Fw: outdrives

T
Tradesure
Tue, Apr 22, 2008 2:26 PM

Pat,
I read many of your comments whihc is very valuable and informative
to us in the boat building business.
I agree that the design and durability of outdrives have improved 100%.

In one of your mails you mentioned that a catamaran the same size as a
monohull
would not really be of value excepting stability.

The last monohull I built was 53ft, then I changed to building Power
Catamarans.

Last year I completed a 50ft power catamaran with a beam of 15.86ft and
amazed myself in the process.

I fitted 4 full size double bed cabins with lots of storage, (for normal
fitted bedding
bought in stores), 4 bathrooms with seperate showers, a galley with saloon
table for 8,
seperated from a drive station, seating and bar, a great aft cockpit with an
engineroom
below with 6ft 2inches of headroom.
The fuel tanks were also bigger, the water not, so on went a watermaker.
I definately could not do this on the 53 monohull with a similar beam.

Tim  Aventure-Powercatamaran

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pat Reischmann" preischmann@msn.com
To: "power-catamaran" power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:56 PM
Subject: [PCW] outdrives

As with most things outdrive design has improved over the years. Most of
the
disadvantages listed relate to old technology.
Volvo has been the leader in this area. Their outdrive legs are made of
composite, so no more corrosion problems. The have also been designed to
raise
higher for better clearance. The synthetic gasket material today is very
reliable. I have built over 100 yachts with saildrives with similar
sealing
gaskets and never had a problem, this is with yachts in service for over
10
years. Additionally Volvo offers Duoprop technology which can improve fuel
economy by another 20%. I do believe the drive train is the most
susceptible
part of an inboard install. Stuffing box, cutlass bearing, coupler,
keyway,
alignment etc. That is why I am currently a big advocate of enclosed shaft
systems with inboard installations. Though it costs more, I for one would
not
do another inboard install any other way.


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

Pat, I read many of your comments whihc is very valuable and informative to us in the boat building business. I agree that the design and durability of outdrives have improved 100%. In one of your mails you mentioned that a catamaran the same size as a monohull would not really be of value excepting stability. The last monohull I built was 53ft, then I changed to building Power Catamarans. Last year I completed a 50ft power catamaran with a beam of 15.86ft and amazed myself in the process. I fitted 4 full size double bed cabins with lots of storage, (for normal fitted bedding bought in stores), 4 bathrooms with seperate showers, a galley with saloon table for 8, seperated from a drive station, seating and bar, a great aft cockpit with an engineroom below with 6ft 2inches of headroom. The fuel tanks were also bigger, the water not, so on went a watermaker. I definately could not do this on the 53 monohull with a similar beam. Tim Aventure-Powercatamaran ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat Reischmann" <preischmann@msn.com> To: "power-catamaran" <power-catamaran@lists.samurai.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 2:56 PM Subject: [PCW] outdrives > As with most things outdrive design has improved over the years. Most of > the > disadvantages listed relate to old technology. > Volvo has been the leader in this area. Their outdrive legs are made of > composite, so no more corrosion problems. The have also been designed to > raise > higher for better clearance. The synthetic gasket material today is very > reliable. I have built over 100 yachts with saildrives with similar > sealing > gaskets and never had a problem, this is with yachts in service for over > 10 > years. Additionally Volvo offers Duoprop technology which can improve fuel > economy by another 20%. I do believe the drive train is the most > susceptible > part of an inboard install. Stuffing box, cutlass bearing, coupler, > keyway, > alignment etc. That is why I am currently a big advocate of enclosed shaft > systems with inboard installations. Though it costs more, I for one would > not > do another inboard install any other way. > _______________________________________________ > Power-Catamaran Mailing List