Hi
Below You will find some comments from looking at 0.1 and 0.2
/hans r
collectionspace
feedback and comments from Hans Rengman, META, Sweden - hans@meta.se
0.1
swedish diacritic characters "åäö" seems to work fine from my environment
(PC - win xp - Firefox)
http://demo.collectionspace.org:8080/cspace-ui/html/objectentry.html?objectId=12345
but not from Murberget , county museum of wasternorrland
()
http://demo.collectionspace.org:8080/cspace-ui/html/objectentry.html?objectId=m45.56
ACCESSION NUMBER
the history/tradition of giving "accession
number"/"inventory number" is not that
standardised here as it might look from Your examples and guidelines:
1
year.acquisition.number.part - systems with variations
2
a clean series of running numbers (MM12345)
3
other locally defined structure. (including
letters showing parts of collections etc as part
of the number.) (including /-_&% etc which might be system critic symbols)
1 and 3 forms a djungle and might not be as
structured as it looks at the first -
The discussion since 1980-ies form two schools,
either that the number is just an identifier of
the object - bearing no coded information. This
viewpoint is furthermore avoiding subnumbers as
long as possible. You can find this model
represented in quite a lot of regional museums.
...or the more structured (rigid) way of
presuming a pre-knowledge in interpreting information.
Related to this is the numbering of images of
objects - where museums either use the object
accession nr as identity for the first image,
then adding .a or .1 or other suffix for extra
images OR maintaining images in a serie of its
own with structured or running number format -
Analysis:
Experiences tells us that accession number/
inventory number fields MUST be handled as a free
format - (or even better - possible to local
customisation (like the "system generated number
setup" - of input rules (more than one syntax
allowed since routines have changed over time)
...and that object id-number and images id-number
(free format) must be possible to interconnect in many-to-many relationships.
===================
0.2
Very comprehensive forms - There is a lot of
terms which are not intuitive in english to a
swedish user - I think this points to two problem areas.
1
"real" translation - finding wlee vorking equivalents to terminology used...
2
discussing "cultural" differences in context and
concept - curatorial traditions and legal issues colouring terminology.
I will gladly take part in these areas!
a "wordbook" of system terminology acn be useful for interoperability.
=========================
hans rengman
- META - Kunskap om kunskap Hans Rengman *
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
-
www.meta.se hans@meta.se *
-
*
- Hovslagaregatan 11 tel: +46 (0)522 - 51 10 94 *
- SE-451 44 Uddevalla *
- Sweden GSM: +46 (0)70 - 718 23 25 *
*********** P Please consider the environment
before printing this e-mail ************
Hi
Below You will find some comments from looking at 0.1 and 0.2
/hans r
***************************************
collectionspace
--------------
feedback and comments from Hans Rengman, META, Sweden - hans@meta.se
0.1
------------------------------
swedish diacritic characters "åäö" seems to work fine from my environment
(PC - win xp - Firefox)
http://demo.collectionspace.org:8080/cspace-ui/html/objectentry.html?objectId=12345
but not from Murberget , county museum of wasternorrland
()
http://demo.collectionspace.org:8080/cspace-ui/html/objectentry.html?objectId=m45.56
-------------------------------
ACCESSION NUMBER
the history/tradition of giving "accession
number"/"inventory number" is not that
standardised here as it might look from Your examples and guidelines:
1
year.acquisition.number.part - systems with variations
2
a clean series of running numbers (MM12345)
3
other locally defined structure. (including
letters showing parts of collections etc as part
of the number.) (including /-_&% etc which might be system critic symbols)
1 and 3 forms a djungle and might not be as
structured as it looks at the first -
The discussion since 1980-ies form two schools,
either that the number is just an identifier of
the object - bearing no coded information. This
viewpoint is furthermore avoiding subnumbers as
long as possible. You can find this model
represented in quite a lot of regional museums.
...or the more structured (rigid) way of
presuming a pre-knowledge in interpreting information.
Related to this is the numbering of images of
objects - where museums either use the object
accession nr as identity for the first image,
then adding .a or .1 or other suffix for extra
images OR maintaining images in a serie of its
own with structured or running number format -
Analysis:
Experiences tells us that accession number/
inventory number fields MUST be handled as a free
format - (or even better - possible to local
customisation (like the "system generated number
setup" - of input rules (more than one syntax
allowed since routines have changed over time)
...and that object id-number and images id-number
(free format) must be possible to interconnect in many-to-many relationships.
===================
0.2
Very comprehensive forms - There is a lot of
terms which are not intuitive in english to a
swedish user - I think this points to two problem areas.
1
"real" translation - finding wlee vorking equivalents to terminology used...
2
discussing "cultural" differences in context and
concept - curatorial traditions and legal issues colouring terminology.
I will gladly take part in these areas!
a "wordbook" of system terminology acn be useful for interoperability.
=========================
hans rengman
*****************************************************************
* META - Kunskap om kunskap Hans Rengman *
*'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''*
* www.meta.se hans@meta.se *
* *
* Hovslagaregatan 11 tel: +46 (0)522 - 51 10 94 *
* SE-451 44 Uddevalla *
* Sweden GSM: +46 (0)70 - 718 23 25 *
*********** P Please consider the environment
before printing this e-mail ************