great-loop@lists.trawlering.com

Cruising America's Great Loop and other inland routes

View all threads

Hyper Miling

MS
M S
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 11:34 AM

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!!

Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there
isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the lines
cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic
improvement with a following current.

It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a following
current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage
going 6 knots as opposed to 9.

With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full
thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are
hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines
would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water
becomes more efficent.

Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the
fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over
ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from home,
at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no
difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm.

Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't care
about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!! Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the lines cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic improvement with a following current. It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a following current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage going 6 knots as opposed to 9. With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water becomes more efficent. Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from home, at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm. Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't care about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.
TB
Tom Barnes
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 12:28 PM

You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started flooding the cruising
scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of gallons
used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever tried to figure
how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like driving your car down
the road. To many other rhings can effect it.

Tom B.

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S valhalla360@yahoo.com wrote:

From: M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
Subject: GL: Hyper Miling
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!!

Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there
isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the
lines
cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic
improvement with a following current.

It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a following
current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage
going 6 knots as opposed to 9.

With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full
thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are
hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines
would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water
becomes more efficent.

Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the
fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over
ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from home,
at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no
difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm.

Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't
care
about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop

You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started flooding the cruising scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of gallons used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever tried to figure how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like driving your car down the road. To many other rhings can effect it. Tom B. --- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> wrote: From: M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> Subject: GL: Hyper Miling To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!! Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the lines cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic improvement with a following current. It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a following current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage going 6 knots as opposed to 9. With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water becomes more efficent. Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from home, at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm. Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't care about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel. _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
L
Luther
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 12:51 PM

Well said Mr Barnes,

I find that cruising at 6.5 to 8 knots is very comfortable and to estimate fuel consumption I have always referred to gph. Travelling at the speed of say 6 knots and be hit with a 2 knot counter-current, I have just taken a 33% impact in mpg. However when estimates are based on the gph I have a warmer feeling for fuel requirements.

Luther

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Tom Barnes tomb215@yahoo.com wrote:

From: Tom Barnes tomb215@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com, valhalla360@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 8:28 AM
You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started
flooding the cruising
scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of
gallons
used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever
tried to figure
how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like
driving your car down
the road. To many other rhings can effect it.

Tom B.

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
wrote:

From: M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
Subject: GL: Hyper Miling
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!!

Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the
same point, so there
isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower
boat will have the
lines
cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a
more dramatic
improvement with a following current.

It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no
current or a following
current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4
times the milage
going 6 knots as opposed to 9.

With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume
9 knots is full
thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot
range. If we are
hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed
where the lines
would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6
knots thru the water
becomes more efficent.

Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot
counter current, the
fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots.
The actual speed over
ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am
10 mile from home,
at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for
little or no
difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm.

Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I
probably wouldn't
care
about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change
email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change
email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop

Well said Mr Barnes, I find that cruising at 6.5 to 8 knots is very comfortable and to estimate fuel consumption I have always referred to gph. Travelling at the speed of say 6 knots and be hit with a 2 knot counter-current, I have just taken a 33% impact in mpg. However when estimates are based on the gph I have a warmer feeling for fuel requirements. Luther --- On Thu, 6/26/08, Tom Barnes <tomb215@yahoo.com> wrote: > From: Tom Barnes <tomb215@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling > To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com, valhalla360@yahoo.com > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 8:28 AM > You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started > flooding the cruising > scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of > gallons > used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever > tried to figure > how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like > driving your car down > the road. To many other rhings can effect it. > > Tom B. > > --- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > From: M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> > Subject: GL: Hyper Miling > To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM > > You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!! > > Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the > same point, so there > isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower > boat will have the > lines > cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a > more dramatic > improvement with a following current. > > It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no > current or a following > current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 > times the milage > going 6 knots as opposed to 9. > > With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume > 9 knots is full > thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot > range. If we are > hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed > where the lines > would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 > knots thru the water > becomes more efficent. > > Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot > counter current, the > fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. > The actual speed over > ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am > 10 mile from home, > at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for > little or no > difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm. > > Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I > probably wouldn't > care > about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel. > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change > email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change > email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
D&
Dan & Peggy
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 1:35 PM

Doesn't mpg matter if you are actually trying to get somewhere?

Dan B.

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Barnes
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com ; valhalla360@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling

You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started flooding the cruising
scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of gallons
used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever tried to figure
how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like driving your car down
the road. To many other rhings can effect it.

Tom B.

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S valhalla360@yahoo.com wrote:

From: M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
Subject: GL: Hyper Miling
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!!

Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there
isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the
lines
cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic
improvement with a following current.

It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a
following
current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage
going 6 knots as opposed to 9.

With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full
thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are
hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines
would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water
becomes more efficent.

Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the
fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over
ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from
home,
at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no
difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm.

Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't
care
about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop

Doesn't mpg matter if you are actually trying to get somewhere? Dan B. ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Barnes To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com ; valhalla360@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:28 AM Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started flooding the cruising scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number of gallons used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever tried to figure how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like driving your car down the road. To many other rhings can effect it. Tom B. --- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> wrote: From: M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> Subject: GL: Hyper Miling To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 knots!! Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the same point, so there isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower boat will have the lines cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have a more dramatic improvement with a following current. It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no current or a following current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost 4 times the milage going 6 knots as opposed to 9. With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I assume 9 knots is full thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot range. If we are hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed where the lines would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 knots thru the water becomes more efficent. Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot counter current, the fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. The actual speed over ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I am 10 mile from home, at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle for little or no difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm. Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I probably wouldn't care about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel. _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop _______________________________________________ http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change email address, unsubscribe, etc.) go to: http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
L
Luther
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 1:57 PM

Dan,

When you are trying to actually get somewhere, surely you have an estimate of your normal speed along with your course and the distance you have plotted out. Knowing these items, you can estimate your fuel requirements per hour or per mile based on previous experience.

Now let's say you estimate a thirty mile trip at 30 mph, this would be one hour. However you get stuck behind a long tow or at several bridges and sit at idle. Your gpm has been blown! On the other hand if one was to relate to gph, ones estimate would be more sound.

FWIW, I find gph safer with all things being considered. And I never equat to miles while on the water. With mpg, way too many varibles will come in to play. Remember Murphy was a sailor....

Luther

knots vs miles, maybe the reason... gph vs mpg

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, Dan & Peggy dpbow@frontiernet.net wrote:

From: Dan & Peggy dpbow@frontiernet.net
Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling
To: "Great Loop List" great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 9:35 AM
Doesn't mpg matter if you are actually trying to get
somewhere?

Dan B.

----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Barnes
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com ; valhalla360@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling

You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started
flooding the cruising
scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number
of gallons
used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever
tried to figure
how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like
driving your car down
the road. To many other rhings can effect it.

Tom B.

--- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
wrote:

From: M S valhalla360@yahoo.com
Subject: GL: Hyper Miling
To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com
Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM

You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9
knots!!

Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the
same point, so there
isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower
boat will have the
lines
cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have
a more dramatic
improvement with a following current.

It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no
current or a
following
current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost
4 times the milage
going 6 knots as opposed to 9.

With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I
assume 9 knots is full
thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot
range. If we are
hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed
where the lines
would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6
knots thru the water
becomes more efficent.

Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot
counter current, the
fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots.
The actual speed over
ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I
am 10 mile from
home,
at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle
for little or no
difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm.

Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I
probably wouldn't
care
about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change
email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change
email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop

To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change
email address,
unsubscribe, etc.) go to:
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop

Dan, When you are trying to actually get somewhere, surely you have an estimate of your normal speed along with your course and the distance you have plotted out. Knowing these items, you can estimate your fuel requirements per hour or per mile based on previous experience. Now let's say you estimate a thirty mile trip at 30 mph, this would be one hour. However you get stuck behind a long tow or at several bridges and sit at idle. Your gpm has been blown! On the other hand if one was to relate to gph, ones estimate would be more sound. FWIW, I find gph safer with all things being considered. And I never equat to miles while on the water. With mpg, way too many varibles will come in to play. Remember Murphy was a sailor.... Luther knots vs miles, maybe the reason... gph vs mpg --- On Thu, 6/26/08, Dan & Peggy <dpbow@frontiernet.net> wrote: > From: Dan & Peggy <dpbow@frontiernet.net> > Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling > To: "Great Loop List" <great-loop@lists.samurai.com> > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 9:35 AM > Doesn't mpg matter if you are actually trying to get > somewhere? > > Dan B. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tom Barnes > To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com ; valhalla360@yahoo.com > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:28 AM > Subject: Re: GL: Hyper Miling > > > You know, until all the "Baby Boomers" started > flooding the cruising > scene, fuel consumption was always figured by the number > of gallons > used over a period of time at a given RPM. No one ever > tried to figure > how many miles you got to a gallon. It's not like > driving your car down > the road. To many other rhings can effect it. > > Tom B. > > --- On Thu, 6/26/08, M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > From: M S <valhalla360@yahoo.com> > Subject: GL: Hyper Miling > To: great-loop@lists.samurai.com > Date: Thursday, June 26, 2008, 7:34 AM > > You guys with your big high powered speed boats. 9 > knots!! > > Nice graph. The lines don't neccessarily cross at the > same point, so there > isn't neccessarily anything wrong. A smaller slower > boat will have the > lines > cross at lower counter current speeds. It will also have > a more dramatic > improvement with a following current. > > It does demonstrates the value of slower speed with no > current or a > following > current. With a 3 knot following current, you get almost > 4 times the milage > going 6 knots as opposed to 9. > > With a counter current, it gets more complicated. I > assume 9 knots is full > thortle and normal cruise speeds would be in the 6-7 knot > range. If we are > hyper miling at say 4 knots (assuming 8 mpg), I eyeballed > where the lines > would cross and at a little over 2 knots of current, 6 > knots thru the water > becomes more efficent. > > Another point, on the graph, when you get to a 5 knot > counter current, the > fuel eficency isn't much different from 6 to 9 knots. > The actual speed over > ground is ranging from 1 to 4 knots. If it is 4PM and I > am 10 mile from > home, > at six knots I get in around 2AM. Crank up the throttle > for little or no > difference in fuel efficency, I get in around 6:30pm. > > Of course, if I could afford a nice new 48' Krogen, I > probably wouldn't > care > about an extra $10,000 a year in fuel. > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change > email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change > email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/great-loop > > To modify your Great-Loop subscription options (change > email address, > unsubscribe, etc.) go to: > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/options/great-loop
MS
M S
Thu, Jun 26, 2008 5:33 PM

Babyboomer: I don't know if I should take that as a compliment or insult. We
are a generation or so behind them (working as we go. lost track of the trust
fund along with the new Krogen).

Sounds like you are using gph, but mentally keeping track of mpg, which
achieves the same result.

Mike & Tamy
Valhalla II

Babyboomer: I don't know if I should take that as a compliment or insult. We are a generation or so behind them (working as we go. lost track of the trust fund along with the new Krogen). Sounds like you are using gph, but mentally keeping track of mpg, which achieves the same result. Mike & Tamy Valhalla II