time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] OT loosing things

J
jimlux
Sat, Nov 13, 2010 4:32 PM

And, on the one hand, it's frustrating being the orphan child of the RF
user community: you can't get off the shelf test equipment. On the other
hand, it's cool, because then you have to build your test equipment.

Hmm. Should do more of that.

Well, one does have to convince someone to pay you to do it..

To the Ku-band downconverters.. They're pretty crummy (but have a decent
SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds.. a
vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap
($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the
difference? And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the
reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the
LNB? And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator? I was
thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of
Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together. They are
pretty low noise (20-30K)

The key seek-term to add is "external reference" and it seems that 10
MHz sine seems to be the standard external reference frequency for LNBs
with external reference. I know it will be a tricky frequency for you to
score, but the things you do for science.

Browsing the aisles of the local electronics mega-mart... I don't think
I've ever seen "external reference" in the commodity units.  I figure
that the "crystal locked" units have a crystal in the LNB (as opposed to
just running the DRO open loop)..

But, presumably, one could modify the LNB to drive the reference with
something external (and somehow, I doubt it will be 10 MHz.. but anyone
able to modify LNBs will be able to make whatever is needed)

>> >> And, on the one hand, it's frustrating being the orphan child of the RF >> user community: you can't get off the shelf test equipment. On the other >> hand, it's cool, because then you have to *build* your test equipment. > > Hmm. Should do more of that. Well, one *does* have to convince someone to pay you to do it.. > >> To the Ku-band downconverters.. They're pretty crummy (but have a decent >> SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds.. a >> vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap >> ($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the >> difference? And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the >> reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the >> LNB? And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator? I was >> thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of >> Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together. They *are* >> pretty low noise (20-30K) > > The key seek-term to add is "external reference" and it seems that 10 > MHz sine seems to be the standard external reference frequency for LNBs > with external reference. I know it will be a tricky frequency for you to > score, but the things you do for science. Browsing the aisles of the local electronics mega-mart... I don't think I've ever seen "external reference" in the commodity units. I figure that the "crystal locked" units have a crystal in the LNB (as opposed to just running the DRO open loop).. But, presumably, one could modify the LNB to drive the reference with something external (and somehow, I doubt it will be 10 MHz.. but anyone able to modify LNBs will be able to make whatever is needed)
J
jimlux
Sat, Nov 13, 2010 4:45 PM

Hi Jim,

Is BPSK the modulation used on such an 8bps link for DSN?

BPSK, typically with a lot of residual carrier.  And, at slow rates, the
data is modulated on a (e.g. 16 kHz) subcarrier, which is then phase
modulated on the main carrier with a mod index to create the desired
ratio between power in the data signal and power in the carrier. Typical
mod indices would be 0.2 to 1.3 radian (peak).

If so, any idea what limit of C/N is used? And in what BW?

For the SDST, which we've been using for the last 10-15 years, threshold
(the signal level at which the carrier can be acquired and tracked) is
<-156 dBm. Tracking loop BW is on the order of 20Hz for small signals.
NF is <2.5dB

You can read more at
nmp-techval-reports.jpl.nasa.gov/DS1/SDST_Integrated_Report.pdf

(actually, googling SDST will turn up a fair amount of data)

The challenge in operating is that you don't necessarily have a-priori
knowledge of where the SDST is listening (temperature and doppler
uncertainty, mostly).. so we sweep the uplink signal over a range that
hopefully covers where it is.  So there's a tradeoff between loop
bandwidth being wide enough to allow a decent sweep rate and narrow
enough to allow working at low signal levels. Because of the long light
time delay, the sweep and acquisition process is open loop (that is, we
assume we swept across the appropriate frequency, that the SDST acquired
and is following, and we can send the data)

Newer radio designs do things like change the bandwidth, or use
parallel detection.

My interest in short-term stability has always been for more DX on the
mm-wave ham bands. My best results were running QRSS with <1Hz BW on
241GHz but have often wondered if BPSK would be better than OOK.

For a given transmitter power, BPSK has a higher average power than OOK.
The problem is that it takes a more sophisticated receiver than a
power detector.  OOK has the virtue of simplicity.

-Brian, WA1ZMS


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

wa1zms@att.net wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Is BPSK the modulation used on such an 8bps link for DSN? BPSK, typically with a lot of residual carrier. And, at slow rates, the data is modulated on a (e.g. 16 kHz) subcarrier, which is then phase modulated on the main carrier with a mod index to create the desired ratio between power in the data signal and power in the carrier. Typical mod indices would be 0.2 to 1.3 radian (peak). > > If so, any idea what limit of C/N is used? And in what BW? For the SDST, which we've been using for the last 10-15 years, threshold (the signal level at which the carrier can be acquired and tracked) is <-156 dBm. Tracking loop BW is on the order of 20Hz for small signals. NF is <2.5dB You can read more at nmp-techval-reports.jpl.nasa.gov/DS1/SDST_Integrated_Report.pdf (actually, googling SDST will turn up a fair amount of data) The challenge in operating is that you don't necessarily have a-priori knowledge of where the SDST is listening (temperature and doppler uncertainty, mostly).. so we sweep the uplink signal over a range that hopefully covers where it is. So there's a tradeoff between loop bandwidth being wide enough to allow a decent sweep rate and narrow enough to allow working at low signal levels. Because of the long light time delay, the sweep and acquisition process is open loop (that is, we assume we swept across the appropriate frequency, that the SDST acquired and is following, and we can send the data) Newer radio designs do things like change the bandwidth, or use parallel detection. > > My interest in short-term stability has always been for more DX on the > mm-wave ham bands. My best results were running QRSS with <1Hz BW on > 241GHz but have often wondered if BPSK would be better than OOK. For a given transmitter power, BPSK has a higher average power than OOK. The problem is that it takes a more sophisticated receiver than a power detector. OOK has the virtue of simplicity. > > -Brian, WA1ZMS > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sat, Nov 13, 2010 4:46 PM

On 11/13/2010 05:32 PM, jimlux wrote:

And, on the one hand, it's frustrating being the orphan child of the RF
user community: you can't get off the shelf test equipment. On the other
hand, it's cool, because then you have to build your test equipment.

Hmm. Should do more of that.

Well, one does have to convince someone to pay you to do it..

Once in a while, I end up being paid to do it. :)

But I do not play in Ku-band. Haven't had to... yet.

The key seek-term to add is "external reference" and it seems that 10
MHz sine seems to be the standard external reference frequency for
LNBs with external reference. I know it will be a tricky frequency for
you to score, but the things you do for science.

Browsing the aisles of the local electronics mega-mart... I don't think
I've ever seen "external reference" in the commodity units. I figure
that the "crystal locked" units have a crystal in the LNB (as opposed to
just running the DRO open loop)..

But, presumably, one could modify the LNB to drive the reference with
something external (and somehow, I doubt it will be 10 MHz.. but anyone
able to modify LNBs will be able to make whatever is needed)

There is really three types available from my quick search:

  1. Open Loop L.O. LNBs

  2. Crystal locked L.O. LNBs

  3. External referenced locked L.O. LNBs

Searching the web using say Google should get you the part numbers you
would need for your short-hand.

Crystal locked would require modification, but modifying them for a 10
MHz reference would probably be a good choice.

Cheers,
Magnus

On 11/13/2010 05:32 PM, jimlux wrote: > >>> >>> And, on the one hand, it's frustrating being the orphan child of the RF >>> user community: you can't get off the shelf test equipment. On the other >>> hand, it's cool, because then you have to *build* your test equipment. >> >> Hmm. Should do more of that. > > Well, one *does* have to convince someone to pay you to do it.. Once in a while, I end up being paid to do it. :) But I do not play in Ku-band. Haven't had to... yet. >> The key seek-term to add is "external reference" and it seems that 10 >> MHz sine seems to be the standard external reference frequency for >> LNBs with external reference. I know it will be a tricky frequency for >> you to score, but the things you do for science. > > > Browsing the aisles of the local electronics mega-mart... I don't think > I've ever seen "external reference" in the commodity units. I figure > that the "crystal locked" units have a crystal in the LNB (as opposed to > just running the DRO open loop).. > > But, presumably, one could modify the LNB to drive the reference with > something external (and somehow, I doubt it will be 10 MHz.. but anyone > able to modify LNBs will be able to make whatever is needed) There is really three types available from my quick search: 1) Open Loop L.O. LNBs 2) Crystal locked L.O. LNBs 3) External referenced locked L.O. LNBs Searching the web using say Google should get you the part numbers you would need for your short-hand. Crystal locked would require modification, but modifying them for a 10 MHz reference would probably be a good choice. Cheers, Magnus
RK
Rob Kimberley
Sat, Nov 13, 2010 6:34 PM

Reminds me of a story someone once told me....

This is how it goes:

I decide to water my garden.

As I turn on the hose in the driveway, I look over at my car and decide it
needs washing.

As I head towards the garage, I notice post on the porch table that I picked
up from the postman earlier.

I decide to go through it before I wash the car.

I put my car keys on the table, put the junk mail in the recycling box under
the table, and notice that the recycling box is full.

So, I decide to put the bills back on the table and take out the recycling
first.

But then I think, since I'm going to be near the post-box when I take out
the recycling paper anyway, I may as well pay the bills first.

I take my cheque book off the table and notice that there is only one cheque
left.

My extra cheques are in the desk in my study, so I go into the house to my
desk where I find the cup of coffee I'd been drinking.

I'm going to look for my cheques but first I need to push the coffee aside
so that I don't accidentally knock it over.

The coffee is getting cold, and I decide to make another cup.

As I head toward the kitchen with the cold coffee, a vase of flowers on the
worktop catches my eye - the flowers need water.

I put the coffee on the worktop and discover my reading glasses that I've
been searching for all morning.

I decide I better put them back on my desk, but first I'm going to water the
flowers.

I put the glasses back down on the worktop, fill a container with water and
suddenly spot the TV remote control.  Someone left it on the kitchen table.

I realise that tonight when we go to watch TV, I'll be looking for the
remote, but I won't remember that it's on the kitchen table, so I decide to
put it back where it belongs, but first I'll water the flowers.

I pour some water in the flowers, but quite a bit of it spills on the floor.

So, I put the remote back on the table, get some towels and wipe up the
spill.

Then, I head down the hall trying to remember what I was planning to do.

At the end of the day:
The car isn't washed. The bills aren't paid. There is a cold cup of coffee
sitting on the kitchen work-surface. The flowers don't have enough water.
There is still only one cheque in my cheque book, I can't find the remote, I
can't find my glasses, and I don't remember what I did with the car keys.

Then, when I try to figure out why nothing got done today, I'm really
baffled because I know I was busy all bloody day and I'm really tired.

:-)

Rob Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Mike S
Sent: 13 November 2010 10:57 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT loosing things

At 08:15 PM 11/12/2010, Mike Feher wrote...

Relax

GFY


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reminds me of a story someone once told me.... This is how it goes: I decide to water my garden. As I turn on the hose in the driveway, I look over at my car and decide it needs washing. As I head towards the garage, I notice post on the porch table that I picked up from the postman earlier. I decide to go through it before I wash the car. I put my car keys on the table, put the junk mail in the recycling box under the table, and notice that the recycling box is full. So, I decide to put the bills back on the table and take out the recycling first. But then I think, since I'm going to be near the post-box when I take out the recycling paper anyway, I may as well pay the bills first. I take my cheque book off the table and notice that there is only one cheque left. My extra cheques are in the desk in my study, so I go into the house to my desk where I find the cup of coffee I'd been drinking. I'm going to look for my cheques but first I need to push the coffee aside so that I don't accidentally knock it over. The coffee is getting cold, and I decide to make another cup. As I head toward the kitchen with the cold coffee, a vase of flowers on the worktop catches my eye - the flowers need water. I put the coffee on the worktop and discover my reading glasses that I've been searching for all morning. I decide I better put them back on my desk, but first I'm going to water the flowers. I put the glasses back down on the worktop, fill a container with water and suddenly spot the TV remote control. Someone left it on the kitchen table. I realise that tonight when we go to watch TV, I'll be looking for the remote, but I won't remember that it's on the kitchen table, so I decide to put it back where it belongs, but first I'll water the flowers. I pour some water in the flowers, but quite a bit of it spills on the floor. So, I put the remote back on the table, get some towels and wipe up the spill. Then, I head down the hall trying to remember what I was planning to do. At the end of the day: The car isn't washed. The bills aren't paid. There is a cold cup of coffee sitting on the kitchen work-surface. The flowers don't have enough water. There is still only one cheque in my cheque book, I can't find the remote, I can't find my glasses, and I don't remember what I did with the car keys. Then, when I try to figure out why nothing got done today, I'm really baffled because I know I was busy all bloody day and I'm really tired. :-) Rob Kimberley -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Mike S Sent: 13 November 2010 10:57 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT loosing things At 08:15 PM 11/12/2010, Mike Feher wrote... >Relax GFY _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
DL
Don Latham
Sat, Nov 13, 2010 10:27 PM

It's called a sequential vortex...
Don

Rob Kimberley

Reminds me of a story someone once told me....

This is how it goes:

I decide to water my garden.

As I turn on the hose in the driveway, I look over at my car and decide it
needs washing.

As I head towards the garage, I notice post on the porch table that I
picked
up from the postman earlier.

I decide to go through it before I wash the car.

I put my car keys on the table, put the junk mail in the recycling box
under
the table, and notice that the recycling box is full.

So, I decide to put the bills back on the table and take out the recycling
first.

But then I think, since I'm going to be near the post-box when I take out
the recycling paper anyway, I may as well pay the bills first.

I take my cheque book off the table and notice that there is only one
cheque
left.

My extra cheques are in the desk in my study, so I go into the house to my
desk where I find the cup of coffee I'd been drinking.

I'm going to look for my cheques but first I need to push the coffee aside
so that I don't accidentally knock it over.

The coffee is getting cold, and I decide to make another cup.

As I head toward the kitchen with the cold coffee, a vase of flowers on
the
worktop catches my eye - the flowers need water.

I put the coffee on the worktop and discover my reading glasses that I've
been searching for all morning.

I decide I better put them back on my desk, but first I'm going to water
the
flowers.

I put the glasses back down on the worktop, fill a container with water
and
suddenly spot the TV remote control.  Someone left it on the kitchen
table.

I realise that tonight when we go to watch TV, I'll be looking for the
remote, but I won't remember that it's on the kitchen table, so I decide
to
put it back where it belongs, but first I'll water the flowers.

I pour some water in the flowers, but quite a bit of it spills on the
floor.

So, I put the remote back on the table, get some towels and wipe up the
spill.

Then, I head down the hall trying to remember what I was planning to do.

At the end of the day:
The car isn't washed. The bills aren't paid. There is a cold cup of coffee
sitting on the kitchen work-surface. The flowers don't have enough water.
There is still only one cheque in my cheque book, I can't find the remote,
I
can't find my glasses, and I don't remember what I did with the car keys.

Then, when I try to figure out why nothing got done today, I'm really
baffled because I know I was busy all bloody day and I'm really tired.

:-)

Rob Kimberley

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Mike S
Sent: 13 November 2010 10:57 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT loosing things

At 08:15 PM 11/12/2010, Mike Feher wrote...

Relax

GFY


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are
as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
R. Bacon

Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com

It's called a sequential vortex... Don Rob Kimberley > Reminds me of a story someone once told me.... > > This is how it goes: > > I decide to water my garden. > > As I turn on the hose in the driveway, I look over at my car and decide it > needs washing. > > As I head towards the garage, I notice post on the porch table that I > picked > up from the postman earlier. > > I decide to go through it before I wash the car. > > I put my car keys on the table, put the junk mail in the recycling box > under > the table, and notice that the recycling box is full. > > So, I decide to put the bills back on the table and take out the recycling > first. > > But then I think, since I'm going to be near the post-box when I take out > the recycling paper anyway, I may as well pay the bills first. > > I take my cheque book off the table and notice that there is only one > cheque > left. > > My extra cheques are in the desk in my study, so I go into the house to my > desk where I find the cup of coffee I'd been drinking. > > I'm going to look for my cheques but first I need to push the coffee aside > so that I don't accidentally knock it over. > > The coffee is getting cold, and I decide to make another cup. > > As I head toward the kitchen with the cold coffee, a vase of flowers on > the > worktop catches my eye - the flowers need water. > > I put the coffee on the worktop and discover my reading glasses that I've > been searching for all morning. > > I decide I better put them back on my desk, but first I'm going to water > the > flowers. > > I put the glasses back down on the worktop, fill a container with water > and > suddenly spot the TV remote control. Someone left it on the kitchen > table. > > I realise that tonight when we go to watch TV, I'll be looking for the > remote, but I won't remember that it's on the kitchen table, so I decide > to > put it back where it belongs, but first I'll water the flowers. > > I pour some water in the flowers, but quite a bit of it spills on the > floor. > > So, I put the remote back on the table, get some towels and wipe up the > spill. > > Then, I head down the hall trying to remember what I was planning to do. > > At the end of the day: > The car isn't washed. The bills aren't paid. There is a cold cup of coffee > sitting on the kitchen work-surface. The flowers don't have enough water. > There is still only one cheque in my cheque book, I can't find the remote, > I > can't find my glasses, and I don't remember what I did with the car keys. > > Then, when I try to figure out why nothing got done today, I'm really > baffled because I know I was busy all bloody day and I'm really tired. > > :-) > > Rob Kimberley > > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On > Behalf Of Mike S > Sent: 13 November 2010 10:57 AM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT loosing things > > At 08:15 PM 11/12/2010, Mike Feher wrote... >>Relax > > GFY > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." R. Bacon Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL Six Mile Systems LLP 17850 Six Mile Road POB 134 Huson, MT, 59846 VOX 406-626-4304 www.lightningforensics.com www.sixmilesystems.com
DI
David I. Emery
Mon, Nov 15, 2010 3:24 AM

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:26AM -0800, jimlux wrote:

To the Ku-band downconverters..  They're pretty crummy (but have a
decent SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds..
a vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap
($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the
difference?  And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the
reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the
LNB?  And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator?  I was
thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of
Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together.  They
are pretty low noise (20-30K)

There are three kinds of LNBs in common use in the VSAT world...


1.  Open loop unlocked DROs, often with around a MHz or two or

more error due to temperature and calibration and drift over time.  More
expensive higher grade ones are tighter spec'd, but rarely much less
than 250-500 KHz over time and temp.  Most all DTH dishes use these,
often with rather loose frequency specs since the DTH carriers are wide,
fast signals.

2.  Closed loop DROs phase locked to a crystal or I believe

about as common, a UHF or higher frequency oscillator phase locked to a
crystal reference with some degree of multiplication to the final LO
frequency (maybe not much these days with fast prescaler/divider chips).
Crystal in this case is - depending on price - just a plain XO or either
a TXCO or in certain cases a OXCO.  More expensive ones have better
stability specs.    Generally these sell for 5-10 times what a cheap DRO
LNB for the mass market might go for.  And can be as good as 1 PPM or
so.

PLL LNBs are mostly used for data or audio transmissions on

narrower, lower  bit rate carriers than TV but also used for many critical
professional TV broadcast and similar applications.

3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going

up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down.
I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter
and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and
how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in.  Otherwise similar
(and often  derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types
in 2 above.

These ER types are more apt to be used for more exotic

specialized applications where very high frequency accuracy or some
degree of phase coherence  with other equipment or LNBs is useful.

Obviously with the high multiplication factor, one needs a quiet

reference inside the PLL bandwidth (and that is pretty wide to ensure
reliable lock) - one suspects that issues with degradation due to
mechanically induced noise and phase shift in the cables can be a
problem.

--
Dave Emery N1PRE/AE, die@dieconsulting.com  DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass 02493
"An empty zombie mind with a forlorn barely readable weatherbeaten
'For Rent' sign still vainly flapping outside on the weed encrusted pole - in
celebration of what could have been, but wasn't and is not to be now either."

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:26AM -0800, jimlux wrote: > > To the Ku-band downconverters.. They're pretty crummy (but have a > decent SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds.. > a vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap > ($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the > difference? And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the > reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the > LNB? And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator? I was > thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of > Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together. They > *are* pretty low noise (20-30K) There are three kinds of LNBs in common use in the VSAT world... 1. Open loop unlocked DROs, often with around a MHz or two or more error due to temperature and calibration and drift over time. More expensive higher grade ones are tighter spec'd, but rarely much less than 250-500 KHz over time and temp. Most all DTH dishes use these, often with rather loose frequency specs since the DTH carriers are wide, fast signals. 2. Closed loop DROs phase locked to a crystal or I believe about as common, a UHF or higher frequency oscillator phase locked to a crystal reference with some degree of multiplication to the final LO frequency (maybe not much these days with fast prescaler/divider chips). Crystal in this case is - depending on price - just a plain XO or either a TXCO or in certain cases a OXCO. More expensive ones have better stability specs. Generally these sell for 5-10 times what a cheap DRO LNB for the mass market might go for. And can be as good as 1 PPM or so. PLL LNBs are mostly used for data or audio transmissions on narrower, lower bit rate carriers than TV but also used for many critical professional TV broadcast and similar applications. 3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down. I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in. Otherwise similar (and often derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types in 2 above. These ER types are more apt to be used for more exotic specialized applications where very high frequency accuracy or some degree of phase coherence with other equipment or LNBs is useful. Obviously with the high multiplication factor, one needs a quiet reference inside the PLL bandwidth (and that is pretty wide to ensure reliable lock) - one suspects that issues with degradation due to mechanically induced noise and phase shift in the cables can be a problem. -- Dave Emery N1PRE/AE, die@dieconsulting.com DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass 02493 "An empty zombie mind with a forlorn barely readable weatherbeaten 'For Rent' sign still vainly flapping outside on the weed encrusted pole - in celebration of what could have been, but wasn't and is not to be now either."
J
jimlux
Mon, Nov 15, 2010 4:48 AM

David I. Emery wrote:

On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:26AM -0800, jimlux wrote:

To the Ku-band downconverters..  They're pretty crummy (but have a
decent SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds..
a vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap
($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the
difference?  And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the
reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the
LNB?  And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator?  I was
thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of
Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together.  They
are pretty low noise (20-30K)

There are three kinds of LNBs in common use in the VSAT world...


1.  Open loop unlocked DROs, often with around a MHz or two or

more error due to temperature and calibration and drift over time.  More
expensive higher grade ones are tighter spec'd, but rarely much less
than 250-500 KHz over time and temp.  Most all DTH dishes use these,
often with rather loose frequency specs since the DTH carriers are wide,
fast signals.

2.  Closed loop DROs phase locked to a crystal or I believe

about as common, a UHF or higher frequency oscillator phase locked to a
crystal reference with some degree of multiplication to the final LO
frequency (maybe not much these days with fast prescaler/divider chips).
Crystal in this case is - depending on price - just a plain XO or either
a TXCO or in certain cases a OXCO.  More expensive ones have better
stability specs.    Generally these sell for 5-10 times what a cheap DRO
LNB for the mass market might go for.  And can be as good as 1 PPM or
so.

Bummer.. so much for making myself a radio camera with scavenged Ku-band
DBS dishes/feeds (when people around here subscribe, they just junk
the existing, almost identical, assembly)..

I was willing to spend a few tens of dollars/element.. But $100/element
is pushing it out of the "hmm, interesting project for not much money,
can I accumulate some more junk in the garage" category.

PLL LNBs are mostly used for data or audio transmissions on

narrower, lower  bit rate carriers than TV but also used for many critical
professional TV broadcast and similar applications.

3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going

up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down.
I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter
and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and
how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in.  Otherwise similar
(and often  derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types
in 2 above.

And, I'll bet those are fairly pricey.. (after all, it needs another
connector, and that's a price sensitive application..)

Hmm.. I wonder if one could do the pilot tone technique.. I can radiate
a weak Ku band signal, in band, and record what I see from the LNB, then
post process to "close the loop" in software.  Have to think about that
some more.. The Ku band beacon/pilot is easy (a comb), so what I'd need
is a multichannel "softrock" type receiver (which has other uses) that
can deal with the L-band IF from the cheap LNBs.  I wonder if the LO of
the cheap LNBs are within, say, 50kHz of each other.. Then I could use a
common L-band LO.. But based on the discussion above, probably not.

David I. Emery wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:26AM -0800, jimlux wrote: >> To the Ku-band downconverters.. They're pretty crummy (but have a >> decent SNR to work with).. however, I've seen that there are two kinds.. >> a vanilla LNB and ones described as "crystal locked"... both are cheap >> ($20-30 for the former, maybe twice that for the latter)... what's the >> difference? And, getting into time-nuts territory here, where's the >> reference for the "locked" variety coming from? Up the coax? inside the >> LNB? And, can it be retrofitted from a much quieter oscillator? I was >> thinking that one could build a radio camera with a small array of >> Ku-band dishes, if you could lock all the receivers together. They >> *are* pretty low noise (20-30K) > > There are three kinds of LNBs in common use in the VSAT world... > > > 1. Open loop unlocked DROs, often with around a MHz or two or > more error due to temperature and calibration and drift over time. More > expensive higher grade ones are tighter spec'd, but rarely much less > than 250-500 KHz over time and temp. Most all DTH dishes use these, > often with rather loose frequency specs since the DTH carriers are wide, > fast signals. > > 2. Closed loop DROs phase locked to a crystal or I believe > about as common, a UHF or higher frequency oscillator phase locked to a > crystal reference with some degree of multiplication to the final LO > frequency (maybe not much these days with fast prescaler/divider chips). > Crystal in this case is - depending on price - just a plain XO or either > a TXCO or in certain cases a OXCO. More expensive ones have better > stability specs. Generally these sell for 5-10 times what a cheap DRO > LNB for the mass market might go for. And can be as good as 1 PPM or > so. Bummer.. so much for making myself a radio camera with scavenged Ku-band DBS dishes/feeds (when people around here subscribe, they just junk the existing, almost identical, assembly).. I was willing to spend a few tens of dollars/element.. But $100/element is pushing it out of the "hmm, interesting project for not much money, can I accumulate some more junk in the garage" category. > > PLL LNBs are mostly used for data or audio transmissions on > narrower, lower bit rate carriers than TV but also used for many critical > professional TV broadcast and similar applications. > > 3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going > up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down. > I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter > and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and > how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in. Otherwise similar > (and often derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types > in 2 above. And, I'll bet those are fairly pricey.. (after all, it needs another connector, and that's a price sensitive application..) Hmm.. I wonder if one could do the pilot tone technique.. I can radiate a weak Ku band signal, in band, and record what I see from the LNB, then post process to "close the loop" in software. Have to think about that some more.. The Ku band beacon/pilot is easy (a comb), so what I'd need is a multichannel "softrock" type receiver (which has other uses) that can deal with the L-band IF from the cheap LNBs. I wonder if the LO of the cheap LNBs are within, say, 50kHz of each other.. Then I could use a common L-band LO.. But based on the discussion above, probably not.
R(
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Mon, Nov 15, 2010 5:25 AM

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with.
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for
the frequency difference.  They were made for a GPS
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day.
Any interest in these?

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with. I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for the frequency difference. They were made for a GPS version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day. Any interest in these? Rick Karlquist N6RK
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Mon, Nov 15, 2010 5:32 AM

Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote:

Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with.
I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are
interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for
the frequency difference.  They were made for a GPS
version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day.
Any interest in these?

Rick Karlquist
N6RK

Yes

Bruce

Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: > Someone was asking about SC cut crystals to play with. > I have a few dozen 10.23 MHz SC cut crystals that are > interchangeable with 10811 10 MHz crystals, except for > the frequency difference. They were made for a GPS > version of the 10811 that never saw the light of day. > Any interest in these? > > Rick Karlquist > N6RK > Yes Bruce
R
Rex
Mon, Nov 15, 2010 5:39 AM

On 11/14/2010 7:24 PM, David I. Emery wrote:

  1. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going
    up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down.
    I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter
    and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and
    how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in.  Otherwise similar
    (and often  derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types
    in 2 above.

    These ER types are more apt to be used for more exotic
    specialized applications where very high frequency accuracy or some
    degree of phase coherence  with other equipment or LNBs is useful.

    Obviously with the high multiplication factor, one needs a quiet
    reference inside the PLL bandwidth (and that is pretty wide to ensure
    reliable lock) - one suspects that issues with degradation due to
    mechanically induced noise and phase shift in the cables can be a
    problem.

I picked up an LNB a about 10 years back that used this external
reference method.  The LO in the thing was a DRO that locked to a 10 MHz
signal coming up the cable. The LO in this one locked to 10.750 GHz.
Experimenting, I found that the DRO adjustment screw could be turned and
it would lock every 10 MHz. I found it would lock as low as 10.690. I
assume it would tune up about that far too.

I needed an LO in the 10 GHz area, so I hacked mine to use it just as a
LO, not using any of the receive chain. Here's a page where I described
the LNB and what I did with it.

http://www.xertech.net/Projects/sat_lo.html

Maybe the description there will help someone. If nothing else, it show
pictures of what one external ref type LNB looks like.

On 11/14/2010 7:24 PM, David I. Emery wrote: > > 3. External reference LNBs with 10 MHz (pretty universal) going > up the cable that also carries power and brings the L band signal down. > I'm not entirely sure how many of these designs simply bandpass filter > and then limit the 10 MHz and use that directly as a PLL reference and > how many phase lock a VCXO to the 10 MHz coming in. Otherwise similar > (and often derived from designs for) the internal reference PLL types > in 2 above. > > These ER types are more apt to be used for more exotic > specialized applications where very high frequency accuracy or some > degree of phase coherence with other equipment or LNBs is useful. > > Obviously with the high multiplication factor, one needs a quiet > reference inside the PLL bandwidth (and that is pretty wide to ensure > reliable lock) - one suspects that issues with degradation due to > mechanically induced noise and phase shift in the cables can be a > problem. > I picked up an LNB a about 10 years back that used this external reference method. The LO in the thing was a DRO that locked to a 10 MHz signal coming up the cable. The LO in this one locked to 10.750 GHz. Experimenting, I found that the DRO adjustment screw could be turned and it would lock every 10 MHz. I found it would lock as low as 10.690. I assume it would tune up about that far too. I needed an LO in the 10 GHz area, so I hacked mine to use it just as a LO, not using any of the receive chain. Here's a page where I described the LNB and what I did with it. http://www.xertech.net/Projects/sat_lo.html Maybe the description there will help someone. If nothing else, it show pictures of what one external ref type LNB looks like.