Yet this is configured as an authority reference to the concept authority,
not a cspace relation between authorities of type See Also or some such
implemented in the style of the hierarchy section (which was discussed at
times as future).
Very true. This has few of the handy features of the Hierarchy section.
There are some early wireframes that give some
Is it possible to refer to the current authority in a field in that
authority?
Off the top of my head, I can't recall any limitations that would
prevent you from doing that.
For instance, the Citation record includes a Term Source field
(labeled just "Source" in the UI) - you can find that field near the
bottom of each group in the repeatable Citation Term Group field.
This field references terms from one or more vocabularies within ...
the Citation authority.
Aron
Susan
On 05/06/2014 05:25 PM, Aron Roberts wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Susan Stone sstone@berkeley.edu
wrote [directly to me, noting that she's encountering difficulties
posting to the Talk list]:
Note that Related Term and Related Term Type appear in the authority
documentation schemas for at least Person and Org even though they aren't
implemented.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Susan Stone <sstone@berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Yet this is configured as an authority reference to the concept authority,
> not a cspace relation between authorities of type See Also or some such
> implemented in the style of the hierarchy section (which was discussed at
> times as future).
Very true. This has few of the *handy* features of the Hierarchy section.
There are some early wireframes that give some
> Is it possible to refer to the current authority in a field in that
> authority?
Off the top of my head, I can't recall any limitations that would
prevent you from doing that.
For instance, the Citation record includes a Term Source field
(labeled just "Source" in the UI) - you can find that field near the
bottom of each group in the repeatable Citation Term Group field.
This field references terms from one or more vocabularies within ...
the Citation authority.
Aron
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> On 05/06/2014 05:25 PM, Aron Roberts wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Susan Stone <sstone@berkeley.edu>
>> wrote [directly to me, noting that she's encountering difficulties
>> posting to the Talk list]:
>>
>>> Note that Related Term and Related Term Type appear in the authority
>>> documentation schemas for at least Person and Org even though they aren't
>>> implemented.
>>
>> Good point. There also appears to be an active implementation of
>> those two fields in the Citation Authority, an authority which was a
>> contribution from SMK:
>>
>>
>> http://demo.collectionspace.org:8180/collectionspace/ui/core/html/citation.html
>>
>> Aron
>
>
