"Such broad language, however, does not comport with our precedent. A search is justified at its inception if there is reasonable suspicion that a search will uncover evidence of further wrongdoing or of injury to the student or another. Not all infractions involving cell phones will present such indications. Moreover, even assuming that a search of the phone were justified, the scope of the search must be tailored to the nature of the infraction and must be related to the objectives of the search. Under our two-part test, using a cell phone on school grounds does not automatically trigger an essentially unlimited right enabling a school official to search any content stored on the phone that is not related either substantively or temporally to the infraction. Because the crux of the T.L.O. standard is reasonableness, as evaluated by the circumstances of each case, we decline to adopt the broad standard set forth by DeSoto and the district court." 13a0078p.06<http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0078p-06.pdf> 11-6476<https://ecf.ca6.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSelectionTable.jsp?csnum1=11-6476> Glendle Cain, III v. Owensboro Public Schools Western District of Kentucky at Owensboro Charles W. Thompson, Jr. Executive Director and General Counsel International Municipal Lawyers Association, Inc. 7910 Woodmont Ave., Suite 1440 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 202-466-5424 x7110 Direct: 202-742-1016 Cell: 240-876-6790 Plan ahead: IMLA Mid-Year Seminar April 14-16, 2013 IMLA'S Annual Conference in San Francisco September 29-October 2, 2013