Re: [PCW] What's happening in your world? (Georgs Kolesnikovs)

JG
Jim Garner
Wed, Oct 17, 2007 6:29 AM

Georgs,

Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?

What power do you have?

It is one of the boats on my short list.

Regards,
Jim Garner

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:16:04 -0400
From: Georgs Kolesnikovs georgs@powercatamaranworld.com
Subject: [PCW] What's happening in your world?
To: Power Catamaran List power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: <a06240849c33a67dcdd3d@[10.0.1.200]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hey, guys!

I've been preoccupied with magazine business for the past nine months
but I'm now starting to resurface, aiming to boost traffic on our
List and get that darn ite up and running at last.

I'm located on Lake Ontario. Admiral and I have plans to focus on
inland and coastal cruising over the coming years, thus, we've
purchased a trailerable power catamaran, a previously owned TomCat 24:

http://www.c-dory.com/TomCat%2024.htm

Before the snow flies, we hope to explore the western end of Lake
Ontario. Next year, we plan to head east to Thousand Islands, the
Rideau and the Trent-Severn.

--Georgs

Georgs, Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat? What power do you have? It is one of the boats on my short list. Regards, Jim Garner Message: 1 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:16:04 -0400 From: Georgs Kolesnikovs <georgs@powercatamaranworld.com> Subject: [PCW] What's happening in your world? To: Power Catamaran List <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Message-ID: <a06240849c33a67dcdd3d@[10.0.1.200]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hey, guys! I've been preoccupied with magazine business for the past nine months but I'm now starting to resurface, aiming to boost traffic on our List and get that darn ite up and running at last. I'm located on Lake Ontario. Admiral and I have plans to focus on inland and coastal cruising over the coming years, thus, we've purchased a trailerable power catamaran, a previously owned TomCat 24: http://www.c-dory.com/TomCat%2024.htm Before the snow flies, we hope to explore the western end of Lake Ontario. Next year, we plan to head east to Thousand Islands, the Rideau and the Trent-Severn. --Georgs
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Wed, Oct 17, 2007 4:25 PM

Jim Garner wrote:
Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?

Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us:

-- It looks good.
-- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive.
-- It's trailerable.
-- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions.
-- It has a nice turn of speed.
-- It's unsinkable.
-- It has an enclosed head.
-- The berth lies athwartships.
-- It looks good.

What power do you have?

Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were
ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the
power of it.

We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but
the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit
40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you.

--Georgs

PS  Here are photos of several sister ships:

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=FanTC&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=MollyBrown&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Dive-Cat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Katie-Kat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

>Jim Garner wrote: >Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat? Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us: -- It looks good. -- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive. -- It's trailerable. -- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions. -- It has a nice turn of speed. -- It's unsinkable. -- It has an enclosed head. -- The berth lies athwartships. -- It looks good. >What power do you have? Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the power of it. We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit 40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you. --Georgs PS Here are photos of several sister ships: http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=FanTC&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=MollyBrown&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Dive-Cat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Katie-Kat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
C
capt.len
Wed, Oct 17, 2007 5:20 PM

Georgs

Sitting here 8 days after a knee replacement and thinking of my next vessel.

Unfortunately the PT 32 is gone to a new home and I am not planning on
building and so your choice is very interesting.

A question on livability with  the limits of a pair of new knees.

The one thing I am told is  NO KNEELING.

So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth.

Anything you have to crawl too ?

Len

Georgs Kolesnikovs wrote:

Jim Garner wrote:
Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat?

Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us:

-- It looks good.
-- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive.
-- It's trailerable.
-- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions.
-- It has a nice turn of speed.
-- It's unsinkable.
-- It has an enclosed head.
-- The berth lies athwartships.
-- It looks good.

What power do you have?

Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were
ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the
power of it.

We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but
the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit
40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you.

--Georgs

PS  Here are photos of several sister ships:

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=FanTC&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=MollyBrown&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Dive-Cat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php

http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Katie-Kat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
After Dec. 13,2007
Email : trikini2007@comcast.net
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

Georgs Sitting here 8 days after a knee replacement and thinking of my next vessel. Unfortunately the PT 32 is gone to a new home and I am not planning on building and so your choice is very interesting. A question on livability with the limits of a pair of new knees. The one thing I am told is NO KNEELING. So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth. Anything you have to crawl too ? Len Georgs Kolesnikovs wrote: >>Jim Garner wrote: >>Perhaps you would share with us your reasons for acquiring the TomCat? >> >> > >Here's why we concluded the TomCat 24 (not the new 255) was right for us: > >-- It looks good. >-- It's small yet spacious, and relatively inexpensive. >-- It's trailerable. >-- It won't roll, and provides a stable, smooth ride in cruising conditions. >-- It has a nice turn of speed. >-- It's unsinkable. >-- It has an enclosed head. >-- The berth lies athwartships. >-- It looks good. > > > >>What power do you have? >> >> > >Twin 100 Yamahas which is the most economical approach. If I were >ordering from scratch, I'd probably go a little bigger. Just for the >power of it. > >We can cruise at 20 knots or better all day, no problem there, but >the top end is just over 30 knots. With larger engines, you could hit >40, and get up to speed quicker. If that's important to you. > >--Georgs > >PS Here are photos of several sister ships: > >http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=FanTC&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php > >http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=MollyBrown&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php > >http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Dive-Cat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php > >http://www.c-brats.com/modules.php?set_albumName=Katie-Kat&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > > > -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com After Dec. 13,2007 Email : trikini2007@comcast.net What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Thu, Oct 18, 2007 1:54 PM

Len wrote:

A question on livability with  the limits of a pair of new knees.
The one thing I am told is  NO KNEELING.

So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth.

It's pretty well stand up or stoop for just about everything. But,
for the lowest lockers, you might want to kneel.

Anything you have to crawl too ?

No.

--Georgs

At Last, TomCat 24
Frenchman's Bay, Lake Ontario

Len wrote: >A question on livability with the limits of a pair of new knees. >The one thing I am told is NO KNEELING. > >So How would it stack up, access to gear, lockers, head even the berth. It's pretty well stand up or stoop for just about everything. But, for the lowest lockers, you might want to kneel. >Anything you have to crawl too ? No. --Georgs At Last, TomCat 24 Frenchman's Bay, Lake Ontario