A question of weight

GS
Gary Stavrou
Mon, Sep 4, 2006 1:45 PM

Pat,
Your answer "at 16 knots the heavier boat would require more
horsepower and burn more fuel" is a statement, not an explanation. I
don't deny that it's right. Experience tells us so. But why?
Your previous, fuller answer, was mainly comparing cats to monohulls.
That is not the issue.
Gary

Pat, Your answer "at 16 knots the heavier boat would require more horsepower and burn more fuel" is a statement, not an explanation. I don't deny that it's right. Experience tells us so. But why? Your previous, fuller answer, was mainly comparing cats to monohulls. That is not the issue. Gary
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Mon, Sep 4, 2006 2:13 PM

Your answer "at 16 knots the heavier boat would require more
horsepower and burn more fuel" is a statement, not an explanation. I
don't deny that it's right. Experience tells us so. But why?

Gary, sounds like you're after the kind of answer only a physics
professor could provide. Perhaps these definitions of weight, mass,
velocity et al might help:

http://www.av8n.com/physics/weight.htm
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci552571,00.html

--Georgs

>Your answer "at 16 knots the heavier boat would require more >horsepower and burn more fuel" is a statement, not an explanation. I >don't deny that it's right. Experience tells us so. But why? Gary, sounds like you're after the kind of answer only a physics professor could provide. Perhaps these definitions of weight, mass, velocity et al might help: http://www.av8n.com/physics/weight.htm http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci552571,00.html --Georgs