Fw: wet or dry

BH
Bert/Noelle Harrott
Mon, Dec 12, 2005 2:50 PM

----- Original Message -----
From: Bert/Noelle Harrott
To: power-catamaran-confirm+60b00be5e2dfc756170a52ae4941eda099a50ea0@lists.samurai.com
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:25 AM
Subject: wet or dry

We would like to invite informed comment on the hydro-dynamic differences of apparently similar boats. We have been very interested in the Lagoon Powercat 43. With the release of the new 44 our interest has been heightend. A point of concern has been the apparent "wetness" of this boat when underway. Every observation points to excessive spray streaming from the bows, outboard and between the hulls. By comparison, the Cumberland 44,(see video@ www.aeroyachts.com) is virtually "dry". Can anyone shed light on this issue and/or speak from experience

                                                                                                Noelle& Bert Harrott
----- Original Message ----- From: Bert/Noelle Harrott To: power-catamaran-confirm+60b00be5e2dfc756170a52ae4941eda099a50ea0@lists.samurai.com Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:25 AM Subject: wet or dry We would like to invite informed comment on the hydro-dynamic differences of apparently similar boats. We have been very interested in the Lagoon Powercat 43. With the release of the new 44 our interest has been heightend. A point of concern has been the apparent "wetness" of this boat when underway. Every observation points to excessive spray streaming from the bows, outboard and between the hulls. By comparison, the Cumberland 44,(see video@ www.aeroyachts.com) is virtually "dry". Can anyone shed light on this issue and/or speak from experience Noelle& Bert Harrott