about this problem on and off over the last couple of days. Would it be better to take the absolute value rather than squaring the signal? I might try some tricky but impractical analog sampling and/or synchronous demodulation recovery method but the Costas loop looks awfully easy to do without any digital signal processing. On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:45:16 -0700 (PDT), "J. Forster" <jfor@quikus.com> wrote: >You cannot put a narrow filter before the squarer for reasons previously >cited. In a low S/N area, squaring just makes matters worse wrt dynamic >range and clipping. > >-John > >========== > >> Hi >> >> A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase >> tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to >> double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the >> signal and lock to the result. If you simply put up a real narrow filter >> and hit it with continuous 180 degree phase shifts, the output will be >> nothing at all… >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote: >> >>> Various comments - >>> >>> Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent >>> demodulator of arbitrary >>> bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small >>> bandwidth since at that point >>> there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a >>> stable VCXO you can probably get down >>> to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out >>> there on phase tracking receivers >>> that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have >>> to search far and the BW can be increased >>> for acquisition and closed up for tracking. >>> >>> On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used >>> the admittedly more powerful software >>> techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of >>> code is for the fun of it, this is after all >>> a hobby. >>> >>> GPS Antenna Siting - >>> >>> Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to >>> an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house >>> within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but >>> I also have severe thunderstorms - so the house >>> plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better >>> than 1e-12 over 24 hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps >>> as plotted on a strip chart recorder. >>> >>> Sooooo - >>> >>> Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who >>> is gonna notice? >>> set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec. >>> get the t bolt manual >>> get Tbolt monitor >>> get Lady Heather and read all that stuff. >>> >>> Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS) for at least two days - >>> you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation >>> Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as >>> blocked using the signal >>> level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak = >>> poor signals. Mine works good >>> with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than >>> lots of weak ones. >>> >>> The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is >>> OK and the AMU sets the acceptable signal >>> level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the >>> strong guys go up to 50. This is a function >>> of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required. >>> >>> -73 john k6iql
MD
Magnus Danielson
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 3:38 AM

On 09/28/2012 01:34 AM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the signal and lock to the result. If you simply put up a real narrow filter and hit it with continuous 180 degree phase shifts, the output will be nothing at all…

Then there is the Costas loop. It's just a fancy PLL.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 09/28/2012 01:34 AM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > A PLL locks to phase. If the phase switches by 180 degrees, the phase tracking switches signs. There's no way to track that. You either need to double the frequency (and thus eliminate the modulation) or demodulate the signal and lock to the result. If you simply put up a real narrow filter and hit it with continuous 180 degree phase shifts, the output will be nothing at all… Then there is the Costas loop. It's just a fancy PLL. Cheers, Magnus
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 1:16 PM

Hi

Flag poles are prohibited.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a

number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were
to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was
inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation.

Bob

On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Various comments -

Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent

demodulator of arbitrary

bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small

bandwidth since at that point

there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable

VCXO you can probably get down

to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out there

on phase tracking receivers

that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have to

search far and the BW can be increased

for acquisition and closed up for tracking.

On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used

the admittedly more powerful software

techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of

code is for the fun of it, this is after all

a hobby.

GPS Antenna Siting -

Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to

an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house

within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but I

also have severe thunderstorms - so the house

plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better

than 1e-12 over 24  hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps

as plotted on a  strip chart recorder.

Sooooo  -

Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who

is gonna notice?

set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec.
get the t bolt manual
get Tbolt monitor
get Lady Heather and read all that stuff.

Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS)  for at least two days -

you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation

Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as

blocked using the signal

level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak =

poor signals. Mine works good

with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than

lots of weak ones.

The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is OK

and the AMU sets the acceptable signal

level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the

strong guys go up to 50. This is a function

of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required.

-73 john k6iql


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Flag poles are prohibited. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation. > > Bob > > > On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote: > >> Various comments - >> >> Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent demodulator of arbitrary >> bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small bandwidth since at that point >> there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable VCXO you can probably get down >> to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out there on phase tracking receivers >> that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have to search far and the BW can be increased >> for acquisition and closed up for tracking. >> >> On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used the admittedly more powerful software >> techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of code is for the fun of it, this is after all >> a hobby. >> >> GPS Antenna Siting - >> >> Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house >> within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but I also have severe thunderstorms - so the house >> plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better than 1e-12 over 24 hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps >> as plotted on a strip chart recorder. >> >> Sooooo - >> >> Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who is gonna notice? >> set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec. >> get the t bolt manual >> get Tbolt monitor >> get Lady Heather and read all that stuff. >> >> Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS) for at least two days - you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation >> Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as blocked using the signal >> level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak = poor signals. Mine works good >> with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than lots of weak ones. >> >> The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is OK and the AMU sets the acceptable signal >> level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the strong guys go up to 50. This is a function >> of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required. >> >> -73 john k6iql >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > Put up a flagpole. Randy, KI6WAS _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BD
Bill Dailey
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 2:31 PM

I don't think it is legal to prohibit flag poles

Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero!

On Sep 28, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Bob Camp" lists@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

Flag poles are prohibited.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a

number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were
to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was
inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation.

Bob

On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Various comments -

Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent

demodulator of arbitrary

bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small

bandwidth since at that point

there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable

VCXO you can probably get down

to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out there

on phase tracking receivers

that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have to

search far and the BW can be increased

for acquisition and closed up for tracking.

On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used

the admittedly more powerful software

techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of

code is for the fun of it, this is after all

a hobby.

GPS Antenna Siting -

Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to

an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house

within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but I

also have severe thunderstorms - so the house

plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better

than 1e-12 over 24  hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps

as plotted on a  strip chart recorder.

Sooooo  -

Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who

is gonna notice?

set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec.
get the t bolt manual
get Tbolt monitor
get Lady Heather and read all that stuff.

Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS)  for at least two days -

you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation

Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as

blocked using the signal

level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak =

poor signals. Mine works good

with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than

lots of weak ones.

The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is OK

and the AMU sets the acceptable signal

level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the

strong guys go up to 50. This is a function

of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required.

-73 john k6iql


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I don't think it is legal to prohibit flag poles Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero! On Sep 28, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Bob Camp" <lists@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Flag poles are prohibited. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting > > On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a > number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were > to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was > inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation. >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote: >> >>> Various comments - >>> >>> Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent > demodulator of arbitrary >>> bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small > bandwidth since at that point >>> there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable > VCXO you can probably get down >>> to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out there > on phase tracking receivers >>> that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have to > search far and the BW can be increased >>> for acquisition and closed up for tracking. >>> >>> On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used > the admittedly more powerful software >>> techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of > code is for the fun of it, this is after all >>> a hobby. >>> >>> GPS Antenna Siting - >>> >>> Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to > an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house >>> within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but I > also have severe thunderstorms - so the house >>> plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better > than 1e-12 over 24 hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps >>> as plotted on a strip chart recorder. >>> >>> Sooooo - >>> >>> Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who > is gonna notice? >>> set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec. >>> get the t bolt manual >>> get Tbolt monitor >>> get Lady Heather and read all that stuff. >>> >>> Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS) for at least two days - > you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation >>> Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as > blocked using the signal >>> level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak = > poor signals. Mine works good >>> with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than > lots of weak ones. >>> >>> The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is OK > and the AMU sets the acceptable signal >>> level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the > strong guys go up to 50. This is a function >>> of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required. >>> >>> -73 john k6iql >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > Put up a flagpole. > > Randy, KI6WAS > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
JF
J. Forster
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 2:38 PM

Welcome to:

Regulation Nation

-John

==============

Hi

Flag poles are prohibited.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from
a

number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I
were
to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was
inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation.

Bob

On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Various comments -

Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent

demodulator of arbitrary

bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small

bandwidth since at that point

there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a
stable

VCXO you can probably get down

to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out
there

on phase tracking receivers

that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have
to

search far and the BW can be increased

for acquisition and closed up for tracking.

On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used

the admittedly more powerful software

techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of

code is for the fun of it, this is after all

a hobby.

GPS Antenna Siting -

Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to

an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house

within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but
I

also have severe thunderstorms - so the house

plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to
better

than 1e-12 over 24  hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps

as plotted on a  strip chart recorder.

Sooooo  -

Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod -
who

is gonna notice?

set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100
sec.
get the t bolt manual
get Tbolt monitor
get Lady Heather and read all that stuff.

Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS)  for at least two days -

you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation

Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as

blocked using the signal

level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak

poor signals. Mine works good

with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than

lots of weak ones.

The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is
OK

and the AMU sets the acceptable signal

level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the

strong guys go up to 50. This is a function

of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required.

-73 john k6iql


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Welcome to: Regulation Nation -John ============== > Hi > > Flag poles are prohibited. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting > > On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from >> a > number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I > were > to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was > inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation. >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote: >> >>> Various comments - >>> >>> Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent > demodulator of arbitrary >>> bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small > bandwidth since at that point >>> there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a >>> stable > VCXO you can probably get down >>> to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out >>> there > on phase tracking receivers >>> that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have >>> to > search far and the BW can be increased >>> for acquisition and closed up for tracking. >>> >>> On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used > the admittedly more powerful software >>> techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of > code is for the fun of it, this is after all >>> a hobby. >>> >>> GPS Antenna Siting - >>> >>> Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to > an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house >>> within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but >>> I > also have severe thunderstorms - so the house >>> plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to >>> better > than 1e-12 over 24 hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps >>> as plotted on a strip chart recorder. >>> >>> Sooooo - >>> >>> Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - >>> who > is gonna notice? >>> set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 >>> sec. >>> get the t bolt manual >>> get Tbolt monitor >>> get Lady Heather and read all that stuff. >>> >>> Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS) for at least two days - > you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation >>> Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as > blocked using the signal >>> level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak >>> = > poor signals. Mine works good >>> with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than > lots of weak ones. >>> >>> The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is >>> OK > and the AMU sets the acceptable signal >>> level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the > strong guys go up to 50. This is a function >>> of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required. >>> >>> -73 john k6iql >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > Put up a flagpole. > > Randy, KI6WAS > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Sep 28, 2012 4:17 PM

Hi

Legal or not, that's the way the titles are all written around here. The
logic is "visual pollution". You are fine displaying the flag. It's the free
standing pole they prohibit.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Dailey
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:32 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

I don't think it is legal to prohibit flag poles

Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero!

On Sep 28, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Bob Camp" lists@rtty.us wrote:

Hi

Flag poles are prohibited.

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting

On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from

a

number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I

were

to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was
inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation.

Bob

On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote:

Various comments -

Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent

demodulator of arbitrary

bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small

bandwidth since at that point

there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a

stable

VCXO you can probably get down

to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out

there

on phase tracking receivers

that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have

to

search far and the BW can be increased

for acquisition and closed up for tracking.

On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used

the admittedly more powerful software

techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of

code is for the fun of it, this is after all

a hobby.

GPS Antenna Siting -

Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to

an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house

within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but

I

also have severe thunderstorms - so the house

plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better

than 1e-12 over 24  hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps

as plotted on a  strip chart recorder.

Sooooo  -

Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who

is gonna notice?

set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec.
get the t bolt manual
get Tbolt monitor
get Lady Heather and read all that stuff.

Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS)  for at least two days -

you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation

Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as

blocked using the signal

level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak =

poor signals. Mine works good

with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than

lots of weak ones.

The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is

OK

and the AMU sets the acceptable signal

level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the

strong guys go up to 50. This is a function

of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required.

-73 john k6iql


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.

Put up a flagpole.

Randy, KI6WAS


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to

and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Legal or not, that's the way the titles are all written around here. The logic is "visual pollution". You are fine displaying the flag. It's the free standing pole they prohibit. Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Bill Dailey Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 10:32 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting I don't think it is legal to prohibit flag poles Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero! On Sep 28, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Bob Camp" <lists@rtty.us> wrote: > Hi > > Flag poles are prohibited. > > Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Randy D. Hunt > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:24 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] BPSK Receiver & GPS Antenna siting > > On 9/27/2012 4:20 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> At least in my back yard, a 6' tall tripod would be very noticeable from a > number of directions. There are many others in similar situations. If I were > to interpret the restrictions literally as written, an antenna that was > inside the house, but visible through an open window is also a violation. >> >> Bob >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2012, at 7:11 PM, johncroos@aol.com wrote: >> >>> Various comments - >>> >>> Hal mentioned SNR for the scheme I suggested. A PLL can be a coherent > demodulator of arbitrary >>> bandwidth. Thus the PLL at the output of the doubler can have a small > bandwidth since at that point >>> there is no PSK, it having been removed by the doubler. So given a stable > VCXO you can probably get down >>> to 1 Hz and thereby achieve a good SNR. There is a lot of stuff out there > on phase tracking receivers >>> that do exactly that. You know the frequency so the loop does not have to > search far and the BW can be increased >>> for acquisition and closed up for tracking. >>> >>> On writing reams of code - my point was that it is not required to used > the admittedly more powerful software >>> techniques to do this job - I noted that one reason to write reams of > code is for the fun of it, this is after all >>> a hobby. >>> >>> GPS Antenna Siting - >>> >>> Lets not make this so hard. Mine is at 6 ft elevation and is blocked to > an elevation angle of 20 to 30 degrees by a house >>> within 15 ft and a forest of trees. I have room and no restrictions but I > also have severe thunderstorms - so the house >>> plays lightning protect for the antenna. My T bolt tracks a Rb to better > than 1e-12 over 24 hours with no serious 10 MHz phase bumps >>> as plotted on a strip chart recorder. >>> >>> Sooooo - >>> >>> Put your antenna at 6 ft in back yard. Start out on a photo tripod - who > is gonna notice? >>> set up a t bolt at EL=5 AMU=0 Damping = 1.2 and Time Constant = 100 sec. >>> get the t bolt manual >>> get Tbolt monitor >>> get Lady Heather and read all that stuff. >>> >>> Run Lady Heather antenna survey (command SAS) for at least two days - > you get a map of signal level in dBc vs elevation >>> Reset the Tbolt elevation mask to reject anything that is shown as > blocked using the signal >>> level map. Likewise experiment with the AMU setting to reject the weak = > poor signals. Mine works good >>> with AMU all the way up to 10 as fewer good satellites are better than > lots of weak ones. >>> >>> The satellites are in high orbits so masking those below 25 degrees is OK > and the AMU sets the acceptable signal >>> level - at AMU 10 my setup throws out those below about 40 dBc - the > strong guys go up to 50. This is a function >>> of you antenna performance so some experimentation is required. >>> >>> -73 john k6iql >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > Put up a flagpole. > > Randy, KI6WAS > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.