Valdis Krebs presented a nice political-choice network diagram in the
Rainie-Wellman Networked book, analyzing the Amazon book-purchase info--People
who bought Book X also bought Book Y. It showed 3 filter bubbles: Republicans,
Democrats, Obama-fans. Implicit in this is that printed publications count. It
appeared to me a specification of the classic two-step flow of communication.
The events of 2016 suggest otherwise. Every single mainstream media--from the
New Republic to the Wall Street Journal--has been anti-Trump. They view him as
an abomination. Yet he continues to get a sizeable minority of US voter
choices. In other words, MSM choices almost do not matter, and may in fact be
counter-productive. Trumpians (1) may not be aware of the MSM anti-Trump
arguments because they do not read, or even hear about them, or (2) MSM
endorsements of whatever ilk may even be counter-productive to people who
believe the establishment they represent are out to get them -- or are
indifferent to them.
Your thoughts appreciated, but to the list only please.
Barry Wellman
A vision is just a vision if it's only in your head
Step by step, link by link, putting it together
Streisand/Sondheim
NetLab Network FRSC INSNA Founder
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman twitter: @barrywellman
NETWORKED: The New Social Operating System Lee Rainie & Barry Wellman
http://amzn.to/zXZg39
Thanks, for the shout-out, Barry.
Here is the 2016 Political Book Map from recent data (after debates) from Amazon…
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309718066_US_Polemics_Oct2016
Enjoy!
Valdis Krebs
Orgnet, LLC
valdis@orgnet.com
http://orgnet.com
http://thenetworkthinkers.com
On Nov 5, 2016, at 9:55 AM, Barry Wellman wellman@chass.utoronto.ca wrote:
Valdis Krebs presented a nice political-choice network diagram in the Rainie-Wellman Networked book, analyzing the Amazon book-purchase info--People who bought Book X also bought Book Y. It showed 3 filter bubbles: Republicans, Democrats, Obama-fans. Implicit in this is that printed publications count. It appeared to me a specification of the classic two-step flow of communication.
The events of 2016 suggest otherwise. Every single mainstream media--from the New Republic to the Wall Street Journal--has been anti-Trump. They view him as an abomination. Yet he continues to get a sizeable minority of US voter choices. In other words, MSM choices almost do not matter, and may in fact be counter-productive. Trumpians (1) may not be aware of the MSM anti-Trump arguments because they do not read, or even hear about them, or (2) MSM endorsements of whatever ilk may even be counter-productive to people who believe the establishment they represent are out to get them -- or are indifferent to them.
Your thoughts appreciated, but to the list only please.
Barry Wellman
A vision is just a vision if it's only in your head
Step by step, link by link, putting it together
Streisand/Sondheim
NetLab Network FRSC INSNA Founder
http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/~wellman twitter: @barrywellman
NETWORKED: The New Social Operating System Lee Rainie & Barry Wellman
http://amzn.to/zXZg39
CITAMS mailing list
CITAMS@list.citams.org
http://list.citams.org/mailman/listinfo/citams_list.citams.org