Hose Adapter for table saw
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you created such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
This seems to me as quite a simple case although haven't tried it yet.
As per my understanding it should be easy to do with BOSL library. May be
Adrian can comment.
If you want, I can make it through my python approach.
It is mainly 2 tubes which needs to be fused together and some easy
filleting.
Threads parts maybe a little tricky, but not too difficult for sure.
On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 12:42 pm Karl Exler, karl.exler@meinklang.cc wrote:
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you created such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
I would split it up at least 4 or 5 cilinders, bottom and top straight,
middle with different r1 and r2, and two cilnders for the left side.
The top with a tread inside from BOSSL or another treads library.
Should be do-able in openscad without the need for python.
Sanjeev Prabhakar schreef op 2023-08-16 10:59:
This seems to me as quite a simple case although haven't tried it yet.
As per my understanding it should be easy to do with BOSL library. May
be Adrian can comment.
If you want, I can make it through my python approach.
It is mainly 2 tubes which needs to be fused together and some easy
filleting.
Threads parts maybe a little tricky, but not too difficult for sure.
On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 12:42 pm Karl Exler, karl.exler@meinklang.cc
wrote:
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you created
such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL
libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
Have a look at the osVAC-website and the pages on ThingiVerse
Absaugung für DeWALT 7492 & 7485 (STL Download zum selber Drucken) – Homewerken
https://homewerken.de/produkt/absaugung-dewalt-7492-stl-download/
No OpenSCAD-File
osVAC – osSso
osvac-things - Search - Thingiverse
https://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=osvac&page=1&type=things&sort=relevant
Thingiverse - Digital Designs for Physical Objects
STLs downzuloaden ist ein bisschen wir Onanie....
Ich würde es gerne aus eigener Kraft schaffen ;-)
lG
Karl
Am 16. August 2023 11:57:23 MESZ schrieb poppele@posteo.de:
Have a look at the osVAC-website and the pages on ThingiVerse
Absaugung für DeWALT 7492 & 7485 (STL Download zum selber Drucken) – Homewerken
https://homewerken.de/produkt/absaugung-dewalt-7492-stl-download/
No OpenSCAD-File
osVAC – osSso
osvac-things - Search - Thingiverse
https://www.thingiverse.com/search?q=osvac&page=1&type=things&sort=relevant
Thingiverse - Digital Designs for Physical Objects
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von unterwegs gesendet...
openscad version
[image: Screenshot 2023-08-16 at 9.44.44 PM.png]
#python code to create this:
from openscad1 import *
sec=circle(25)
path=cr(pts1([[0,0,0],[0,15,1],[-6,50,1],[0,18,0]]),10)
sol=prism(sec,path)
sol1=prism(circle(24),path)
sol0=swp_prism_h(sol,sol1)
sec2=circle(15)
path2=cr_3d([[0,0,15,0],[-60,0,40,20],[0,0,30,0]],10)
sol2=path_extrude_open(sec2,path2)
sol3=path_extrude_open(offset(sec2,-1),path2)
sol02=swp_prism_h(sol2,sol3)
fillet1=ip_fillet(sol,sol2,3,3)
sec3=cr(pts1([[0,0],[-2,1,.2],[2,1]]),10)
path3=helix(14,2.5,6,5)
sol4=path_extrude_open(sec3,path3)
sol4=sol2vector([0,0,1,],sol4,[-60,0,70])
with open('/Users/sanjeevprabhakar/iCloud Drive
(Archive)/Documents/Download/openscad/trial.scad','w+') as f:
f.write(f'''
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol0)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol02)}
{swp(sol)}
}}
{swp_c(fillet1)}
intersection(){{
color("blue"){swp(sol4)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
''')
#for this code to work you would need file openscad1.py
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 14:29, Sanjeev Prabhakar sprabhakar2006@gmail.com
wrote:
This seems to me as quite a simple case although haven't tried it yet.
As per my understanding it should be easy to do with BOSL library. May be
Adrian can comment.
If you want, I can make it through my python approach.
It is mainly 2 tubes which needs to be fused together and some easy
filleting.
Threads parts maybe a little tricky, but not too difficult for sure.
On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 12:42 pm Karl Exler, karl.exler@meinklang.cc
wrote:
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you created such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
How do the forum members feel about postings like this, which have more
to do with python than with OpenSCAD? I personally find it to be
unnecessary and distracting, but I will defer to the feelings of the group.
Jon
On 8/16/2023 12:22 PM, Sanjeev Prabhakar wrote:
openscad version
Screenshot 2023-08-16 at 9.44.44 PM.png
#python code to create this:
from openscad1 import *
sec=circle(25)
path=cr(pts1([[0,0,0],[0,15,1],[-6,50,1],[0,18,0]]),10)
sol=prism(sec,path)
sol1=prism(circle(24),path)
sol0=swp_prism_h(sol,sol1)
sec2=circle(15)
path2=cr_3d([[0,0,15,0],[-60,0,40,20],[0,0,30,0]],10)
sol2=path_extrude_open(sec2,path2)
sol3=path_extrude_open(offset(sec2,-1),path2)
sol02=swp_prism_h(sol2,sol3)
fillet1=ip_fillet(sol,sol2,3,3)
sec3=cr(pts1([[0,0],[-2,1,.2],[2,1]]),10)
path3=helix(14,2.5,6,5)
sol4=path_extrude_open(sec3,path3)
sol4=sol2vector([0,0,1,],sol4,[-60,0,70])
with open('/Users/sanjeevprabhakar/iCloud Drive
(Archive)/Documents/Download/openscad/trial.scad','w+') as f:
f.write(f'''
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol0)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol02)}
{swp(sol)}
}}
{swp_c(fillet1)}
intersection(){{
color("blue"){swp(sol4)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
''')
#for this code to work you would need file openscad1.py
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 14:29, Sanjeev Prabhakar
sprabhakar2006@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to me as quite a simple case although haven't tried it
yet.
As per my understanding it should be easy to do with BOSL library.
May be Adrian can comment.
If you want, I can make it through my python approach.
It is mainly 2 tubes which needs to be fused together and some
easy filleting.
Threads parts maybe a little tricky, but not too difficult for sure.
On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 12:42 pm Karl Exler,
<karl.exler@meinklang.cc> wrote:
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately
nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you
created such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL
libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
_______________________________________________
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email todiscuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
Well, that question should be debated in its own thread/subj:-line.
I feel we have 3 subject areas:
- The "pure" OpenSCAD usage questions: syntax, funktion, getting data
in&out, versions, bugs ... - The "add ons" - BOSL2 and Sanjeev's python frontend.
- Hardware related- ie on how to get a physical implementation of a model.
The list could be subdivided a bit further.
IMHO the list should restrict itself to 1. The occasional hardware
question is not a problem, but it gets a bit strained in that many OpenSCAD
questions are answered with "use this instead". Admittedly, pure (and
simple) OpenSCAD can not solve all 3D model desires, but should that be a
problem?
I found it nice to hear about BOSL2, but find longer problems irrelevant.
BOSL2 is bigger than OpenSCAD in the number of features and functions, i.e.
it is like a new language (perhaps like C++ is "just" an extension of C ?)
Sanjeev's python work is also a new language which only uses OpenSCAD as a
render, as it produces one large polyhedra. Fantastic, but has almost
nothing to do with OpenSCAD.
Msquare
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 18:52, jon jon@jonbondy.com wrote:
How do the forum members feel about postings like this, which have more to
do with python than with OpenSCAD? I personally find it to be unnecessary
and distracting, but I will defer to the feelings of the group.
Jon
On 8/16/2023 12:22 PM, Sanjeev Prabhakar wrote:
openscad version
[image: Screenshot 2023-08-16 at 9.44.44 PM.png]
#python code to create this:
from openscad1 import *
sec=circle(25)
path=cr(pts1([[0,0,0],[0,15,1],[-6,50,1],[0,18,0]]),10)
sol=prism(sec,path)
sol1=prism(circle(24),path)
sol0=swp_prism_h(sol,sol1)
sec2=circle(15)
path2=cr_3d([[0,0,15,0],[-60,0,40,20],[0,0,30,0]],10)
sol2=path_extrude_open(sec2,path2)
sol3=path_extrude_open(offset(sec2,-1),path2)
sol02=swp_prism_h(sol2,sol3)
fillet1=ip_fillet(sol,sol2,3,3)
sec3=cr(pts1([[0,0],[-2,1,.2],[2,1]]),10)
path3=helix(14,2.5,6,5)
sol4=path_extrude_open(sec3,path3)
sol4=sol2vector([0,0,1,],sol4,[-60,0,70])
with open('/Users/sanjeevprabhakar/iCloud Drive
(Archive)/Documents/Download/openscad/trial.scad','w+') as f:
f.write(f'''
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol0)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol02)}
{swp(sol)}
}}
{swp_c(fillet1)}
intersection(){{
color("blue"){swp(sol4)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
''')
#for this code to work you would need file openscad1.py
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 14:29, Sanjeev Prabhakar sprabhakar2006@gmail.com
wrote:
This seems to me as quite a simple case although haven't tried it yet.
As per my understanding it should be easy to do with BOSL library. May be
Adrian can comment.
If you want, I can make it through my python approach.
It is mainly 2 tubes which needs to be fused together and some easy
filleting.
Threads parts maybe a little tricky, but not too difficult for sure.
On Wed, 16 Aug, 2023, 12:42 pm Karl Exler, karl.exler@meinklang.cc
wrote:
Dear all
I found the enclosed adapter on Thingiverse. Unfortunately nearly all
diameters are not in that size I need it. Did anyone of you created such
an (similar) object in Openscad? Is it possible to get that file?
Or- if not- how would an expert start with that projects?
Until now I only use Openscad functions and some of the BOSL libraries.
Many thanks in advance
Karl
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org
I agree that this should be separate. Thanks for pointing this out.
Jon
On 8/16/2023 1:44 PM, Michael Möller wrote:
Well, that question should be debated in its own thread/subj:-line.
I feel we have 3 subject areas:
- The "pure" OpenSCAD usage questions: syntax, funktion, getting data
in&out, versions, bugs ... - The "add ons" - BOSL2 and Sanjeev's python frontend.
- Hardware related- ie on how to get a physical implementation of a
model.
The list could be subdivided a bit further.
IMHO the list should restrict itself to 1. The occasional hardware
question is not a problem, but it gets a bit strained in that many
OpenSCAD questions are answered with "use this instead". Admittedly,
pure (and simple) OpenSCAD can not solve all 3D model desires, but
should that be a problem?
I found it nice to hear about BOSL2, but find longer problems
irrelevant. BOSL2 is bigger than OpenSCAD in the number of features
and functions, i.e. it is like a new language (perhaps like C++ is
"just" an extension of C ?) Sanjeev's python work is also a new
language which only uses OpenSCAD as a render, as it produces one
large polyhedra. Fantastic, but has almost nothing to do with OpenSCAD.
Msquare
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 18:52, jon jon@jonbondy.com wrote:
How do the forum members feel about postings like this, which have
more to do with python than with OpenSCAD? I personally find it
to be unnecessary and distracting, but I will defer to the
feelings of the group.
Jon
On 8/16/2023 12:22 PM, Sanjeev Prabhakar wrote:
openscad version
Screenshot 2023-08-16 at 9.44.44 PM.png
#python code to create this:
from openscad1 import *
sec=circle(25)
path=cr(pts1([[0,0,0],[0,15,1],[-6,50,1],[0,18,0]]),10)
sol=prism(sec,path)
sol1=prism(circle(24),path)
sol0=swp_prism_h(sol,sol1)
sec2=circle(15)
path2=cr_3d([[0,0,15,0],[-60,0,40,20],[0,0,30,0]],10)
sol2=path_extrude_open(sec2,path2)
sol3=path_extrude_open(offset(sec2,-1),path2)
sol02=swp_prism_h(sol2,sol3)
fillet1=ip_fillet(sol,sol2,3,3)
sec3=cr(pts1([[0,0],[-2,1,.2],[2,1]]),10)
path3=helix(14,2.5,6,5)
sol4=path_extrude_open(sec3,path3)
sol4=sol2vector([0,0,1,],sol4,[-60,0,70])
with open('/Users/sanjeevprabhakar/iCloud Drive
(Archive)/Documents/Download/openscad/trial.scad','w+') as f:
f.write(f'''
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol0)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
difference(){{
{swp_c(sol02)}
{swp(sol)}
}}
{swp_c(fillet1)}
intersection(){{
color("blue"){swp(sol4)}
{swp(sol3)}
}}
''')
#for this code to work you would need file openscad1.py
There is simple way of subdividing the mailing list, reasonable
mail clients should be able to suppress unwanted threads though.
I'm still trying to figure out if there's anything we could self-
host that could bring back the combined forum/mail usage we had
earlier. Maybe the new fediverse apps (Lemmy/Kbin...) bring some
new options to the table...
Declaring a strict "pure OpenSCAD" policy seems both too limited
and also difficult to enforce anyway.
Declaring BOSL2 or any library off-topic is just wrong in my
personal opinion. It does not get more OpenSCAD related than that.
The python topic is debatable, especially in it's current form,
but considering there's going to be some native Python support
it could become much more integrated / native soon.
In summary, I'm seeing all 3 topics in the on-topic category,
maybe with the hope the hardware topics would not take a too
big percentage.
ciao,
Torsten.