This patch fix two bugs in PJSIP' base64 implementation:
--- a/pjlib-util/src/pjlib-util/base64.c 2017-05-03 10:29:07.200417026 -0400
+++ b/pjlib-util/src/pjlib-util/base64.c 2017-05-03 10:28:30.344335390 -0400
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
PJ_ASSERT_RETURN(input && out && out_len, PJ_EINVAL);
while (len && buf[len-1] == '=')
--len;
PJ_ASSERT_RETURN(*out_len >= PJ_BASE64_TO_BASE256_LEN(len),
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
out[j++] = (pj_uint8_t)(((c[2] & 0x03)<<6) | (c[3] & 0x3F));
}
pj_assert(j <= *out_len);
*out_len = j;
return PJ_SUCCESS;
Adrien Béraud
Hi Adrien,
Thanks for the patch. We committed it in r5589 (
https://trac.pjsip.org/repos/changeset/5589).
Best regards,
Ming
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 11:26 PM, Adrien Béraud <
adrien.beraud@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
This patch fix two bugs in PJSIP' base64 implementation:
--- a/pjlib-util/src/pjlib-util/base64.c 2017-05-03
10:29:07.200417026 -0400
+++ b/pjlib-util/src/pjlib-util/base64.c 2017-05-03
10:28:30.344335390 -0400
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
PJ_ASSERT_RETURN(input && out && out_len, PJ_EINVAL);
while (len && buf[len-1] == '=')
--len;
PJ_ASSERT_RETURN(*out_len >= PJ_BASE64_TO_BASE256_LEN(len),
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
out[j++] = (pj_uint8_t)(((c[2] & 0x03)<<6) | (c[3] & 0x3F));
}
pj_assert(j <= *out_len);
*out_len = j;
return PJ_SUCCESS;
Adrien Béraud
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org