trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Your Perfect Boat -- for when it's over?

K
kvolk@mindspring.com
Sun, Sep 16, 2001 9:13 AM

Thinking that a little fun in fantasy might offer a diversion from the
events of the past week and be instructive as well --- I'd like to pose a
question that I genuinely long to hear answers to.

What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you like
to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the
voyaging you would most enjoy doing?

Choosing a boat, selecting cruising areas, and outfitting a boat, speaks
volumes about a 'yachtsman's' personal 'philosophy' in approaching the
water.  I may be a bit odd, but it is a subject that never ceases to
interest me :-)

My family just returned from a wonderful (car trip) vacation to Maine.
While we were there, I realized that the small harbors might alter my idea
of the perfect boat -- a 125' Burger Motoryacht!  (Fortunately dreaming
doesen't cost anything, so I can have anything I want :-)  )

Seriously, I would like to know what list members are thinking about in
terms of "next boats", "dream boats", and "perfect boats" -- Where would you
like to go?  Coaswise or Global?  And, how is your dreamboat ideally
equipped to take you there?  How big?  How wide?  What draft?  Power?  A
simple boat?  Or, a boat with all the 'bells and whistles"?

A skipper's boat, how it is chosen and equipped, usually expresses a
personal cruising philosophy.  Imagine a rich uncle left you a $million --
what would the new boat look like?

It's an honest diversion from the events of the past week and one I look
forward to learning from!

Very sincerely, Kurt Volk

M/V Seranade
Branford, CT

Thinking that a little fun in fantasy might offer a diversion from the events of the past week and be instructive as well --- I'd like to pose a question that I genuinely long to hear answers to. What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you like to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the voyaging you would most enjoy doing? Choosing a boat, selecting cruising areas, and outfitting a boat, speaks volumes about a 'yachtsman's' personal 'philosophy' in approaching the water. I may be a bit odd, but it is a subject that never ceases to interest me :-) My family just returned from a wonderful (car trip) vacation to Maine. While we were there, I realized that the small harbors might alter my idea of the perfect boat -- a 125' Burger Motoryacht! (Fortunately dreaming doesen't cost anything, so I can have anything I want :-) ) Seriously, I would like to know what list members are thinking about in terms of "next boats", "dream boats", and "perfect boats" -- Where would you like to go? Coaswise or Global? And, how is your dreamboat ideally equipped to take you there? How big? How wide? What draft? Power? A simple boat? Or, a boat with all the 'bells and whistles"? A skipper's boat, how it is chosen and equipped, usually expresses a personal cruising philosophy. Imagine a rich uncle left you a $million -- what would the new boat look like? It's an honest diversion from the events of the past week and one I look forward to learning from! Very sincerely, Kurt Volk M/V Seranade Branford, CT
T
tgrave1@home.com
Sun, Sep 16, 2001 12:00 PM

Kurt,
A while back, Passagemaker Magazine published such an article, based
on their survey. It's the one with a grand banks on the cover, and a
feature article on Grand Banks. I have a copy on the boat, and will copy
it if you want.

Ted Grave
GB32
Branford, CT

Thinking that a little fun in fantasy might offer a diversion from the
events of the past week and be instructive as well --- I'd like to

pose a

question that I genuinely long to hear answers to.

Kurt, A while back, Passagemaker Magazine published such an article, based on their survey. It's the one with a grand banks on the cover, and a feature article on Grand Banks. I have a copy on the boat, and will copy it if you want. Ted Grave GB32 Branford, CT > Thinking that a little fun in fantasy might offer a diversion from the > events of the past week and be instructive as well --- I'd like to pose a > question that I genuinely long to hear answers to.
E
elnav@uniserve.com
Sun, Sep 16, 2001 2:41 PM

At 02:13 AM 09/16/2001 -0700, Kurt Volk wrote:

What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you like
to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the
voyaging you would most enjoy doing?

    <<<< snip>>>

It's an honest diversion from the events of the past week and one I look
forward to learning from!
Very sincerely, Kurt Volk

REPLY

Arild writes:

Rather than taking the  discussion offline by simply referring to some
magazine aticle or pictures not necessariy seen by the other list members
lets keep the discussion online  by posting directly to TWL.

Several years ago, a friend in my squadron asked me to  design just such a
vessel.
Since  our tastes are so similar it is a moot point if the boat was to be
mine or his. ( he had the money :-)  )

What I came up with  was dictated by  the criteria of liveaboard, global
range,  a full family plus a crew (me)
The  design was based on the old Romsdahl design.    In the process  I
actually contacted the present owners of the original yard.
Turns out a fire destroyed  much of it and very few drawings  survived.

A profile looks much like a Malahide or Romsdahl ( or for that matter Eric
Thomans "Abysinnia)  and had  five cabins below.
The  huge wheelhouse  included what was essentially  a Captain's daycabin
and a toilet.
This was no lightweight. Her displacement came in at just under 100 tons.
Just enough to  stay below  a size which required a Canadian Coast Guard
100 Ton licence.
( since the rules have subsequently changed this may be a moot point)

A single large slow turning diesel  provided motive power, with  a  pair of
gensets providing  electrical ac.

Interior finish  was  not fancy.  More like  good workboat standards.
Easily maintained, light and airy with a minimum  of varnish to maintain.
As much as I love the  gleam of  finely varnished  wood,  I have spent too
many hours  scraping, sanding and fuzzing over getting it just right to
want to  inflict that on myself  once a gain.

While  aluminum or steel construction  looks like the most cost effective
method, if money was no object,  I think I would prefer wood.
My first large boat was wood, and  there is definitely something unique
and special  about wooden hulls that cannot be captured by any metallic or
glass fiber boat.

One  of the  drawbacks of this design was the  draft.  The  hullwas simply
too big to  fit into many east coast places not to mention the Bahamas.
Try as I might  it just was not feasible to  get the draft down to six feet
even.  And even that would pose a problem in some places.

As an alternative we also looked at  purchasing  one of the  decommissioned
Scandinavian  search and rescue boats  that was advertised a few years
ago.  ( more on that in a separate post. )

Regards

Arild

At 02:13 AM 09/16/2001 -0700, Kurt Volk wrote: >What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you like >to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the >voyaging you would most enjoy doing? <<<< snip>>> >It's an honest diversion from the events of the past week and one I look >forward to learning from! >Very sincerely, Kurt Volk REPLY Arild writes: Rather than taking the discussion offline by simply referring to some magazine aticle or pictures not necessariy seen by the other list members lets keep the discussion online by posting directly to TWL. Several years ago, a friend in my squadron asked me to design just such a vessel. Since our tastes are so similar it is a moot point if the boat was to be mine or his. ( he had the money :-) ) What I came up with was dictated by the criteria of liveaboard, global range, a full family plus a crew (me) The design was based on the old Romsdahl design. In the process I actually contacted the present owners of the original yard. Turns out a fire destroyed much of it and very few drawings survived. A profile looks much like a Malahide or Romsdahl ( or for that matter Eric Thomans "Abysinnia) and had five cabins below. The huge wheelhouse included what was essentially a Captain's daycabin and a toilet. This was no lightweight. Her displacement came in at just under 100 tons. Just enough to stay below a size which required a Canadian Coast Guard 100 Ton licence. ( since the rules have subsequently changed this may be a moot point) A single large slow turning diesel provided motive power, with a pair of gensets providing electrical ac. Interior finish was not fancy. More like good workboat standards. Easily maintained, light and airy with a minimum of varnish to maintain. As much as I love the gleam of finely varnished wood, I have spent too many hours scraping, sanding and fuzzing over getting it just right to want to inflict that on myself once a gain. While aluminum or steel construction looks like the most cost effective method, if money was no object, I think I would prefer wood. My first large boat was wood, and there is definitely something unique and special about wooden hulls that cannot be captured by any metallic or glass fiber boat. One of the drawbacks of this design was the draft. The hullwas simply too big to fit into many east coast places not to mention the Bahamas. Try as I might it just was not feasible to get the draft down to six feet even. And even that would pose a problem in some places. As an alternative we also looked at purchasing one of the decommissioned Scandinavian search and rescue boats that was advertised a few years ago. ( more on that in a separate post. ) Regards Arild
E
elnav@uniserve.com
Sun, Sep 16, 2001 2:57 PM

At 02:13 AM 09/16/2001 -0700, Kurt Volk wrote:

What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat . . .  < snip>

Arild comments

While helping a friend look for  his "perfect boat"  we took a serious
look at  the  decommissioned search and rescue boats from Norway and other
scandinavian  countries.
These were well found boats  built specifically for rugged duty  in the
inhospitable conditions found in the  northern Atlantic close to Norway's
rocky shores.

While none of them offer  luxurious accomodations, they did offer
excell;ent design, watertight compartments and  every imaginable type of
equipment needed for  offshore passage. Several of them also had enough
tankage to  realistically  consider making a trans atlantic voyage.
At the time  the major drawback  was the  220V  50Hz  electrical system
that all of them came with.
The only equipment available back ( 1996 - 1998)  then was  large, and
expensive too big to fit in anything smaller than a 100 foot  vessel.
Since then  I have discovered  a new company  called ASEA makes  compact
affordable solid state frequency and voltage conversion equipment  that
would fit into  a much smaller boat.  With the  inclusion of  such
equipment it might be feasible to  purchase a  Norwegian  vessel and
convert  it to use North American 120V 60 Hz shore power and appliances.

The alternative would have been to  make a trip overseas and purchase all
the  domestic equipment  in Europe.
However,  that would mean that  any  problems  with the  appliances would
be magnified and  take  lots of money and time to correct. if the boat was
still in North America.

Now with  the availability of compact, cost effective  voltage and
frequency  conversion equipment, it is possible to retain the  gensets and
primary elecrtical system and  do a conversion to 120V 60 Hz on the  outlet
circuits only.
Now you can  buy and use  domestic 120V 60Hz. appliances for use on board.
Suddenly the  purchase of these surplus  Coast Guard boats loks like a
viable proposition.
I wonder if any of them are still available?

Cheers

Arild

At 02:13 AM 09/16/2001 -0700, Kurt Volk wrote: >What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat . . . < snip> Arild comments While helping a friend look for his "perfect boat" we took a serious look at the decommissioned search and rescue boats from Norway and other scandinavian countries. These were well found boats built specifically for rugged duty in the inhospitable conditions found in the northern Atlantic close to Norway's rocky shores. While none of them offer luxurious accomodations, they did offer excell;ent design, watertight compartments and every imaginable type of equipment needed for offshore passage. Several of them also had enough tankage to realistically consider making a trans atlantic voyage. At the time the major drawback was the 220V 50Hz electrical system that all of them came with. The only equipment available back ( 1996 - 1998) then was large, and expensive too big to fit in anything smaller than a 100 foot vessel. Since then I have discovered a new company called ASEA makes compact affordable solid state frequency and voltage conversion equipment that would fit into a much smaller boat. With the inclusion of such equipment it might be feasible to purchase a Norwegian vessel and convert it to use North American 120V 60 Hz shore power and appliances. The alternative would have been to make a trip overseas and purchase all the domestic equipment in Europe. However, that would mean that any problems with the appliances would be magnified and take lots of money and time to correct. if the boat was still in North America. Now with the availability of compact, cost effective voltage and frequency conversion equipment, it is possible to retain the gensets and primary elecrtical system and do a conversion to 120V 60 Hz on the outlet circuits only. Now you can buy and use domestic 120V 60Hz. appliances for use on board. Suddenly the purchase of these surplus Coast Guard boats loks like a viable proposition. I wonder if any of them are still available? Cheers Arild
J
jpmunson@home.com
Sun, Sep 16, 2001 3:23 PM

Kurt Volk asked:

"What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat <snip> and what
features make her ideal for undertaking the
voyaging you would most enjoy doing?"

Look at page 206 of PMM for October 2001.  Charles Neville Assoc.
illustrates a 48' Family Cruiser.  Aft owners' stateroom, main saloon,
pilothouse, guest cabin forward, single screw, fly bridge, substantial mast
(not just a stick with spreaders), walk-around side decks, boat deck,
sundeck.

Jerry & Pam Munson
Anacortes, WA 98221-3158

Kurt Volk asked: "What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat <snip> and what features make her ideal for undertaking the voyaging you would most enjoy doing?" Look at page 206 of PMM for October 2001. Charles Neville Assoc. illustrates a 48' Family Cruiser. Aft owners' stateroom, main saloon, pilothouse, guest cabin forward, single screw, fly bridge, substantial mast (not just a stick with spreaders), walk-around side decks, boat deck, sundeck. Jerry & Pam Munson Anacortes, WA 98221-3158
A
alexh@olypen.com
Mon, Sep 17, 2001 12:42 AM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kurt Volk" kvolk@mindspring.com

What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you

like

to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the
voyaging you would most enjoy doing?

Hi Kurt,

Sometimes a lack of money is a good prophylactic against ignorance. I think
that there's a pretty good chance that my dream boat and my dream trip may
be incompatible.

For reasons that I don't fully understand I've fallen in love with Jay
Benford's Coaster designs; Specifically the 38' Packet, the 45' Packet, and
the 65' Tramp. BTW: The 45' Packet in question is "Sails", the boat that
Paul Browne mentioned in a post last month.

There are, of course, plenty of practical reasons to covet one of these
designs: Lots of space, designed for household fixtures and appliances, tons
of space, stand up engine room, gobs of space, large comfortable pilot house
at flying bridge height, abundant space, steel construction (plywood is an
option on the 38'), and, to top it off, these boats are very spacious. None
of those is my real reason for liking these boats though. The real reason I
like these boats is that they look salty, purposeful, and just plain cool!

We live in Washington State. Between here and SE Alaska there is enough area
and variety that I can't imagine ever seeing enough of it. My dream trip
would be a circumnavigation of Vancouver Island with an emphasis on the
island's west coast.

That's what leads to my compatibility questions. With a shallow draft and a
lot of house you could say that these boats have the A/B ratio from hell.
For example, I would estimate that the 45' has an A/B of approx. 3.9/1. It
should also be mentioned that the minimum freeboard is quite low (1'2" on
the 38'). With a couple of exceptions, exploring the west coast of Vancouver
Island means exposing oneself to the open Pacific every day and I'm not sure
that this is the type of boat for that kind of duty.

All in all I'd say that a lack of cash is protecting me from myself. OTOH:
It sure is fun to dream!

Irreconcilably yours,

Alex

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kurt Volk" <kvolk@mindspring.com> > > What is YOUR current idea of the perfect cruising boat, where would you like > to voyage in her, -- and what features make her ideal for undertaking the > voyaging you would most enjoy doing? > Hi Kurt, Sometimes a lack of money is a good prophylactic against ignorance. I think that there's a pretty good chance that my dream boat and my dream trip may be incompatible. For reasons that I don't fully understand I've fallen in love with Jay Benford's Coaster designs; Specifically the 38' Packet, the 45' Packet, and the 65' Tramp. BTW: The 45' Packet in question is "Sails", the boat that Paul Browne mentioned in a post last month. There are, of course, plenty of practical reasons to covet one of these designs: Lots of space, designed for household fixtures and appliances, tons of space, stand up engine room, gobs of space, large comfortable pilot house at flying bridge height, abundant space, steel construction (plywood is an option on the 38'), and, to top it off, these boats are very spacious. None of those is my real reason for liking these boats though. The real reason I like these boats is that they look salty, purposeful, and just plain cool! We live in Washington State. Between here and SE Alaska there is enough area and variety that I can't imagine ever seeing enough of it. My dream trip would be a circumnavigation of Vancouver Island with an emphasis on the island's west coast. That's what leads to my compatibility questions. With a shallow draft and a lot of house you could say that these boats have the A/B ratio from hell. For example, I would estimate that the 45' has an A/B of approx. 3.9/1. It should also be mentioned that the minimum freeboard is quite low (1'2" on the 38'). With a couple of exceptions, exploring the west coast of Vancouver Island means exposing oneself to the open Pacific every day and I'm not sure that this is the type of boat for that kind of duty. All in all I'd say that a lack of cash is protecting me from myself. OTOH: It sure is fun to dream! Irreconcilably yours, Alex
E
elnav@uniserve.com
Mon, Sep 17, 2001 1:14 PM

Apropo the recent thread on  getting the perfect boat:
The following email arrived this morning:
Only the  relevant introduction  is quoted.
It suer sounds familiar!  < grin>

              • Original message  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The following was published in the September 17 2001 edition of Lloyds
List

True or false? With ships you tend to get what you pay for

Michael Grey

True, says the shipbuilder, who has discovered over long and painful
experience that their customers are seriously "price-driven", unable to
even comprehend the need for shipbuilders to turn a profit on the deal,
and utterly obsessed with cheapness.

We know, he says mournfully, that a lot of the equipment we are putting
into a ship is stuff that will offer only short term satisfaction, but
they are unimpressed by any better alternatives, if they are more
expensive. If they cannot get them at the same price as the bog standard
and utterly basic, we may as well pipe down.

False, says the shipowner, who has a long litany of complaints to
recount about shipbuilding disappointments, mostly occurring after the
final payment had been handed over and he had taken delivery. We buy a
design that is supposed to be fit for purpose, but the work of the
subcontractors is so poor and the equipment and outfit so cheaply done,
that within a couple of years it is only fit for scrap. Quality and
reliability, says the shipowner, appear to be long forgotten concepts,
that can no longer be taken for granted, even if there is a newbuilding
superintendent in the yard with the tolerance of Tamurlaine.

<<< snip>>>    end of quote

Apropo the recent thread on getting the perfect boat: The following email arrived this morning: Only the relevant introduction is quoted. It suer sounds familiar! < grin> - - - - - - - Original message - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following was published in the September 17 2001 edition of Lloyds List True or false? With ships you tend to get what you pay for Michael Grey True, says the shipbuilder, who has discovered over long and painful experience that their customers are seriously "price-driven", unable to even comprehend the need for shipbuilders to turn a profit on the deal, and utterly obsessed with cheapness. We know, he says mournfully, that a lot of the equipment we are putting into a ship is stuff that will offer only short term satisfaction, but they are unimpressed by any better alternatives, if they are more expensive. If they cannot get them at the same price as the bog standard and utterly basic, we may as well pipe down. False, says the shipowner, who has a long litany of complaints to recount about shipbuilding disappointments, mostly occurring after the final payment had been handed over and he had taken delivery. We buy a design that is supposed to be fit for purpose, but the work of the subcontractors is so poor and the equipment and outfit so cheaply done, that within a couple of years it is only fit for scrap. Quality and reliability, says the shipowner, appear to be long forgotten concepts, that can no longer be taken for granted, even if there is a newbuilding superintendent in the yard with the tolerance of Tamurlaine. <<< snip>>> end of quote