volt-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise voltage measurement

View all threads

Re: [volt-nuts] 731A output impedance

EB
ed breya
Wed, Nov 28, 2012 1:37 AM

I'm not sure how much elaboration is needed, but here's some:

If you take all of the feedback from the output terminal, that's
better for DC accuracy by eliminating the voltage drop of the series
resistor, while still providing some overload protection to the
opamp. But, it also decreases phase margin so that it will be more
prone to oscillate with capacitive load. If the series R becomes
zero, the voltage drop and the extra loss of phase margin are
eliminated, but the inability to drive large capacitive loads remains

  • it is a limitation of the amplifier.

Usually a small amount of series R can help a lot with capacitive
loading stability, but even when small it can drop enough DCV to be a
problem. A common way to solve both problems is to sense the DC right
at the output to eliminate the drop in the series R as above, but to
increase stability by taking some AC ahead of the resistor - usually
at the output of the amplifier.

If the amplifier has an integrating feedback capacitor, it's usually
already connected that way, so only the resistive part of the
feedback needs to go to the terminal. If there is no feedback
capacitance, then a small amount can be added from the amplifier
output to the effective inverting input.

I don't know what the output stage of the 731A looks like, but it
must be an inverting (integrator) amplifier or a buffer, if using an
opamp. In either case there should be a way to modify the feedback
network. However, whatever is changed or added may affect the overall
frequency response and noise.

Ed

I'm not sure how much elaboration is needed, but here's some: If you take all of the feedback from the output terminal, that's better for DC accuracy by eliminating the voltage drop of the series resistor, while still providing some overload protection to the opamp. But, it also decreases phase margin so that it will be more prone to oscillate with capacitive load. If the series R becomes zero, the voltage drop and the extra loss of phase margin are eliminated, but the inability to drive large capacitive loads remains - it is a limitation of the amplifier. Usually a small amount of series R can help a lot with capacitive loading stability, but even when small it can drop enough DCV to be a problem. A common way to solve both problems is to sense the DC right at the output to eliminate the drop in the series R as above, but to increase stability by taking some AC ahead of the resistor - usually at the output of the amplifier. If the amplifier has an integrating feedback capacitor, it's usually already connected that way, so only the resistive part of the feedback needs to go to the terminal. If there is no feedback capacitance, then a small amount can be added from the amplifier output to the effective inverting input. I don't know what the output stage of the 731A looks like, but it must be an inverting (integrator) amplifier or a buffer, if using an opamp. In either case there should be a way to modify the feedback network. However, whatever is changed or added may affect the overall frequency response and noise. Ed
BS
Bob Smither
Wed, Nov 28, 2012 4:18 AM

On 11/27/2012 07:37 PM, ed breya wrote:

I'm not sure how much elaboration is needed, but here's some:

If you take all of the feedback from the output terminal, that's better for DC
accuracy by eliminating the voltage drop of the series resistor, while still
providing some overload protection to the opamp. But, it also decreases phase
margin so that it will be more prone to oscillate with capacitive load. If the
series R becomes zero, the voltage drop and the extra loss of phase margin are
eliminated, but the inability to drive large capacitive loads remains - it is a
limitation of the amplifier.

Usually a small amount of series R can help a lot with capacitive loading
stability, but even when small it can drop enough DCV to be a problem. A common
way to solve both problems is to sense the DC right at the output to eliminate
the drop in the series R as above, but to increase stability by taking some AC
ahead of the resistor - usually at the output of the amplifier.

Figure 9 of the TI data sheet shows exactly what you are suggesting.

If the amplifier has an integrating feedback capacitor, it's usually already
connected that way, so only the resistive part of the feedback needs to go to
the terminal. If there is no feedback capacitance, then a small amount can be
added from the amplifier output to the effective inverting input.

I don't know what the output stage of the 731A looks like, but it must be an
inverting (integrator) amplifier or a buffer, if using an opamp. In either case
there should be a way to modify the feedback network. However, whatever is
changed or added may affect the overall frequency response and noise.

Excellent points Ed.  The output stage is a non-inverting amplifier with a small
gain (about 1.3).  The compensation of the lm301A is OK but I think it could be
improved to better tolerate load capacitance.

I have not looked at what would be required to move the op-amp sense point to
the 731A output and leave the 1K inside the loop.  I would prefer to not butcher
the board.  Clearly shorting the 1K is pretty easy!  The lm301 is protected
against shorts to ground.

Thanks to all who added to this thread.

--


---=======
Bob Smither, PhD                                  Circuit Concepts, Inc.

I've come to realize that protecting freedom of choice in our everyday
lives is essential to maintaining a healthy civil society.
-- George McGovern

Smither@C-C-I.Com            http://www.C-C-I.Com            281-331-2744


---=======

On 11/27/2012 07:37 PM, ed breya wrote: > I'm not sure how much elaboration is needed, but here's some: > > If you take all of the feedback from the output terminal, that's better for DC > accuracy by eliminating the voltage drop of the series resistor, while still > providing some overload protection to the opamp. But, it also decreases phase > margin so that it will be more prone to oscillate with capacitive load. If the > series R becomes zero, the voltage drop and the extra loss of phase margin are > eliminated, but the inability to drive large capacitive loads remains - it is a > limitation of the amplifier. > > Usually a small amount of series R can help a lot with capacitive loading > stability, but even when small it can drop enough DCV to be a problem. A common > way to solve both problems is to sense the DC right at the output to eliminate > the drop in the series R as above, but to increase stability by taking some AC > ahead of the resistor - usually at the output of the amplifier. Figure 9 of the TI data sheet shows exactly what you are suggesting. > If the amplifier has an integrating feedback capacitor, it's usually already > connected that way, so only the resistive part of the feedback needs to go to > the terminal. If there is no feedback capacitance, then a small amount can be > added from the amplifier output to the effective inverting input. > > I don't know what the output stage of the 731A looks like, but it must be an > inverting (integrator) amplifier or a buffer, if using an opamp. In either case > there should be a way to modify the feedback network. However, whatever is > changed or added may affect the overall frequency response and noise. Excellent points Ed. The output stage is a non-inverting amplifier with a small gain (about 1.3). The compensation of the lm301A is OK but I think it could be improved to better tolerate load capacitance. I have not looked at what would be required to move the op-amp sense point to the 731A output and leave the 1K inside the loop. I would prefer to not butcher the board. Clearly shorting the 1K is pretty easy! The lm301 is protected against shorts to ground. Thanks to all who added to this thread. -- ========================================================================= Bob Smither, PhD Circuit Concepts, Inc. I've come to realize that protecting freedom of choice in our everyday lives is essential to maintaining a healthy civil society. -- George McGovern Smither@C-C-I.Com http://www.C-C-I.Com 281-331-2744 =========================================================================