Georgs,
Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?
What power do you have?
It is one of the boats on my short list.
Regards,
Jim Garner
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:16:04 -0400
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Subject: [PCW] What's happening in your world?
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: <a06240849c33a67dcdd3d@[10.0.1.200]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hey, guys!
I've been preoccupied with magazine business for the past nine months
but I'm now starting to resurface, aiming to boost traffic on our
List and get that darn ite up and running at last.
I'm located on Lake Ontario. Admiral and I have plans to focus on
inland and coastal cruising over the coming years, thus, we've
purchased a trailerable power catamaran, a previously owned TomCat 24:
http://www.c-dory.com/TomCat%2024.htm
Before the snow flies, we hope to explore the western end of Lake
Ontario. Next year, we plan to head east to Thousand Islands, the
Rideau and the Trent-Severn.
--Georgs
Jim Garner wrote:
Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?
Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us:
-- It looks good.
-- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive.
-- It's trailerable.
-- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions.
-- It has a nice turn of speed.
-- It's unsinkable.
-- It has an enclosed head.
-- The berth lies athwartships.
-- It looks good.
What power do you have?
Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were
ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the
power of it.
We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but
the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit
40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you.
--Georgs
PS Here are photos of several sister ships:
Georgs
Sitting here 8 days after a knee replacement and thinking of my next vessel.
Unfortunately the PT 32 is gone to a new home and I am not planning on
building and so your choice is very interesting.
A question on livability with the limits of a pair of new knees.
The one thing I am told is NO KNEELING.
So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth.
Anything you have to crawl too ?
Len
Georgs Kolesnikovs wrote:
Jim Garner wrote:
Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?
Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us:
-- It looks good.
-- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive.
-- It's trailerable.
-- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions.
-- It has a nice turn of speed.
-- It's unsinkable.
-- It has an enclosed head.
-- The berth lies athwartships.
-- It looks good.
What power do you have?
Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were
ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the
power of it.
We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but
the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit
40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you.
--Georgs
PS Here are photos of several sister ships:
Power-Catamaran Mailing List
--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
After Dec. 13,2007
Email : trikini2007@comcast.net
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
Len wrote:
A question on livability with the limits of a pair of new knees.
The one thing I am told is NO KNEELING.
So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth.
It's pretty well stand up or stoop for just about everything. But,
for the lowest lockers, you might want to kneel.
Anything you have to crawl too ?
No.
--Georgs
At Last, TomCat 24
Frenchman's Bay, Lake Ontario