My interest is long distance voyaging and rather than speed, so fuel effeciency is important to me. I recognise that may not be a big priority of all boaters here. I was under the impression that cats had the edge over monohulls for for fuel effeciency so I was quite surpised to see that the Manta 44 comsumes 5 USG per hour for 9 knots per the lastest  Passagemaker magazine. My own boat a twin engine 53ft monohull trawler consumers 4 USG per hour for 8 knots and 3.2 USG for 7 knots.

  ____________________________________________________________________________________

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

John,

If 7-8 knots is a satisfactory speed for you, I doubt that a cat is your
animal of choice.  While it's not easy to directly compare a Manta 44 with
your trawler, the fact is that cats have more wetted surface for a given
length than do monohulls.  More wetted surface equals more 'friction', which
equals more fuel consumption.

But as speed increases, wetted surface resistance becomes a smaller and
smaller fraction of a displacement hull's resistance, while wave-making
resistance becomes the dominant component.  That's where cats quickly take
over.

What's your trawler's fuel economy at 10 kts?  At 12 kts?  14?  No point
asking any further, is there?  The Manta will be able to travel at those
speeds, and still at a reasonable fuel consumption rate.

So if 7 kts works for you, the added cost of a cat might not be worth it,
though the stability, improved ride, and unsinkable aspects may have value
in themselves.

Bob Deering
Juneau, Alaska