discuss@lists.openscad.org

OpenSCAD general discussion Mailing-list

View all threads

Re: chat-gpt

GS
Guenther Sohler
Thu, Apr 6, 2023 11:18 AM

hey guys!

I literally  believe, you share your OpenSCAD knowledge over
chatGPT platform channel .

As chatGPT cannot be as clever as you it's like in an chidlren's game.

Here in Germany we have a game, which is called "Stille Post" ( silent
post).
1st Child in  sequence whispers a secret sentence to child 2, then child 2
whispers to next child.
Finally all the children are laughing about the  final derivation of the
sentence.

Probably I will also test chatGPT some time  to see how well it  knows
openscad already, it appears to be a funny topic

On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 12:55 PM jeremy ardley via Discuss <
discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jeremy ardley jeremy@ardley.org
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:54:42 +0800
Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: chat-gpt

On 6/4/23 18:32, Raymond West wrote:

Hi,

Has anyone been playing with this wrt openscad script generation?
(https://chat.openai.com/chat). I have seen fairly impressive results
with it generating arduino code and python, I think there are more
examples of those on the web, for it to have 'studied'. I experimented
a few months ago, with openscad, and it looked as if there was a
possibility of it being useful. More recently I have spent some spare?
time trying to train it a bit more, but it is pretty tedious, it seems
to have little short term memory, but then it says something
impressive, if you keep pressing it.

I have some recent experience with ChatGPT4 and ChatGPT3.5. ChatGPT4 is
a lot better.

With both it is the quality of question and scope that matters. If you
ask a precise question with limited scope it will usually produce a
workable result. If you ask an open ended question you will get less
relevant or accurate results.

You can also give it code bodies to identify problems.

The best strategy is to iterate through your project logic and get small
parts of it coded, then take the results of many questions and merge
them into your specific code.

You can also usefully describe the overall operation of some code and
ask to have it broken up into smaller parts that you can then ask
specifics about each.

jeremy

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: jeremy ardley via Discuss discuss@lists.openscad.org
To: discuss@lists.openscad.org
Cc: jeremy ardley jeremy@ardley.org
Bcc:
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:54:42 +0800
Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: chat-gpt


OpenSCAD mailing list
To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org

hey guys! I literally believe, you share your OpenSCAD knowledge over chatGPT platform channel . As chatGPT cannot be as clever as you it's like in an chidlren's game. Here in Germany we have a game, which is called "Stille Post" ( silent post). 1st Child in sequence whispers a secret sentence to child 2, then child 2 whispers to next child. Finally all the children are laughing about the final derivation of the sentence. Probably I will also test chatGPT some time to see how well it knows openscad already, it appears to be a funny topic On Thu, Apr 6, 2023 at 12:55 PM jeremy ardley via Discuss < discuss@lists.openscad.org> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: jeremy ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> > To: discuss@lists.openscad.org > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:54:42 +0800 > Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: chat-gpt > > On 6/4/23 18:32, Raymond West wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone been playing with this wrt openscad script generation? > > (https://chat.openai.com/chat). I have seen fairly impressive results > > with it generating arduino code and python, I think there are more > > examples of those on the web, for it to have 'studied'. I experimented > > a few months ago, with openscad, and it looked as if there was a > > possibility of it being useful. More recently I have spent some spare? > > time trying to train it a bit more, but it is pretty tedious, it seems > > to have little short term memory, but then it says something > > impressive, if you keep pressing it. > > > > I have some recent experience with ChatGPT4 and ChatGPT3.5. ChatGPT4 is > a lot better. > > With both it is the quality of question and scope that matters. If you > ask a precise question with limited scope it will usually produce a > workable result. If you ask an open ended question you will get less > relevant or accurate results. > > You can also give it code bodies to identify problems. > > The best strategy is to iterate through your project logic and get small > parts of it coded, then take the results of many questions and merge > them into your specific code. > > You can also usefully describe the overall operation of some code and > ask to have it broken up into smaller parts that you can then ask > specifics about each. > > jeremy > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: jeremy ardley via Discuss <discuss@lists.openscad.org> > To: discuss@lists.openscad.org > Cc: jeremy ardley <jeremy@ardley.org> > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:54:42 +0800 > Subject: [OpenSCAD] Re: chat-gpt > _______________________________________________ > OpenSCAD mailing list > To unsubscribe send an email to discuss-leave@lists.openscad.org >