time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Is SC the most stable cut for lowest phase noise?

B
brucekareen@aol.com
Thu, Jun 9, 2022 5:03 PM

My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions.  I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures.  Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut?
Bruce

My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions.  I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures.  Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut? Bruce
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Thu, Jun 9, 2022 7:37 PM

On 6/9/2022 10:03 AM, Bruce Hunter via time-nuts wrote:

My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions.  I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures.  Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut?
Bruce

Absolutely not.  It is strictly due to thermal stress compensation.

Rick N6RK

On 6/9/2022 10:03 AM, Bruce Hunter via time-nuts wrote: > My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions.  I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures.  Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut? > Bruce Absolutely not. It is strictly due to thermal stress compensation. Rick N6RK
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 3:53 AM

Hi

There happen to be some AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical
SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :)

Bob

On Jun 9, 2022, at 9:03 AM, Bruce Hunter via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions.  I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures.  Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut?
Bruce


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi There happen to be *some* AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :) Bob > On Jun 9, 2022, at 9:03 AM, Bruce Hunter via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > My only experience with SC-cut crystals is that time base oscillators in later EIP/Phase-Matrix counters with SC-cut crystal oscillators seem to warm-up from a cold start and stabilize more quickly than earlier AT-cut versions. I was surprised to see from Jeff Cartwright's paper that SC-cut crystals operate at higher temperatures. Could this rapid warm up characteristic be attributable to oven design rather than crystal cut? > Bruce > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
LJ
Lux, Jim
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 1:47 PM

On 6/9/22 8:53 PM, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote:

Hi

There happen to be some AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical
SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :)

Bob

On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could
dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator,
lights in room dim for a few moments.

But everything is a tradeoff, and I suspect that over time "standard
designs" sort of migrate to particular ratios of things like peak vs
average heater current, etc.  Especially in applications driven by
design rules for things like "maximum current per connector pin" or
"component derating" - I suspect that drives things more than the
fundamental physics, in most cases.  Why are diodes rated at 1 or 3
Amps?  And not 2?

On 6/9/22 8:53 PM, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote: > Hi > > There happen to be *some* AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical > SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :) > > Bob > On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator, lights in room dim for a few moments. But everything is a tradeoff, and I suspect that over time "standard designs" sort of migrate to particular ratios of things like peak vs average heater current, etc.  Especially in applications driven by design rules for things like "maximum current per connector pin" or "component derating" - I suspect that drives things more than the fundamental physics, in most cases.  Why are diodes rated at 1 or 3 Amps?  And not 2?
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 7:13 PM

I think there is a severe misunderstanding of this issue.
First of all, "rapid warmup" is a red herring.  The real
issue is "rapid frequency stabilization".

The time it takes for the oven to cut back (typically only
a minute or two) is a very minor part of the time budget
to get to frequency stabilization.  You could have an AT
cut oscillator that reached "oven warmup" in 1 second, but
then you would have something like a 1 hour wait to get
frequency stability, due to the thermal stresses.

Part of the reason for the misunderstanding is that the
problem I have described is basically orthogonal to the
proverbial time nut with his master OCXO in an underground
bunker running on an uninterruptible power supply, that has been
powered up continuously for umpteen years.

Rick N6RK

On 6/10/2022 6:47 AM, Lux, Jim via time-nuts wrote:

On 6/9/22 8:53 PM, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote:

Hi

There happen to be some AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical
SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :)

Bob

On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could
dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator,
lights in room dim for a few moments.

But everything is a tradeoff, and I suspect that over time "standard
designs" sort of migrate to particular ratios of things like peak vs
average heater current, etc.  Especially in applications driven by
design rules for things like "maximum current per connector pin" or
"component derating" - I suspect that drives things more than the
fundamental physics, in most cases.  Why are diodes rated at 1 or 3
Amps?  And not 2?


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

I think there is a severe misunderstanding of this issue. First of all, "rapid warmup" is a red herring. The real issue is "rapid frequency stabilization". The time it takes for the oven to cut back (typically only a minute or two) is a very minor part of the time budget to get to frequency stabilization. You could have an AT cut oscillator that reached "oven warmup" in 1 second, but then you would have something like a 1 hour wait to get frequency stability, due to the thermal stresses. Part of the reason for the misunderstanding is that the problem I have described is basically orthogonal to the proverbial time nut with his master OCXO in an underground bunker running on an uninterruptible power supply, that has been powered up continuously for umpteen years. Rick N6RK On 6/10/2022 6:47 AM, Lux, Jim via time-nuts wrote: > On 6/9/22 8:53 PM, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote: >> Hi >> >> There happen to be *some* AT cut based OCXO’s that beat the typical >> SC cut on warmup … just saying …. :) >> >> Bob >> > On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could > dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator, > lights in room dim for a few moments. > > But everything is a tradeoff, and I suspect that over time "standard > designs" sort of migrate to particular ratios of things like peak vs > average heater current, etc.  Especially in applications driven by > design rules for things like "maximum current per connector pin" or > "component derating" - I suspect that drives things more than the > fundamental physics, in most cases.  Why are diodes rated at 1 or 3 > Amps?  And not 2? > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com >
DD
Dr. David Kirkby
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 9:25 PM

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could
dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator,
lights in room dim for a few moments.

Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and
likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time,
putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's
probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up
in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the
crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have
anything to back it up.

At the other extreme,  would there be any advantage in actually heating the
crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the
temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an
oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient
for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might
outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one
would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal
gradient across the crystal.

I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I
was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to
reduce stresses in the glass.

Dave

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts < time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could > dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator, > lights in room dim for a few moments. > Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time, putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have anything to back it up. At the other extreme, would there be any advantage in actually heating the crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal gradient across the crystal. I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to reduce stresses in the glass. Dave
BK
Bob kb8tq
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 10:00 PM

Hi

Well …. folks have made AT based OCXO’s that heat up in “seconds” ( as in under
a minute ). Back in the 1980’s they stabilized to < 1x10^-7 at least as fast as the
then typical SC based OCXO’s did ….  ( < 6 minutes ). Collins bought quite a few of
them over the years.

Bob

On Jun 10, 2022, at 1:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could
dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator,
lights in room dim for a few moments.

Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and
likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time,
putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's
probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up
in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the
crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have
anything to back it up.

At the other extreme,  would there be any advantage in actually heating the
crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the
temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an
oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient
for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might
outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one
would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal
gradient across the crystal.

I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I
was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to
reduce stresses in the glass.

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi Well …. folks have made AT based OCXO’s that heat up in “seconds” ( as in under a minute ). Back in the 1980’s they stabilized to < 1x10^-7 at least as fast as the then typical SC based OCXO’s did …. ( < 6 minutes ). Collins bought quite a few of them over the years. Bob > On Jun 10, 2022, at 1:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts < > time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > >> >> On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could >> dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator, >> lights in room dim for a few moments. >> > > Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and > likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time, > putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's > probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up > in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the > crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have > anything to back it up. > > At the other extreme, would there be any advantage in actually heating the > crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the > temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an > oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient > for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might > outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one > would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal > gradient across the crystal. > > I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I > was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to > reduce stresses in the glass. > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
MD
Magnus Danielson
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 10:34 PM

Hi,

It is in this context one should look at the CSAC, as the low power
consumption can enable it to be powered on much earlier. It's not that
it's performance is stellar, but when you consider power consumption and
what that can enable, it becomes impressive and another approach to
solve things.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 2022-06-11 00:00, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote:

Hi

Well …. folks have made AT based OCXO’s that heat up in “seconds” ( as in under
a minute ). Back in the 1980’s they stabilized to < 1x10^-7 at least as fast as the
then typical SC based OCXO’s did ….  ( < 6 minutes ). Collins bought quite a few of
them over the years.

Bob

On Jun 10, 2022, at 1:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts <
time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote:

On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could
dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator,
lights in room dim for a few moments.

Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and
likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time,
putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's
probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up
in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the
crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have
anything to back it up.

At the other extreme,  would there be any advantage in actually heating the
crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the
temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an
oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient
for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might
outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one
would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal
gradient across the crystal.

I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I
was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to
reduce stresses in the glass.

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi, It is in this context one should look at the CSAC, as the low power consumption can enable it to be powered on much earlier. It's not that it's performance is stellar, but when you consider power consumption and what that can enable, it becomes impressive and another approach to solve things. Cheers, Magnus On 2022-06-11 00:00, Bob kb8tq via time-nuts wrote: > Hi > > Well …. folks have made AT based OCXO’s that heat up in “seconds” ( as in under > a minute ). Back in the 1980’s they stabilized to < 1x10^-7 at least as fast as the > then typical SC based OCXO’s did …. ( < 6 minutes ). Collins bought quite a few of > them over the years. > > Bob > >> On Jun 10, 2022, at 1:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 at 17:39, Lux, Jim via time-nuts < >> time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: >> >>> On the subject of rapid warm up. I suppose if you had a need, one could >>> dump as much power as you need into the heater. Turn on oscillator, >>> lights in room dim for a few moments. >>> >> Is that not likely to damage a crystal? Different parts of the crystal and >> likely to be at significantly different temperatures at the same time, >> putting a lot of stress on the crystal due to a thermal gradient. It's >> probably a bit academic, as nobody is going to make an oven that heats up >> in fractions of a second, but if one did, I suspect it might not do the >> crystal a lot of good. This is only an educated guess - I don't have >> anything to back it up. >> >> At the other extreme, would there be any advantage in actually heating the >> crystal very slowly, over the course of an hour/day/week, so the >> temperature gradient across the crystal is very small? Of course, if an >> oven took ages to reach the correct temperature, it would be inconvenient >> for most applications, but for some applications, the advantages might >> outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, if one does this, I suspect one >> would have to cool the crystal slowly too to prevent a significant thermal >> gradient across the crystal. >> >> I know it's a bit different, but I have a 600 mm f4 Nikon camera lens. I >> was told that Nikon cools the front element over a period of 6 months to >> reduce stresses in the glass. >> >> Dave >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
LJ
Lux, Jim
Fri, Jun 10, 2022 10:36 PM

On 6/10/22 12:13 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

I think there is a severe misunderstanding of this issue.
First of all, "rapid warmup" is a red herring.  The real
issue is "rapid frequency stabilization".

Indeed. But to a certain extent, that's why oscillators don't have 5
second warm up times - it wouldn't help. So the "few minutes" is a good
compromise between design simplicity and waiting for the internals to
equilibrate.

I suspect that those fancy USOs in vacuum bottles take a long, long time
to come to equilibrium.

And that is one of the claims to fame of the CSAC - from power on to "on
frequency" is quite short.

The time it takes for the oven to cut back (typically only
a minute or two) is a very minor part of the time budget
to get to frequency stabilization.  You could have an AT
cut oscillator that reached "oven warmup" in 1 second, but
then you would have something like a 1 hour wait to get
frequency stability, due to the thermal stresses.

On 6/10/22 12:13 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: > I think there is a severe misunderstanding of this issue. > First of all, "rapid warmup" is a red herring.  The real > issue is "rapid frequency stabilization". Indeed. But to a certain extent, that's why oscillators don't have 5 second warm up times - it wouldn't help. So the "few minutes" is a good compromise between design simplicity and waiting for the internals to equilibrate. I suspect that those fancy USOs in vacuum bottles take a long, long time to come to equilibrium. And that is one of the claims to fame of the CSAC - from power on to "on frequency" is quite short. > > The time it takes for the oven to cut back (typically only > a minute or two) is a very minor part of the time budget > to get to frequency stabilization.  You could have an AT > cut oscillator that reached "oven warmup" in 1 second, but > then you would have something like a 1 hour wait to get > frequency stability, due to the thermal stresses.