[CITASA] CFP: Design, Influence, and Social Technologies (DIST) Workshop @ CSCW 2012

KL
Karen Levy
Thu, Sep 29, 2011 7:58 PM

Hi all,
We're running a workshop at CSCW 2012 that may be of interest. Short or
long papers welcome from all disciplines, due by November 25. For more
information: http://distworkshop.wordpress.com/


Design, Influence, and Social Technologies (DIST) Workshop @ CSCW 2012
Seattle, WA -- February 2012

The explosion of research around social networks and social media
highlights the ways that our actions and opinions---what we know and
believe, how we behave and make decisions---are embedded in and shaped
by webs of social relationships. Small individual actions that flow
within networks can lead to broad systemic dynamics that fundamentally
impact how societies function economically, socially, and culturally.

Social technology provides a set of affordances that makes it easier for
individuals to manage this web of relationships and the information that
flows through it, but designers can configure and make use of the same
affordances to influence user behavior. We have a responsibility both to
understand its impacts and to develop ethical guidelines for its use, as
its impacts could be profound.

This workshop will engage the CSCW community in discussion about how
social technology is, could be, and should (or shouldn't!) be used to
influence behavior. We invite practitioners and researchers across
disciplines to present and discuss techniques that are or might be used,
the impacts these techniques may have at the individual and aggregate
levels, and our ethical responsibilities in their application.

We seek contributions addressing the following --

  • Tools + Techniques - How might tools and techniques be deployed to
    influence the spread of particular behaviors, information, or beliefs
    within social technology platforms? Contributions might cover existing
    or envisioned techniques, including (but not limited to): selective
    information targeting, the setting of defaults, filtering mechanisms,
    recommendation algorithms, saliency of features, motivational messaging,
    and attempts to reconfigure social networks.

  • Impacts + Analysis -**What are the potential impacts of these
    techniques, both at the individual level and also within the broader
    ecology of multiple sociotechnical systems and at time scales that might
    reveal extended system dynamics? This broader perspective recognizes
    that neither individual behavior nor social technology exists in a
    vacuum, and that individual behavior change in one system may interact
    in complex ways with influences in other systems. We welcome new methods
    of study that can be used to measure behavior change and the influence
    of design elements across multiple levels of sociotechnical systems.

  • Ethics + Power - **If a technology is designed to alter the behavior
    of its users, how and why are values and strategic choices manifested in
    system design, and how are such decisions made? How can we conceptualize
    control and persuasion when they are embedded in sociotechnical systems?
    Can we articulate ethical guidelines regarding if, when, and how social
    technologies /should /manipulate users toward some beneficial end?
    Suggested topics include but are not limited to: the roles of
    transparency, openness, accountability, and choice in system design;
    what it might mean for a technology to be "pro-social"; what
    participatory or user-centered design might look like in this context.

See http://distworkshop.wordpress.com/ for submission details and other
information!

--
Karen Levy
PhD Candidate
Department of Sociology
Princeton University
kelevy@princeton.edu

Hi all, We're running a workshop at CSCW 2012 that may be of interest. Short or long papers welcome from all disciplines, due by November 25. For more information: http://distworkshop.wordpress.com/ * * * Design, Influence, and Social Technologies (DIST) Workshop @ CSCW 2012 Seattle, WA -- February 2012 The explosion of research around social networks and social media highlights the ways that our actions and opinions---what we know and believe, how we behave and make decisions---are embedded in and shaped by webs of social relationships. Small individual actions that flow within networks can lead to broad systemic dynamics that fundamentally impact how societies function economically, socially, and culturally. Social technology provides a set of affordances that makes it easier for individuals to manage this web of relationships and the information that flows through it, but designers can configure and make use of the same affordances to influence user behavior. We have a responsibility both to understand its impacts and to develop ethical guidelines for its use, as its impacts could be profound. This workshop will engage the CSCW community in discussion about how social technology is, could be, and should (or shouldn't!) be used to influence behavior. We invite practitioners and researchers across disciplines to present and discuss techniques that are or might be used, the impacts these techniques may have at the individual and aggregate levels, and our ethical responsibilities in their application. We seek contributions addressing the following -- * Tools + Techniques - How might tools and techniques be deployed to influence the spread of particular behaviors, information, or beliefs within social technology platforms? Contributions might cover existing or envisioned techniques, including (but not limited to): selective information targeting, the setting of defaults, filtering mechanisms, recommendation algorithms, saliency of features, motivational messaging, and attempts to reconfigure social networks. * Impacts + Analysis -**What are the potential impacts of these techniques, both at the individual level and also within the broader ecology of multiple sociotechnical systems and at time scales that might reveal extended system dynamics? This broader perspective recognizes that neither individual behavior nor social technology exists in a vacuum, and that individual behavior change in one system may interact in complex ways with influences in other systems. We welcome new methods of study that can be used to measure behavior change and the influence of design elements across multiple levels of sociotechnical systems. * Ethics + Power - **If a technology is designed to alter the behavior of its users, how and why are values and strategic choices manifested in system design, and how are such decisions made? How can we conceptualize control and persuasion when they are embedded in sociotechnical systems? Can we articulate ethical guidelines regarding if, when, and how social technologies /should /manipulate users toward some beneficial end? Suggested topics include but are not limited to: the roles of transparency, openness, accountability, and choice in system design; what it might mean for a technology to be "pro-social"; what participatory or user-centered design might look like in this context. See http://distworkshop.wordpress.com/ for submission details and other information! -- Karen Levy PhD Candidate Department of Sociology Princeton University kelevy@princeton.edu