2005 Excitecat 810 Catamaran, 26.5 Ft:eBay Motors (item 260502799798 end time Nov-27-09 13:43:39 PST)

NH
Noelle Harrott
Wed, Nov 25, 2009 4:43 AM

This posting is for info only!
I have no connection to the boat.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2005-Excitecat-810-Catamaran-26-5-Ft_W0QQitemZ
260502799798QQcmdZViewItemQQptZPower_Motorboats?hash=item3ca72d45b6

This posting is for info only! I have no connection to the boat. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2005-Excitecat-810-Catamaran-26-5-Ft_W0QQitemZ 260502799798QQcmdZViewItemQQptZPower_Motorboats?hash=item3ca72d45b6
RB
Roger Bingham
Wed, Nov 25, 2009 9:42 AM

Hi All

I posted this in Oct 2006 - The Excitecat is probably a nice boat.

My wife and I decided to forsake a visit to the International Boat Show at
Southampton and check-out several boats at the much smaller Grand Pavois at
la Rochelle. Of particular interest among these were three powercats; the
Fountaine-Pajot Highland 35 Trawler Cat and two from Excitecat, the 810 and
the new 1010. My impressions follow.

The big Cumberland 44 and the enormous Eleuthera 60 dominated the catamarans
and made all the others look like toys but we were heading for the smallest.
I had previously read the account by Ian Vale of Soundcats, on his journey
from Connecticut to Key West in the Excitecat 810. It was, perhaps, smaller
than my wife and I wanted but definitely worth a look with the promise of
the larger 1010 if this was the case.

We boarded the 810 from the pontoon and immediately felt comfortable in the
large cockpit leading into the saloon. A representative of the French
Atlantic coast dealers said to make ourselves at home - but someone had
beaten us to it. The galley sink was full of dirty coffee cups and cutlery
and the Starboard cabin berth still had bedding which had obviously been
slept in the previous night. Not impressed.

We tried to ignore the "lived in" look of the boat when a young lady arrived
and started unpacking and loading the lockers with groceries. We felt that
we were intruding and after a quick walk-through we left.

My memory is of a small but comfortable boat with a lower helm designed for
a one-legged dwarf. I am not as slim as I used to be (who is) but sitting at
the helm with my feet in the recess halfway between the wheel and the deck
with my right knee forced against the throttle quadrant was uncomfortable
even at rest. I felt off-balance and in any seaway it would be unacceptable.
We were not able to take this boat to sea but see
http://soundcats.com/EXCITECAT810Multihulls.pdf

The saloon is well proportioned within the overall dimensions; a dinette
with galley opposite.  The cabins tolerable for a cat and the heads useable.
The flying bridge and cockpit were the high points of this boat but still
smaller than we would be comfortable with so we popped next door to the
1010.

The 1010 on display was the prototype hull No.1. Its larger dimensions were
immediately apparent and the whole boat "breathed" easily. The cockpit is
vast and we judged that it would easily take our teak steamers (loungers)
and a table and a couple of chairs. The saloon, basically the same layout as
the 810, was fitted out to a much higher standard from what I could see. I
couldn't see everything as 4 or five men were sitting in the dinette looking
at a laptop displaying something which appeared to mesmerise them. They
ignored us completely. That's OK but we thought we were intruding on a
private meeting and therefore felt slightly intimidated.

The double beds had not been slept in but, no surprise, they had the
universal properties that all cabins in the hulls of catamarans have.
Box-like with high beds. A step is provided and I'm sure practice will make
the ascent easier. I really don't know if there are any alternatives when
trying to put a double bed into a narrow hull.
The port cabin was fitted a useful hand basin in a tidy cabinet and the
optional 2nd WC. I didn't even try to see if I would fit in there, if I got
into the compartment I may have to be sold with the boat. Useable for
children or others under 4ft but this space (without the WC) is ideal for
hanging clothes and storage. The heads compartment is a good size and well
fitted out.

The flying bridge is lovely with really nice stainless steel work and bimini
(or is it a T top?). The helm positions are both comfortable.

Returning to the saloon we gave our attention to the galley which on this
boat was devoid of breakfast debris. One of the men abandoned the meeting
and approached us and asked if we had any questions. My wife commented that
the galley had little preparation surface but he seemed to regard this
remark as beneath contempt (I don't think Spanish men do much cooking),
looked at me and again asked if I had any questions. I said that I did not
like the instrument layout at the lower helm, could it be modified? He said
" If I say so. We like it, perhaps you will get used to it".

Now without getting into a discussion about the generally appalling
ergonomics found on boats compared with the sensible instrument layouts
found on aircraft this was the wrong answer at the wrong time. This man is a
senior executive at Excitecats but knew nothing about customer relations.
The two boats we had seen were not staffed or presented in a way to
encourage visitors, one or two of whom may well become customers. I accept
that there may have been misunderstandings caused by language although his
English was excellent. The "lived in" atmosphere of the 810 and the
"boardroom" on the 1010 made the whole experience totally negative. These
may be fine boats but we struck them off our short list after that
experience.

BTW The rather strange location of the steering compass at the lower helm is
not as silly as it looks. It is large and clear, easily seen from the helm
position and is as far away from any magnetic influence as possible.

Don't be put off Excitecats based on my experience. That was down to people
rather than the boats. The 1010 will be a lovely boat for sure.

Regards
Roger Bingham
France

Hi All I posted this in Oct 2006 - The Excitecat is probably a nice boat. My wife and I decided to forsake a visit to the International Boat Show at Southampton and check-out several boats at the much smaller Grand Pavois at la Rochelle. Of particular interest among these were three powercats; the Fountaine-Pajot Highland 35 Trawler Cat and two from Excitecat, the 810 and the new 1010. My impressions follow. The big Cumberland 44 and the enormous Eleuthera 60 dominated the catamarans and made all the others look like toys but we were heading for the smallest. I had previously read the account by Ian Vale of Soundcats, on his journey from Connecticut to Key West in the Excitecat 810. It was, perhaps, smaller than my wife and I wanted but definitely worth a look with the promise of the larger 1010 if this was the case. We boarded the 810 from the pontoon and immediately felt comfortable in the large cockpit leading into the saloon. A representative of the French Atlantic coast dealers said to make ourselves at home - but someone had beaten us to it. The galley sink was full of dirty coffee cups and cutlery and the Starboard cabin berth still had bedding which had obviously been slept in the previous night. Not impressed. We tried to ignore the "lived in" look of the boat when a young lady arrived and started unpacking and loading the lockers with groceries. We felt that we were intruding and after a quick walk-through we left. My memory is of a small but comfortable boat with a lower helm designed for a one-legged dwarf. I am not as slim as I used to be (who is) but sitting at the helm with my feet in the recess halfway between the wheel and the deck with my right knee forced against the throttle quadrant was uncomfortable even at rest. I felt off-balance and in any seaway it would be unacceptable. We were not able to take this boat to sea but see http://soundcats.com/EXCITECAT810Multihulls.pdf The saloon is well proportioned within the overall dimensions; a dinette with galley opposite. The cabins tolerable for a cat and the heads useable. The flying bridge and cockpit were the high points of this boat but still smaller than we would be comfortable with so we popped next door to the 1010. The 1010 on display was the prototype hull No.1. Its larger dimensions were immediately apparent and the whole boat "breathed" easily. The cockpit is vast and we judged that it would easily take our teak steamers (loungers) and a table and a couple of chairs. The saloon, basically the same layout as the 810, was fitted out to a much higher standard from what I could see. I couldn't see everything as 4 or five men were sitting in the dinette looking at a laptop displaying something which appeared to mesmerise them. They ignored us completely. That's OK but we thought we were intruding on a private meeting and therefore felt slightly intimidated. The double beds had not been slept in but, no surprise, they had the universal properties that all cabins in the hulls of catamarans have. Box-like with high beds. A step is provided and I'm sure practice will make the ascent easier. I really don't know if there are any alternatives when trying to put a double bed into a narrow hull. The port cabin was fitted a useful hand basin in a tidy cabinet and the optional 2nd WC. I didn't even try to see if I would fit in there, if I got into the compartment I may have to be sold with the boat. Useable for children or others under 4ft but this space (without the WC) is ideal for hanging clothes and storage. The heads compartment is a good size and well fitted out. The flying bridge is lovely with really nice stainless steel work and bimini (or is it a T top?). The helm positions are both comfortable. Returning to the saloon we gave our attention to the galley which on this boat was devoid of breakfast debris. One of the men abandoned the meeting and approached us and asked if we had any questions. My wife commented that the galley had little preparation surface but he seemed to regard this remark as beneath contempt (I don't think Spanish men do much cooking), looked at me and again asked if I had any questions. I said that I did not like the instrument layout at the lower helm, could it be modified? He said " If I say so. We like it, perhaps you will get used to it". Now without getting into a discussion about the generally appalling ergonomics found on boats compared with the sensible instrument layouts found on aircraft this was the wrong answer at the wrong time. This man is a senior executive at Excitecats but knew nothing about customer relations. The two boats we had seen were not staffed or presented in a way to encourage visitors, one or two of whom may well become customers. I accept that there may have been misunderstandings caused by language although his English was excellent. The "lived in" atmosphere of the 810 and the "boardroom" on the 1010 made the whole experience totally negative. These may be fine boats but we struck them off our short list after that experience. BTW The rather strange location of the steering compass at the lower helm is not as silly as it looks. It is large and clear, easily seen from the helm position and is as far away from any magnetic influence as possible. Don't be put off Excitecats based on my experience. That was down to people rather than the boats. The 1010 will be a lovely boat for sure. Regards Roger Bingham France