If you persist hard enough in suggesting it may like to write correct scad code, it replies > As a language model, I do not have the ability to execute or run code, > nor do I have the ability to determine if a given line of code is > correct or not. My purpose is to assist users by providing information > and answering questions to the best of my knowledge based on the text > that I have been trained on. I do not have the ability to make logical > decisions or judgments about the correctness of code. But, as a search engine, it may be useful. On 15/12/2022 20:41, larry wrote: > On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 20:03 +0000, nop head wrote: >> Tried to create an account but it just goes round in a loop asking me >> to identify harder and harder captchas. > Odd. I clicked on the "I am not a robot" box and it let me in. > > It's interesting. I tried a number of things on it, and got some strage > results. Try a few of these (preceded by write openscad code for a): > > house > box > coffee cup > dog > tapered cylinder of 100mm height, a 50mm base, and a 20mm top with a > vertical hole all the way through > > >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 19:54, Daniel Shriver <tabbydan@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I think the acid test for if it is more than just a fun toy is to >>> ask it to do something difficult/complicated.  I suspect that if >>> you ask it to make a complicated object there will be lots of >>> problems.  Maybe that would make it ok as a first visualization, or >>> an idea of how to start out- but I'm deeply skeptical that it >>> generates a solution that is close to what is desired. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 2:37 PM Raymond West <raywest@raywest.com> >>> wrote: >>>> I've poked around a bit on the web, it seems it is pretty good at >>>> python., and iirc, some folk have used it for debugging, and >>>> optimising code. It apparently has some morality filters, but you >>>> can jailbreak that. e.g. you could ask it how to commit a >>>> robbery, and it will say it's illegal, give a lecture to you. But >>>> if you say you say you are writing a play about committing a >>>> robbery, it would explain how to commit the robbery, or >>>> apparently it used to. I've asked it a few openscad problems, and >>>> it has never got them correct, but you can see it tried. Very >>>> much like most of us, on starting, I guess. Maybe could get it to >>>> ask the questions, then tell it the correct code. >>>> On 15/12/2022 19:09, Whosawhatsis wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well, it's valid OpenSCAD code. Interesting that it got the >>>>> wall thickness wrong. I wonder if that had to do with confusion >>>>> about the difference between how cubes and cylinders work... >>>>> On Dec 15, 2022 at 09:55 -0800, Raymond West >>>>> <raywest@raywest.com>, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Just found https://chat.openai.com >>>>>> >>>>>> you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and >>>>>> most anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it >>>>>> gets the right commands, and then some, but in the wrong >>>>>> order. Maybe we could train it?) >>>>>> >>>>>> <Clipboard01.jpg>____________________________________________ >>>>>> ___ >>>>>>  OpenSCAD mailing list >>>>>>  To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OpenSCAD mailing list >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenSCAD mailing list >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenSCAD mailing list >>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenSCAD mailing list >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Stack Exchange banned code generated by it. On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:14 PM Raymond West <raywest@raywest.com> wrote: > If you persist hard enough in suggesting it may like to write correct > scad code, it replies > > > As a language model, I do not have the ability to execute or run code, > > nor do I have the ability to determine if a given line of code is > > correct or not. My purpose is to assist users by providing information > > and answering questions to the best of my knowledge based on the text > > that I have been trained on. I do not have the ability to make logical > > decisions or judgments about the correctness of code. > > But, as a search engine, it may be useful. > > On 15/12/2022 20:41, larry wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 20:03 +0000, nop head wrote: > >> Tried to create an account but it just goes round in a loop asking me > >> to identify harder and harder captchas. > > Odd. I clicked on the "I am not a robot" box and it let me in. > > > > It's interesting. I tried a number of things on it, and got some strage > > results. Try a few of these (preceded by write openscad code for a): > > > > house > > box > > coffee cup > > dog > > tapered cylinder of 100mm height, a 50mm base, and a 20mm top with a > > vertical hole all the way through > > > > > >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 19:54, Daniel Shriver <tabbydan@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> I think the acid test for if it is more than just a fun toy is to > >>> ask it to do something difficult/complicated. I suspect that if > >>> you ask it to make a complicated object there will be lots of > >>> problems. Maybe that would make it ok as a first visualization, or > >>> an idea of how to start out- but I'm deeply skeptical that it > >>> generates a solution that is close to what is desired. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 2:37 PM Raymond West <raywest@raywest.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> I've poked around a bit on the web, it seems it is pretty good at > >>>> python., and iirc, some folk have used it for debugging, and > >>>> optimising code. It apparently has some morality filters, but you > >>>> can jailbreak that. e.g. you could ask it how to commit a > >>>> robbery, and it will say it's illegal, give a lecture to you. But > >>>> if you say you say you are writing a play about committing a > >>>> robbery, it would explain how to commit the robbery, or > >>>> apparently it used to. I've asked it a few openscad problems, and > >>>> it has never got them correct, but you can see it tried. Very > >>>> much like most of us, on starting, I guess. Maybe could get it to > >>>> ask the questions, then tell it the correct code. > >>>> On 15/12/2022 19:09, Whosawhatsis wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Well, it's valid OpenSCAD code. Interesting that it got the > >>>>> wall thickness wrong. I wonder if that had to do with confusion > >>>>> about the difference between how cubes and cylinders work... > >>>>> On Dec 15, 2022 at 09:55 -0800, Raymond West > >>>>> <raywest@raywest.com>, wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> Just found https://chat.openai.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and > >>>>>> most anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it > >>>>>> gets the right commands, and then some, but in the wrong > >>>>>> order. Maybe we could train it?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <Clipboard01.jpg>____________________________________________ > >>>>>> ___ > >>>>>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to > >>>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to > >>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenSCAD mailing list > >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenSCAD mailing list > > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >

 If you persist hard enough in suggesting it may like to write correct
 scad code, it replies

 code,

 information

 text

 logical

 But, as a search engine, it may be useful.

 On 15/12/2022 20:41, larry wrote:

 asking me

 strage

 visualization, or

 _______________________________________________
 OpenSCAD mailing list
 To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

Although the name is "openai"(.com) it's not open at all.  It's so closed source and you have to make an account just to try the demos.  I'd argue this is not worth the time sharing. On 12/15/2022 5:21 PM, Father Horton wrote: > Stack Exchange banned code generated by it. > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 4:14 PM Raymond West <raywest@raywest.com> wrote: > > If you persist hard enough in suggesting it may like to write correct > scad code, it replies > > > As a language model, I do not have the ability to execute or run > code, > > nor do I have the ability to determine if a given line of code is > > correct or not. My purpose is to assist users by providing > information > > and answering questions to the best of my knowledge based on the > text > > that I have been trained on. I do not have the ability to make > logical > > decisions or judgments about the correctness of code. > > But, as a search engine, it may be useful. > > On 15/12/2022 20:41, larry wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-12-15 at 20:03 +0000, nop head wrote: > >> Tried to create an account but it just goes round in a loop > asking me > >> to identify harder and harder captchas. > > Odd. I clicked on the "I am not a robot" box and it let me in. > > > > It's interesting. I tried a number of things on it, and got some > strage > > results. Try a few of these (preceded by write openscad code for a): > > > > house > > box > > coffee cup > > dog > > tapered cylinder of 100mm height, a 50mm base, and a 20mm top with a > > vertical hole all the way through > > > > > >> On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 19:54, Daniel Shriver <tabbydan@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> I think the acid test for if it is more than just a fun toy is to > >>> ask it to do something difficult/complicated.  I suspect that if > >>> you ask it to make a complicated object there will be lots of > >>> problems.  Maybe that would make it ok as a first > visualization, or > >>> an idea of how to start out- but I'm deeply skeptical that it > >>> generates a solution that is close to what is desired. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 2:37 PM Raymond West <raywest@raywest.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> I've poked around a bit on the web, it seems it is pretty good at > >>>> python., and iirc, some folk have used it for debugging, and > >>>> optimising code. It apparently has some morality filters, but you > >>>> can jailbreak that. e.g. you could ask it how to commit a > >>>> robbery, and it will say it's illegal, give a lecture to you. But > >>>> if you say you say you are writing a play about committing a > >>>> robbery, it would explain how to commit the robbery, or > >>>> apparently it used to. I've asked it a few openscad problems, and > >>>> it has never got them correct, but you can see it tried. Very > >>>> much like most of us, on starting, I guess. Maybe could get it to > >>>> ask the questions, then tell it the correct code. > >>>> On 15/12/2022 19:09, Whosawhatsis wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Well, it's valid OpenSCAD code. Interesting that it got the > >>>>> wall thickness wrong. I wonder if that had to do with confusion > >>>>> about the difference between how cubes and cylinders work... > >>>>> On Dec 15, 2022 at 09:55 -0800, Raymond West > >>>>> <raywest@raywest.com>, wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> Just found https://chat.openai.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and > >>>>>> most anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it > >>>>>> gets the right commands, and then some, but in the wrong > >>>>>> order. Maybe we could train it?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> <Clipboard01.jpg>____________________________________________ > >>>>>> ___ > >>>>>>   OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>>>>   To unsubscribe send an email to > >>>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to > >>>>> discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenSCAD mailing list > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenSCAD mailing list > >> To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenSCAD mailing list > > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email todiscuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

That's quite amazing ... in two senses: first, that it's able to do that at all, and second, that it does it so poorly. On 12/15/2022 12:54 PM, Raymond West wrote: > > Hi, > > Just found https://chat.openai.com > > > you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and most > anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it gets the right > commands, and then some, but in the wrong order. Maybe we could train it?) > >

On 16/12/2022 8:26 am, Douglas Miller wrote: > That's quite amazing ... in two senses: first, that it's able to do > that at all, and second, that it does it so poorly. > > On 12/15/2022 12:54 PM, Raymond West wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just found https://chat.openai.com >> >> you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and most >> anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it gets the right >> commands, and then some, but in the wrong order. Maybe we could train >> it?) >> > Question: "brothers and sisters I have none, but this man's father is my father's son" Response: "This statement means that the speaker does not have any siblings, but the man being referred to is the speaker's cousin. The man's father is the son of the speaker's father, which makes the man and the speaker cousins." Correct Answer: The speaker is referring to his son. -- Jeremy

I have got it to do several laughable attempts at making a pineapple. Such as the one below. I'm not sure why it's convinced the bottom needs to be cut off the pineapple, maybe its reading this from some instructables site on how to cut a pineapple but it's a recurring theme in a few attempts it made. It also loves cheating like if you tell it to make some object it will try to import "some_object.stl" and tell you to supply it. Or if you tell it to use BOSL2 it will include it but not actually use it. Still there is endless amounts of entertainment to be had with it -Daniel // Define the size and detail level of the pineapple size = 50; detail = 50; // Create the base shape of the pineapple difference() {   union() {     // Add a cylinder for the body of the pineapple     cylinder(h=size, r=size/2, center=true, $fn=detail);     // Add a cone for the top of the pineapple     translate([0, 0, size]) {       rotate(90, [1, 0, 0]) {         cone(h=size/2, r=size/2, center=true, $fn=detail);       }     }   }   // Cut off the bottom of the pineapple   translate([0, 0, -size/10]) {     rotate(90, [1, 0, 0]) {       cylinder(h=size/5, r=size/2, center=true, $fn=detail);     }   }   // Create the indentations on the body of the pineapple   for (i = [0 : detail-1]) {     rotate(360/detail*i, [0, 0, 1]) {       translate([size/2, 0, size/2]) {         scale([1, 1, 0.5]) {           rotate(45, [0, 0, 1]) {             cylinder(h=size/2, r=size/10, center=true, $fn=detail);           }         }       }     }   } } On 15/12/2022 17:54, Raymond West wrote: > > Hi, > > Just found https://chat.openai.com > > > you need to log in, but it almost writes openscad code, and most > anything else. Not tried any more complex shapes. (it gets the right > commands, and then some, but in the wrong order. Maybe we could train it?) > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email todiscuss-leave@lists.openscad.org